Free Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to copy files generated by an on-premises application to AWS without modifying the application code. The files are stored on an SMB file share and require a low-latency connection to the application servers.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS): EFS is designed for Linux-based workloads and does not natively support SMB file shares.

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx supports SMB file shares but would require changes to the application or additional infrastructure to connect on-premises systems.

AWS Snowball: Suitable for large data transfers but not for continuous, low-latency file copying.

AWS Storage Gateway: Provides a hybrid cloud storage solution, supporting SMB file shares and enabling seamless copying of files to AWS without requiring changes to the application.

Best Solution:

AWS Storage Gateway: This service meets the requirement for a low-latency, seamless file transfer solution from on-premises to AWS without modifying the application code.

AWS Outposts is a fully managed service that delivers AWS infrastructure and services to virtually any on-premises or edge location for a consistent hybrid experience. AWS Outposts supports Amazon EKS, which is a managed service that makes it easy to run Kubernetes on AWS and on-premises. By installing an AWS Outposts rack in the company’s data center, the company can run containers in a Kubernetes environment using Amazon EKS and other AWS managed services, while keeping the data locally in the company’s data center and meeting the compliance requirements. AWS Outposts also provides a seamless connection to the local AWS Region for access to a broad range of AWS services.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Local Zones are not deployed in the company’s data center, but in large metropolitan areas closer to end users. AWS Local Zones are owned, managed, and operated by AWS, and they provide low-latency access to the public internet and the local AWS Region. Option B is not a valid solution because AWS Snowmobile is a service that transports exabytes of data to AWS using a 45-foot long ruggedized shipping container pulled by a semi-trailer truck. AWS Snowmobile is not designed for running containers or AWS managed services on-premises, but for large-scale data migration. Option D is not a valid solution because AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized is a device that provides 80 TB of HDD or 210 TB of NVMe storage capacity for data transfer and edge computing. AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized does not support Amazon EKS or other AWS managed services, and it is not suitable for running containers in a Kubernetes environment.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs highly available, scalable storage for a document management application without modifying the application during migration.

EFS Overview: Amazon EFS provides scalable file storage that can be mounted concurrently on multiple EC2 instances across different Availability Zones.

EFS Standard-IA: Using the Standard-IA storage class helps reduce costs for infrequently accessed data while maintaining high availability and scalability.

Implementation:

Create an EFS file system.

Configure mount targets in multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.

Mount the EFS file system on EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group.

Conclusion: This solution meets the high availability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness requirements without needing application modifications.

References

Amazon EFS:Amazon EFS Documentation

EFS Storage Classes:Amazon EFS Storage Classes

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to improve caching to enhance website performance while ensuring that stale content is not served for more than a few minutes after a deployment.

Analysis of Options:

Set CloudFront TTL: Setting a short TTL (e.g., 2 minutes) ensures that cached content is refreshed frequently, reducing the risk of serving stale content.

S3 Bucket TTL: This would not control the cache duration for the CloudFront distribution.

Cache-Control Private: This directive is for controlling caching by private caches (e.g., browsers) and is not applicable for CloudFront.

Lambda@Edge: While this can add headers dynamically, it adds complexity and operational overhead.

Cache-Control max-age and CloudFront Invalidation: Setting a longer max-age for objects ensures they are cached longer, reducing load on the origin. Invalidation ensures that updated content is refreshed immediately after deployment.

Best Combination of Caching Methods:

Set the CloudFront default TTL to 2 minutes: This balances caching and freshness of content.

Add a Cache-Control max-age directive of 24 hours and use CloudFront invalidation: This ensures efficient caching while providing a mechanism to clear outdated content immediately after a deployment.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to migrate an application to AWS, increase its availability, and use AWS WAF in the architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This option provides high availability by distributing instances across multiple Availability Zones. The ALB ensures even traffic distribution, and AWS WAF provides security at the application layer.

Cluster placement group with ALB and WAF: Cluster placement groups are for low-latency networking within a single AZ, which does not provide the high availability across AZs.

