Free CIPS L4M6 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Explanation

CIPS state the following reasons for the end of supplier relationships; the contract comes to a natural end, the contract is re-tendered, a material breach or the supplier becomes insolvent (p.15) In this case the only valid option is 'the contract has ended'.

Explanation

In an adversarial relationship "the outcome of the deal… is more important than maintaining the relationship over a long-term period" p.7. They can be characterised by poor communication and can be used for one-off purchases but be careful for words in answers such as 'only' and 'always', as these can be misleading; adversarial relationships aren't always for one-off purchases, and communication isn't always poor. The other answer is incorrect (price is more important) because it doesn't describe the relationship, which is what the question asked.

Explanation

Using technical jargon can lead to misunderstandings if not all parties understand the jargon. See p. 158 on communication issues

In the Norming stage of Tuckman’s model of team development, teams begin to resolve their differences, appreciate each other's strengths, and respect authority. Agreement on design and role assignment indicates the team has moved past conflict (Storming) and is now functioning collaboratively, although not yet fully productive (Performing).

Explanation

Designing the specification is not a stage in the relationship cycle- this would be done before the relationship begins. There are 6 stages of the relationship cycle; on-boarding, qualification,segmentation and risk management, performance management, development and innovation, phase out. P.13

Explanation

Unrestricted is not a type of tender. The 5 types are; open, restricted, competitive with negotiation, competitive dialogue and innovative partnership (though this last one is very rare in the public sector). The five types are explained in detail on p.77

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Effective conflict resolution involves:

Individual Meetings:Understanding the root cause of the conflict by discussing with each individual separately to determine if issues are personal or work-related.

Joint Meetings with Mutual Targets:Bringing the individuals together to set mutual goals can foster collaboration and reduce friction.

Avoiding the issue (Option D) or moving a team member (Option C) are not proactive solutions and may not address the underlying problem.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Early Supplier Involvement (ESI) refers to the practice of involving suppliers early in the product development process to leverage their expertise and capabilities. Cross-organisational involvement entails collaboration across various departments within the organization, such as procurement, engineering, manufacturing, and R&D, to ensure the product design is feasible and efficient for production.

Arranging a meeting to clarify roles and setting performance targets provides clear expectations and encourages accountability. This aligns with CIPS guidelines on managing conflicts through constructive engagement.

Explanation

This question is very, very similar to a real exam QUESTION NO: and is a really mean one. The CIPS study guide describes stages of team development as forming, storming, norming and performing. Of those listed in the book only forming is listed above. What the textbook fails to tell you is that some people add on two additional stages to this model which are mourning and adjourning. I strongly recommend doing some further reading on this (it’s called the Tuckman Group Development Model) as it comes up a lot in the exam and the study guide doesn’t really go into enough detail.