Free PRINCE2 PRINCE2-Agile-Foundation Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Agile Foundation guidance clearly identifies Scrum as an iterative and timeboxed approach to product delivery, making option A the correct answer. Scrum is built around fixed-length iterations called sprints, which are typically one to four weeks long. These timeboxes create a regular cadence for planning, development, review, and improvement, enabling teams to deliver usable increments of a product frequently and predictably.

Scrum emphasizes iterative delivery by breaking complex work into smaller, manageable pieces that can be completed within a sprint. Each sprint begins with planning, where the team selects work from the product backlog, and ends with a review and retrospective. This structure supports frequent inspection of both the product and the team’s way of working, allowing for continuous adaptation based on feedback and learning. Agile Foundation documents highlight that timeboxing is a key mechanism in Scrum, helping teams focus, limit work in progress, and reduce risk.

Option B, Kanban, is not timeboxed. Kanban focuses on continuous flow, visualizing work, and limiting work in progress rather than delivering in fixed iterations. Option C, the Agilometer, is an assessment tool used to evaluate suitability and risks of Agile adoption, not a delivery approach. Option D, Lean, is a broader philosophy focused on eliminating waste and optimizing value flow; while it can influence Agile delivery, it is not inherently iterative and timeboxed in the way Scrum is.

Agile Foundation materials stress that Scrum’s iterative and timeboxed nature supports transparency, predictability, and early value delivery. By delivering small increments regularly, teams can gather feedback early, reduce uncertainty, and adapt priorities as needs change. This makes Scrum particularly effective in environments where requirements evolve and learning is essential.

Psychological safety is a critical enabler of effective Agile teams, and Agile Foundation materials often reference the four progressive levels of psychological safety: inclusion safety, learner safety, contributor safety, and challenger safety. Among these, contributor safety is the level that specifically encourages individuals to share their ideas, knowledge, and skills openly while making meaningful contributions to the team’s work.

Contributor safety exists when team members feel trusted and empowered to apply their skills, experience, and ideas without fear of embarrassment, rejection, or negative consequences. At this level, individuals are not only accepted as part of the team but are also encouraged to actively participate, take ownership of tasks, and contribute value. Agile environments rely heavily on this level of safety because collaboration, cross-functional work, and self-organization depend on people confidently sharing what they know and what they can do.

Option C, inclusion safety, is more foundational. It ensures that individuals feel accepted and respected as members of the group, but it does not necessarily mean they feel safe enough to contribute ideas or skills. Option D, learner safety, focuses on the ability to ask questions, experiment, and make mistakes in order to learn. While important, it centers on learning rather than contribution. Option A, challenger safety, represents the most advanced level, where individuals feel safe to challenge existing ideas, processes, and decisions. This goes beyond sharing skills and ideas into constructive dissent.

Agile Foundation guidance emphasizes contributor safety because Agile teams thrive when every member actively contributes to delivering value. When contributor safety is present, teams benefit from diverse perspectives, improved problem-solving, higher engagement, and stronger accountability. This level of psychological safety directly supports Agile principles such as collaboration, transparency, and continuous improvement, making option B the correct answer.

Agility is defined as the ability to embrace and respond to change quickly and effectively. It is a core principle of agile methods, enabling organizations and teams to adapt to evolving business needs, customer feedback, and external factors while delivering value continuously.

This definition contrasts with traditional change control, which often aims to prevent changes (C). Agility promotes flexibility, learning, and continuous improvement, but the belief that anyone is capable of learning (D), while important, is a cultural aspect rather than a direct definition of agility. The sequence of actions (A) relates more to processes than agility itself.

Understanding agility as the capacity to adapt ensures project approaches remain relevant in dynamic environments.

User inputs are initially gathered as user stories in the product backlog in PRINCE2 Agile. User stories represent small, customer-focused requirements that capture the "who," "what," and "why" of a feature. These stories form the foundation of requirements and quality criteria for the product and ensure that development is driven by user needs and value delivery.

The Definition of Done is developed later as part of the quality management approach to specify when work is complete. Epic user stories are larger features that can be broken down into smaller user stories. The quality register tracks quality-related activities but is not the first step for gathering user inputs.

Personas in PRINCE2 Agile serve as fictional, archetypal users representing the needs, behaviors, and goals of real users. In the business case practice, personas are used to identify and articulate specific user benefits. This ensures the project focuses on delivering value that meets the actual needs of different user groups.

By understanding personas, teams can tailor product features and prioritize requirements that provide meaningful benefits, thereby strengthening the business case and increasing stakeholder buy-in. Personas help clarify who will use the product, what problems they face, and how the solution delivers value.

Personas go beyond demographic grouping (A); they are detailed profiles including motivations and pain points. They do not relate directly to timelines (B) or product version differentiation (D).

Using personas aligns with agile principles of customer focus and continuous stakeholder engagement embedded in PRINCE2 Agile.

When transitioning from project delivery into business as usual (BAU), establishing regular feedback loops is crucial to ensure continual improvement. Feedback loops enable ongoing monitoring, learning, and adaptation of both products and processes post-transition. They provide mechanisms for capturing user experiences, operational issues, and evolving requirements that inform future iterations and enhancements.

Feedback loops can take many forms, such as user surveys, retrospectives, operational reviews, or service desk reports. Their regularity and structure ensure that BAU teams remain aligned with customer needs and organizational goals while adapting to changes effectively. This approach fosters a culture of continuous learning and agility even after the formal project has closed.

Providing access to Kanban or team boards (A) supports transparency and workflow management but is more tactical and internal to teams rather than a strategic approach to continuous improvement across BAU. Agreeing on SLAs (C) and KPIs (D) define performance and service targets but do not inherently drive feedback or improvement cycles without mechanisms for learning and response.

PRINCE2 Agile highlights the importance of feedback loops as part of the ‘progress’ and ‘quality’ practices extended into BAU to sustain value delivery.