Free CIPS L4M2 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Explanation

When using conformance specification, the buying organisation is responsible for the performance of the purchase. If the product fails due to poorly designed specification, the buyer is wholly responsible for it. It cannot blame the supplier for the failure because they still provided 'fit for purpose' product.

'Time to produce specification is shortened': Conformance specification requires details on dimen-sion, materials, design, etc. With such requirements, time to produce a complete conformance specification is often longer than producing performance specification.

'Buyer cannot control the inputs': Conformance specification is a list of inputs from buyer, so buyer has control over the inputs that will make the product. It also means that buyer is responsible for any product failure.

'Buyer may face liquidity risks': Liquidity means that how quick a business turns its assets into cash. This is a financial term, it does not link directly with specification failure.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (paraphrased from CIPS L4M2 content)

CIPS L4M2 clearly distinguishes between conformance and performance specifications.

A conformance specification describes exactly what the item must be like – dimensions, materials, design drawings, tolerances, etc.

It is appropriate when the buyer already has a detailed design and simply wants the supplier to manufacture to that design.

In this scenario:

The buyer’s organisation has designed the specialist item and has a detailed specification.

They cannot manufacture it in-house, but they need the item exactly as designed.

This is precisely when CIPS says a conformance specification is appropriate: the purpose is to ensure the supplier delivers exactly what has been specified and that the item meets all the buyer’s technical and functional requirements.

Option D matches this principle exactly.

Option A mentions cost-effectiveness, which might happen, but it is not the main reason for using conformance specifications.

Options B and C describe issues that are either irrelevant or are more associated with over-specification or missed innovation opportunities, not with the basic correctness of using conformance specifications in this situation.

Relevant CIPS L4M2 areas:

Types of specification: conformance vs performance vs outcome

When to use buyer-designed (conformance) specifications

Risks and benefits of restricting supplier design freedom

Detailed Explanation:

When the buyer does not align with the supplier’s strategic interests, the supplier may take advantage by charging higher prices to compensate for the perceived lack of value. This approach maximizes the supplier’s benefit from a transactional relationship. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Supplier Engagement and Negotiation Strategies.

Detailed Explanation:

A (Fulfilment of business objective): Aligning procurement practices with sustainability goals supports the overall corporate strategy.

D (Improved brand equity): Sustainable practices enhance reputation and consumer trust.Other options, like increased capacity or reduced costs, are secondary or unrelated to CSR initiatives. Reference: CIPS Level 4, CSR and Sustainability.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (from CIPS L4M2 – Market Dynamics)

When substitute products are available, buyers can easily switch to alternatives, lowering loyalty and increasing price sensitivity.

Thus, Option C correctly identifies the key factor enabling frequent switching.

Relevant L4M2 references:

“Impact of substitute products on buyer behaviour”

“Porter’s Five Forces – threat of substitutes”

Detailed Explanation:

B (Limited number of suppliers): Fewer suppliers lead to higher bargaining power due to reduced competition.

E (Urgent buyer requirement): Suppliers gain leverage when buyers have limited time to source alternatives.

Education on markets and buyer size are factors that strengthen buyer, not supplier, bargaining power. Reference: CIPS Level 4, Supplier Negotiation and Market Power.

Explanation

Barriers to Entry to Agriculture: If stakeholders are going to address the need for new, conserva-tion-minded farmers, they must understand the barriers these farmers encounter when transitioning into the profession. A review of the literature revealed a number of barriers—most of them structural—to entry to agriculture. While each barrier is distinct, they are all interconnected. Though not an exhaustive list, the following barriers are ones that were most frequently mentioned in the literature:

- Access to Affordable Land

- Startup Capital

- Lack of Agricultural Knowledge and Experience

- Lack of Knowledge about Farm Business Planning

- Discrimination

- Student Loans

- Limited Access to Markets

- Affordable Housing and Affordable Healthcare

Source: Exploring the Barriers to Entry to Agriculture: Challenges Facing Beginning Farmers in North Carolina - Kelley Robbins-Thompson

Explanation

The following are typical social criteria in procurement:

• Reducing unemployment

• Preventing the use of child labour

• Preventing discrimination on the grounds of race, religion, disability, sex or sexual orientation

• Encouraging good employment practice

• Reducing local unemployment

• Reducing social exclusion

• Promoting training opportunities for the young or disadvantaged

• Encouraging access to work for people with disabilities