Free Cisco 350-601 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 10

The install all epld command initiates installation of the specified Electronic Programmable Logic Device image on applicable components of the Nexus switch. EPLD updates reprogram hardware logic and commonly require affected modules or the switch to reload, making the operation disruptive. The command shown does not contain a verification, compatibility-check, or simulation keyword; consequently, it performs the upgrade rather than merely reporting its expected effect. A compatibility or impact assessment would require the appropriate pre-upgrade verification mechanism. A simulated upgrade would likewise require a specific simulation or dry-run option that is absent from the displayed command. Administrators should confirm platform compatibility, save the configuration, schedule a maintenance window, and account for traffic interruption before executing the actual EPLD installation. Therefore, the direct result of the command is a disruptive EPLD upgrade.

The correct answer is C because it is the only option that satisfies all four requirements at the same time. Cisco UCS Manager documentation states that an All configuration backup is an XML file containing all system and logical configuration settings. Because it is XML, it is human-readable, which matches the operations team requirement. By contrast, a Full state backup is a binary snapshot, so it is not human-readable, and System configuration or Logical configuration alone do not include both sets of settings.

For the transport requirement, SCP is correct because Cisco UCS supports backup transfer over FTP, TFTP, SCP, or SFTP, and SCP runs over SSH/TCP, providing authenticated, secure file transfer before the actual data copy occurs. TFTP is not valid here because it uses UDP and does not provide secure identity verification. Although SFTP also uses SSH/TCP, option D fails because Full state is binary, and option A fails because System configuration does not include all logical settings. Therefore, the only fully correct combination is All configuration + SCP.

The correct answer is D. From the exhibit, N5K-1 has interface Vlan100 in VRF WEB with IP 10.1.1.1/24 for Server 1’s gateway, and interface Vlan150 in VRF WEB with IP 192.168.1.1/30 toward N5K-2. On N5K-2, interface Vlan200 has IP 172.16.1.1/24 for Server 2’s gateway, and interface Vlan150 has IP 192.168.1.2/30 as the routed transit link back to N5K-1. The exhibit also shows that N5K-2 already has a static route pointing to Server 1’s host/subnet via 192.168.1.1, but N5K-1 only has a route for 172.16.1.0 that is not placed in VRF WEB. Because Server 1’s SVI belongs to VRF WEB, N5K-1 needs a route inside that same VRF toward Server 2’s subnet through 192.168.1.2. Without that VRF-specific route, traffic sourced from Server 1 cannot be forwarded correctly to Server 2. The other options do not solve the Layer 3 reachability problem between the two VRF-connected subnets.