Free Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 3

To ensure that Amazon S3 buckets do not have unauthorized configuration changes, a solutions architect should turn on AWS Config with the appropriate rules. AWS Config is a service that allows users to audit and assess their AWS resource configurations for compliance with industry standards and internal policies. It provides a detailed view of the resources and their configurations, including information on how the resources are related to each other. By turning on AWS Config with the appropriate rules, users can identify and remediate unauthorized configuration changes to their Amazon S3 buckets.

Amazon API Gatewayprovides a scalable and reusable solution for interacting with DynamoDB without requiring direct access by developers. By setting up a REST API with a POST methodthat integrates with DynamoDB'sPutItemaction, developers can submit data (such as user ratings) to the DynamoDB table through API Gateway, without having to directly interact with the database. This solution is serverless and minimizes operational overhead.

Option A: Using ALB with Lambda adds complexity and is less efficient for this use case.

Option B: While using Lambda is possible, API Gateway provides a more scalable, reusable interface.

Option C: SQS with Lambda introduces unnecessary components for a simple put operation.

AWS References:

Amazon API Gateway with DynamoDB

AWS Control Tower: Provides a managed service to set up and govern a secure, multi-account AWS environment based on AWS best practices. It automates the setup of AWS Organizations and applies security controls (guardrails).

Networking Account:

Create a centralized networking account that includes a VPC with both private and public subnets.

This centralized VPC will manage and control the networking resources.

AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM):

Use AWS RAM to share the subnets from the networking account with the other workload accounts.

This allows different workload accounts to utilize the shared networking resources without the need to manage their own VPCs.

Operational Efficiency: Using AWS Control Tower simplifies the setup and governance of multiple AWS accounts, while AWS RAM facilitates centralized management of networking resources, reducing operational overhead and ensuring consistent security and compliance.

https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/lustre/

Amazon FSx has native support for Windows file system features and for the industry-standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol to access file storage over a network.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/what-is.html

Option Auses an IAM role attached to the EC2 instance profile, enabling secure and automated access to Secrets Manager. This is the recommended approach.

Option Buses IAM users, which is less secure and harder to manage.

Option Cis not practical for accessing secrets programmatically.

Option Dviolates best practices by granting direct access to the EC2 instance.

Amazon S3 Standard-IA: This storage class is designed for data that is accessed less frequently but requires rapid access when needed. It offers lower storage costs compared to S3 Standard while still providing high availability and durability.

Access Patterns: Since the files are frequently accessed in the first 30 days and rarely accessed afterward, transitioning them to S3 Standard-IA after 30 days aligns with their access patterns and reduces storage costs significantly.

Lifecycle Policy: Implementing a lifecycle policy to transition the files to S3 Standard-IA ensures automatic management of the data lifecycle, moving files to a lower-cost storage class without manual intervention. Deleting the files after 4 years further optimizes costs by removing data that is no longer needed.

To meet the requirements for tagging and preventing instance creation or deletion without proper tags, the company can use a combination of AWS Organizations tag policies and service control policies (SCPs).

Tag Policies: These enforce specific tag values across resources. Creating a tag policy with required values (e.g., sensitive, non-sensitive) and attaching it to the appropriate organizational unit (OU) ensures consistency in tagging.

SCPs: SCPs can be used to enforce compliance by preventing instance creation without a tag and preventing tag deletion. These policies control actions at the account level across the organization.

Key AWS features:

Tag Policieshelp standardize tags across accounts, andSCPsenforce governance by restricting actions that violate the policies.

AWS Documentation: AWS best practices recommend using tag policies and SCPs to enforce compliance across multiple accounts within AWS Organizations​.

The best solution is to useAmazon SQSto receive updates from the mobile app and process them with anAWS Lambdafunction. The Lambda function can rewrite the message body as necessary for each shipper and then publish the updates to the appropriateSNS topicfor distribution. Thissetup ensures that each shipper receives only the relevant data and minimizes operational overhead by using managed services.

Option A (SNS filter policy): SNS does not have the capability to rewrite message bodies before forwarding.

Option C (Second SNS topic): Using an additional SNS topic adds unnecessary complexity without solving the message rewriting requirement.

Option D (EventBridge Pipes): EventBridge Pipes is more complex than necessary for this use case, and Lambda can handle the logic more efficiently.

AWS References:

Amazon SQS

Amazon SNS with Lambda

The best solution to enforce encryption at rest for Amazon EBS volumes is to use anIAM policyto restrict the creation of unencrypted volumes. To automatically identify and remediate unencryptedvolumes, you can useAWS Configrules, which continuously monitor the compliance of resources, andAWS Systems Managerto automate the remediation by encrypting existing unencrypted volumes. This setup requires minimal administrative overhead while ensuring compliance.

Option B (KMS): KMS is for managing encryption keys, but Config and Systems Manager provide a better solution for automatic detection and enforcement.

