Master the Project Management Professional (2024 Version) PMP Exam with Confidence!

The project manager should take proactive steps to restore the team morale and trust after an incident that affects the team dynamics. Hosting a special meeting to talk about what happened is a way to facilitate open communication, address the root causes of the conflict, and resolve any issues or grievances among the team members. Conducting a team-building workshop is a way to enhance the team cohesion, collaboration, and performance by engaging the team in fun and interactive activities that foster positive relationships and mutual respect. These two actions are consistent with the principle of leading with empathy and respect, which is part of the PMI Talent Triangle®. References:

• PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 133
• Agile Practice Guide, page 48
• PMI Talent Triangle® 1

 Diversity and inclusion are important for project effectiveness, as they enable diverse perspectives, ideas, and experiences to be shared and valued among the project team and stakeholders. However, diversity and inclusion are not just about demographics, but also about creating a culture of respect, belonging, and empowerment for everyone. To achieve this, the organization needs to provide training and education to the entire workforce, not just to specific teams or departments, to raise awareness, foster understanding, and promote positive behaviors. By doing so, the organization can prevent or reduce potential conflicts, misunderstandings, or biases that may arise from different backgrounds, views, or preferences. Furthermore, the organization can leverage the benefits of diversity and inclusion, such as improved innovation, collaboration, and customer satisfaction. References:

• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Project Management
• Diversity and Inclusion Are Important for Project Effectiveness
• Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion | PMI

When using an agile approach, the project manager should use a contract type that allows for flexibility and adaptation to changing requirements and priorities. A fixed-price contract with increments based on user stories is a suitable option, as it aligns the payment with the delivery of value to the customer. The other options are not appropriate for an agile project, as they either do not provide enough flexibility (A and B) or do not link the payment to the value delivered (D). References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 374; Agile Practice Guide, page 97.

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager should be involved in the procurement process to ensure that the project requirements are clearly defined and communicated to the potential suppliers1. The project manager should also verify that the project objectives are aligned with the business needs and the expectations of the stakeholders before approving an agreement2. Therefore, the best option is to ensure that the requirements for the project are understood and that the objectives are verified before approval of an agreement. Option B is incorrect because informing the project sponsor that there cannot be any changes to the scope of the project is unrealistic and may not account for the possible risks and uncertainties that may arise during the project execution3. Option C is incorrect because notifying the project sponsor that the project manager cannot be involved in the agreement negotiation process is not a proactive or collaborative approach, and may result in a poor or unsuitable agreement for the project. Option D is incorrect because asking the project sponsor to involve the legal department in the negotiation for the project agreement is not the responsibility of the project manager, and may not address the issue of the project manager’s participation in the procurement process. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.1.3.1, p. 465 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.1.3.1, p. 89 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 5.6.3.1, p. 161 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.1, p. 473 : PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 12.2.3.2, p. 474

The project manager should not compare the velocity of two agile teams as teams can size items differently. Velocity is a measure of the amount of work a team can complete in a given time period. It is not a measure of the quality or value of the work. Comparing the velocity of two teams can lead to inaccurate conclusions and unhealthy competition. Instead, the project manager should use the velocity of each team to help them plan and forecast their own work, and focus on other metrics that reflect the outcomes and benefits of the project. References: Agile Practice Guide, page 48; PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 97.

 The project manager should meet with the PMO/compliance entity to work on process tailoring, as this will help them to adapt the agile approach to the specific compliance requirements of the organization. Process tailoring is the act of customizing the project management processes, practices, and tools to suit the needs and characteristics of a particular project. By meeting with the PMO/compliance entity, the project manager can identify the relevant compliance standards, regulations, and policies that apply to the project, and determine how to align the agile deliverables with them. The project manager can also negotiate the level of documentation, reporting, and auditing that is required for the project, and seek ways to streamline and simplify them. This will help to ensure that the project is compliant, while also maintaining the agility and performance of the project team. References:

• Project Manager’s Guide To Implementing A Compliance Program
• Project Management Compliance Process - RMC Learning Solutions
• Compliance - Scaled Agile Framework
• Agile Approach in Regulatory Enviroment | DA - Project Management Institute
• Achieving Regulatory and Industry Standards Compliance with the Scaled …

According to the PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, one of the principles of project management is to tailor the delivery approach based on context1. This principle suggests that project managers should select and adapt the delivery approach that best suits the project characteristics, stakeholder needs, and organizational goals. It also implies that project managers should recognize and respond to changes in the project environment and facilitate the transition between different delivery approaches1.

In a hybrid project, the delivery approach combines elements of predictive, adaptive, and iterative methods2. A hybrid project may start with a predictive phase to define the scope, schedule, and budget, and then switch to an adaptive or iterative phase to deliver the product or service incrementally2. A hybrid project may also use different delivery approaches for different components or work packages within the same project2.

In this scenario, the project manager observes that the team performance was excellent during the predictive stages, but declined when the iterations began. This could indicate that the team members are not comfortable or familiar with the change in the delivery approach, and that they are lacking the skills, mindset, or tools to work effectively in an adaptive or iterative environment. Therefore, the best course of action for the project manager is to perform team-building activities and enhance collaboration. This will help the team to build trust, rapport, and cohesion among themselves and with other stakeholders, and to align their expectations, roles, and responsibilities with the new delivery approach. It will also help the team to learn and apply the agile values and principles, such as customer collaboration over contract negotiation and working software over comprehensive documentation3.

