Free Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 12

To prevent developers from unintentionally attaching an Elastic IP address to an Amazon EC2 instance in production, the best approach is to use IAM policies and AWS Config rules. By attaching an IAM policy that denies the associate-address permission to the developers’ IAM group, you ensure that developers cannot perform this action. Additionally, creating a custom AWS Config rule to check for Elastic IP addresses associated with instances tagged as production provides ongoing monitoring. If the rule detects an Elastic IP address, it can trigger an alert to notify the security team. This method is proactive and enforces the necessary permissions while also providing a mechanism for detection and notification. References: from Amazon DevOps sources

This solution will meet the requirements because it will reduce the number of errorless records that are sent to the dead-letter queue. When you configure the setting to split the batch when an error occurs, Lambda will retry only the records that caused the error, instead of retrying the entire batch. This way, the records that have no data errors and have already been processed by the legacy REST API will not be retried and sent to the dead-letter queue unnecessarily.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/with-kinesis.html

This solution meets the requirements in the most operationally efficient manner by automating the application restart process on the instances without restarting them. When the CloudWatch alarm enters the ALARM state, the EventBridge rule is triggered, which in turn invokes the Systems Manager Automation runbook that contains the script to restart the application on the instances.

API Gateway supports canary deployment on a deployment stage before you direct all traffic to that stage. A parallel environment means we will create a new ALB and a target group that will target a new set of EC2 instances on which the newer version of the app will be deployed. So the canary setting associated to the new version of the API will connect with the new ALB instance which in turn will direct the traffic to the new EC2 instances on which the newer version of the application is deployed.

Option A directly matches all requirements with the least extra infrastructure:

State Manager is the Systems Manager capability for defining and maintaining a desired configuration by running associations on a schedule (for example, hourly). That satisfies the “run periodically” requirement in a managed way across a large fleet.

The AWS-ApplyChefRecipes Systems Manager document is specifically intended to run Chef recipes/cookbooks on managed instances without requiring you to run your own Chef server infrastructure. You can point it at a cookbook source (such as an artifact/repo location) and have Systems Manager handle execution on the instances.

Why the other options aren’t correct:

B is not the right mechanism for periodic Chef cookbook execution. Installing an application package and running a “repair action” via Run Command is not the purpose-built Chef cookbook runner, and it’s more brittle/DIY than State Manager associations.

C (AWS-RefreshAssociation) is used to refresh/reevaluate association metadata/targets; it does not itself execute Chef cookbooks as the compliance mechanism.

D is for OS patching compliance (Patch Manager/patch policies), not for applying Chef cookbooks that detect and remediate configuration drift.

Option A is correct because removing the AdministratorAccess policy and assigning the ReadOnlyAccess managed IAM policy to the developer role is a valid way to prevent the developers from making any manual changes to the deployed resources. The AdministratorAccess policy grants full access to all AWS resources and actions, which is not necessary for the developers. The ReadOnlyAccess policy grants read-only access to most AWS resources and actions, which is sufficient for the developers to view the status of their stacks. Instructing the developers to use the CloudFormationDeployment role as a CloudFormation service role when they deploy new stacks is also a valid way to ensure that only CloudFormation can use the new role. A CloudFormation service role is an IAM role that allows CloudFormation to make calls to resources in a stack on behalf of the user1. The user can specify a service role when they create or update a stack, and CloudFormation will use that role’s credentials for all operations that are performed on that stack1.

Option B is incorrect because updating the trust of CloudFormationDeployment role to allow the developer IAM role to assume the CloudFormationDeployment role is not a valid solution. This would allow the developers to manually assume the CloudFormationDeployment role and perform actions on the deployed resources, which is not what the company wants. The trust of CloudFormationDeployment role should only allow the cloudformation.amazonaws.com AWS principal to assume the role, as in option D.

Option C is incorrect because configuring the IAM user to be able to get and pass the CloudFormationDeployment role if cloudformation actions for resources is not a valid solution. This would allow the developers to manually pass the CloudFormationDeployment role to other services or resources, which is not what the company wants. The IAM user should only be able to pass the CloudFormationDeployment role as a service role when they create or update a stack with CloudFormation, as in option A.

Option D is correct because updating the trust of CloudFormationDeployment role to allow the cloudformation.amazonaws.com AWS principal to perform the iam:AssumeRole action is a valid solution. This allows CloudFormation to assume the CloudFormationDeployment role and access resources in other services on behalf of the user2. The trust policy of an IAM role defines which entities can assume the role2. By specifying cloudformation.amazonaws.com as the principal, you grant permission only to CloudFormation to assume this role.

Option E is incorrect because instructing the developers to assume the CloudFormationDeployment role when they deploy new stacks is not a valid solution. This would allow the developers to manually assume the CloudFormationDeployment role and perform actions on the deployed resources, which is not what the company wants. The developers should only use the CloudFormationDeployment role as a service role when they deploy new stacks with CloudFormation, as in option A.

Option F is correct because adding an IAM policy to CloudFormationDeployment that allows cloudformation:* on all resources and adding a policy that allows the iam:PassRole action for ARN of CloudFormationDeployment if iam:PassedToService equals cloudformation.amazonaws.com are valid solutions. The first policy grants permission for CloudFormationDeployment to perform any action with any resource using cloudformation.amazonaws.com as a service principal3. The second policy grants permission for passing this role only if it is passed by cloudformation.amazonaws.com as a service principal4. This ensures that only CloudFormation can use this role.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/logs/SubscriptionFilters.html

Step 1: Enabling AWS Config for the OrganizationThe first step is to enable AWS Config across the AWS Organization. AWS Config is a service that enables you to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of your AWS resources. By enabling AWS Config, you can ensure that all S3 buckets within the organization are tracked and evaluated according to compliance rules.

Action: Turn on AWS Config for all AWS accounts in the organization.

Why: AWS Config will help monitor all resources (like S3 buckets) in real time to detect whether they are compliant with security policies.