Option C (Macie): Macie is for data classification and is not suitable for this use case.

Option D (Inspector): Inspector is used for security vulnerabilities, not encryption compliance.

AWS References:

AWS Config Rules

AWS Systems Manager

 This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead because it uses AWS services that are fully managed and scalable. The EventBridge rule can detect the DeleteKey operation from the AWS KMS API and trigger the Systems Manager Automation runbook, which can execute a predefined workflow to cancel the key deletion. The EventBridge rule can also publish an SNS message to the topic that sends an email notification to the administrators. This way, the company can prevent the accidental deletion of KMS keys and notify the administrators of any attempts to delete them.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Config rules are used to evaluate the configuration of AWS resources, not to cancel the deletion of KMS keys. Option B is not a valid solution because it requires creating and maintaining a custom Lambda function that has logic to prevent KMS key deletion, which adds operational overhead. Option D is not a valid solution because it only notifies the administrators of the DeleteKey operation, but does not cancel it.

This solution meets the requirement of encrypting each customer’s data separately with the least operational overhead by leveraging AWS Key Management Service (KMS).

Separate AWS KMS Keys: By creating separate KMS keys for each customer, you can ensure that each customer’s data is encrypted with a unique key. This approach satisfies the compliance requirement for separate encryption and provides fine-grained control over access to the keys.

Granular Access Control: AWS KMS allows you to define key policies and use IAM policies to grant specific permissions to the keys. This ensures that only authorized users or services can access the keys, thereby maintaining the principle of least privilege.

Logging and Monitoring: AWS KMS integrates with AWS CloudTrail, which logs all key usage and management activities. This provides an audit trail that is essential for meeting compliance requirements.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (Store keys in S3): Storing keys in S3 is not recommended because it does not provide the same level of security, access control, or integration with AWS services as KMS does.

Option B (Hardware security appliance): Deploying a hardware security appliance adds significant operational overhead and complexity, which is unnecessary given that KMS already provides a secure and centralized key management solution.

Option C (Single KMS key for all data): Using a single KMS key does not meet the requirement of encrypting each customer's data separately.

AWS References:

AWS Key Management Service (KMS)- Overview of KMS, its features, and best practices for key management.

Using AWS KMS for Multi-Tenant Applications- Guidance on how to design applications using KMS for multi-tenancy.

Understanding the Requirement: The university wants to centralize management and automate backups for its AWS services (EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB), reducing reliance on custom scripts.

Analysis of Options:

Third-party backup software with AWS Storage Gateway: This solution introduces external dependencies and adds complexity compared to using native AWS services.

AWS Backup: Provides a centralized, fully managed service to automate and manage backups across various AWS services, including EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB.

AWS Config: Primarily used for compliance and configuration monitoring, not for backup management.

AWS Systems Manager State Manager: Useful for configuration management but not specifically designed for managing backups.

Best Solution:

AWS Backup: This service offers the necessary functionality to centralize and automate backups, providing a streamlined and integrated solution with minimal effort.

The company wants to reduce end-to-end load time for its global customer base.AWS Global Acceleratorprovides a network optimization service that reduces latency by routing traffic to the nearest AWS edge locations, improving the user experience for globally distributed customers.

AWS Global Accelerator:

Global Acceleratorimproves the performance of your applications by routing traffic through AWS’s global network infrastructure. This reduces the number of hops and latency compared to using the public internet.

By creating astandard acceleratorand configuring the existing NLBs as target endpoints, Global Accelerator ensures that traffic from users around the world is routed to the nearest AWS edge location and then through optimized paths to the NLBs in each region. This significantly improves end-to-end load time for global customers.

Why Not the Other Options?:

Option A (ALBs instead of NLBs): ALBs are designed for HTTP/HTTPS traffic and provide layer 7 features, but they wouldn’t solve the latency issue for a global customer base. The key problem here is latency, and Global Accelerator is specifically designed to address that.

Option B (Route 53 weighted routing): Route 53 can route traffic to different regions, but it doesn’t optimize network performance. It simply balances traffic between endpoints without improving latency.

Option C (Additional NLBs in more regions): This could potentially improve latency but would require setting up infrastructure in multiple regions. Global Accelerator is a simpler and more efficient solution that leverages AWS’s existing global network.

AWS References:

AWS Global Accelerator

By usingAWS Global Acceleratorwith the existing NLBs, the company can optimize global traffic routing and improve the customer experience by minimizing latency. Therefore,Option Dis the correct answer.

Amazon EBS io2 Block Express volumes are designed to deliver sub-millisecond latency and up to 256,000 IOPS per volume, with durability and high availability. This makes io2 Block Express the recommended choice for workloads requiring very high and predictable IOPS, such as enterprise databases and high-transaction-rate applications.