The other options are not as effective as option B. Option A, giving team members more authority to make decisions, may be appropriate for an agile team, but it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the change in the delivery approach. It may also create more confusion and conflicts if the team members are not clear about the decision-making process or criteria. Option C, identifying the team members who are impacting low morale, may be helpful, but it does not solve the problem of the team’s performance. It may also create a blame culture or a sense of isolation among the team members. Option D, coaching the team members on agile processes and knowledge, is also a good practice, but it is not sufficient to improve the team’s morale. Coaching should be complemented by team-building and collaboration activities to foster a positive and supportive team culture.

References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 10 2: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 19 3: Agile Manifesto,

 According to the PMBOK Guide, a hybrid delivery approach is a combination of predictive, iterative, incremental, and agile methods that best suit the project context and objectives. A hybrid delivery approach may require a phased structure, where each phase has a review gate to ensure alignment and quality. To ensure consistency for this hybrid delivery, the project manager should get agreement from stakeholders on high-level deliverables and requirements. This will help to define the scope and objectives of each phase, as well as the acceptance criteria and success factors. The project manager should also involve the stakeholders in the planning and execution of each phase, and solicit their feedback and approval at the review gates. The project manager should not ask SMEs to provide a detailed plan for each phase, as this may not reflect the stakeholder needs and expectations. The project manager should not commit to a detailed global plan from the initiation phase, as this may not accommodate changes and uncertainties in a hybrid environment. The project manager should not request the PMO to review the initial plan, as this may not ensure the stakeholder buy-in and satisfaction. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53…
• PMI-PBA Guide, pages 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53…

 The project manager should schedule a virtual meeting so onsite and remote stakeholders can attend at the same time because this is the most efficient and effective way to communicate the project objectives, scope, deliverables, and expectations to all the relevant stakeholders. A virtual meeting can also facilitate interaction and feedback among the participants, and foster a sense of collaboration and commitment. The other options are not the best choices because they do not ensure that all the stakeholders are informed and engaged at the same level. Emailing all stakeholders with the objectives of the project and asking for feedback (option A) may not reach all the stakeholders, or may not elicit timely or adequate responses. Waiting for a date when all required attendees can be available onsite (option B) may cause unnecessary delays and risks to the project. Running separate meetings to accommodate everyone’s schedule (option C) may create inconsistencies and confusion among the stakeholders, and increase the workload and complexity for the project manager. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 367-368, 376-377. PMP Sample Test Questions. PMP Questions page 417.

In an agile project, the project manager should collaborate with the stakeholders and ensure their active involvement in the project. The project manager should meet with the unhappy stakeholder to understand their concern and the business impact of the delayed delivery. The project manager should also reprioritize the product backlog as necessary to accommodate the stakeholder’s needs and expectations. Finally, the project manager should invite the stakeholder to join the sprint planning session, where the team selects the work to be done in the next iteration based on the stakeholder’s feedback and the product owner’s guidance. This way, the project manager can improve the stakeholder’s satisfaction and engagement, and foster a trusting and collaborative relationship. Directing the product owner to drop other work in progress and work on the stakeholder’s requirement as the top-priority item may not be the best option, as it may disrupt the team’s flow and compromise the value delivery. Sharing the prioritized items that the team is working on with the stakeholder and inviting them to join the sprint planning session may not be sufficient, as it does not address the stakeholder’s concern and business impact. Securing some additional funding to recruit more resources to the project team to enable faster delivery may not be feasible or effective, as it may violate the agile principle of simplicity and increase the complexity and communication overhead of the project. References:

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 14: Team, Section 14.2: Enable Team Performance, Section 14.3: Lead the Team
• Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: Life Cycle Selection, Section 2.2: Implementing Agile: Creating an Agile Environment, Section 2.3: Implementing Agile: Delivering in an Agile Environment
• Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 4: Analysis, Task 9: Validate Requirements
• [Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline], Domain 4: Analysis, Task 9: Validate Requirements

The project manager should schedule a kick-off session to explain the problems of the project and gain approval and support from the stakeholders. This will help to align the expectations, clarify the objectives, and address the concerns of the stakeholders. A kick-off session is a tool and technique of the Develop Project Charter process, which is the first process in the project integration management knowledge area. Sending communications for clarification, demonstrating the performance indexes and recommending corrective actions, or speaking with the sponsor and explaining the situation are all possible actions that the project manager can take after the kick-off session, but they are not the first action that the project manager should take to alleviate the stakeholders’ concerns. References: PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 49; Agile Practice Guide, page 26.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, one of the key processes of the Project Stakeholder Management knowledge area is Manage Stakeholder Engagement, which involves communicating and working with stakeholders to meet their needs and expectations, address issues, and foster appropriate stakeholder involvement. One of the inputs for this process is the stakeholder engagement plan, which identifies the strategies and actions to promote productive involvement of stakeholders in project decisions and activities. By reviewing the stakeholder engagement plan, the project manager can assess the current level of stakeholder engagement and identify the gaps or issues that need to be addressed to overcome the resistance and gain acceptance of the change. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 513-514, 518.

