Free Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

To design a resilient solution that can improve the recovery time for the system, a solutions architect should recommend creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to recover the EC2 instance in case of failure. This solution has the following benefits:

It allows the EC2 instance to be automatically recovered when a system status check failure occurs, such as loss of network connectivity, loss of system power, software issues on the physical host, or hardware issues on the physical host that impact network reachability1.

It preserves the instance ID, private IP addresses, Elastic IP addresses, and all instance metadata of the original instance. A recovered instance is identical to the original instance, except for any data that is in-memory, which is lost during the recovery process1.

It does not require any modification of the application code or the EC2 instance configuration. The solutions architect can create a CloudWatch alarm using the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the CloudWatch API2.

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to decouple the analytics software from the user requests and scale the EC2 instances dynamically based on the demand. By using Amazon SQS, the company can create a queue that stores the user requests and acts as a buffer between the users and the analytics software. This way, the software can process the requests at its own pace without losing any data or overloading the EC2 instances. By using EC2 Auto Scaling, the company cancreate an Auto Scaling group that launches or terminates EC2 instances automatically based on the size of the queue. This way, the company can ensure that there are enough instances to handle the load and optimize the cost and performance of the system. By updating the software to read from the queue, the company can enable the analytics software to consume the requests from the queue and process the data from Amazon S3.

A. Create a copy of the instance Place all instances behind an Application Load Balancer. This option is not optimal because it does not address the root cause of the problem, which is the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An Application Load Balancer can distribute the incoming traffic across multiple instances, but it cannot scale the instances based on the load or reduce the processing time of the analytics software. Moreover, this option can incur additional costs for the load balancer and the extra instances.

B. Create an S3 VPC endpoint for Amazon S3 Update the software to reference the endpoint. This option is not effective because it does not solve the issue of the high CPU utilization of the EC2 instances. An S3 VPC endpoint can enable the EC2 instances to access Amazon S3 without going through the internet, which can improve the network performance and security. However, it cannot reduce the processing time of the analytics software or scale the instances based on the load.

C. Stop the EC2 instances. Modify the instance type to one with a more powerful CPU and more memory. Restart the instances. This option is not scalable because it does not account for the variability of the user load. Changing the instance type to a more powerful one can improve the performance of the analytics software, but it cannot adjust the number of instances based on the demand. Moreover, this option can increase the cost of the system and cause downtime during the instance modification.

Recycle Bin is a data recovery feature that enables you to restore accidentally deleted Amazon EBS snapshots and EBS-backed AMIs. When using Recycle Bin, if your resources are deleted, they are retained in the Recycle Bin for a time period that you specify before being permanently deleted. You can restore a resource from the Recycle Bin at any timebefore its retention period expires. This solution has the least operational overhead, as you do not need to create, copy, or upload any additional resources. You can also manage tags and permissions for AMIs in the Recycle Bin. AMIs in the Recycle Bin do not incur any additional charges. References:

Recover AMIs from the Recycle Bin

Recover an accidentally deleted Linux AMI

An Application Load Balancer (ALB) is a type of Elastic Load Balancer (ELB) that distributes incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, Lambda functions, and IP addresses, in multiple Availability Zones1. An ALB can be internet-facing or internal. An internet-facing ALB has a public DNS name that clients can use to send requests over the internet1. An internal ALB has a private DNS name that clients can use to send requests within a VPC1. This solution meets the requirements of the question because:

It allows external internet traffic to connect to the web server on ports 80 and 443, as the ALB listens for requests on these ports and forwards them to the EC2 instance in the private subnet1.

It does not violate the corporate security mandate, as the EC2 instance is launched in a private subnet and does not have a public IPaddress or a route to an internet gateway2.

It reduces the operational overhead, as the ALB is a fully managed service that handles the tasks of load balancing, health checking, scaling, and security1.

AWS Shield Advanced is designed to provide enhanced protection against DDoS attacks with proactive engagement and response capabilities, making it the best solution for this scenario.

AWS Shield Advanced: This service provides advanced protection against DDoS attacks. It includes detailed attack diagnostics, 24/7 access to the AWS DDoS Response Team (DRT), and financial protection against DDoS-related scaling charges. Shield Advanced also integrates with Route 53 and the Application Load Balancer (ALB) to ensure comprehensive protection for your web applications.

Route 53 and ALB Protection: By adding your Route 53 hosted zones and ALB resources to AWS Shield Advanced, you ensure that these components are covered under the enhanced protection plan. Shield Advanced actively monitors traffic and provides real-time attack mitigation, minimizing the impact of DDoS attacks on your application.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (AWS Config): AWS Config is a configuration management service and does not provide DDoS protection or detection capabilities.

