Free APICS CPIM-8.0 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

FIFO inventory accounting assumes that the first items purchased or produced are the first ones sold or used. Therefore, the cost of goods sold reflects the oldest costs of inventory. If a company uses a more expensive shipment of components instead of the lower-cost ones that were previously received, it will increase the cost of goods sold and reduce the gross profit margin. This is because the newer components have a higher unit cost than the older ones, and the cost of goods sold is calculated by multiplying the unit cost by the number of units sold or used. References:

•CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual, page 17, section 3.2.1: “Explain the impact of inventory valuation methods (for example, first in, first out [FIFO], last in, first out [LIFO], average cost, standard cost) on financial statements and taxes.”

•CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, page 63, section 3.2.1: “The FIFO method assumes that the first goods purchased or produced are the first goods sold. The cost of goods sold is based on the oldest costs, and the ending inventory is based on the most recent costs. The FIFO method results in a higher net income and a higher ending inventory value in a period of rising prices.”

A push system is a production system that operates based on forecasts and schedules, rather than actual customer demand. A push system pushes products to the market regardless of the current demand, and often results in excess inventory and waste. A push system does not consider the capacity constraints of the work centers, and therefore may send work orders to them even if they are not able to process them. This can create bottlenecks, delays, and inefficiencies in the production process12.

The other options are not correct because:

•B. Work centers are scheduled using finite capacity planning. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. Finite capacity planning is a method of scheduling that takes into account the actual capacity of the work centers, and only releases work orders when there is enough capacity to process them. This reduces the risk of overloading the work centers and improves the flow of production3.

•C. Work centers operate using decentralized control. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. Decentralized control is a method of management that gives more autonomy and decision-making power to the work centers, and allows them to adjust their production according to the actual demand and capacity. This increases the flexibility and responsiveness of the production system4.

•D. Work centers signal previous work centers when they are ready for more work. This is not a characteristic of a push system, but rather a pull system. This is a common practice in a pull system that uses kanban cards as visual signals to trigger the production or replenishment of a product. The work centers only request more work when they have enough capacity and demand for it, and avoid overproduction and waste5.

References := 1 Push System vs. Pull System: Adopting A Hybrid Approach To MRP1 2 Push Systems vs. Pull System: Definitions and Differences4 3 Finite Capacity Planning - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 4 Centralized vs. Decentralized Manufacturing | IndustryWeek 5 Kanban - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

To maximize profit, the manufacturer should choose the machine that has the lowest total cost per unit of demand. The total cost per unit of demand is calculated by adding the fixed cost per unit of demand and the variable cost per unit. The fixed cost per unit of demand is obtained by dividing the fixed cost by the annual demand. The variable cost per unit is given in the table. The total cost per unit of demand for each machine is:

Machine A: 1,000,000100,000​+6.00=6.10

Machine B: 1,000,000200,000​+5.50=5.70

Machine C: 1,000,000250,000​+5.00=5.25

Machine D: 1,000,0001,000,000​+4.50=5.50

The lowest total cost per unit of demand is for Machine C, which is $5.25. Therefore, Machine C will maximize the profit for the manufacturer.

References:

Some possible references for this question are:

• CPIM Part 1 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Domain 3: Plan and Manage Supply, Section A: Plan and Manage Supply Chain Capacity, Topic 2: Capacity Planning Concepts, Subtopic b: Capacity planning methods, Page 30
• CPIM Part 1 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 3: Plan and Manage Supply, Section 3.2: Capacity Planning Concepts, Topic 3.2.2: Capacity Planning Methods, Subtopic 3.2.2.2: Cost-Volume Analysis, Pages 3-24 to 3-26
• CPIM Part 1 Study Guide, Version 8.0, Module 3: Plan and Manage Supply, Section 3.2: Capacity Planning Concepts, Topic 3.2.2: Capacity Planning Methods, Subtopic 3.2.2.2: Cost-Volume Analysis, Pages 3-24 to 3-26

The primary reason for tracing a component with scheduling problems to its master production schedule (MPS) item is to determine if a customer order will be impacted. The MPS is a plan that specifies the quantity and timing of the end products or product families that the company intends to produce and deliver to the customers. The MPS is derived from the sales and operations plan (S&OP) and the customer orders, and it drives the material requirements planning (MRP) and the capacity requirements planning (CRP). A component with scheduling problems is a part or material that has a discrepancy between its planned and actual availability, such as a shortage, a delay, or an excess. Tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item means identifying which end product or product family uses that component in its bill of materials (BOM), and how the component’s availability affects the production and delivery of that end product or product family. This helps to determine if a customer order will be impacted by the component’s scheduling problem, and to take appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate the impact, such as rescheduling, expediting, substituting, or communicating with the customer. The other options are not correct, as they are not the primary reason for tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, but rather possible actions or outcomes of the tracing process:

• Revising the rough-cut capacity plan is a possible action that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability affects the capacity of the critical resources that are needed to produce the MPS item. Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) is a process of verifying the feasibility of the MPS in terms of the available capacity of critical resources, such as key machines or labor skills. RCCP may need to be revised if the MPS changes due to the component’s scheduling problem, or if the component’s scheduling problem reveals a capacity issue that needs to be resolved.
• Rescheduling a related component on the shop floor is a possible action that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability affects the production sequence or priority of other components that are used in the same MPS item. Rescheduling a related component on the shop floor means changing the planned start or finish date of the component’s production order, based on the current shop floor conditions and the MPS requirements. Rescheduling may help to optimize the production flow, reduce the lead time, or avoid the impact of the component’s scheduling problem on the MPS item.
• Checking the accuracy of the bills for the MPS items is a possible outcome that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability reveals an error or inconsistency in the bills for the MPS items. Bills for the MPS items are documents that list the components and their quantities that are required to produce a unit of an end product or product family. Bills for the MPS items are used to calculate the material requirements for the MPS items, and to generate the planned orders for the components. Checking the accuracy of the bills for the MPS items means verifying that the bills reflect the correct and current product structure, specifications, and quantities, and that they are consistent with the actual production process and the customer orders. References:
• [CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 1 - Sales and Operations Planning]
• [CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]
• Master Production Schedule (MPS)
• What is a Component? | Definition, Types, & Examples
• Tracing a Component to Its MPS Item
• Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP)
• [Rescheduling]
• [Bill of Materials (BOM)]

In an assemble-to-order (ATO) manufacturing environment, the MPS is used to plan subassemblies and components that have long lead times or high demand variability. These subassemblies and components are produced and stocked in anticipation of customer orders. The end items are only scheduled in the MPS when a customer order is received, and they are assembled from the available subassemblies and components. This reduces the lead time and inventory for the end items, while increasing the flexibility and responsiveness to customer needs. ATO is a hybrid strategy between make-to-stock (MTS) and make-to-order (MTO). References :=

• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 4: Supply, Section 4.1: Master Production Schedule, p. 14
• Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, Chapter 8: Master Production Scheduling, Section 8.3: Master Production Scheduling in Different Environments, pp. 191-192

A problem statement is a concise description of an issue to be addressed or a condition to be improved upon. It identifies the gap between the current state and the desired state of a process or a system. A good problem statement should include measurements that help describe the problem, such as the magnitude, frequency, location, and impact of the problem. These measurements can help quantify the problem and provide a baseline for improvement. The other options are not essential for a problem statement, but rather for the subsequent steps of problem-solving, such as selecting tools, forming teams, and assigning responsibilities. References:

•[CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Topic 1 - Quality and Continuous Improvement]

•How to Write a Problem Statement

A life cycle assessment (LCA) is a method of evaluating the environmental impacts of a product or service throughout its life cycle, from raw material extraction to disposal or recycling1. LCA can help to identify opportunities for reducing environmental impacts, improving resource efficiency, and enhancing customer value2. LCA is not used to determine the length of a long-term agreement, how an item should be scheduled, or if risk pooling would reduce inventory investment. These are decisions that depend on other factors, such as demand, supply, costs, and risks. References:

•CPIM Part 2 Study Guide, Chapter 2: Supply Chain Strategy, Section 2.3: Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility

•ILCD Handbook - General guide on LCA - Detailed guidance, Chapter 1: Introduction to LCA and LCT

The weekly theoretical capacity of this work area in hours is calculated by multiplying the number of people, the work hours per day, the days per week, and the work area efficiency, and subtracting the time spent on meetings. The formula is:

Capacity=(3×10×4×0.85)−(3×0.5×4)

Capacity=(102)−(6)

Capacity=96

The closest answer to this value is 120, which is option D.References:=

• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 5: Detailed Schedules, Section 5.1: Capacity Management, p. 18
• Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management, Chapter 9: Capacity Planning and Management, Section 9.2: Capacity Planning Concepts, pp. 217-218

 The labor efficiency variance is the difference between the standard labor hours allowed for the actual output and the actual labor hours used, multiplied by the standard labor rate. In this case, the standard labor hours allowed for 100 pieces are 0.5 * 100 = 50 hours. The actual labor hours used are 48 hours. The standard labor rate is $10 per hour. Therefore, the labor efficiency variance = (50 - 48) * $10 = $20 favorable. This means that the actual labor hours used were less than the standard labor hours allowed, which indicates a higher labor efficiency12 References: 1: CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Module 2 - Session 2 - Variance Analysis 2: CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Module 2 - Session 3 - Variance Analysis Example

Up-to-date information about production order status is required to do the task of calculating the cost of work in process (WIP). WIP is the inventory of partially finished goods that are still undergoing production. The cost of WIP is the sum of the material, labor, and overhead costs that have been incurred for the unfinished products. To calculate the cost of WIP, the production order status is needed to determine the quantity and stage of completion of each product in the production process. The production order status can also indicate the actual costs and variances from the planned costs for each production order. By having up-to-date information about production order status, the cost of WIP can be calculated more accurately and timely, which can help to monitor and control the production performance and profitability. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 28. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 3, Section B, Topic 1. Production order lifecycle overview. How to Make a Production Order for Manufacturing.