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for closing the project or phase, which includes verifying that all the project deliverables are completed and accepted, updating the project records and documents, releasing the project resources, and communicating the project closure to the stakeholders. Performing administrative closure of the project ensures that the project is formally completed and closed, and that the project budget is finalized and closed as well. This will prevent any confusion or issues with the accounting manager or other parties in the future. Conveying task completion information to accounting may be part of the project closure process, but it is not sufficient to close the project budget. The project manager should also update the project status, financial records, and lessons learned. Closing the procurement process properly is necessary for projects that involve contracts or agreements with external vendors or suppliers, but it is not the only aspect of closing the project. The project manager should also close the internal aspects of the project, such as deliverables, resources, and stakeholder satisfaction. Completing the transition process is relevant for projects that produce products, services, or results that need to be transferred to the operations or maintenance teams, but it is not the only activity for closing the project. The project manager should also ensure that the project objectives are met, the project scope is verified, and the project performance is evaluated. References: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.7 (Close Project or Phase) and Appendix X3, Table X3-1 (Project Closure Checklist)

Velocity is a measure of the amount of work a team can complete in a given iteration. It is calculated by dividing the total number of story points completed by the team by the duration of the iteration. Velocity can vary from iteration to iteration due to various factors such as team size, complexity of work, technical issues, etc. Therefore, it is not advisable to use a single iteration’s velocity as a baseline for future planning. Instead, the project manager should ask the product owner to look at a minimum of four to eight iterations and use the average or median velocity as a more reliable indicator of the team’s performance. This way, the product owner can replan the velocity for the next iteration based on the team’s current performance and adjust the scope and schedule accordingly. This is consistent with the agile principle of responding to change over following a plan and the PMI-PBA practice of planning and monitoring the business analysis approach. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18, section 1.2.3.2
• Agile Practice Guide, page 36, section 3.3.2
• PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, page 9, task 1.1
• PMI-PBA Certification Exam Prep Guide, page 63, section 3.2.1

According to the PMBOK Guide, the project manager is responsible for ensuring that the project deliverables meet the acceptance criteria and obtaining formal acceptance of the deliverables from the customer or sponsor1. The project manager should also involve the relevant stakeholders in the validation and acceptance process to ensure their satisfaction and buy-in2. Therefore, the best option is to set up a meeting with stakeholders to validate and confirm acceptance of the deliverables. Option A is incorrect because the project sponsor is not the only stakeholder who needs to approve the deliverables. Option B is incorrect because updating the project management plan and marking the milestone as completed are actions that should be done after obtaining formal acceptance, not before. Option C is incorrect because asking the vendor to validate the agreement for any deviations is not a sufficient way to ensure the quality and compliance of the deliverables. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 4.6.3.2, p. 123 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, section 13.4.2.2, p. 529

 The project manager should take these two actions to align customer expectations with the current situation of the project. The sprint velocity is a measure of how much work the agile team can complete in a sprint. By reviewing the updated sprint velocity with the customer, the project manager can show the impact of losing two team members on the project schedule and scope. The customer can then adjust their expectations accordingly and provide feedback on the project progress. The prioritized backlog is a list of features and requirements that the customer wants to have in the product. By asking the product owner to review the prioritized backlog with the customer, the project manager can ensure that the most valuable and important features are delivered first. The customer can also reprioritize the backlog items based on their changing needs and preferences. This way, the project manager can deliver early results that meet the customer’s satisfaction.

The other options are not the best actions to align customer expectations. Asking the agile team to review and update the quality management plan with the customer is not relevant to the budget reduction or the early results. The quality management plan defines the quality standards, criteria, and methods for the project. It is not a tool for communicating the project status or scope with the customer. Reviewing the impediments log with the customer is not a good practice, as it may expose the internal issues and challenges of the agile team. The impediments log is a record of the obstacles and problems that the agile team faces during the project. It is used by the agile team and the scrum master to identify and resolve the impediments. The customer does not need to know the details of the impediments log, as it may affect their trust and confidence in the project team. Sending a detailed project management plan to the customer is not appropriate for an agile project, as it may imply a fixed and rigid approach to the project. The project management plan is a formal document that describes how the project will be executed, monitored, and controlled. It is not suitable for an agile project, as it does not accommodate the changes and uncertainties that occur during the project. An agile project relies on frequent and informal communication, collaboration, and feedback with the customer, rather than a detailed project management plan. References:

• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 6, Section 6.7, “Control Schedule”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.2, “Plan Stakeholder Engagement”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.3, “Sprint Velocity”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.4, “Prioritized Product Backlog”
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.5, “Impediments Log”
• PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 12, Section 12.2, “Agile Project Management” 1

The project manager should meet with the project team to assess their current skills and identify any gaps or training needs that may affect the project execution. This is part of the Plan Resource Management process, which involves determining the project roles, responsibilities, required skills, and reporting relationships1. Sending the list to the project team and asking them to get training on the required skills (A) is not a proactive or effective way of managing the project resources. Asking the functional manager to review the resource pool and recommend the right individuals to join the team (B) is not feasible since the project team has already been assigned. Discussing the list with the project sponsor to confirm that the resources have the required skills © is not the responsibility of the project sponsor, who is mainly concerned with the project benefits and alignment with the strategic objectives2. References:

• 1: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 8, Section 8.1.3.1
• 2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.1.2.1

 The project manager should meet with the team member’s functional manager to try to remove the impediment that is preventing the team member from completing their user story. The project manager should explain the impact of the delay on the project scope, schedule, and quality, and negotiate a solution that would allow the team member to resume their work on the user story as soon as possible. This approach is consistent with the agile principle of removing impediments and enabling self-organizing teams12. References: 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 5: Project Scope Management 2: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 2: An Agile Mindset

The best way to address the complaint is to involve the operations director or a representative from the operations team in the agile process. By inviting them to the validation and sprint meetings, they can provide feedback, clarify requirements, and validate the product increments. This will help to ensure that the product meets the performance indicators and the expectations of the operations department. It will also foster collaboration and transparency among the stakeholders and the project team. References:

• What is a Sprint Review? | Scrum.org
• What Is a Sprint Review? Goals and Tips for Running This Scrum Event
• What is a sprint review? 3 steps to better sprint reviews - Atlassian
• What is Stakeholder Management? - ProjectManager
• What is Stakeholder Management? | A Step-by-Step Guide - Creately

Answer steps

Graphical user interface Description automatically generated

According to the PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, an issue is a point or matter in question or in dispute, or a point or matter that is not settled and is under discussion or over which there are opposing views or disagreements1. Issues can arise from various sources, such as changes, risks, defects, conflicts, or assumptions1. Issues can affect the project performance, scope, quality, schedule, cost, or stakeholder satisfaction1.

An issues log is a project document used to capture and track issues until they are resolved1. The issues log typically contains information such as the issue description, priority, owner, status, resolution, and impact1. The issues log is updated throughout the project life cycle as new issues are identified, analyzed, and resolved1.

In this scenario, the newly assigned project manager is informed by a few key stakeholders that the project has some serious issues. The first thing that the project manager should do to understand the issues is to review the issues log to ensure the issues are captured. This will help the project manager to get an overview of the current state of the project, and to identify the nature, scope, and impact of the issues. It will also help the project manager to verify if the issues have been properly documented, prioritized, and assigned to the responsible parties. Reviewing the issues log will also enable the project manager to plan the next steps to address the issues, such as communicating with the stakeholders, performing root cause analysis, implementing corrective actions, or escalating the issues if needed1.

The other options are not as effective as option B. Option A, escalating the issues to the project sponsor, may be necessary if the issues are beyond the project manager’s authority or control, but it is not the first thing to do. The project manager should first review the issues log to understand the issues and their implications, and then decide if escalation is required or not. Option C, checking the risk management plan to ensure there is a strategy to address the issues, may be helpful, but it is not sufficient. The risk management plan provides guidance on how to manage risks, not issues2. Risks are uncertain events or conditions that may have a positive or negative effect on the project objectives, while issues are certain events or conditions that have already occurred and have a negative effect on the project performance1. Therefore, the risk management plan may not cover all the issues that the project faces, and the project manager should review the issues log instead. Option D, asking the key stakeholders to discuss the issues with the project team, may be beneficial, but it is not the first thing to do. The project manager should first review the issues log to get a clear picture of the issues, and then facilitate the discussion between the stakeholders and the team to resolve the issues.

References: 1: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 101 2: PMBOK® Guide, 7th edition, page 113

The project manager should use Monitor Communications techniques to ensure that the communication needs of the project and its stakeholders are met. This involves collecting and analyzing feedback from stakeholders, reviewing the effectiveness and quality of the communication activities, and identifying and resolving communication issues. By doing so, the project manager may discover the reasons why some stakeholders are not fully comprehending the status of the project based on the reports that are being circulated, and may initiate changes to the communications management plan to address them. For example, the project manager may decide to use a different report format, frequency, or distribution method that suits the needs and preferences of the new stakeholders. Adding the issue to the issue log and determining the corrective action (option A) is a possible outcome of Monitor Communications, but not the best answer. Creating a fishbone diagram to determine the root cause for the misunderstanding (option B) is a tool that can be used in Monitor Communications, but not the only one. Sharing the communications management plan and reminding all stakeholders of the agreed-upon reporting templates (option D) is not likely to solve the problem, as it may imply that the new stakeholders are at fault for not understanding the reports, rather than acknowledging that the communication needs may have changed. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 386-387, section 10.2 Manage Communications
• PMP Exam Prep, 10th edition, page 415, question 415, answer and explanation

According to the PMBOK Guide, an iteration is a fixed time period during which a set of activities are performed to deliver a potentially releasable product increment. In an agile or hybrid environment, the project manager should encourage the team to continuously inspect and adapt their processes and practices to improve their performance and deliver value to the customer. If a team member suggests a new method of doing things that provides no value to the end customer, but may help the team to work more efficiently, the project manager should consider the change because it will help the team work more efficiently. This means that the project manager should evaluate the benefits and costs of the proposed change, and determine if it is worth implementing. The project manager should also consult with the team and the product owner to get their feedback and approval. The change should not be immediately added to the product backlog, as it may disrupt the prioritization and planning of the customer requirements. The change should not be presented to the project sponsor for approval, as it is not a significant change that affects the project scope, schedule, or budget. The change should not be rejected because it adds no value to the end customer, as it may add value to the team and the project by improving the team’s efficiency and quality. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 18-19, 686-687, 723-724.

