Free APICS CPIM-8.0 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Finite loading is a capacity planning approach that takes into account the available capacity of the resources and does not allow overloading. It considers adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization, which means that it can change the start or end dates of the operations to avoid exceeding the capacity limits. This way, finite loading ensures that the production schedule is realistic and feasible. Other capacity planning approaches, such as infinite loading, do not consider adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization. Infinite loading ignores the capacity constraints and schedules the operations based on the due dates and the lead times, regardless of the resource availability. This may result in overloading the resources and causing delays or disruptions in the production process. Therefore, the fundamental difference between finite loading and other capacity planning approaches is that finite loading considers adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization, while other approaches do not. References:

CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 48

The Difference Between Finite Capacity Scheduling and Infinite Capacity Loading

FINITE LOADING

Creating short-term wins is a useful element in the change process because it helps to build momentum, motivate the team, and overcome resistance. Short-term wins are concrete achievements that demonstrate the benefits of the change and provide evidence that the efforts are paying off. They also help to create a sense of urgency and alignment among the stakeholders involved in the change process. Calculating a break-even point, performing a SWOT analysis, and developing key performance indicators (KPIs) are all important tools for planning and evaluating the change process, but they are not as effective as creating short-term wins in generating support and commitment for the change. References: Change Management: The Kotter Model, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

A cellular layout is a workplace organization in which processes are organized by the product or product family, rather than by the type of work (function). A cellular layout consists of cells, which are groups of machines or workstations that are located close to each other and perform all the operations required for a product or product family. A cellular layout has several advantages over a functional layout, such as reduced material handling, improved quality, increased flexibility, and enhanced employee involvement. One of the main benefits of a cellular layout is that products will have faster throughput. Throughput is the rate at which products are produced and delivered to the customers. A cellular layout can increase the throughput by reducing the travel distance, the waiting time, and the setup time for the products. A cellular layout can also improve the production flow, the synchronization, and the visibility of the products. The other options are not correct, as they are not the typical benefits of switching from a functional to a cellular layout, but rather possible drawbacks or trade-offs of switching from a functional to a cellular layout:

Equipment utilization will be higher: This is unlikely to be true, as a cellular layout may result in lower equipment utilization than a functional layout. Equipment utilization is the ratio of the actual output of a machine to its maximum possible output. A cellular layout may reduce the equipment utilization by dedicating some machines to specific products or product families, which may limit the sharing of machines across different products or product families. A cellular layout may also reduce the equipment utilization by balancing the workload among the machines within a cell, which may prevent some machines from operating at their full capacity.

Quality inspections will be reduced: This may or may not be true, depending on the quality level and the quality control system of the production process. A cellular layout may reduce the quality inspections by improving the quality of the products, as the workers in a cell are more responsible, skilled, and empowered to perform the operations and to detect and correct the defects. However, a cellular layout may also increase the quality inspections by requiring more frequent and rigorous checks of the products, as the products move from one cell to another or from one stage to another.

Capital expenditures will be reduced: This is unlikely to be true, as a cellular layout may result in higher capital expenditures than a functional layout. Capital expenditures are the costs of acquiring or upgrading the fixed assets, such as machines, equipment, or facilities. A cellular layout may increase the capital expenditures by requiring more machines or equipment to create the cells, especially if the machines or equipment are specialized or customized for specific products or product families. A cellular layout may also increase the capital expenditures by requiring more space or facilities to accommodate the cells, especially if the cells are dispersed or isolated from each other. References:

[CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Topic 4 - Sustainability]

Cellular Manufacturing: Definition, Examples & Advantages — Katana

Cellular or Functional Layout? - IGI Global

Functional Layout - Velaction

What is cell layout? - Studybuff.com

Mixed-model scheduling is a technique that allows multiple products to be produced on the same assembly line without changeovers, and then sequences those products in a way that smoothes the demand for upstream components12. In this case, the company is using mixed-model scheduling to produce three different products (A, B, and C) on the same line, and then alternating them in a pattern that minimizes the variation in the workload and the inventory levels. The other options are not correct because:

•Matrix scheduling is a technique that assigns tasks to workers based on their skills and availability3.

•Synchronized scheduling is a technique that coordinates the production and delivery of materials and components to match the demand of the final assembly4.

•Line balancing is a technique that distributes the workload evenly among the workers or machines on a production line5. References := 1 Create Mixed Model Flow in 5 Steps | Industrial Equipment News 2 Mixed Model Scheduling - Mountain Home Academy 3 Matrix Scheduling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 4 Synchronized Scheduling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 5 Line Balancing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

Plan-do-check-action (PDCA) is a technique that would best be used to return a process under control when it is outside its upper control limit (UCL). PDCA is a four-step cycle of continuous improvement that involves planning a change, implementing the change, checking the results, and acting on the findings. PDCA can help identify and eliminate the root causes of variation, improve the process performance, and prevent the recurrence of problems. PDCA is also known as the Deming cycle or the Shewhart cycle. References:

Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Quality Management, Section 9.3: Quality Improvement, Subsection 9.3.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 8: Quality, Technology and Continuous Improvement, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement, Subsection 8.2.1: Continuous Improvement Concepts, Subsubsection 8.2.1.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle