Free Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 14

company need to setup a cheaper connection (200 M) but B is incorrect because you can only order port speeds of 1, 10, or 100 Gbps for more flexibility you can go with hosted connection, You can order port speeds between 50 Mbps and 10 Gbps.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-vpc-connectivity-options/aws-direct-connect.html

Amazon Macie can also send its findings to Amazon EventBridge, which is a serverless event bus that makes it easy to connect applications using data from a variety of sources. You can create an EventBridge rule that filters the SensitiveData event type from Macie findings and sends an Amazon SNS notification to the security team. Amazon SNS is a fully managed messaging service that enables you to send messages to subscribers or other applications.References:https://docs.aws.amazon.com/macie/latest/userguide/macie-findings.html#macie-findings-eventbridge

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/ses/latest/dg/send-email-formatted.html

D. Create an Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) scheduled event that invokes an AWS Lambda function to query the application's API for the data. This step can be done using AWS Lambda to extract the shipping statistics and organize the data into an HTML format.

B. Use Amazon Simple Email Service (Amazon SES) to format the data and send the report by email. This step can be done by using Amazon SES to send the report to multiple email addresses at the same time every morning.

Therefore, options D and B are the correct choices for this question. Option A is incorrect because Kinesis Data Firehose is not necessary for this use case. Option C is incorrect because AWS Glue is not required to query the application's API. Option E is incorrect because S3 event notifications cannot be used to send the report by email.

To design the API Gateway URL with the company's domain name and corresponding certificate, the company needs to do the following: 1. Create a Regional API Gateway endpoint: This will allow the company to create an endpoint that is specific to a region. 2. Associate the API Gateway endpoint with the company's domain name: This will allow the company to use its own domain name for the API Gateway URL. 3. Import the public certificate associated with the company's domain name into AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) in the same Region: This will allow the company to use HTTPS for secure communication withits APIs. 4. Attach the certificate to the API Gateway endpoint: This will allow the company to use the certificate for securing the API Gateway URL. 5. Configure Route 53 to route traffic to the API Gateway endpoint: This will allow the company to use Route 53 to route traffic to the API Gateway URL using the company's domain name.

A cluster placement group is a logical grouping of EC2 instances within a single Availability Zone that are placed close together to minimize network latency. This is suitable for latency-sensitive HPC workloads that require high network performance. A compute optimized EC2 instance is an instance type that has a high ratio of vCPUs to memory, which is ideal for compute-intensive applications. Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP is a fully managed service that provides NFS and SMB multi-protocol access from the file system, as well as features such as data deduplication, compression, thin provisioning, and snapshots. This solution will meet the requirements with the least latency, as it leverages the low-latency network and storage performance of AWS.

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to migrate the container application to AWS with minimal changes and leverage a managed service to run the Kubernetes cluster and the message queue. By using Amazon EKS, the company can run the container application on a fully managed Kubernetes control plane that is compatible with the existingKubernetes tools and plugins. Amazon EKS handles the provisioning, scaling, patching, and security of the Kubernetes cluster, reducing the operational overhead and complexity. By using Amazon MQ, the company can use a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols. Amazon MQ handles the administration, maintenance, and scaling of the message broker, ensuring high availability, durability, and security of the messages.

A. Migrate the container application to Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not optimal because it requires the company to change the container orchestration platform from Kubernetes to ECS, which can introduce additional complexity and risk. Moreover, it requires the company to change the messaging protocol from AMQP to SQS, which can also affect the application logic and performance. Amazon ECS and Amazon SQS are both fully managed services that simplify the deployment and management of containers and messages, but they may not be compatible with the existing application architecture and requirements.

C. Use highly available Amazon EC2 instances to run the application Use Amazon MQ to retrieve the messages. This option is not ideal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the container application. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs. Moreover, the company would need to install and maintain the Kubernetes software on the EC2 instances, which can also add complexity and risk. Amazon MQ is a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols, but it cannot compensate for the lack of a managed Kubernetes service.

