Free Cisco 300-215 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

TCPdumpis a CLI-based packet capture tool that is widely used for real-time traffic inspection and analysis on Unix/Linux systems.

TCPsharkis a variant CLI tool used similarly for packet analysis.

AlthoughWiresharkis a powerful network protocol analyzer, it requires a GUI. Therefore, it is not suitable for environments without a graphical interface.

The-hoption in theobjdumpcommand displayssection headersof an object file. According to general usage and command-line documentation, and also explained in digital forensics tools discussions in the CyberOps course, the header information includes details about the name, size, VMA, LMA, file offset, and alignment of each section in the object file. This helps analysts understand how data is stored and organized within compiled files during forensic examinations.

According to theCyberOps Technologies (CBRFIR) 300-215 study guidecurriculum, command-and-control (C2) communication is a strong indicator that a system has already been compromised and is actively under the control of an attacker. Sudden outbound traffic to high-risk regions and resolution of known malicious domains are high-confidence signs of an active threat. Therefore, prioritizing detection and disruption of this outbound traffic is critical to prevent further damage or data exfiltration.

While monitoring vulnerability exploitation (B) and gathering port scan data (D) are also valuable, they are more preventive or forensic in nature. The most immediate threat—and therefore the top priority—is stopping active C2 communications.

In cloud environments, investigators typically do not have access to the physical storage devices where the data resides. This restricts traditional forensic processes, such as imaging or direct disk access, which are commonly used in on-premises investigations.

To prevent macro-based attacks, the Cisco CyberOps study guide emphasizes the importance of limiting execution of unauthorized or unsigned macros. "Requiring that all macros be digitally signed and limiting execution only to those that meet the required trust level is a key mitigation strategy against malicious macros." Additionally, enabling features likeControlled Folder Accesshelps in protecting sensitive directories from unauthorized changes by untrusted applications, including those launched via malicious macros .

These two measures—enforcing signed macro policies and leveraging controlled folder access—directly help in mitigating the risk posed by embedded malicious macros in documents.

Volatility is an open-source memory forensics tool specifically designed for memory analysis. It allows forensic investigators to inspect memory dumps for running processes, hidden processes, injected code, and malicious activity in memory.

As per the Cisco CyberOps Associate study guide, “Volatility helps security professionals with both incident response and malware analysis. It can identify processes, registry artifacts, network connections, and memory-resident malware”.

While Memoryze (D) is also a memory analysis tool, Volatility is the more recognized, command-line driven tool used widely in industry and is directly highlighted in the curriculum.

When analyzing suspicious files in a sandbox environment, a security analyst focuses on identifying and evaluating their behavior in a controlled setting to confirm potential malicious activity:

Inspect processes (B): Observing the processes that the file spawns or injects into during execution helps identify malicious actions or privilege escalation. This is a crucial part of dynamic analysis in the sandbox environment.

Inspect PE header (E): The PE (Portable Executable) header contains metadata about how the file will execute on Windows systems. It reveals details such as the entry point, libraries used, and whether the file is suspiciously crafted or packed, which can be strong indicators of malicious behavior.

The other options (A, C, D) are important in the broader forensic analysis, but within thesandbox dynamic analysis, focusing on process behavior and file execution headers is critical for determining how the file interacts with the system and whether it is indeed malicious.

The Apache access logs in the exhibit show a sequence of HTTP requests and responses indicative of a malicious upload via WordPress:

A POST to:

/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php with parameters that include uploading r57.php (a known PHP web shell).

The uploaded file name appears as r57.php in:→ &name=%5B%5D=r57.php&FILES...

There are plugin installation and activation attempts, specifically for:

file-manager plugin:→ plugin=file-manager&...

Which is known to be vulnerable and exploited for file uploads.

GET requests to:

/wp-content/57.php and variations such as 57.php?28 — This suggests that r57.php was successfully uploaded and is being accessed.

These logs reveal that:

D. The attacker used the WordPress file manager plugin to upload r57.php — confirmed by plugin activity and file uploads.

B. The attacker uploaded the WordPress file manager trojan — as evidenced by the direct access to /wp-content/57.php (r57 shell variant).

Other options are invalid or speculative:

A is correct in identifying r57 as a web shell, but the logs don't show privilege escalation.

C mentions brute force and SQL injection, which are not indicated here.

E assumes legitimate access — logs suggest exploitation, not standard login.

In therecovery phase, the goal is to restore affected systems to normal operations and ensure the threat has been completely eradicated. According to the CyberOps Associate guide:

"This phase may include restoring data from clean backups, replacing compromised systems, and the re-installation of the Operating System (OS) and applications".

Also:

"During recovery, scanning hosts with updated antivirus and removing vulnerabilities ensures systems do not get reinfected".