 According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, one of the key processes of the Project Quality Management knowledge area is Manage Quality, which involves identifying and resolving quality problems. One of the tools and techniques for this process is problem solving, which consists of defining the problem, identifying the root cause, generating and selecting alternatives, and implementing solutions. By requesting that the team identifies, documents, and registers the issues, the project manager is following a systematic approach to problem solving, which will help to prevent recurrence of the same or similar problems, and improve the quality of the project deliverables. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 286-287, 291.

According to the Agile Practice Guide, the product owner is the person who is responsible for defining and prioritizing the product backlog, and ensuring that the product meets the customer’s needs and expectations (Section 3.2.2). The product owner is also the key stakeholder who has the authority to accept or reject the work results, and to make the final decisions regarding the scope and requirements of the product (Section 3.2.3). Therefore, if there is a requirement that conflicts with the product owner’s requirements, the product owner is the one who should analyze the new requirement and make the final decision, in collaboration with the other stakeholders and the project team. This is also consistent with the PMBOK® Guide, which states that “the project manager should work with the product owner to ensure that the project delivers the agreed-upon features and functionality” (Section 5.1.2.2). References:

• Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.2.2, Section 3.2.3
• PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Section 5.1.2.2

 According to the PMBOK Guide, the project steering committee is a group of senior stakeholders who provide strategic direction, guidance, and support to the project. The project steering committee is also responsible for resolving high-level issues and risks that may affect the project. In this scenario, the project manager should escalate the issue of funding access to the project steering committee, as they have the authority and influence to resolve it. The project steering committee can help to expedite the funding process, negotiate with the finance department, or find alternative sources of funding. This will help to avoid further delays and ensure the project can proceed with the procurement process. References: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 33-34. PMP Questions page 524, question 524. [Project Steering Committee: Roles and Responsibilities].

According to the PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, chapter 8, page 179, incremental budgeting is a technique that allows agile teams to estimate and allocate funds for each iteration or release of a product. This technique enables the teams to respond to changing requirements and priorities, and to deliver value to the customer faster. Incremental budgeting also reduces the risk of over- or under-budgeting, as the teams can adjust their estimates based on the actual costs and benefits of each increment. The other options are not suitable for agile teams, as they do not support the agile principles of flexibility, collaboration, and customer satisfaction. Requesting the finance team to allocate a budget based on historical data may not reflect the current or future needs of the product. Providing the budget to the finance team for only the planned increments may not account for the changes that may occur during the product development. Extrapolating the budget based on the current cost performance index (CPI) may not be accurate or reliable, as the CPI may vary depending on the scope, schedule, and quality of each increment. References:

• PMI-PBA Exam Practice Test and Study Guide, 2nd edition, chapter 8, page 179
• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, section 8.1.3, page 269

A benefits management plan is a document that describes how and when the benefits of the project will be delivered, and how they will be measured and evaluated. It also aligns the benefits with the organization’s strategic objectives and shows how the project contributes to them. A benefits management plan can help the project manager communicate the value and benefits of the project to the stakeholders, especially if the project is in danger of failing or losing support. A benefits management plan is an output of the Identify Stakeholders process in the PMBOK Guide, and it is also covered in the PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline under Domain II: Needs Assessment. References:

• PMBOK Guide, 7th edition, page 133
• PMI-PBA Exam Content Outline, 2018, page 9

According to the Agile Practice Guide, the definition of done (DoD) is a clear and concise list of requirements that a deliverable must adhere to for the team to consider it complete. The DoD helps to ensure that the quality standards and customer expectations are met, and that there is a consistent understanding of what done means among the team and the customer. Therefore, the project manager should have included all relevant criteria in the agreed upon DoD, and crafted a shared product vision that aligns with the customer’s needs and goals. This would have helped to prevent the customer from rejecting the deliverables at the end of the iteration. Involved the customer more in the planning process for the project, and ensured agreement on the proceedings may be a good practice, but it is not the best answer. The customer may still reject the deliverables if the planning process does not result in a clear and agreed upon DoD and product vision. Provided the customer with the backlog and the specified user stories at the beginning of the iteration may be helpful, but it is not sufficient to prevent the customer from rejecting the deliverables. The backlog and the user stories may change during the iteration, and they may not reflect the quality criteria and the customer expectations. Developed the DoD in close cooperation with all stakeholders to ensure their expectations were included may be a good practice, but it is not the best answer. The DoD should be developed with the customer, not with all stakeholders. Some stakeholders may have different or conflicting expectations than the customer, and they may not be the ones who accept or reject the deliverables. References: Agile Practice Guide, Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2 (Definition of Done) and Section 3.2.3 (Product Vision)