Option B (AWS WAF): While AWS WAF can help mitigate some types of attacks, it does not provide the comprehensive DDoS protection and proactive engagement offered by Shield Advanced.

Option C (GuardDuty): GuardDuty is a threat detection service that identifies potentially malicious activity within your AWS environment, but it is not specifically designed to provide DDoS protection.

AWS References:

AWS Shield Advanced- Overview of AWS Shield Advanced and its DDoS protection capabilities.

Integrating AWS Shield Advanced with Route 53 and ALB- Detailed guidance on how to protect Route 53 and ALB with AWS Shield Advanced.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is cost-effective, as it only uses serverless components that are charged based on usage and do not require any upfront provisioning or maintenance.

It is scalable, as it can handle any number of recipe records that are uploaded to the S3 bucket without any performance degradation or manual intervention.

It is easy to implement, as it does not require any machine learning knowledge or complex data processing logic. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing service that can automatically extract entities such as ingredients from text files. The Lambda function can simply invoke the Comprehend API and store the results in the DynamoDB table.

It is reliable, as it can handle non-food records and errors gracefully. Amazon Comprehend can detect the language and domain of the text files and return an appropriate response. The Lambda function can also implement error handling and logging mechanisms to ensure the data quality and integrity.

This solution will meet the requirements with the most operational efficiency because:

Amazon Cognito user pools provide a secure and scalable user directory that can store and manage user profiles, and handle user sign-up, sign-in, and access control. User pools can also integrate with social identity providers and enterprise identity providers via SAML or OIDC. User pools can issue JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) that can be used to authenticate users and authorize API requests.

Amazon API Gateway REST APIs enable you to create and deploy APIs that expose your backend services to your clients. REST APIs support multiple authorization mechanisms, including Cognito user pools, IAM, Lambda, and custom authorizers. A Cognito authorizer is a type of Lambda authorizer that uses a Cognito user pool as the identity source. When a client makes a request to a REST API method that is configured with a Cognito authorizer, API Gateway verifies the JWTs that are issued by the user pool and grants access based on the token’s claims and the authorizer’s configuration.

By using Cognito user pools and API Gateway REST APIs with a Cognito authorizer, you can achieve a high level of security, scalability, and performance for your web analytics service. You can also leverage the built-in features of Cognito and API Gateway, such as user management, token validation, caching, throttling, and monitoring, without having to implement them yourself. This reduces the operational overhead and complexity of your solution.

This solution meets the requirements because it uses the following components and features:

AWS Transfer Family SFTP internal server: This allows the application to securely transfer order files from the on-premises ERP system to AWS using the SFTP protocol over a private connection. The internal server is deployed in two Availability Zones for high availability and fault tolerance.

Amazon S3 storage: This provides scalable, durable, and cost-effective object storage for the order files. Amazon S3 also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as lifecycle policies and versioning for data protection and compliance.

AWS Lambda function: This enables the application to process the order files in a serverless manner, without provisioning or managing servers. The Lambda function can perform any custom logic or transformation on the order files, such as validating, parsing, or enriching the data.

Transfer Family managed workflow: This simplifies the orchestration of the file processing tasks by triggering the Lambda function as soon as a file is uploaded to the SFTP server. The managed workflow also provides error handling, retry policies, and logging capabilities.

This solution meets the requirements because it allows the company to track and manage its cloud spending by using cost allocation tags to assign costs to different departments, creating usage budgets to set spending limits, and adding alert thresholds to receive notifications when the spending reaches a certain percentage of the budget. This way, the company can monitor its experimental workloads and avoid overspending on the cloud.

This combination of actions will provide high availability and minimum latency for global users by using AWS Global Accelerator and Application Load Balancers. AWS GlobalAccelerator is a networking service that helps you improve the availability, performance, and security of your internet-facing applications by using the AWS global network. It provides two global static public IPs that act as a fixed entry point to your application endpoints, such as Application Load Balancers, in multiple Regions1. Global Accelerator uses the AWS backbone network to route traffic to the optimal regional endpoint based on health, client location, and policies that you configure. It also offers TCP and UDP support, traffic encryption, and DDoS protection2. Application Load Balancers are external load balancers that distribute incoming application traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, in multiple Availability Zones. They support both HTTP and HTTPS (SSL/TLS) protocols, and offer advanced features such as content-based routing, health checks, and integration with other AWS services3. By creatingexternal Application Load Balancers in front of the application in each Region, you can ensure that the application can handle varying load patterns and scale on demand. By creating an AWS Global Accelerator accelerator to route traffic to the load balancers in each Region, you can leverage the performance, security, and availability of the AWS global network to deliver the best possible user experience.