Reference Extract:

"EBS io2 Block Express volumes deliver up to 256,000 IOPS and sub-millisecond latency, supporting high-performance, high-durability workloads."

Source: AWS Certified Solutions Architect – Official Study Guide, EBS Performance section.

Understanding the Requirement: The development team needs to prevent the launch of large EC2 instances across multiple AWS accounts used for development, staging, and production environments.

Analysis of Options:

IAM Policies: Would need to be applied individually to each user in every account, leading to significant operational overhead.

AWS Resource Access Manager: Used for sharing resources, not for enforcing restrictions on resource creation.

IAM Role in Each Account: Requires creating and managing roles in each account, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using a centralized approach.

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: Provides a centralized way to enforce policies across multiple AWS accounts, ensuring that large EC2 instances cannot be launched in any account.

Best Solution:

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: This solution offers the least operational overhead by allowing centralized management and enforcement of policies across all accounts, effectively preventing the launch of large EC2 instances.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to process images as they are uploaded to S3 in a cost-effective manner, currently using an EC2 Spot Fleet for nightly processing.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and Lambda: This setup allows for event-driven processing with Lambda, which scales automatically based on the number of messages in the queue. It is cost-effective as Lambda charges are based on the compute time used.

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and EC2 Reserved Instance: Involves managing EC2 instances, which adds operational overhead and is less cost-effective.

S3 Event Notifications to SNS and ECS: More complex and potentially less cost-effective compared to using Lambda for simple processing tasks.

S3 Event Notifications to SNS: Requires additional configuration and management to process messages.

Best Solution:

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and Lambda: This option is the most cost-effective and scalable, leveraging AWS managed services with minimal operational overhead.

Amazon CloudFront is a content delivery network (CDN) service that caches copies of your content at edge locations around the world. This helps improve performance by serving content from the edge nearest to the user. However, when the content in Amazon S3 (your origin) is updated, those updates may not immediately reflect on the website if they are cached at the CloudFront edge locations.

The issue described in the question suggests that the CI/CD pipeline is functioning correctly, and updates are being deployed to S3. However, since CloudFront caches this content, the edge locations may still be serving outdated content, causing the updates to not be reflected on the website.

To resolve this issue, you need to invalidate the CloudFront cache. By invalidating the cache, CloudFront will remove the outdated content and retrieve the latest version from the S3 origin.

AWS documentation on this process:

CloudFront cache invalidation allows you to clear items from the cache so that CloudFront retrieves the latest version from the origin. You can create invalidation requests via the AWS Management Console, AWS CLI, or SDKs.

AWS CloudFront Documentation

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Add an Application Load Balancer: ALBs are used to distribute incoming application traffic and are not relevant to caching or serving content from CloudFront.

B. Add Amazon ElastiCache for Redis or Memcached: This would help in caching database queries but has no relation to static website content hosted on CloudFront and S3.

D. Use AWS Certificate Manager (ACM): ACM is used for managing SSL/TLS certificates and is unrelated to the issue of content not being updated on CloudFront.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to design a scalable and serverless solution for a near-real-time streaming application that experiences high latency due to large amounts of incoming data. The job processing takes about 30 minutes.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: Provides a fully managed service for real-time data streaming and ingestion, allowing for seamless data delivery to destinations such as Amazon S3, Redshift, and Elasticsearch.

AWS Lambda with AWS Step Functions: While suitable for orchestration and lightweight processing, Lambda might not handle long-running jobs (max 15 minutes execution limit) efficiently.

AWS DMS: Primarily used for database migration, not for real-time data ingestion in this context.

Amazon EC2 in Auto Scaling Group: Provides scalability but involves managing servers, which is not serverless and adds operational overhead.

AWS Fargate with ECS: Offers a serverless compute engine for containers, allowing easy scaling and management without managing the underlying infrastructure.

Best Solution:

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose: For ingesting the streaming data efficiently.

AWS Fargate with ECS: For processing the data in a scalable and serverless manner.

Using SQS as a buffer between S3 and the Lambda function ensures durability and allows for retries in case of processing failures. Messages in the queue can be retried by Lambda, and failed processing can be directed to a dead-letter queue for further inspection. This guarantees reliable and scalable message-driven processing.

AWS Transfer Family: This service provides fully managed support for file transfers directly into and out of Amazon S3 using the SFTP, FTPS, and FTP protocols.

SFTP Endpoints:

Set up an AWS Transfer Family server and configure SFTP endpoints to handle the file transfers.

This service is scalable and managed, reducing operational overhead compared to running an SFTP solution on EC2 instances.

Integration with Active Directory:

Choose the AWS Directory Service option as the identity provider for the Transfer Family server.

Use AD Connector to link the on-premises Active Directory with AWS, allowing employees to use their existing AD credentials to access the SFTP service.