According to the PMBOK Guide1, project communication management includes the processes of planning, managing, and monitoring project communications. The first process, plan communications management, involves determining the information and communication needs of the project stakeholders, such as the sponsor. The project manager should have analyzed the sponsor’s communication requirements, such as the type, format, frequency, and level of detail of the information they need, as well as their preferred communication channels and methods. By doing so, the project manager could have designed and implemented a communication system that meets the sponsor’s expectations and needs, and avoids any dissatisfaction or complaints. The other options are not the best preventive actions, as they are either reactive or irrelevant. Confirming that the portal is providing adequate information, verifying that the project team is following the communications management plan, and ensuring the sponsor had the necessary skills to use the portal are all actions that could be taken after the situation has occurred, but they do not address the root cause of the problem, which is the lack of alignment between the communication system and the sponsor’s requirements. References:

• A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Sixth Edition
• Project Communication Management - Five Steps | PMI
• ProjectManagement.com - Project Communication Management

According to the PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 141, the project manager should engage with stakeholders throughout the project life cycle to ensure that their needs and expectations are met. When there are changes in the stakeholder environment, such as new or replaced stakeholders, the project manager should identify them and assess their impact on the project. The project manager should also review and prioritize the new requirements with the stakeholders and analyze how they affect the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, and risk. The project manager should then follow the change control process to submit, evaluate, approve, and implement the change requests that are needed to accommodate the new requirements. This approach ensures that the project manager maintains effective communication, collaboration, and alignment with the stakeholders, and delivers a product, service, or result that meets their needs and expectations.

The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the new requirements in a proactive and collaborative manner. Option B is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is trying to avoid the new requirements and resist the change, which could create conflict and dissatisfaction among the stakeholders. Option C is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is accepting all the new requirements without analyzing their impact and feasibility, which could lead to scope creep, unrealistic expectations, and poor quality. Option D is not the best choice because it implies that the project manager is imposing a rigid and inflexible approach to the project, which could alienate the new stakeholders and jeopardize their support and engagement.

References:

• PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, pages 141-142, 161-162, 171-172
• PMP Exam Questions - Part 17 (Q 161-170), YouTube video by Certify Me Now
• [PMP Exam Prep: 100% Coverage for PMP Exam Success], Udemy course by Joseph Phillips

Retrospective results are the outputs of the retrospective meeting, which is a ceremony that is performed at the end of every sprint or iteration in an agile project. The retrospective meeting is an opportunity for the team to reflect on what went well, what could be improved, and how to implement the improvement actions in the next sprint or iteration. The retrospective results can help the project manager to identify the risks and opportunities for the event planning, and to update the risk register accordingly. 12345 References:

• 1: ProjectManagement.com - Retrospectives
• 2: A Guide To Effective Retrospectives By Project Managers
• 3: Retrospective - BrainBOK
• 4: Retrospective - Lovepmp
• 5: Retrospective - InLoox

 According to the PMBOK Guide, when using an agile approach, the project manager needs to deliver value early and often by creating and testing increments of the product, service, or result that are potentially releasable1. A minimum viable product (MVP) is a version of the product that has enough features to satisfy the initial needs of the customers and stakeholders, and to provide feedback for future development2. By developing an MVP for assessment from a select customer group, the project manager can address the issue of the product owner’s uncertainty about the business value of each feature, as well as validate the product vision, test the assumptions, and reduce the risks2. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not reflect the agile mindset and principles. Assessing the product roadmap, commissioning a business analyst, or completing a WBS are all possible actions that could be taken in a predictive or waterfall approach, where the product features are defined and fixed upfront. However, in an agile approach, the product features are emergent and adaptive, and the project manager should collaborate with the customer and the team to deliver the best possible product3. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 158
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 156

According to the PMBOK® Guide, hybrid project management is a technique where high-level project phases are planned using the waterfall approach, and project phase work (actual tasks) execution is done the Agile way1. Hybrid project management is getting more attention as it offers the flexibility to combine the best practices from both waterfall and agile methodologies2. One of the benefits of hybrid project management is that it allows the project team to adapt to changing requirements and customer needs, which are common in projects with a high level of uncertainty3. However, this also requires the project manager to adopt a different role than in a traditional waterfall project. Instead of being a central authority who directs and controls the project, the project manager should act as a facilitator, coach, and servant leader who supports and empowers the project team to do the work4. This means that the project manager should trust the team’s expertise and experience, delegate decision-making authority, provide feedback and guidance, and remove any impediments that hinder the team’s progress5. By doing so, the project manager can foster a collaborative and agile culture that enhances the team’s performance and satisfaction6.