To meet the requirements of the use case in a cost-effective way, the following steps are recommended:

Deploy an AWS Storage Gateway on premises in Amazon S3 File Gateway mode. This will allow the company to write the .csv files generated by the devices to an SMB file share, which will be stored as objects in Amazon S3 buckets. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that integrates on-premises environments with AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway mode provides a seamless way to connect to Amazon S3 and access a virtually unlimited amount of cloud storage1.

Set up an AWS Glue crawler to create a table based on the data that is in Amazon S3. This will enable the company to use standard SQL to query the data stored in Amazon S3 buckets. AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that simplifies data preparation and analysis. AWS Glue crawlers can automatically discover and classify data from various sources, and create metadata tables in the AWS Glue Data Catalog2. The Data Catalog is a central repository that stores information about data sources and how to access them3.

Set up Amazon Athena to query the data that is in Amazon S3. This will provide the company analysts with a serverless and interactive query service that can analyze data directly in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena is integrated with the AWS Glue Data Catalog, so users can easily point Athena at the data source tables defined by the crawlers. Amazon Athenacharges only for the queries that are run, and offers a pay-per-query pricing model, which makes it a cost-effective option for periodic queries4.

The other options are not correct because they are either not cost-effective or not suitable for the use case. Deploying an AWS Storage Gateway on premises in Amazon FSx File Gateway mode is not correct because this mode provides low-latency access to fully managed Windows file shares in AWS, which is not required for the use case. Setting up an Amazon EMR cluster with EMR File System (EMRFS) to query the data that is in Amazon S3 is not correct because this option involves setting up and managing a cluster of EC2 instances, which adds complexity and cost to the solution. Setting up an Amazon Redshift cluster to query the data that is in Amazon S3 is not correct because this option also involves provisioning and managing a cluster of nodes, which adds overhead and cost to the solution.

The solution that meets the requirements is to develop an on-premises custom identity broker application or process that uses AWS Security Token Service (AWS STS) to get short-lived credentials. This solution allows the company to use its existing LDAP directory service to authenticate its users to the AWS Management Console, without requiring SAML compatibility.The custom identity broker application or process can act as a proxy between the LDAP directory service and AWS STS, and can request temporary security credentials for the users based on their LDAP attributes and roles. The users can then use these credentials to access the AWS Management Console via a sign-in URL generated by the identity broker. This solution also enhances security by using short-lived credentials that expire after a specified duration.

The other solutions do not meet the requirements because they either require SAML compatibility or do not provide access to the AWS Management Console. Enabling AWS IAM Identity Center (AWS Single Sign-On) between AWS and the on-premises LDAP would require the LDAP directory service to support SAML 2.0, which is not the case for this scenario. Creating an IAM policy that uses AWS credentials and integrating the policy into LDAP would not provide access to the AWS Management Console, but only to the AWSAPIs. Setting up a process that rotates the IAM credentials whenever LDAP credentials are updated would also not provide access to the AWS Management Console, but only to the AWS CLI. Therefore, these solutions are not suitable for the given requirements.

AWS WAF is a web application firewall that helps protect web applications from common web exploits that could affect application availability, compromise security, or consume excessive resources. AWS WAF allows users to create rules that block, allow, or count web requests based on customizable web security rules. One of the types of rules that can be created is an SQL injection rule, which allows users to specify a list of IP addresses or IP address ranges that they want to allow or block. By using AWS WAF to protect the application, the company can prevent SQL injection and other web-based attacks from reaching the application and the database.

RDS parameter groups are collections of parameters that define how a database instance operates. Users can modify the parameters in a parameter group to change the behavior and performance of the database. By using RDS parameter groups to configure the security settings, the company can enforce best practices such as disabling remote root login, requiring SSL connections, and limiting the maximum number of connections.

The other options are not correct because they do not effectively protect the application and the database from SQL injection and other web-based attacks. Using security groups and network ACLs to secure the database and application servers is not sufficient because they only filter traffic at the network layer, not at the application layer. Using AWS Network Firewall to protect the application and the database is not necessary because it is a stateful firewall service that provides network protection for VPCs, not for individual applications or databases. Using different database accounts in the application code for different functions is a good practice, but it does not prevent SQL injection attacks from exploiting vulnerabilities in the application code.

