Free CIPS L4M4 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Embedding ESG/ethical clauses and reporting in contracts is a key mechanism to implement responsible sourcing, set clear expectations, and enable monitoring and remedies. Suppliers can be held to contractual ESG obligations where these are defined and agreed.

Incoterms are grouped as E (Ex Works), F (Free Carrier), C (Carriage Paid To), and D (Delivered Duty Paid), reflecting various stages of responsibility transfer between buyer and seller. Understanding Incoterms is critical for responsible sourcing, as it clarifies logistics and cost responsibilities.

Liquidity measures a company’s ability to meet short-term obligations. The current ratio = current assets ÷ current liabilities, indicating whether the business can cover debts due within one year. Ratios above 1 suggest healthy liquidity, though excessively high ratios may show underutilised cash. Gearing reflects debt-to-equity (solvency); ROI assesses profitability; total asset turnover measures efficiency. Responsible sourcing requires buyers to evaluate liquidity to ensure suppliers have the working capital to maintain operations and deliver reliably. Poor liquidity is a red flag for potential supply disruption.

The 'people' element of the triple bottom line focuses on social responsibility, including fair labor practices and community engagement. A supplier's demonstrated commitment to a labor industry code of conduct indicates adherence to ethical labor standards, such as fair wages, safe working conditions, and respect for workers' rights, aligning with the social sustainability goals of the project.

Exact Extract from Study Guide:

"The triple bottom line – profit, people and planet

• Adopt sustainable practices, standards and specifications in the supply chain

• Consider the social impact of the organisation’s behaviours

• Design procurement processes to deliver social outcomes as well as, or as an alternative to, normal economic measures of value"

Credit rating agencies assess an organisation’s financial stability and risk of default. Key data includes financial obligations (such as outstanding loans, debt levels, repayment schedules) and payment history (how reliably the firm pays creditors and suppliers). These indicators show liquidity, cash flow reliability, and debt servicing ability. Factors such as “value for money” or “ecosystems” are irrelevant in a financial risk context. Responsible sourcing requires buyers to consider supplier financial resilience, as instability could disrupt supply chains, increase risk exposure, and lead to reputational damage. Agencies like Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch provide independent assessments that complement in-house financial analysis.

Professional magazines, economic indices, and supplier websites provide secondary data that can be useful in understanding market trends and supplier performance. Responsible sourcing often relies on a mix of primary and secondary data sources to make informed decisions about supplier selection.

The current ratio is calculated by dividing total current assets by total current liabilities. Here, dividing $300 by $150 gives a current ratio of 2.0, indicating that the supplier has adequate current assets to cover its short-term obligations, an important factor in supplier evaluation.

Public sector organisations are required to demonstratevalue for money, transparency, and fairnessin the use of public funds. Competitive tendering ensures procurement decisions are objective, auditable, and based on pre-defined criteria. While competition and market access are benefits, the primary obligation is to ensure taxpayer money is spent responsibly and ethically. Competitive tendering reduces the risk of corruption, bias, and inefficiency, supporting accountability to stakeholders and the public. Ethical and responsible sourcing in the public sector is therefore closely linked to transparent procurement processes and regulatory compliance.

Explanation

The best way to deal with potential Conflicts of Interest is to openly declare these. Just because you have a relationship with someone doesn't mean this is going to be an issue or lead to fraud, but it is a good idea to keep a written record of these.

It wouldn't be a risk register, because how can you rate someone's risk of doing something dodgy? Risk registers are for objective risks such as Health and Safety.

Explanation

The correct answers are innovation, on time in full deliveries and sustainability.

The other options are pricing mechanisms rather than 'added value'. Added Value is giving the buyer something extra that's not necessarily financial. It can be as simple as delivering orders quicker than expected, or having a dedicated customer service phone line. Something that makes their lives a little easier.