D. Use AWS Lambda functions to run the application Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not feasible because AWS Lambda does not support running container applications directly. Lambda functions are executed in a sandboxed environment that is isolated from other functions and resources. To run container applications on Lambda, the company would need to use a custom runtime or a wrapper library that emulates the container API, which can introduce additional complexity and overhead. Moreover, Lambda functions have limitations in terms of available CPU, memory, and runtime, which may not suit the application needs. Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queue service that supports asynchronous communication, but it does not support AMQP or other messaging protocols.

This solution meets the requirements because it allows the company to use both predictive scaling and dynamic scaling to optimize the capacity of its Auto Scaling group. Predictive scaling uses machine learning to analyze historical data and forecast future traffic patterns. It then adjusts the desired capacity of the group in advance of the predicted changes. Dynamic scaling uses target tracking to maintain a specified metric (such as CPU utilization) at a target value. It scales the group in or out as needed to keep the metric close to the target. By using both scaling methods, the company can benefitfrom faster, simpler, and more accurate scaling that responds to both forecasted and live changes in utilization.

https://www.quora.com/How-can-I-use-DynamoDB-for-storing-metadata-for-Amazon-S3-objects

This solution meets the requirements of scalability, performance, and availability. AWS Lambda can process the photos in parallel and scale up or down automatically depending on the demand. Amazon S3 can store the photos and metadata reliably and durably, and provide high availability and low latency. DynamoDB can store the metadata efficiently and provide consistent performance. This solution also reduces the cost and complexity of managing EC2 instances and EBS volumes.

Option A is incorrect because storing the photos in DynamoDB is not a good practice, as it can increase the storage cost and limit the throughput. Option B is incorrect because Kinesis Data Firehose is not designed for processing photos, but for streaming data to destinations such as S3 or Redshift. Option D is incorrect because increasing the number of EC2 instances and usingProvisioned IOPS SSD volumes does not guarantee scalability, as it depends on the load balancer and the application code. It also increases the cost and complexity of managing the infrastructure.

AWS DataSync is a data transfer service that simplifies, automates, and accelerates moving data between on-premises storage systems and AWS storage services over the internet or AWS Direct Connect1. AWS DataSync can transfer data to Amazon FSx for Windows File Server, which is a fully managed file system that is accessible over the industry-standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is builton Windows Server, delivering a wide range of administrative features suchas user quotas, end-user file restore, and Microsoft Active Directory (AD) integration2. This solution meets the requirements of the question because:

It can migrate more than 100 TB of data to AWS within a reasonable time frame, as AWS DataSync is optimized for high-speed and efficient data transfer1.

It can preserve the intricate directory structure and the millions of small files stored in deep hierarchies of subfolders, as AWS DataSync can handle complex file structures and metadata, such as file names, permissions, and timestamps1.

It can avoid changing the applications to access the data after migration, as Amazon FSx for Windows FileServer supports the same SMB protocol and Windows Server features that the company’s on-premises file storage uses2.

It can reduce the operational overhead, as AWS DataSync and Amazon FSx for Windows File Server are fully managed services that handle the tasks of setting up, configuring, and maintaining the data transfer and the file system12.

The most suitable solution for the company’s requirements is to enable Default Host Configuration Management in Systems Manager to manage the EC2 instances. This solution will allow the company to patch the EC2 instances without disrupting the running applications and without manually creating or modifying IAM roles or users.

Default Host Configuration Management is a feature of AWS Systems Manager that enables Systems Manager to manage EC2 instances automatically as managed instances. A managed instance is an EC2 instance that is configured for use with Systems Manager. The benefits of managing instances with Systems Manager include the following:

Connect to EC2 instances securely using Session Manager.

Perform automated patch scans using Patch Manager.

View detailed information about instances using Systems Manager Inventory.

Track and manage instances using Fleet Manager.

Keep SSM Agent up to date automatically.