The solution that will meet the requirements is to run the application on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) as microservices with service auto scaling. This solution will allow the application to be flexible, scalable, and gradually improved, as well as minimize application downtime. By breaking down the monolithic application into microservices, the company can decouple the modules and update them independently, without affecting the whole application. By running the microservices on Amazon ECS, the company can leverage the benefits of containerization, such as portability, efficiency, and isolation. By enabling service auto scaling, the company can adjust the number of containers running for each microservice based on demand, ensuring optimal performance and cost. Amazon ECS also supports various deployment strategies, such as rolling update or blue/green deployment, that can reduce or eliminate downtime during updates.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not meet the requirements or introduce new challenges. Running the application on AWS Lambda as a single function with maximum provisioned concurrency will not meet the requirements, as it will not break down the monolith into microservices, nor will it reduce the complexity of maintenance. Lambda functions are also limited by execution time (15 minutes), memory size (10 GB), and concurrency quotas, which may not be sufficient for the report generation application. Running the application on Amazon EC2 Spot Instances as microservices with a Spot Fleet default allocation strategy will not meet the requirements, as it will introduce the risk of interruptions due to spot price fluctuations. Spot Instances are not guaranteed to be available or stable, and may be reclaimed by AWS at any time with a two-minute warning. This may cause report generation to fail or restart from scratch. Running the application on AWS Elastic Beanstalk as a single application environment with an all-at-once deployment strategy will not meet the requirements, as it will not break down the monolith into microservices, nor will it minimize application downtime. The all-at-once deployment strategy will deploy updates to all instances simultaneously, causing a brief outage for the application.

This option is the most efficient because it uses a gateway VPC endpoint for Amazon S3, which provides reliable connectivity to Amazon S3 without requiring an internet gateway or a NAT device for the VPC1. A gateway VPC endpoint routes traffic from the VPC to Amazon S3 using a prefix list for the service and does not leave the AWS network2. This meets the requirement of not traversing the internet. Option A is less efficient because it uses a private hosted zone by using Amazon Route 53, which is a DNS service that allows you to create custom domain names for your resources within your VPC3. However, this does not provide connectivity to Amazon S3 without an internet gateway or a NAT device. Option C is less efficient because it uses a NAT gateway to access the S3 bucket, which is a highly available, managed Network Address Translation (NAT) service that enables instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet or other AWS services, but prevents the internet from initiating a connection with those instances4. However, this does not meet the requirement of not traversing the internet. Option D is less efficient because it uses an AWS Site-to-Site VPN connection between the VPC and the S3 bucket, which is a secure and encrypted network connection between your on-premises network and your VPC. However, this does not meet the requirement of not traversing the internet.

The most cost-effective DynamoDB table configuration for the web application is to configure DynamoDB in on-demand mode by using the DynamoDB Standard table class. This configuration will allow the company to scale in response to application traffic and pay only for the read and write requests that the application performs on the table.

On-demand mode is a flexible billing option that can handle thousands of requests per second without capacity planning. On-demand mode automatically adjusts the table’s capacity based on the incoming traffic, and charges only for the read and write requests that are actually performed.On-demand mode is suitable for applications withunpredictable or variable workloads, or applications that prefer the ease of paying for only what they use1.

The DynamoDB Standard table class is the default and recommended table class for most workloads. The DynamoDB Standard table class offers lower throughput costs than the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class, and is more cost-effective for tables where throughput is the dominant cost.The DynamoDB Standard table class also offers the same performance, durability, and availability as the DynamoDB Standard-IA table class2.

The other options are not correct because they are either not cost-effective or not suitable for the use case. Configuring DynamoDB with provisioned read and write by using the DynamoDB Standard table class, and setting DynamoDB auto scaling to a maximum defined capacity is not correct because this configuration requires manual estimation and management of the table’s capacity, which adds complexity and cost to the solution. Provisioned mode is a billing option that requires users to specify the amount of read and write capacity units for their tables, and charges for the reserved capacity regardless of usage.Provisioned mode is suitable for applications with predictable or stable workloads, or applications that require finer-grained control over their capacity settings1. Configuring DynamoDB with provisioned read and write by using the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class, and setting DynamoDB auto scaling to a maximum defined capacity is not correct because thisconfiguration is not cost-effective for tables with moderate to high throughput. The DynamoDB Standard-IA table class offers lower storage costs than the DynamoDB Standard table class, but higher throughput costs.The DynamoDB Standard-IA table class is optimized for tables where storage is the dominant cost, such as tables that store infrequently accessed data2. Configuring DynamoDB in on-demand mode by using the DynamoDB Standard-Infrequent Access (DynamoDB Standard-IA) table class is not correct because this configuration is notcost-effective for tables with moderate to high throughput. As mentioned above, the DynamoDB Standard-IA table class has higher throughput costs than the DynamoDB Standard table class, which can offset the savings from lower storage costs.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/ec2/userguide/as-scaling-target-tracking.html#target-tracking-choose-metrics