Therefore, the best way for the project manager to address the issue of losing control of the project is to adopt the role of supporting and empowering the project team to do the work (option C). This will help the project manager to cope with the uncertainty and complexity of the project, and to leverage the team’s skills and knowledge. Modifying the daily standup meetings to include project status reporting (option A) may not be effective, as it may disrupt the purpose and flow of the standup meetings, which are meant to be brief and focused on the team’s progress, issues, and plans. Escalating the issue to the change control board (CCB) and asking for advice (option B) may not be appropriate, as the CCB is usually responsible for reviewing and approving changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, or quality, not for providing guidance on the project management approach. Changing the approach for the project to a predictive approach (option D) may not be feasible or desirable, as it may not suit the nature and context of the project, and it may cause resistance and confusion among the project stakeholders. References:

• 1: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, p. 19
• 2: Teamhood, Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Approach & Software
• 3: The Digital Project Manager, Ultimate Guide To Hybrid Project Methodologies & How To Make Them
• 4: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, p. 54
• 5: PMI, Agile Practice Guide, p. 21
• 6: PMI, Agile Practice Guide, p. 22
• [7]: PMI, Agile Practice Guide, p. 50
• [8]: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, p. 115
• [9]: PMBOK® Guide, 6th edition, p. 18

According to the PMBOK Guide, when using an agile approach, the project manager needs to embrace change and respond to customer feedback by continuously refining and reprioritizing the product backlog1. The product backlog is a dynamic list of the product requirements, user stories, and other work items that need to be completed by the project team. By working with the product manager and the rest of the team to update the project backlog, the project manager can incorporate the new feature requested by the customer, and deliver value early and often1. The other options are not appropriate, as they do not reflect the agile mindset and principles. Assessing the impact of the new requirements and initiating the change request process, assessing the impact and communicating the updated product roadmap, and following the change management plan to update the risk register are all possible actions that could be taken in a predictive or waterfall approach, where changes are more controlled and formalized. However, in an agile approach, changes are expected and welcomed, and the project manager should collaborate with the customer and the team to deliver the best possible product2. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 18
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 156

According to the PMBOK Guide, an impediment board is a visual tool that tracks the impediments or blockers that prevent the team from completing their work1. The project manager should create an entry in the impediment board and assign it to the person or team responsible for resolving it. This will help the project manager monitor the progress of the impediment resolution and communicate it to the stakeholders. The other options are not the best actions for the project manager to do. Inviting the project team to a swarming session to define a solution is a technique that can be used to address complex or urgent problems, but it is not appropriate for an issue that is outside the project team’s control2. Leveraging the network of the former department and asking for help is a possible way to expedite the completion of the task, but it is not a formal or transparent way to manage the impediment. Escalating the issue to the product owner to define the next steps is not the project manager’s responsibility, as the product owner is mainly concerned with the product vision and value, not the project execution3. References:

• 1: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 570
• 2: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 571
• 3: PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, page 49

 According to the PMBOK® Guide, the project manager is responsible for managing the project resources, including human resources, and ensuring that they have the necessary skills and competencies to perform the project work. Therefore, the project manager should identify the sources and specifics of the knowledge gap from the interns and new recruits, and put them into groups and assign a SME as a mentor. These actions will help the project manager to address the root cause of the problem, provide effective learning and coaching opportunities for the interns and new recruits, and leverage the expertise and experience of the SMEs. Hiring more SMEs and informing the human resources manager to lay off the nonperforming interns and new recruits may not be feasible or ethical. The project manager should try to resolve the issue within the existing project team, rather than replacing or firing the team members. Initiating a project change request for additional budget to train the interns and new recruits may not be possible or timely. The project manager should try to use the available resources and budget, rather than requesting more funds. Ignoring the issues with the project and trying to deliver the project successfully without asking for training funds may not be realistic or responsible. The project manager should not overlook the knowledge gap that may affect the project quality, scope, or schedule, but rather seek to close the gap and improve the team performance. References: PMBOK® Guide, Sixth Edition, Chapter 9, Section 9.2 (Develop Team) and Section 9.3 (Manage Team)QUESTION NO: 449

In the context of agile project management, when a facilitator is working with a new team, it is important to establish a common understanding and set the stage for collaboration. Holding a team charter discussion is a foundational step in this process. It allows the team to define their mission, objectives, and the norms that will guide their work together. This session helps in building trust, setting expectations, and ensuring that everyone is aligned with the project’s goals. It is a critical step for team formation, especially when the facilitator and the team have not worked together before.

References: The recommendation for an agile facilitator to hold a team charter discussion with a new team is supported by agile best practices and the guidelines provided in PMI’s resources on project management and business analysis123

 In a project with diverse stakeholders, it is essential to manage the risks associated with differing expectations and potential misunderstandings. The project manager should analyze the probability and impact of these risks and develop a response plan that addresses them. This involves identifying the root causes of confusion, determining the likelihood of their occurrence, assessing their potential impact on the project, and planning actions to mitigate or avoid these risks. By doing so, the project manager can integrate the diverse stakeholder groups more effectively, ensuring that all voices are heard and that the project remains on track123.

References:

• PMI’s "A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)"1
• LinkedIn article on "How to Involve Diverse Stakeholders in Your Projects"2
• ExamTopics discussion on "Exam PMP topic 1 question 718 discussion"3

Text Description automatically generated

When stakeholders express concerns about poor communication, it’s important for the project manager to investigate the underlying causes of the communication issues. Performing a root cause analysis (RCA) can help identify not just superficial problems, but also systemic issues that may be affecting communication. This approach aligns with PMI’s emphasis on continuous improvement and problem-solving within project management processes.