Default Host Configuration Management makes it possible to manage EC2 instances without having to manually create an IAM instance profile. Instead, Default Host Configuration Management creates and applies a default IAM role to ensure that Systems Manager has permissions to manage all instances in the Region and account where it is activated.If thepermissions provided are not sufficient for the use case, the default IAM role can be modified or replaced with a custom role1.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Creating a new IAM role, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the new IAM role, and attaching the new IAM role and the existing IAM role to the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM roles, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.The AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy is a managed policy that grants permissions for Systems Manager core functionality2. Creating an IAM user, attaching the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the IAM user, and configuring Systems Manager to use the IAM user to manage the EC2 instances is not correct because this solution requires manual creation and management of IAM users, which adds complexity and cost to the solution.An IAM user is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a single person or application3. Removing the existing policies from the existing IAM role and adding the AmazonSSMManagedInstanceCore policy to the existing IAM role is not correct because this solution may disrupt the running applications that rely on the existing policies for accessing RDS databases.An IAM role is an identity within an AWS account that has specific permissions for a service or entity4.

These options are the most suitable ways to design a shared storage solution for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones and requires strong consistency. Option B uses Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) as a shared file system that can be mounted on multiple EC2 instances in different Availability Zones. Amazon EFS provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for file-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the file system are immediately visible to all clients. Option E uses Amazon S3 as a shared object store that can store the web content and serve it through Amazon CloudFront, a content delivery network (CDN). Amazon S3 provides high availability, durability, scalability, and performance for object-based workloads. It also supports strong consistency for read-after-write and list operations, which means that any changes made to the objects are immediately visible to all clients. By setting the metadata for the Cache-Control header to no-cache, the web content can be prevented from being cached by the browsers or the CDN edge locations, ensuring that the latest content is always delivered to the users.

Option A is not suitable because using AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway as a shared storage solution for a web application is not efficient or scalable. AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides block storage volumes that can be mounted on-premises or on EC2 instances as iSCSI devices. It is useful for migrating or backing up data to AWS, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using Volume Gateway would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services.

Option C is not suitable because creating a shared Amazon EBS volume and mounting it on multiple EC2 instances is not possible or reliable. Amazon EBS is a block storage service that provides persistent and high-performance volumes for EC2 instances. However, EBS volumescan only be attached to one EC2 instance at a time, and they are constrained to a single Availability Zone. Therefore, creating a shared EBS volume for a web application that is deployed across multiple Availability Zones is not feasible. Moreover, EBS volumes do not support strong consistency, which means that any changes made to the volume may not be immediately visible to other clients.

Option D is not suitable because using AWS DataSync to perform continuous synchronization of data between EC2 hosts in the Auto Scaling group is not efficient or scalable. AWS DataSync is a data transfer service that helps you move large amounts of data to and from AWS storage services. It is useful for migrating or archiving data, but it is not designed for serving web content or providing strong consistency. Moreover, using DataSync would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native AWS storage services. References:

What Is Amazon Elastic File System?

What Is Amazon Simple Storage Service?

What Is Amazon CloudFront?

What Is AWS Storage Gateway?

What Is Amazon Elastic Block Store?

What Is AWS DataSync?

AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that lets you run code without provisioning or managing servers. You can use Lambda to create and test microservices that are written in Python or other supported languages. Lambda scales automatically to handle the number of requests per second. You only pay for the compute time you consume. Lambda also integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon API Gateway, Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, and Amazon SQS, to enable event-driven architectures. Lambda has minimal infrastructure andoperational overhead, as you do not need to manage servers, operating systems, patches, or scaling policies.

The other options are not serverless solutions and require more infrastructure and operational support. They also do not scale automatically to handle the number of requests per second. A Spot Fleet is a collection of EC2 instances that run on spare capacity at low prices. However, Spot Instances can be interrupted by AWS at any time, which can affect the availability and performance of your microservice. AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a service that automates the deployment and management of web applications on EC2 instances. However, you still need to provision, configure, and monitor the underlying EC2 instances and load balancers. Amazon EKS is a service that runs Kubernetes on AWS. However, you still need to create, configure, and manage the EC2 instances that form the Kubernetes cluster and nodes. You also need to install and update the Kubernetes software and tools.

To ensure that the shopping cart data is preserved at all times, a solutions architect should configure Amazon ElastiCache for Redis to cache catalog data from Amazon DynamoDB and shopping cart data from the user’s session. This solution has the following benefits:

It offers the lowest possible latency from the application, as ElastiCache for Redis is a blazing fast in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency to power internet-scale real-time applications1.