A target tracking scaling policy is a type of dynamic scaling policy that adjusts the capacity of an Auto Scaling group based on a specified metric and a target value1. A target tracking scaling policy can automatically scale out or scale in the Auto Scaling group to keep the actual metric value at or near the target value1. A target trackingscaling policy issuitable for scenarios where the load on the application changes frequently and unpredictably, such as during working hours2.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use a target tracking scaling policy to scale the Auto Scaling group based on instance CPU utilization. Instance CPU utilization is a common metric that reflects the demand on the application1. The solutions architect should specify a target value that represents the ideal average CPU utilization level for the application, such as 50 percent1. Then, the Auto Scaling group will scale out or scale in to maintain that level of CPU utilization.

Scheduled scaling is a type of scaling policy that performs scaling actions based on a date and time3. Scheduled scaling is suitable for scenarios where the load on the application changes periodically and predictably, such as on weekends2.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should also use scheduled scaling to change the Auto Scaling group minimum, maximum, and desired capacity to zero for weekends. This way, the Auto Scaling group will terminate all instances on weekends when they are not required to operate. The solutions architect should also revert to the default values at the start of the week, so that the Auto Scaling group can resume normal operation.

EBS encryption by default is a feature that enables encryption for all new EBS volumes and snapshots created in a Region1. EBS encryption by default uses a service managed key or a customer managed key that is stored in AWS KMS1. EBS encryption by default is suitable for scenarios where data at rest must be encrypted by using a customer managed key, such as the digital media streaming application in the scenario1.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should enable EBS encryption by default in the AWS Region where the EKS cluster will be created. The solutions architect should select the customer managed key as the default key for encryption1. This way, all newEBS volumes and snapshots created in that Region will be encrypted by using the customer managed key.

EKS encryption provider support is a feature that enables envelope encryption of Kubernetes secrets in EKS with a customer managed key that is stored in AWS KMS2. Envelope encryption means that data is encrypted by data encryption keys (DEKs) using AES-GCM; DEKs are encrypted by key encryption keys (KEKs) according to configuration in AWS KMS3. EKS encryption provider support is suitable for scenarios where secrets must be encrypted by using a customer managed key, such as the digital media streaming application in the scenario2.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should create the EKS cluster and create an IAM role that has a policy that grants permission to the customer managed key. The solutions architect should associate the role with the EKS cluster2. This way, the EKS cluster can use envelope encryption of Kubernetes secrets with the customer managed key.

This answer is correct because it allows the web tier to access the database tier by using security groups as a source, which is a recommended best practice for VPC connectivity. Security groups are stateful and can reference other security groups in the same VPC, which simplifies the configuration and maintenance of the firewall rules. By adding an inbound rule to the database tier’s security group, the web tier’s EC2 instances can connect to the RDS instance on port 3306, regardless of their IP addresses or subnets.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/rotate-amazon-rds-database-credentials-automatically-with-aws-secrets-manager/

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/waf-block-common-attacks/#:~:text=To%20protect%20your%20applications%20against,%2C%20query%20string%2C%20or%20URI. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect against SQL injection and cross-site scripting To protect your applications against SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, use the built-in SQL injection and cross-site scripting engines. Remember that attacks can be performed ondifferent parts of the HTTP request, such as the HTTP header, query string, or URI. Configure the AWS WAF rules to inspect different parts of the HTTP request against the built-in mitigation engines.

Creating a peering connection between the two VPCs and configuring an inbound rule for the ElastiCache cluster's security group to allow inbound connection from the application's security group is the most cost-effective solution. Peering connections are free and you only incur the cost of configuring the security group rules. The Transit VPC solution requires additional VPCs and associated resources, which would incur additional costs.