Operational Efficiency: This solution leverages managed services for both file transfer and identity management, ensuring minimal changes to the current authentication mechanisms and reducing operational overhead.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs highly available, scalable storage for a document management application without modifying the application during migration.

EFS Overview: Amazon EFS provides scalable file storage that can be mounted concurrently on multiple EC2 instances across different Availability Zones.

EFS Standard-IA: Using the Standard-IA storage class helps reduce costs for infrequently accessed data while maintaining high availability and scalability.

Implementation:

Create an EFS file system.

Configure mount targets in multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.

Mount the EFS file system on EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group.

Conclusion: This solution meets the high availability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness requirements without needing application modifications.

References

Amazon EFS:Amazon EFS Documentation

EFS Storage Classes:Amazon EFS Storage Classes

AWS Secrets Manager is designed specifically to securely store and manage sensitive information such as database credentials. It integrates seamlessly with AWS services like Lambda and RDS, and it provides automatic credential rotation with minimal operational overhead.

AWS Secrets Manager: By storing the database credentials in Secrets Manager, you ensure that the credentials are securely stored, encrypted, and managed. Secrets Manager provides a built-in mechanism to automatically rotate credentials at regular intervals (e.g., every 30 days), which helps in maintaining security best practices without requiring additional manual intervention.

Lambda Integration: The Lambda function can be easily configured to retrieve the credentials from Secrets Manager using the AWS SDK, ensuring that the credentials are accessed securely at runtime.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (Parameter Store with Rotation): While Parameter Store can store parameters securely, Secrets Manager is more tailored for secrets management and automatic rotation, offering more features and less operational overhead.

Option C (Encrypted Lambda environment variable): Storing credentials directly in Lambda environment variables, even when encrypted, requires custom code to manage rotation, which increases operational complexity.

Option D (KMS with automatic rotation): KMS is for managing encryption keys, not for storing and rotating secrets like database credentials. This option would require more custom implementation to manage credentials securely.

AWS References:

AWS Secrets Manager- Detailed documentation on how to store, manage, and rotate secrets using AWS Secrets Manager.

Using Secrets Manager with AWS Lambda- Guidance on integrating Secrets Manager with Lambda for secure credential management.

This solution allows for secure and least-privilege access with minimal operational overhead.

IAM Identity Center: AWS IAM Identity Center (formerly AWS SSO) enables you to centrally manage access to multiple AWS accounts and applications. By using IAM Identity Center, you can assign permission sets that define what users or groups can access, ensuring that only necessary permissions are granted.

Permission Sets: Permission sets in IAM Identity Center allow you to define granular access controls for specific services, such as Amazon RDS and S3. You can tailor these permissions to meet the needs of different teams, adhering to the principle of least privilege.

Group Management: By assigning users to groups and associating those groups with specific permission sets, you reduce the complexity and overhead of managing individual IAM roles and policies. This method also simplifies compliance and audit processes.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (IAM roles): While IAM roles can provide least-privilege access, managing multiple roles and policies across teams increases operational overhead compared to using IAM Identity Center.

Option C (Individual IAM users): Managing individual IAM users and roles can be cumbersome and does not scale well compared to group-based management in IAM Identity Center.

Option D (AWS Organizations with cross-account roles): Creating separate accounts and cross-account roles adds unnecessary complexity and overhead for this use case, where IAM Identity Center provides a more straightforward solution.

AWS References:

AWS IAM Identity Center- Overview and best practices for using IAM Identity Center.

Managing Access Permissions Using IAM Identity Center- Guide on creating and managing permission sets for secure access.

Requirement Analysis: The application needs near real-time access to data, persistence, and minimal operational overhead.

ElastiCache for Redis: Provides in-memory data storage with persistence, supporting fast access and durability.

Operational Overhead: Managed service reduces the burden of setup, maintenance, and scaling.

Implementation:

Deploy an ElastiCache for Redis cluster.

Configure Redis to persist data to disk using AOF (Append-Only File) or RDB (Redis Database Backup) snapshots.

Conclusion: ElastiCache for Redis meets the requirements for fast access, data persistence, and low operational overhead.

References

Amazon ElastiCache:ElastiCache for Redis Documentation

The combination of these solutions provides an efficient and automated way to migrate data while preserving metadata and ensuring cleanup:

Create a new S3 bucket with versioning enabled(Option A) to preserve object metadata like version IDs during migration.

UseS3 batch operations(Option B) to efficiently copy data from specific prefixes in the source bucket to the destination bucket, ensuring minimal overhead.

Use an S3 Lifecycle policy(Option F) to automatically delete the data from the source bucket after it has been migrated, reducing manual intervention.

Option C (CopyObject API): This approach would require more manual scripting and effort.

Option D (Same-Region Replication): SRR is designed for ongoing replication, not for one-time migrations.

Option E (DataSync): DataSync adds more complexity than necessary for this task.