It scales with traffic volume, as ElastiCache for Redis supports horizontal scaling by adding more nodes or shards to the cluster, and vertical scaling by changing the node type2.

It ishighly available, as ElastiCache for Redis supports replication across multiple Availability Zones and automatic failover in case of a primary node failure3.

It preserves user session data even if the user is disconnected and reconnects, as ElastiCache for Redis can store session data, such as user login information and shopping cart contents, in a persistent and durable manner using snapshots or AOF (append-only file) persistence4.

AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that allows you to seamlessly integrate your on-premises applications with AWS cloud storage. Volume Gateway is a type of Storage Gateway that presents cloud-backed iSCSI block storage volumes to your on-premises applications. Volume Gateway operates in either cache mode or stored mode. In cache mode, your primary data is stored in Amazon S3, while retaining your frequently accessed data locally in the cache for low latency access. In stored mode, your primary data is stored locally and your entire dataset is available for low latency access on premises while also asynchronously getting backed up to Amazon S3.

For the pharmaceutical company’s use case, cache mode is the most suitable option, as it meets the following requirements:

It reduces the need to scale the on-premises storage infrastructure, as most of the data is stored in Amazon S3, which is scalable, durable, and cost-effective.

It provides low latency access to the subset of the data that the researchers regularly require, as it is cached locally in the Storage Gateway appliance.

It does not require the entire dataset to be accessed on a daily basis, as it is stored in Amazon S3 and can be retrieved on demand.

It offers flexible data protection and recovery options, as it allows taking point-in-time copies of the volumes using AWS Backup, which are stored in AWS as Amazon EBS snapshots.

Therefore, the solutions architect should recommend deploying an AWS Storage Gateway volume gateway with cached volumes with an Amazon S3 bucket as the target storage and migrating the data to the Storage Gateway appliance.

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to decouple the analytics software from the user requests and scale the EC2 instances dynamically based on the demand. By using Amazon SQS, the company can create a queue that stores the user requests and acts as a buffer between the users and the analytics software. This way, the software can process the requests at its own pace without losing any data or overloading the EC2 instances. By using EC2 Auto Scaling, the company cancreate an Auto Scaling group that launches or terminates EC2 instances automatically based on the size of the queue. This way, the company can ensure that there are enough instances to handle the load and optimize the cost and performance of the system. By updating the software to read from the queue, the company can enable the analytics software to consume the requests from the queue and process the data from Amazon S3.

A. Create a copy of the instance Place all instances behind an Application Load Balancer. This option is not optimal because it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An Application Load Balancer can distribute the incoming traffic across multiple instances, but it cannot scale the instances based on the load or reduce the processing time of the analytics software. Moreover, this option can incur additional costs for the load balancer and the extra instances.

B. Create an S3 VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 Update the software to reference the endpoint. This option is not effective because it does not solve the issue of the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An S3 VPC endpoint can enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3 without going through the internet, which can improve the network performance and security. However, it cannot reduce the processing time of the analytics software or scale the instances based on the load.

C. Stop the EC2 instances. Modify the instance type to one with a more powerful CPU and more memory. Restart the instances. This option is not scalable because it does not account for the variability of the user load. Changing the instance type to a more powerful one can improve the performance of the analytics software, but it cannot adjust the number of instances based on the demand. Moreover, this option can increase the cost of the system and cause downtime during the instance modification.

The most suitable solution for the company’s compliance policy is to enable the restricted-ssh AWS Config managed rule and generate an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) notification when a noncompliant rule is created. This solution has the least operational overheadbecause it uses a predefined rule that is already available in AWS Config, which is a service that enables users to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of their AWS resources. The restricted-ssh rule checks whether security groups that are in use have inbound rules that allow SSH from 0.0.0.0/0 addresses, and reports them as noncompliant1. Users can configure the rule to send notifications to an Amazon SNS topic when a noncompliant change occurs, and subscribe to the topic to receive alerts via email, SMS, or other methods2.