Two EC2 instances with ALB and WAF: This setup provides some availability but does not scale automatically, missing the benefits of an Auto Scaling group.

Auto Scaling group with WAF directly: AWS WAF cannot be directly connected to an Auto Scaling group; it needs to be attached to an ALB, CloudFront distribution, or API Gateway.

Best Solution:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This configuration ensures high availability, scalability, and security, meeting all the requirements effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to keep daily EBS snapshots for 1 month and retain monthly snapshots for 7 years due to new regulations.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: Moving snapshots to S3 Glacier Deep Archive involves additional complexity and might not be the most straightforward approach for EBS snapshots.

EBS Snapshots Archive: This is a cost-effective solution designed specifically for long-term storage of EBS snapshots.

Standard Tier for 7 Years: Keeping snapshots in the standard tier for 7 years is more expensive and does not optimize costs.

EBS Direct APIs to S3: This involves additional operational overhead and is not the most cost-effective approach compared to using EBS Snapshots Archive.

Best Solution:

EBS Snapshots Archive: Adding a policy to move monthly snapshots to the EBS Snapshots Archive for long-term retention is the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution.

https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/features/

"Provisioned IOPS volumes are backed by solid-state drives (SSDs) and are the highest performance EBS volumes designed for your critical, I/O intensive database applications.

These volumes are ideal for both IOPS-intensive and throughput-intensive workloads that require extremely low latency."

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/CHAP_Storage.html

Understanding the Requirement: The mobile app captures and uploads raw video clips to S3, but users experience buffering and playback issues due to the large size of these videos.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon CloudFront: A content delivery network (CDN) that can cache and deliver content globally with low latency. It helps reduce buffering by delivering content from edge locations closer to the users.

AWS DataSync: Primarily used for data transfer and replication across AWS Regions, which does not directly address the video size and buffering issue.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder: A media transcoding service that can convert raw video files into formats and resolutions more suitable for streaming, reducing the size and improving playback performance.

EC2 Instances in Local Zones: While this could provide content delivery and caching, it involves more operational overhead compared to using CloudFront.

EC2 Instances for Transcoding: Involves setting up and maintaining infrastructure, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using Elastic Transcoder.

Best Combination of Solutions:

Deploy Amazon CloudFront: This optimizes the performance by caching content at edge locations, reducing latency and buffering for users.

Use Amazon Elastic Transcoder: This reduces the file size and converts videos into formats better suited for streaming on mobile devices.

Use a group email address for the management account's root userhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_best-practices_mgmt-acct.html#best-practices_mgmt-acct_email-address

Amazon S3 Intelligent-Tiering: This storage class is designed to optimize costs by automatically moving data between two access tiers (frequent and infrequent) when access patterns change. It provides cost savings without performance impact or operational overhead.

S3 Lifecycle Rules: By creating an S3 Lifecycle rule, the company can automatically transition objects to the Intelligent-Tiering storage class. This eliminates the need for manual intervention and ensures that objects are moved to the most cost-effective storage tier based on their access patterns.

Operational Efficiency: Intelligent-Tiering requires no additional management and delivers immediate availability for frequently accessed objects. This makes it the most operationally efficient solution for the given requirements.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to centrally collect security data with minimal development effort to assess and improve security across all workloads.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Security Lake: This is a purpose-built service for centralizing security data from across AWS services and third-party sources into a data lake. It provides native integration and requires minimal development effort to set up.

AWS Lake Formation with AWS Glue: While this can be used to create a data lake, it requires more development effort to set up and configure Glue crawlers for ingestion.

AWS Lambda with S3: This approach involves custom development to collect and process security data before storing it in S3, which requires more effort.

AWS DMS to RDS: AWS Database Migration Service is typically used for database migrations and is not suited for collecting and analyzing security data.

Best Option for Minimal Development Effort:

Amazon Security Lake provides the least development effort for setting up a centralized repository for security data. It simplifies data ingestion and management, making it the most efficient solution for this use case.

For the migration of data from an on-premises Oracle database to Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL, this solution effectively handles schema conversion, data migration, and ongoing data replication.

