Free CIPS L4M4 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

Restricted tendering is a two-stage process: first, a pre-qualification stage to ensure only capable, compliant suppliers are invited; second, the issue of the ITT to that shortlist. This method is appropriate when requirements are complex, high-value, or where assurance of supplier competence is essential. It is not based solely on price and does not rely on limited supplier numbers but on filtering through qualification. This balances transparency and efficiency, avoiding wasteful evaluation of unsuitable suppliers while still maintaining competitive tension. CIPS L4M4 highlights that restricted tendering strengthens governance, improves efficiency, and ensures due diligence in supplier selection.

Multiple sourcing is particularly beneficial when requirements are time-sensitive and availability is critical. By engaging more than one supplier, the buyer ensures supply continuity, reduces dependency on a single provider, and improves responsiveness to urgent needs. While sole or single sourcing may suit high-cost strategic components or unique expertise, these arrangements increase dependency risks. For short-notice requirements such as consumables or basic components, multiple sourcing provides resilience and flexibility. CIPS L4M4 stresses that sourcing strategy should reflect risk, demand variability, and supply criticality, and multiple sourcing directly addresses supply risk mitigation.

Under EXW (Ex Works) the seller prices only for making goods available at their premises; the buyer bears transport, export formalities, main carriage, and risk from collection. Because the seller’s obligations are minimal, the quoted unit price is typically the lowest. Delivered terms (DAP/DDP/CPT) add seller costs and risk, raising the price.

Explanation

Robert should look at the supplier's ESG policy. This stands for Environmental Social Governance. So covers both his requirements for community (social) and environmental factors.

ISO 9001 is about Quality Management and ISO27000 about Information Security so these are in-correct answers. An Anti-Slavery Policy would not discuss the environment.

Explanation

the correct answer is 'Yes- a low gearing ratio means the company's finances are made up of equity rather than debt'.

Remember low gearing = good (based on equity), high gearing = bad (based on debt). Anything over 50% is considered high.

The two no answers are therefore incorrect and you can discount these straight away. The other yes answer is one of those answers which COULD be true, but isn't always true, and we'd need more information to know for sure. When you get options like this there will be one that is always right and one which is sometimes right - so always pick the always right one.

Dealing with supply chain disruptions is complex, and depending what the disruption is, how big it is, what the industry is etc determines whether a supplier can handle it or not. Because there's more factors to consider than just gearing, this isn't the right answer.

Explanation

The CIPS Code of Conduct says to adhere to all laws of countries in which I practice. So if you're in the UK and procure stuff from China, you need to abide by both UK and Chinese laws, not just UK laws.

There's no international procurement laws- these are all different for different countries.

ILO doesn't publish laws.

Explanation

The C category is the 'tail spend' - it represents a large number of suppliers of small value items.

I recommend giving this a read ABC Classification & ABC Method | CIPS

Governance of ethical and sustainable behaviours involves monitoring risk coverage and transparency measures. Reviewing insurance clauses (1) ensures suppliers are prepared to cover liabilities responsibly. Checking conflict of interest registers (3) promotes transparency, reducing risks of corruption or unfair influence. Simply reviewing NDAs (4) or updated policies (2) does not provide direct assurance of ethical and sustainable practices. Responsible sourcing requires robust governance mechanisms that ensure supplier compliance, reduce risk, and maintain ethical integrity across the supply chain.

In cases where price differentiation is minimal, negotiating on added-value services like after-sales support can offer additional benefits. This aligns with responsible sourcing by focusing on long-term value and fostering a cooperative relationship with the supplier.

When supplier audits reveal issues, buyers should implement constructive measures. Supplier development programmes (A) help improve performance through training, mentoring, and joint improvement initiatives. Corrective action plans (E) outline specific steps and timelines to address identified gaps. Options like hiring supplier staff or informal brainstorming do not provide structured improvements, while violating contracts would undermine governance. Responsible sourcing emphasises supplier engagement and continuous improvement, ensuring suppliers meet ethical, quality, and sustainability expectations rather than simply penalising them.