The other options are not correct because they either have more operational overhead or do not meet the requirements. Writing an AWS Lambda script that monitors security groups for SSH being open to 0.0.0.0/0 addresses and creates a notification every time it finds one is not correct because it requires custom code development and maintenance, which adds complexity and cost to the solution. Creating an IAM role with permissions to globally open security groups and network ACLs, and creating an Amazon SNS topic to generate a notification every time the role is assumed by a user is not correct because it does not prevent or detect the creation of noncompliant rules by other users or roles, and it does not address the existing rules that may violate the policy. Configuring a service control policy (SCP) that prevents non-administrative users from creating or editing security groups, and creating a notification in the ticketing system when a user requests a rule that needs administrator permissions is not correct because it does not provide an automated solution for the policy enforcement and notification, and it may limit the flexibility and productivity of the users.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is operationally efficient, as it only requires one activation of the cost allocation tag and one creation of the cost report from the management account, which has access to all the member accounts’ data and billing preferences.

It is consistent, as it uses the AWS-defined cost allocation tag named department, which is automatically applied to resources when the company creates tags using the tagging policy enforced by AWS Organizations. This ensures that the tag name and value are the same across all the resources and accounts, and avoids any discrepancies or errors that might arise from user-defined tags.

It is informative, as it creates one cost report in Cost Explorer grouping by the tag name, and filters by EC2. This allows the accounting team to see the breakdown of EC2 consumption and costs by department, regardless of the AWS account. The team can also use other features of Cost Explorer, such as charts, filters, and forecasts, to analyze and optimize the spending.

The company wants to reduce the compute costs and maintain service latency for its Lambda functions that process a constantly increasing number of messages in a message queue. The Lambda functions use CPU intensive code to process the messages. To meet these requirements, a solutions architect should recommend the following solution:

Configure provisioned concurrency for the Lambda functions. Provisioned concurrency is the number of pre-initialized execution environments that are allocated to the Lambda functions. These execution environments are prepared to respond immediately to incoming function requests, reducing the cold start latency. Configuring provisioned concurrency also helps to avoid throttling errors due to reaching the concurrency limit of the Lambda service.

Increase the memory according to AWS Compute Optimizer recommendations. AWS Compute Optimizer is a service that provides recommendations for optimal AWS resource configurations based on your utilization data. By increasing the memory allocated to the Lambda functions, you can also increase the CPU power and improve the performance of your CPU intensive code.AWS Compute Optimizer can help you find the optimal memory size for your Lambda functions based on your workload characteristics and performance goals.

This solution will reduce the compute costs by avoiding unnecessary over-provisioning of memory and CPU resources, and maintain service latency by using provisioned concurrency and optimal memory size for the Lambda functions.

The simplest and most effective way to ensure that all data that is written to the EBS volumes is encrypted at rest is to create the EBS volumes as encrypted volumes. You can do this by selecting the encryption option when you create a new EBS volume, or by copying an existing unencrypted volume to a new encrypted volume. You can also specify the AWS KMS key that you want to use for encryption, or use the default AWS-managed key. When you attach the encrypted EBS volumes to the EC2 instances, the data will be automatically encrypted and decrypted by the EC2 host. This solution does not require any additional IAM roles, tags, or policies.

The correct solution is to provision a separate AWS KMS key for each customer and encrypt the data server-side. This way, the company can use the S3 encryption feature to protect the data at rest and delegate the control of the encryption keys to the customers. The customers can then use their own IAM roles to access and decrypt their data. The company employees will not be able to access the data because they are not authorized by the KMS key policies. The other options are incorrect because:

Option A and D are using ACM certificates to encrypt the data client-side. This is not a recommended practice for S3 encryption because it adds complexity and overhead to the encryption process. Moreover, the company will have to manage the certificates and their policies for each customer, which is not scalable and secure.

Option B is using a separate KMS key for each customer, but it is using the S3 bucket policy to control the decryption access. This is not a secure solution because the bucket policy applies to the entire bucket, not to individual objects. Therefore, the customers will be able to access and decrypt each other’s data if they have the permission to list the bucket contents. The bucket policy also overrides the KMS key policy, which means the company employees can access the data if they have the permission to use the KMS key.