AWS Schema Conversion Tool (SCT): SCT is used to convert the Oracle database schema to a format compatible with Aurora PostgreSQL. This tool automatically converts the database schema and code objects, like stored procedures, to the target database engine.

AWS Database Migration Service (DMS): DMS is employed to perform the data migration. It supports both full-load migrations (for initial data transfer) and continuous replication of ongoing changes (Change Data Capture, or CDC). This ensures that any updates to the Oracle database during the migration are captured and applied to the Aurora PostgreSQL database, minimizing downtime.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (SCT + DMS full-load only): This option does not capture ongoing changes, which is crucial for a live database migration to ensure data consistency.

Option B (DataSync + S3): AWS DataSync is more suited for file transfers rather than database migrations, and it doesn’t support ongoing change replication.

Option D (Snowball + S3): Snowball is typically used for large-scale data transfers that don’t require continuous synchronization, making it less suitable for this scenario where ongoing changes must be captured.

AWS References:

AWS Schema Conversion Tool- Guidance on using SCT for database schema conversions.

AWS Database Migration Service- Detailed documentation on using DMS for data migrations and ongoing replication.

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load your data for analytics. AWS Glue can automatically discover your data in Amazon S3 and catalog it, so you can query and search the data using SQL. AWS Glue can also run serverless ETL jobs using Apache Spark and Python to transform and load your data into various destinations, such as Amazon Redshift, Amazon Athena, or Amazon Aurora. AWS Glue is a serverless service, so you only pay for the resources consumed by the jobs, and you don’t need to provision or manage any infrastructure.

Amazon Redshift is a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse service that enables you to use standard SQL and your existing business intelligence (BI) tools to analyze your data. Amazon Redshift also supports massively parallel processing (MPP), which means it can distribute and execute queries across multiple nodes in parallel, delivering fast performance and scalability. Amazon Redshift Serverless is a new option that automatically scales query compute capacity based on the queries being run, so you don’t need to manage clusters or capacity. You only pay for the query processing time and the storage consumed by your data.

Amazon Redshift ML is a feature that enables you to create, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models using familiar SQL commands. Amazon Redshift ML can automatically discover the best model and hyperparameters for your data, and store the model in Amazon SageMaker, a fully managed service that provides a comprehensive set of tools for building, training, and deploying ML models. You can then use SQL functions to apply the model to your data in Amazon Redshift and generate predictions.

The combination of AWS Glue, Amazon Redshift Serverless, and Amazon Redshift ML meets the requirements of the question, as it provides a serverless, scalable, and SQL-based solution to transform, load, and analyze the data from the Amazon S3 data lake, and to create and train ML models on the data.

Option A is not correct, because Amazon EMR is not a serverless service. Amazon EMR is a managed service that simplifies running Apache Spark, Apache Hadoop, and other big data frameworks on AWS. Amazon EMR requires you to launch and configure clusters of EC2 instances to run your ETL jobs, which adds complexity and cost compared to AWS Glue.

Option B is not correct, because Amazon Aurora Serverless is not a data warehouse service, and it does not support MPP. Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, auto-scaling configuration for Amazon Aurora, a relational database service that is compatible with MySQL and PostgreSQL. Amazon Aurora Serverless can automatically adjust the database capacity based on the traffic, but it does not distribute the data and queries across multiple nodes like Amazon Redshift does. Amazon Aurora Serverless is more suitable for transactional workloads than analytical workloads.

Option D is not correct, because Amazon Athena is not a data warehouse service, and it does not support MPP. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that enables you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena is serverless, so you only pay for the queries you run, and you don’t need to load the data into a database. However, Amazon Athena does not store the data in a columnar format, compress the data, or optimize the query execution plan like Amazon Redshift does. Amazon Athena is more suitable for ad-hoc queries than complex analytics and ML.

Requirement Analysis: The goal is to prevent accidental deletion of EBS snapshots while avoiding indefinite retention.

Recycle Bin for EBS Snapshots: AWS Recycle Bin allows for retention rules that prevent immediate deletion of snapshots, providing a safety net against accidental deletions.