AWS References:

S3 Batch Operations

S3 Lifecycle Policies

This option is the most cost-effective and simple way to enable SFTP access to the S3 data lake. AWS Transfer Family is a fully managed service that supports secure file transfers over SFTP, FTPS, and FTPprotocols. You can create an SFTP-enabled server with a public endpoint and associate it with your S3 bucket. You can also use AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) roles and policies to control access to your S3 data lake. The service scales automatically to handle any volume of file transfers and provides high availability and durability. You do not need to provision, manage, or patch any servers or load balancers.

Option B is not correct because Amazon S3 File Gateway is not an SFTP server. It is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides a local file system interface to S3. You can use it to store and retrieve files as objects in S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS and SMB. However, itdoes not support SFTP protocol, and it requires deploying a file gateway appliance on-premises or on EC2.

Option C is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing an EC2 instance in a private subnet and setting up a VPN connection for the new partner. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instance, the VPN connection, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instance to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable.

Option D is not cost-effective or scalable because it requires launching and managing multiple EC2 instances in a private subnet and placing a NLB in front of them. This would incur additional costs for the EC2 instances, the NLB, and the data transfer. It would also introduce complexity and security risks to the solution. Moreover, it would require running a cron job script on the EC2 instances to upload files to the S3 data lake, which is not efficient or reliable. References:

What Is AWS Transfer Family?

What Is Amazon S3 File Gateway?

What Is Amazon EC2?

[What Is Amazon Virtual Private Cloud?]

[What Is a Network Load Balancer?]

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to migrate an application to AWS, increase its availability, and use AWS WAF in the architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This option provides high availability by distributing instances across multiple Availability Zones. The ALB ensures even traffic distribution, and AWS WAF provides security at the application layer.

Cluster placement group with ALB and WAF: Cluster placement groups are for low-latency networking within a single AZ, which does not provide the high availability across AZs.

Two EC2 instances with ALB and WAF: This setup provides some availability but does not scale automatically, missing the benefits of an Auto Scaling group.

Auto Scaling group with WAF directly: AWS WAF cannot be directly connected to an Auto Scaling group; it needs to be attached to an ALB, CloudFront distribution, or API Gateway.

Best Solution:

Auto Scaling group with ALB and WAF: This configuration ensures high availability, scalability, and security, meeting all the requirements effectively.

Requirement Analysis: The application was overwhelmed with unexpected data volume, leading to data loss and the need for a replay mechanism.

Amazon SQS Overview: SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that decouples and scales microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications.

Data Decoupling: By using an SQS queue, the application can store incoming tracker data reliably and process it asynchronously, preventing data loss.

Implementation:

Create an SQS queue.

Modify the web application to send incoming data to the SQS queue.

Configure the application instances to poll the SQS queue and process the messages.

Conclusion: This solution meets the requirements with minimal operational overhead, ensuring data is not lost and can be processed at the application’s own pace.

References

Amazon SQS:Amazon SQS Documentation

Given the large size (180 TB) of the database and the time constraint,AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimizedis the best solution. Snowball Edge allows for the physical transfer of large datasets to AWS efficiently without relying on slow internet connections.AWS DMSandSCTcan be used to perform ongoing replication of any changes made during the migration, ensuring minimal downtime.

Option B (VPN): Using a 100 Mbps internet connection would take far too long to transfer 180 TB.

Option C (Direct Connect): Establishing a 10 Gbps Direct Connect link might not be feasible within the 2-week timeframe.

Option D (DataSync over internet): With the existing internet connection, DataSync would also take too long.

AWS References:

AWS Snowball Edge

AWS DMS

The question focuses on minimizing costs while serving static content to users in the US and Europe.

Option Auses a single S3 bucket and configures CloudFront to limit edge locations, reducing costs by using fewer edge locations while still improving performance.

Option Bmaximizes edge locations, which increases costs unnecessarily.

Options C and Dinvolve storing data in multiple regions, which increases storage and operational costs.Thus, Option A is the most cost-effective solution.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to redesign the architecture to be highly available and use AWS managed solutions for hosting a web application with static content, PHP application, and Redis for user sessions.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk: Suitable for simplifying deployment but may not provide the desired flexibility and control for complex architectures.

AWS Lambda and API Gateway: Not ideal for hosting a stateful PHP application and handling static content.Adding complexity without significant benefit.

EC2 instance with ElastiCache and S3: Provides some high availability but involves managing EC2 instances, which increases operational overhead.

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This solution leverages fully managed AWS services for each component, ensuring high availability and scalability.

Best Solution:

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This combination of services meets the requirements for a highly available and managed solution, ensuring optimal performance and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The mobile app captures and uploads raw video clips to S3, but users experience buffering and playback issues due to the large size of these videos.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon CloudFront: A content delivery network (CDN) that can cache and deliver content globally with low latency. It helps reduce buffering by delivering content from edge locations closer to the users.