References: = PMI’s PMBOK® Guide and the standards for project communication management emphasize the importance of effective communication and the need for project managers to adapt their communication plans to meet the needs of stakeholders. The PMBOK® Guide provides guidelines on how to manage project communications effectively, which includes monitoring and controlling communications throughout the project life cycle to ensure that stakeholder needs are met.

Please note that this response is based on general project management principles and does not reference specific documents or materials. For detailed information, you should refer to the latest editions of PMI’s PMBOK® Guide and other official PMI publications.

 Defining a minimum viable product (MVP) is a core concept in delivering value early and continuously, which aligns with the agile principles of project management. An MVP allows the project manager and stakeholders to understand the product’s vision more clearly by focusing on the core functionalities that will meet the customer’s needs and provide immediate value. This approach also facilitates early feedback, which is crucial for iterative development and continuous improvement.

References: The answer is verified using the PMP Examination Content Outline, which emphasizes the importance of delivering value and involving stakeholders1. Additionally, the PMBOK Guide standards highlight the need for project managers to engage stakeholders and meet project objectives2. The Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials also support the use of an MVP as part of the business analysis process to maximize value delivery and stakeholder engagement3.

 In the event of a data loss during a software deployment, it is crucial for the project manager to take immediate action to prevent further loss and to understand the root cause of the issue. Inviting a consultant to review the process allows for an expert assessment of the situation, which can help in identifying the problem quickly and preventing recurrence. This approach aligns with the best practices in project management and business analysis, which advocate for prompt and effective response to project issues to mitigate risks and ensure project success123.

References:

• Exam PMP topic 1 question 183 discussion - ExamTopics1.
• How to Avoid Common Software Deployment Challenges - xMatters2.
• Project Managers: How to Leverage Business Analysis for Project Success - AdaptiveUS3.

The project manager should work to ensure that all relevant stakeholders are appropriately engaged in accordance with the project’s needs. The PMBOK® Guide emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement and the need to manage stakeholder expectations through effective communication and involvement in the project decision-making process. In this scenario, the project manager should influence the product owner to consider the CTO’s strategy, as it is likely to be critical to the project’s success and alignment with organizational goals2. References:

• PMP Examination Content Outline - June 20191
• Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials | PMI2

In this scenario, the project manager should review the change management plan to discuss the potential early benefits realization with the client. This involves evaluating the impact of the change, considering the client’s focus on the next milestone, and discussing how the early completion of a deliverable could bring value to the project without significantly affecting resources. The goal is to align the project’s progress with the client’s expectations and the project’s objectives, ensuring that any changes are beneficial and agreed upon by all stakeholders.

References: The answer is based on the principles of engaging stakeholders and managing changes effectively as per the PMP and PMI-PBA guidelines1234.

The project manager should establish a project governance model that aligns with the company’s strategic, investment, and compliance requirements. This involves creating a structure that provides oversight, decision-making processes, and performance measurement to guide the project in accordance with the company’s objectives. It is essential to tailor the governance model to the specific needs of the project while ensuring it supports the organization’s broader governance framework1.

References:

• PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition
• “Project Governance Critical Success” by Salina Sandra Alie, MSc, BSc, PMP1.
• “Governance of Portfolios, Programs, and Projects: A Practice Guide” by PMI2.

 In a scenario where a company is not yet profitable and is facing project delays with an overwhelmed staff, the project manager should prioritize the projects based on their potential to increase profit. This is in line with the principles of project financial management, which suggest that prioritizing projects that align with the company’s strategic goals, such as financial objectives, is crucial. By focusing on projects that are more likely to contribute to the company’s profitability, the project manager can help ensure that resources are allocated effectively and that the company’s financial position is strengthened. This approach is supported by the PMBOK® Guide, which emphasizes the importance of aligning projects with organizational strategy and business objectives.

References:

• PMBOK® Guide – Sixth Edition
• PMP Examination Content Outline – June 20191
• Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials2
• Project Prioritization Process: 5 Strategies to Prioritize Your Projects3
• Analytic Hierarchy Process Prioritize Projects | PMI4

The project manager is engaging in the process of creating a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS). This involves subdividing the project deliverables and project work into smaller, more manageable components, known as work packages. The WBS is a deliverable-oriented hierarchical decomposition of the work to be executed by the project team, which is essential for detailed project planning, assigning responsibilities, and tracking project progress.

References:

• PMBOK Guide – Sixth Edition and the Practice Standard for Work Breakdown Structures – Third Edition1.
• “Effective sizing and content definition of work packages” from the Project Management Journal2.
• "PMP Exam Tip: The Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)"3.
• “Decomposition in Project Management - PM Vidya” which defines Decomposition as a technique used for dividing and subdividing the project scope and project deliverables into smaller, more manageable parts4.

In situations where there is a lack of support for the project, it is crucial to identify and engage with key stakeholders who can influence the project’s success. The PMBOK® Guide emphasizes the importance of stakeholder engagement and the need to analyze stakeholder influence, expectations, and impact on the project to effectively manage their engagement. By understanding which stakeholders have the most influence, the project manager can develop strategies to gain their support and address the concerns that may be hindering the project’s progress.

References: = The PMBOK® Guide1, which outlines the principles of stakeholder engagement and management, and the Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials2, which provide further insights into the importance of stakeholder analysis in project management.