Before Testing | AWS Certification Information and Policies | AWS

https://aws.amazon.com/certification/policies/before-testing/

To improve the architecture of this application, the best solution would be to use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to buffer the requests and decouple the S3 bucket from the Lambda function. This will ensure that the documents are not lost and can be processed at a later time if the Lambda function is not available. This will ensure that the documents are not lost and can be processed at a later time if the Lambda function is not available. By using Amazon SQS, the architecture is decoupled and the Lambda function can process the documents in a scalable and fault-tolerant manner

S3 One Zone-IA is a storage class that is designed for data that is accessed less frequently, but requires rapid access when needed. Unlike other S3 Storage Classes which store data in a minimum of three Availability Zones (AZs), S3 One Zone-IA stores data in a single AZ and costs 20% less than S3 Standard-IA. This storage class meets the requirements of the company because it provides a low-cost solution for the secondary copy of its on-premises dataset that would rarely need to be accessed. The other storage classes are either more expensive or not suitable for infrequently accessed data.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/storage-class-intro.html

Lambda server-less is scalable and elastic than EC2 api gateway solution

A Network Load Balancer is a type of load balancer that operates at the connection level (Layer 4) and can load balance both TCP and UDP traffic1. A Network Load Balancer is suitable for scenarios where high performance and low latency are required, such as real-time multiplayer games1. A Network Load Balancer can also handle sudden and volatile traffic patterns while using a single static IP address per Availability Zone1.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use a Network Load Balancer for traffic distribution between the EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group. The Network Load Balancer can route UDPtraffic from the client to the servers onthe appropriate port2. TheNetwork Load Balancer can also support TLS offloading for secure communications between the client and servers1.

Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that can store and retrieve any amount of data with consistent performance and low latency3. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand is a flexible billing option that requires no capacity planning and charges only for the read and write requests that are performed on the tables3. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand is ideal forscenarios where the application traffic is unpredictable or sporadic, such as gaming applications3.

To meet the requirements of the scenario, the solutions architect should use Amazon DynamoDB on-demand for data storage. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand can store gamer scores and other non-relational data without intervention from the developers. Amazon DynamoDB on-demand can also scale automatically to handle any level of requesttraffic without affecting performance or availability3.

A. Create an Amazon API Gateway REST API. Configure the method to use the Lambda function. Enable IAM authentication on the API. This option is the most operationally efficient as it allows you to use API Gateway to handle the HTTPS endpoint and also allows you to useIAM to authenticate the calls to the microservice. API Gateway also provides manyadditional features such as caching, throttling, and monitoring, which can be useful for a microservice.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/sns/latest/dg/sns-server-side-encryption.htmlhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSSimpleQueueService/latest/SQSDeveloperGuide/sqs-server-side-encryption.html

This option is the most efficient because it uses AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS), which is a service that makes it easy for you to create and manage cryptographickeys and control their use across a wide range of AWS services and with your applications running on AWS1. It also uses AWS KMS to encrypt the EBS volumes and Aurora database storage at rest, which provides data protection by encrypting your data with encryption keys that youmanage23. It also uses AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), which is a service that lets you easily provision, manage, and deploy public and private Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL/TLS) certificates for use with AWS services and your internal connected resources. It also attaches an ACM certificate to the ALB to encrypt data in transit, which provides data protection by enabling SSL/TLS encryption for connections between clients and the load balancer. Thissolution meets the requirement of encrypting all data for the application at rest and in transit. Option A is less efficient because it uses AWS KMS certificates on the ALB to encrypt data in transit, which is not possible as AWS KMS does not provide certificates but only keys. It also uses AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) to encrypt the EBS volumes and Aurora database storage at rest, which is not possible as ACM does not provide encryption but only certificates. Option B is less efficient because it uses the AWS root account to log in to the AWS Management Console, which is not recommended as it has unrestricted access to all resources in your account. It also uploads the company’s encryption certificates, which is not necessary as ACM can provide certificates for free. It also selects the option to turn on encryption for all data at rest and in transit for the account, which is not possible as encryption settings are specific to each service and resource. Option D is less efficient because it uses BitLocker to encrypt all data at rest, which is a Windows feature that provides encryption for volumes on Windows servers. However, this does not provide encryption for Aurora database storage at rest, as Auroraruns on Linux servers. It also imports the company’s TLS certificate keys to AWS KMS, which is not necessary as ACM can provide certificates for free. It also attaches the KMS keys to the ALB to encrypt data in transit, which is not possible as ALB requires certificates and not keys.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/developerguide/web-acl.html

A rate-based rule in AWS WAF allows the security team to configure thresholds that trigger rate-based rules, which enable AWS WAF to track the rate of requests for a specified time period and then block them automatically when the threshold is exceeded. This provides the ability to prevent HTTP flood attacks with minimal operational overhead.

