Free CIPS L4M3 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Advantages of using invitation to tender may be as below:

No Nepotism: Tenders or bids are evaluated on the basis of certain predetermined criteria, such asprice, quality and value for money. In other words, the firm offering the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point would win the contract. As most tender documents are opened and evaluated in a public process, I think that there remains little room for nepotism or favoritism of any kind.

Value for Money: From the perspective of the client, tenders offer the greatest value for the amount of money spent. This is due to the fact that the client can choose from a wide pool of potential suppliers to select the ones that can produce the highest quality product or service at the lowest price point. This allows the company, establishment or organization to save money without having to compromise on quality. Therefore, despite being quite time consuming, tendering is, in my opinion, a profitable long-term process from an organization’s point of view.

Encourages Competition: The process of tendering helps promote a competitive market. This is because a number of potential contractors, firms or suppliers get a chance to bid for every project. And because selection depends on quality and price, every bidder tries to reduce operational inefficiencies and redundancies as much as possible in order to lower expenses and improve quality. This entire process encourages healthy competition in the market and prevents complacency and laziness, which in turn provides a boost to innovation and new ideas.

Easier Entry: The system of tendering makes it easier and simpler for new firms to enter the market or even a particular industry. This is due to the fact that contracts under this system are awarded on the basis of predetermined, objective criteria. As a result, even a firm that is a new entrant to the market, having no connections or contacts in the industry, can win a prestigious and lucrative contract by providing the highest value for the client’s money. This process therefore helps new firms to quickly get a foothold in the market or industry, thus significantly lowering the traditional barriers to entry.

Information Assurance (IA)

Information Assurance (IA) is the practice of managing information-related risks and the steps involved to protect information systems such as computer and network systems. The IA transformation is a partnership that stretches across the Department of Defense (DoD), Office of National Intelligence, Committee on National Security Systems, National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST), and the Office of Management and Budget.

The US Government's definition of information assurance is:

“measures that protect and defend information and information systems by ensuring their availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation. These measures include providing for restoration of information systems by incorporating protection, detection, and reaction capabilities.”

Information Assurance (IA) is essentially protecting information systems, and is often associatedwith the following five pillars:

- Integrity

- Availability

- Authentication

- Confidentiality

- Nonrepudiation

The following pillars can be applied in a variety of ways, depending on the sensitivity of the information, or information systems within your organization. Currently, these five pillars are used at the heart of the US Governments ability to conduct safe and secure operations in a global environment.

1. Integrity

Integrity involves assurance that all information systems are protected and not tampered with. IA aims to maintain integrity through means such as anti-virus software on all computer system, andensuring all staff with access to know how to appropriately use their systems to minimize malware, or viruses entering information systems.

2. Availability

Availability simply means those who need access to information, are allowed to access it. Information should be available to only those who are aware of the risks associated with information systems.

3. Authentication

Authentication involves ensuring those who have access to information, are who they say they are. Ways of improving authentication involve methods such as two-factor authentication, strong passwords, bio-metrics and other devices. Authentication may also be used to not only identify users, but also other devices.

4. Confidentiality

IA involves the confidentiality of information, meaning only those with authorization may view certain data. This step is closely mirrored by the six data processing principles of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), where by personal data must be processed in a secure manner "using appropriate technical and organizational measures" ("integrity and confidentiality").

5. Nonrepudiation

The final pillar simply means someone with access to your organizations information system cannot deny having completed an action within the system, as there should be methods in place to prove that they did make said action.

In a 'battle of the forms', both buyer and supplier exchange documents with conflicting terms. The general rule is that the terms of the last document exchanged before performance (e.g., delivery or payment) that is not objected to will govern the contract. An order acknowledgement from the supplier with its own terms, followed by acceptance (e.g., payment), usually constitutes the final word.

Service credits are financial compensations provided to the buyer when the supplier fails to meet the agreed-upon service levels outlined in the SLA. They serve as a remedy for underperformance. Service guarantees are commitments to meet certain standards, service standards define the expected level of service, and service schedules outline the timing of service delivery, but none directly compensate the buyer for service failures.

This scenario illustrates the "battle of the forms," where each party attempts to impose its own terms. The general legal principle is that the last set of terms sent before performance (in this case, Company B's invoice) takes precedence if the other party proceeds without objection (Company A's payment). Therefore, Company B's terms would likely govern the contract.

The organisation should have an overarching strategies or policies which sets out the social and environmental objectives to be pursued via procurement and the supply chain generally. Some of these will be about the specification, but that must be tied in other aspects of the sourcing strategy. These objectives, policies and strategies can be found in corporate social responsibility policy.

"Cost reductions" and "on-time in full deliveries" are quantifiable, objective performance measures that align directly with supplier effectiveness and value. "Customer loyalty" and "awards" are subjective or aspirational and not reliable indicators of contract or supplier performance.

Procurement teams use key performance indicators (KPIs) to ensure vendors comply with (and hopefully exceed) the obligations outlined in a contract. They help us better understandsuppliers’ performance, measure their output over a long period of time, and identify areas where improvement is needed.

Put simply, it’s good business sense to make sure you’re actually getting what you’ve paid for. This might be as straightforward as confirming a product or service is delivered on time, which means the KPIs you need to use will be minimal and basic.

Indexation and price adjustment clauses are appropriate when future costs are uncertain or likely to change, such as regulatory-driven wage increases (B) or fluctuating material costs (E). These clauses allow adjustments based on objective indices while preserving the integrity of the contract.

Express terms are the terms of the agreement which are expressly agreed between the parties. Ideally, they will be written down in a contract between the parties but where the contract is agreed verbally, they will be the terms discussed and agreed between the parties.

Implied terms are terms implied into the contract by the courts. They are not expressly set out in the contract but are taken to be as effective as if they were and as if they had been included from day one of the contract. The express terms and any implied terms together create the legally binding obligations on the parties.