AWS DataSync: Primarily used for data transfer and replication across AWS Regions, which does not directly address the video size and buffering issue.

Amazon Elastic Transcoder: A media transcoding service that can convert raw video files into formats and resolutions more suitable for streaming, reducing the size and improving playback performance.

EC2 Instances in Local Zones: While this could provide content delivery and caching, it involves more operational overhead compared to using CloudFront.

EC2 Instances for Transcoding: Involves setting up and maintaining infrastructure, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using Elastic Transcoder.

Best Combination of Solutions:

Deploy Amazon CloudFront: This optimizes the performance by caching content at edge locations, reducing latency and buffering for users.

Use Amazon Elastic Transcoder: This reduces the file size and converts videos into formats better suited for streaming on mobile devices.

Understanding the Requirement: The application running on EC2 instances in a private subnet needs to process sensitive information from an S3 bucket without using the internet.

Analysis of Options:

Internet Gateway: This would expose the application to the internet, which is not suitable for accessing sensitive information securely.

VPN Connection: VPN is primarily used for secure connections between on-premises networks and AWS VPCs, not for direct S3 access within the same VPC.

NAT Gateway: This allows instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet, but the goal is to avoid internet access.

VPC Endpoint: Provides a private connection between the VPC and S3 without using the internet, ensuring secure access to the S3 bucket.

Best Solution:

VPC Endpoint: Configuring a VPC endpoint allows secure, private communication between the EC2 instances and the S3 bucket without using the internet, ensuring data security and compliance.

Cloudfront for rapid response and s3 to minimize infrastructure.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to enable communication between VPCs across multiple AWS Regions with minimal administrative effort.

Analysis of Options:

VPC Peering: Managing multiple VPC peering connections across regions is complex and difficult to scale, leading to significant administrative overhead.

AWS Direct Connect Gateways: Primarily used for creating private connections between AWS and on-premises environments, not for inter-VPC communication across regions.

AWS Transit Gateway: Simplifies VPC interconnections within a region and supports Transit Gateway peering for cross-region connectivity, reducing administrative complexity.

AWS PrivateLink: Used for accessing AWS services and third-party services over a private connection, not for inter-VPC communication.

Best Solution:

AWS Transit Gateway with Transit Gateway Peering: This option provides a scalable and efficient solution for managing VPC communications both within a single region and across multiple regions with minimal administrative overhead.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/WindowsGuide/monitor-ami-events.html#:~:text=For%20example%2C%20you%20can%20create%20an%20EventBridge%20rule%20that%20detects%20when%20the%20AMI%20creation%20process%20has %20completed%20and%20then%20invokes%20an%20Amazon%20SNS%20topic%20to%20send%20an%20email%20notification%20to%20you.

Creating an Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) rule for the CreateImage API call and configuring the target as an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) topic to send an alert when a CreateImage API call is detected will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead. Amazon EventBridge is a serverless event bus that makes it easy to connect applications together using data from your own applications, integrated Software as a Service (SaaS) applications, and AWS services. By creating an EventBridge rule for the CreateImage API call, the company can set up alerts whenever this operation is called within their account. The alert can be sent to an SNS topic, which can then be configured to send notifications to the company's email or other desired destination.

A service control policy (SCP) is a type of policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines. SCPs are available only in an organization that has all features enabled. SCPs do not grant permissions; instead, they specify the maximum permissions for an organization or organizational unit (OU). SCPs limit permissions that identity-basedpolicies or resource-based policies grant to entities (users or roles) within the account, but do not grant permissions to entities. You can use SCPs to restrict the actions that the root user in an account can perform. You can also use SCPs to prevent users or roles in any account from creating or modifying certain AWS resources, such as EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “". For example, you can create an SCP that denies the ec2:RunInstances action if the request includes the AssociatePublicIpAddress parameter set to true. You can also create an SCP that denies the iam:PutUserPolicy and iam:PutRolePolicy actions if the request includes a policy document that contains "”. By attaching these SCPs to your organization or OUs, you can prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these rules.

AWS Control Tower proactive controls are guardrails that enforce preventive policies on your accounts and resources. Proactive guardrails are implemented as AWS Organizations service control policies (SCPs) and AWS Config rules. However, AWS Control Tower does not provide a built-in proactive guardrail to block EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “*”. You would have to create your own custom guardrails using AWS CloudFormation templates and SCPs, which is essentially the same as option D. Therefore, option A is not correct.

AWS Control Tower detective controls are guardrails that detect and alert on policy violations in your accounts and resources. Detective guardrails are implemented as AWS Config rules and Amazon CloudWatch alarms. Detective guardrails do not block or remediate noncompliant resources; they only notify you of the issues. Therefore, option B is not correct.