Windows file server is on-premise and we need something to replicate the data to the cloud, the only option we have is AWS FSx for Windows File Server. Also, since the information is confidential and sensitive, we also want to make sure that the appropriate users have access to it in a secure manner.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/what-is.html

This option is the most efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from AWS Certificate Manager (ACM), which is a service that lets you easily provision,manage, and deploy public and private SSL/TLS certificates for use with AWS services and your internal connected resources1. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is required for using an ACM certificate with CloudFront2. It also meets therequirement of deploying the certificate without incurring any additional costs, as ACM does not charge for certificates that are used with supported AWS services3. This solution meets the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates and using a different domain name for the distribution. Option A is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is a type of certificate that can be used only within your organization or virtual private cloud (VPC). However, this does not meet the requirement of configuring its CloudFront distribution to use SSL/TLS certificates, as CloudFront requires a public certificate. It also requests the certificate in the us-east-1 Region, which is correct. Option B is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued private certificate from ACM, which is incorrect for the same reason as option A. It also requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region. Option D is less efficient because it requests an Amazon issued public certificate from ACM, which is correct. However, it requests the certificate in the us-west-1 Region, which is incorrect as CloudFront requires a certificate in the us-east-1 Region.

https://aws.amazon.com/vi/caching/session-management/

In order to address scalability and to provide a shared data storage for sessions that can be accessible from any individual web server, you can abstract the HTTP sessions from the web servers themselves. A common solution to for this is to leverage an In-Memory Key/Value store such as Redis and Memcached. ElastiCache offerings for In-Memory key/value stores includeElastiCache for Redis, which can support replication, and ElastiCache for Memcached which does not support replication.

• Amazon S3 for large-scale, durable, and inexpensive storage of the video content. S3 storage costs are significantly lower than EFS. • Amazon EBS only temporarily during processing. By mounting an EBS volume only when a video needs to be processed, and unmounting it after, the time the content spends on the higher-cost EBS storage is minimized. • The EBS volume can be sized to match the workload needs for active processing, keeping costs lower. The volume does not need to store the entire video library long-term.

Amazon RDS for MySQL is a fully-managed relational database service that makes it easy to set up, operate, and scale MySQL deployments in the cloud. Amazon Aurora Serverless is an on-demand, auto-scaling configuration for Amazon Aurora (MySQL-compatible edition), where the database will automatically start up, shut down, and scale capacity up or down based on your application’s needs. It is a simple, cost-effective option for infrequent, intermittent, or unpredictable workloads.

A) Enable AWS CloudTrail and use it for auditing. AWS CloudTrail provides a record of API calls and can be used to audit changes made to EC2 instances and security groups. By analyzing CloudTrail logs, the solutions architect can track who provisioned oversized instances ormodified security groups without proper approval. D) Enable AWS Config and create rules for auditing and compliance purposes. AWS Config can record the configuration changes made to resources like EC2 instances and security groups. The solutions architect can create AWS Config rules to monitor for non-compliant changes, like launching certain instance types or opening security group ports without permission. AWS Config would alert on any violations of these rules.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/header-caching.html Configuring caching based on the language of the viewer: If you want CloudFront to cache different versions of your objects based on the language specified in the request, configure CloudFront to forward the Accept-Language header to your origin.

This option is the mostefficient because it sets an overall password policy for the entire AWS account, which is a way to specify complexity requirements and mandatory rotationperiods for IAM user passwords1. It also meets the requirement of setting a password policy for all new users, as the password policy applies to all IAM users in the account. This solution meets the requirement of setting specific complexity requirements and mandatory rotation periods for IAM user passwords. Option B is less efficient because it sets a password policy for each IAM user in the AWS account, which is not possible as password policies can only be set at the account level. Option C is less efficient because it uses third-party vendor software to set password requirements, which is not necessary as IAM provides a built-in way to set password policies. Option D is less efficient because it attaches an Amazon CloudWatch rule to the Create_newuser event to set the password with the appropriate requirements, which is not possible as CloudWatch rules cannot modify IAM user passwords.

Read replica use cases - You have a production database that is taking on normal load & You want to run a reporting application to run some analytics • You create a Read Replica to run the new workload there • The production application is unaffected • Read replicas are used for SELECT (=read) only kind of statements (not INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE)

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/patterns/three-aws-glue-etl-job-types-for-converting-data-to-apache-parquet.html

Auto scaling storage RDS will ease storage issues and migrating Oracle Pl/Sql to Aurora is cumbersome. Also Aurora has auto storage scaling by default.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_PIOPS.StorageTypes.html#USER_PIOPS.Autoscaling

Create an Amazon S3 bucket to store the raw data Create an Amazon FSx for Lustre file system that uses persistent SSD storage Select the option to import data from and export data to Amazon S3 Mount the file system on the EC2 instances. Amazon FSx for Lustre uses SSD storage for sub-millisecond latencies and up to 6 GBps throughput, and can import data from and export data to Amazon S3. Additionally, the option to select persistent SSD storage will ensure that the data is stored on the disk and not lost if the file system is stopped.

