Free CIPS L4M5 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 9

The objective of the buyer here is to improve supplier cost structures over time, which requires them to have insight into supplier's current cost information. Purchase price cost analysis (PPCA) can help here. PPCA is a method for gathering, analysing and using price and cost information in a systematic way. The process allows the identification of future savings and opportunities to improve current costs.

STEEPLE analysis is used to analyse the macro environment that may have impact on an organisation.

Competitive rivalry is a part of Porter's Five Forces which is a tool for strategy making.

Volume concentration is a way to increase the purchasing quantities in order for a buying organisation to improve its leverage in negotiation.

“Expanding the pie” is a strategy used in integrative negotiations where both parties collaborate to increase the total value available before dividing it. This leads to mutual gains and supports long-term, strategic relationships.

According to the book 'Influencing: Skills and techniques for business success' by Fiona Dent and Mike Brent, there are two major influencing styles. Push tends to be directive. It tells, and is clear and resolute, but needs to be employed in situations where firmness is required because of difficulties that exist or weakness is evident. Pull is more participatory and collaborative. It seeks to incorporate everyone’s perspective. It can appear wishy-washy if not skilfully employed. Thatapproach should be followed which is most likely to secure commitment and not mere compliance.

The two divisions can be further divided into four style categories: directive; persuasive reasoning; collaborative – team oriented, people oriented to inspire them with a vision. The directive style relies on your expertise and reputation being respected by others, and where there really does seem to be one answer. It is "I" driven whereas persuasive reasoning is more "we" and issue driven. Directive styles can make the user appear as "a bull in a china shop"; persuasive reasoning can be portrayed as tough guy.

Collaborative influencing takes the "we" element further and seeks to mobilise everyone’s ideas in a journey of discovery. It may have the flavour of "I’m your best friend", which may not go down too well. Visioning style is concerned to stir people’s emotions in support of achieving an objective. This last one has been used by demagogues to stir people’s hearts and minds for evil purposes as well as good.

A useful table offers the benefits, problems, words and body language associated with each style along with advice on when to use and when to avoid each. Cases and exercises illustrate these styles.

Empathy comes in for extended treatment with the definition of "standing in the other's shoes". This does not necessarily happen just intuitively, and therefore before a specific influencing effort there should be an intense effort to think about the other person or persons and to sense what it might feel like to be them – their hopes, fears, concerns, what turns them on, what turns them off, where are they coming from.

The analysis of cost into fixed and variable enables organisations to determine their break-even point (BE) - the point where total revenue from sales and total cost exactly balance. All costs need to be covered by sale revenue in order for a company to make a profit. If you know your fixed costs and your variable costs then you can work out the minimum quantity of goods or services you need to sell to break even. Break even point is measured in volume and can be worked out graphically or via formulae:

Price - Variable costs = Contribution

Break even point (volume) = Fixed expenses/Contribution margin per unit

In this scenario, the break even point (Q) is: 270,000/(180-126) = 5,000

To make a profit, the supplier needs to sell more than 5,000 units per month.

The BE point is thus an important determinant of flexibility of pricing for suppliers. Before BE is achieved there will be much greater reluctance to offer price concessions to customers than after BE is achieved.

LO 2, AC 2.1

A business negotiation agenda is a formal agreed upon list of goals to be achieved or items to be discussed in a particular order during a meeting or negotiation. Agendas can be formal and obvious, or informal and subtle in negotiations.

The agenda is one of the main structural elements of negotiation, in addition to such questions as site, identification of participants, and elements of timing. Together, they answer the who, what, when, and where questions. As with other aspects of negotiation, the agenda can be used either manipulatively to enhance leverage or to improve the prospects for agreement and the possibilities for mutual gain. In most cases, it will be used both ways, reflecting the nature of negotiation as a “mixed-motive” situation.

Although it can be instrumental to [research] volunteer as a sole source to write the agenda, in most cases it becomes a joint activity to construct a consensual basis for subsequent negotiation. In these situations, agenda-building becomes one of the pre-negotiation activities that set the tone for the relationship (Saunders, 1985). In other situations, the parties may engage in actual negotiation without a formal or written agenda. When this occurs, the risks and uncertainties may be high but the party who appreciates the importance of the informal agenda has a tremendous advantage.

Whether one plans it or not, during the course of negotiation the parties will discuss a finite set of issues in some sequence and from a particular perceptual framework. Consciousness of the universality and centrality of the agenda is prerequisite to guiding negotiation to a successful conclusion.

Essentially, for trained negotiators under most circumstances, the physical locations of negotiations and the room layout should not make much difference to the outcomes of the meeting. It is reasonable to assume that most commercial negotiations are based at least initially on a principled- or pragmatic-type approach. It is arguable also that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

Having a BATNA:

Increases assertiveness (A): Knowing the fallback position empowers the buyer to negotiate more confidently.

Reduces the chance of a poor agreement (B): A BATNA ensures the buyer does not feel pressured to accept suboptimal terms.

Identifies walk-away points (F): It sets a clear boundary, allowing the buyer to exit negotiations if terms don’t meet minimum requirements.

These align with CIPS’s guidance on using BATNA to strengthen negotiation strategies.

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of dealer style are described below:

LO 2, AC 2.4

The bargaining power of buyers increases when the buyer is large relative to the supplier. A large buyer can leverage its size to negotiate more favorable terms due to its significant impact on the supplier's business. CIPS notes that a buyer’s size and purchasing volume are key factors that enhance its negotiating power in buyer-supplier relationships.