AWS Config is a service that enables you to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of your AWS resources. AWS Config continuously monitors and records your AWS resource configurations and allows you to automate the evaluation of recorded configurations against desired configurations. AWS Config rules are customizable, AWS Lambda functions that AWS Config invokes to evaluate your AWS resource configurations. You can use AWS Config rules to check for compliance with your policies, such as ensuring that EC2 instances have public IP addresses disabled or IAM resources do not have inline policies or “*”. However, AWS Config rules alone cannot prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these policies; they can only report the compliance status. You would need to use another service, such as AWS Systems Manager Session Manager, to run automation scripts to delete or modify the noncompliant resources. This would require additional configuration and permissions, and may not be the most efficient or secure way to enforce your policies. Therefore, option C is not correct.

Current Backup Settings: By default, Amazon RDS creates automated backups with a retention period of 7 days.

Regulatory Requirements: The requirement is to retain daily backups for 30 days.

Adjusting Retention Period: You can modify the RDS instance settings to increase the automated backup retention period to 30 days.

Operational Overhead: This solution is the simplest as it leverages existing automated backups and requires minimal intervention.

Implementation: The change can be made via the AWS Management Console, AWS CLI, or AWS SDKs.

References

Amazon RDS Backups:Amazon RDS Documentation

Understanding the Requirements: The company needs to optimize costs and has the flexibility to change EC2 instance types and families frequently (every 2-3 months).

Savings Plans Overview: Savings Plans offer significant savings over On-Demand pricing, with the flexibility to use any instance type and family within a region.

No Upfront Compute Savings Plan: This plan allows for cost optimization without any upfront payment, offering flexibility to change instance types and families.

Term Selection: A 1-year term is appropriate for balancing cost savings and flexibility given the frequent changes in instance types.

Conclusion: A No Upfront Compute Savings Plan for a 1-year term provides the needed flexibility and cost savings without the commitment and inflexibility of Reserved Instances.

References

AWS Savings Plans:AWS Savings Plans

AWS Cost Management Documentation:AWS Cost Management

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to keep daily EBS snapshots for 1 month and retain monthly snapshots for 7 years due to new regulations.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: Moving snapshots to S3 Glacier Deep Archive involves additional complexity and might not be the most straightforward approach for EBS snapshots.

EBS Snapshots Archive: This is a cost-effective solution designed specifically for long-term storage of EBS snapshots.

Standard Tier for 7 Years: Keeping snapshots in the standard tier for 7 years is more expensive and does not optimize costs.

EBS Direct APIs to S3: This involves additional operational overhead and is not the most cost-effective approach compared to using EBS Snapshots Archive.

Best Solution:

EBS Snapshots Archive: Adding a policy to move monthly snapshots to the EBS Snapshots Archive for long-term retention is the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to optimize costs and reduce operational overhead for an RDS for PostgreSQL database that only needs to be active during business hours on weekdays.

Analysis of Options:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: Allows for automated start and stop schedules based on specified times, ideal for resources only needed during certain hours. This directly optimizes costs by running the database only when needed.

Turn off automatic backups and create weekly snapshots: Does not address the requirement of reducing operational overhead and optimizing runtime costs.

Custom Lambda function: This could work but adds unnecessary complexity compared to using the Instance Scheduler.

All Upfront Reserved DB Instances: While this reduces costs, it does not optimize for usage patterns that require the database only during specific hours.

Best Solution:

Instance Scheduler on AWS: This option effectively manages the database runtime based on the specified schedule, reducing costs and operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: Senior leadership wants a custom dashboard displaying NAT gateway costs daily, starting from the beginning of the current month.

Analysis of Options:

QuickSight with DataSync: While QuickSight is suitable for dashboards, DataSync is not designed for querying and analyzing data reports.

QuickSight with Athena: QuickSight can visualize data queried by Athena, which is designed to analyze data directly from S3.

CloudWatch with DataSync: CloudWatch is primarily for monitoring metrics, not for creating detailed cost analysis dashboards.

CloudWatch with Athena: Similarly, using CloudWatch with Athena does not align well with the requirement for a visual dashboard.

Best Solution for Visualization and Querying:

Amazon QuickSight with Athena: This combination allows for powerful data visualization and querying capabilities. QuickSight can create dynamic dashboards, while Athena efficiently queries the cost and usage report data stored in S3.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to store a copy of all new photos in the us-east-1 Region from an S3 bucket in the us-west-1 Region.

Analysis of Options:

Cross-Region Replication: Automatically replicates objects across regions with minimal operational effort once configured.

CORS Configuration: Used for allowing resources on a web page to be requested from another domain, not for replication.

S3 Lifecycle Rule: Manages the transition of objects between storage classes within the same bucket, not for cross-region replication.

S3 Event Notifications with Lambda: Requires additional configuration and management compared to Cross-Region Replication.