• An Auto Scaling group will automatically scale the EC2 instances to match changes in demand. This optimizes cost by only running as many instances as needed.

• A target tracking scaling policy monitors the ASGAverageCPUUtilization metric and scales to keep the average CPU around the 50% target value. This ensures there are enough resources during CPU surges.

• The ALB and target group are reused, so the application architecture does not change. The Auto Scaling group is associated to the existing load balancer setup.

• A minimum of 2 and maximum of 6 instances provides the ability to scale between 3 and 6 instances as needed based on demand.

• Costs are optimized by starting with only 3 instances (the desired capacity) and scaling up as needed. When CPU usage drops, instances are terminated to match the desired capacity.

The solution that meets the requirements with the least operational overhead is to create a **Regional AWS WAF web ACL with a rate-based rule** and associate the web ACL with the API Gateway stage. This solution will protect the application from HTTP flood attacks by monitoring incoming requests and blocking requests from IP addresses that exceed the predefined rate. Amazon CloudFront distribution with Lambda@Edge in front of the API Gateway Regional API endpoint is also a good solution but it requires more operational overhead than the previous solution. Using Amazon CloudWatch metrics to monitor theCount metric and alerting the security team when the predefined rate is reached is not a solution that can protect against HTTP flood attacks. Creating an Amazon CloudFront distribution in front of the API Gateway Regional API endpoint with a maximum TTL of 24 hours is not a solution that can protect against HTTP flood attacks.

S3 Intelligent-Tiering is a cost-optimized storage class that automatically moves data to the most cost-effective access tier based on changing access patterns. Although it offers cost savings, it also introduces additional latency and retrieval time into the data retrieval process, which may not meet the requirement of "immediately available" data. On the other hand, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) provides low cost storage with low latency and high throughput performance. It is designed for infrequently accessed data that can be recreated if lost, and can be retrieved in a timely manner if required. It is a cost-effective solution that meets the requirement of immediately available data and remains accessible for up to 3 months.

This answer is correct because it provides a resilient and durable replacement for the on-premises file share that is compatible with Windows IIS web servers. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server is a fully managed service that provides shared file storage built on Windows Server. It supports the SMB protocol and integrates with Microsoft ActiveDirectory, which enables seamless access and authentication for Windows-based applications. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server also offers the following benefits:

Resilience: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server can be deployed in multiple Availability Zones, which provides high availability and failover protection. It also supports automatic backups and restores, as well as self-healing features that detect and correct issues.

Durability: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server replicates data within and across Availability Zones, and stores data on highly durable storage devices. It also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as file access auditing and data deduplication.

Performance: Amazon FSx for Windows File Server delivers consistent sub-millisecond latencies and high throughput for file operations. It also supports SSD storage, native Windows features such as Distributed File System (DFS) Namespaces and Replication, and user-driven performance scaling.

By configuring the Amazon FSx file share to use an AWS KMS CMK to encrypt the images in the file share, the company can protect the images from unauthorized access and comply with company policy. By using NTFS permission sets on the images, the company can prevent accidental deletion of the images by restricting who can modify or delete them.

https://aws.amazon.com/ebs/features/ Amazon EBS provides a range of options that allow you to optimize storage performance and cost for your workload. These options are divided into two major categories: SSD-backed storage for transactional workloads, such as databases and boot volumes (performance depends primarily on IOPS), and HDD-backed storage for throughput intensive workloads, such as MapReduce and log processing (performance depends primarily on MB/s).

Since the application has no local data on instances, AMIs alone can meet the RPO by restoring instances from the most recent AMI backup. When combined with automated RDS backups for the database, this provides a complete backup solution for this environment. The other options involving EBS snapshots would be unnecessary given the stateless nature of the instances. AMIs provide all the backup needed for the app tier. This uses native, automated AWS backup features that require minimal ongoing management: - AMI automated backups provide point-in-time recovery for the stateless app tier. - RDS automated backups provide point-in-time recovery for the database.

Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling offers the ability to add lifecycle hooks to your Auto Scaling groups. These hooks let you create solutions that are aware of events in the Auto Scaling instance lifecycle, and then perform a custom action on instances when the corresponding lifecycle event occurs. (https://docs.aws.amazon.com/autoscaling/ec2/userguide/lifecycle-hooks.html)