Retention Rule: A 7-day retention rule ensures snapshots are not permanently deleted immediately, giving time to recover from accidental deletions.

Implementation:

Enable Recycle Bin in your AWS account.

Create a retention rule that specifies a 7-day period for EBS snapshots.

Apply this rule to all EBS snapshots.

Conclusion: This solution provides an automated way to prevent data loss from accidental deletions with minimal development effort.

References

AWS Recycle Bin:AWS Recycle Bin Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to automatically detect and respond to suspicious or unexpected behavior in its AWS environment, beyond the existing AWS WAF setup.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon GuardDuty: Provides continuous monitoring and threat detection across AWS accounts and resources, including integration with AWS WAF for automated response.

AWS Firewall Manager: Manages firewall rules across multiple accounts but is more focused on central management than threat detection.

Amazon Inspector: Focuses on security assessments and vulnerability management rather than real-time threat detection.

Amazon Macie: Primarily used for data security and privacy, not comprehensive threat detection.

Best Solution:

Amazon GuardDuty with EventBridge and Lambda: This combination ensures continuous threat detection and automated response by updating AWS WAF rules based on GuardDuty findings.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sns/latest/dg/sns-dead-letter-queues.html

TheGateway Load Balancer (GWLB)is specifically designed to route traffic through a security appliance in a hub-and-spoke model, making it the ideal solution for inspecting traffic between multiple AWS accounts. GWLB enables you to simplify, scale, and deploy third-party virtual appliances transparently, and it can work across multiple VPCs or accounts using interface endpoints (Gateway Load Balancer Endpoints).

Key AWS features:

Traffic Inspection: The GWLB allows the centralized security appliance to inspect traffic between different VPCs, making it suitable for inspecting inter-account interactions.

Interface VPC Endpoints: By using interface endpoints in the application accounts, traffic can securely and efficiently be routed to the security appliance in the networking account.

AWS Documentation: The use of GWLB aligns with AWS’s best practices for centralized network security, simplifying architecture and reducing operational complexity​.

Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) service that caches copies of your content at edge locations around the world. This helps improve performance by serving content from the edge nearest to the user. However, when the content in Amazon S3 (your origin) is updated, those updates may not immediately reflect on the website if they are cached at the CloudFront edge locations.

The issue described in the question suggests that the CI/CD pipeline is functioning correctly, and updates are being deployed to S3. However, since CloudFront caches this content, the edge locations may still be serving outdated content, causing the updates to not be reflected on the website.

To resolve this issue, you need to invalidate the CloudFront cache. By invalidating the cache, CloudFront will remove the outdated content and retrieve the latest version from the S3 origin.

AWS documentation on this process:

CloudFront cache invalidation allows you to clear items from the cache so that CloudFront retrieves the latest version from the origin. You can create invalidation requests via the AWS Management Console, AWS CLI, or SDKs.

AWS CloudFront Documentation

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Add an Application Load Balancer: ALBs are used to distribute incoming application traffic and are not relevant to caching or serving content from CloudFront.

B. Add Amazon ElastiCache for Redis or Memcached: This would help in caching database queries but has no relation to static website content hosted on CloudFront and S3.

D. Use AWS Certificate Manager (ACM): ACM is used for managing SSL/TLS certificates and is unrelated to the issue of content not being updated on CloudFront.

CloudFront uses a local cache to provide the response, AWS Global accelerator proxies requests and connects to the application all the time for the response.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html#private-content-granting-permissions-to-oai

Amazon API Gatewayprovides a scalable and reusable solution for interacting with DynamoDB without requiring direct access by developers. By setting up a REST API with a POST methodthat integrates with DynamoDB'sPutItemaction, developers can submit data (such as user ratings) to the DynamoDB table through API Gateway, without having to directly interact with the database. This solution is serverless and minimizes operational overhead.

Option A: Using ALB with Lambda adds complexity and is less efficient for this use case.

Option B: While using Lambda is possible, API Gateway provides a more scalable, reusable interface.

Option C: SQS with Lambda introduces unnecessary components for a simple put operation.

AWS References:

Amazon API Gateway with DynamoDB