Best Solution:

S3 Cross-Region Replication: This solution provides an automated and efficient way to replicate objects to another region, meeting the requirement with the least operational effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to improve caching to enhance website performance while ensuring that stale content is not served for more than a few minutes after a deployment.

Analysis of Options:

Set CloudFront TTL: Setting a short TTL (e.g., 2 minutes) ensures that cached content is refreshed frequently, reducing the risk of serving stale content.

S3 Bucket TTL: This would not control the cache duration for the CloudFront distribution.

Cache-Control Private: This directive is for controlling caching by private caches (e.g., browsers) and is not applicable for CloudFront.

Lambda@Edge: While this can add headers dynamically, it adds complexity and operational overhead.

Cache-Control max-age and CloudFront Invalidation: Setting a longer max-age for objects ensures they are cached longer, reducing load on the origin. Invalidation ensures that updated content is refreshed immediately after deployment.

Best Combination of Caching Methods:

Set the CloudFront default TTL to 2 minutes: This balances caching and freshness of content.

Add a Cache-Control max-age directive of 24 hours and use CloudFront invalidation: This ensures efficient caching while providing a mechanism to clear outdated content immediately after a deployment.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to centrally collect security data with minimal development effort to assess and improve security across all workloads.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Security Lake: This is a purpose-built service for centralizing security data from across AWS services and third-party sources into a data lake. It provides native integration and requires minimal development effort to set up.

AWS Lake Formation with AWS Glue: While this can be used to create a data lake, it requires more development effort to set up and configure Glue crawlers for ingestion.

AWS Lambda with S3: This approach involves custom development to collect and process security data before storing it in S3, which requires more effort.

AWS DMS to RDS: AWS Database Migration Service is typically used for database migrations and is not suited for collecting and analyzing security data.

Best Option for Minimal Development Effort:

Amazon Security Lake provides the least development effort for setting up a centralized repository for security data. It simplifies data ingestion and management, making it the most efficient solution for this use case.

Memory Optimized Instances: These instances are designed to deliver fast performance for workloads that process large data sets in memory. They are ideal for high-performance databases like SAP and applications with high memory utilization.

High Memory Utilization: Both the SAP application and the SQL Server database have high memory demands as per the on-premises performance data. Memory optimized instances provide the necessary memory capacity and performance.

Instance Types:

For the SAP application, using a memory optimized instance ensures the application has sufficient memory to handle the high workload efficiently.

For the SQL Server database, memory optimized instances ensure optimal database performance with high memory throughput.

Operational Efficiency: Using the same instance family for both the application and the database simplifies management and ensures both components meet performance requirements.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to copy files generated by an on-premises application to AWS without modifying the application code. The files are stored on an SMB file share and require a low-latency connection to the application servers.

Analysis of Options:

Amazon Elastic File System (EFS): EFS is designed for Linux-based workloads and does not natively support SMB file shares.

Amazon FSx for Windows File Server: FSx supports SMB file shares but would require changes to the application or additional infrastructure to connect on-premises systems.

AWS Snowball: Suitable for large data transfers but not for continuous, low-latency file copying.

AWS Storage Gateway: Provides a hybrid cloud storage solution, supporting SMB file shares and enabling seamless copying of files to AWS without requiring changes to the application.

Best Solution:

AWS Storage Gateway: This service meets the requirement for a low-latency, seamless file transfer solution from on-premises to AWS without modifying the application code.

Understanding the Requirement: The application running in a private subnet needs to store and retrieve data from S3 without data traveling over the public internet.

Analysis of Options:

NAT Gateway: Allows private subnets to access the internet but incurs additional costs and still routes traffic through the public internet.

AWS Storage Gateway: Provides hybrid cloud storage solutions but is not the most cost-effective for direct S3 access from within the VPC.

S3 Interface Endpoint: Provides private access to S3 but is generally used for specific use cases where more granular control is required, which might be overkill and more expensive.

S3 Gateway Endpoint: Provides private, cost-effective access to S3 from within the VPC without routing traffic through the public internet.

Best Solution:

S3 Gateway Endpoint: This option meets the requirements for secure, private access to S3 from a private subnet most cost-effectively.

Understanding the Requirement: The company wants to restrict each application to its specific prefix in an S3 bucket and have granular control over the objects under each prefix.

Analysis of Options:

Dedicated S3 Access Points: Provides a scalable and flexible way to manage access to S3 buckets, allowing specific policies to be attached to each access point, thereby controlling access at the prefix level.

S3 Batch Operations: Suitable for large-scale changes but involves more operational overhead and does not dynamically control future access.

Replication to new S3 buckets: Involves unnecessary duplication of data and increased storage costs, and operational overhead for managing multiple buckets.

Combination of replication and access points: Adds unnecessary complexity and overhead compared to using access points directly.

Best Solution:

Dedicated S3 Access Points: This provides the least operational overhead while meeting the requirements for prefix-level access control and granular management.