Free Adobe AD0-E906 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

For a multi-faceted holiday promotion involving several teams and unique workflows, the best way to track the associated assets is to:

Establish the holiday promotion as a Program: This allows all related projects, each corresponding to a specific marketing platform (e.g., social media, email), to be grouped under a single program for easy tracking.

Associate each project with the Program: This ensures that all related assets and workflows are linked to the holiday promotion and can be reported on collectively.

Create a Project-level Custom Form Field: This will capture specific details related to the holiday promotion for each project, allowing for more tailored reporting.

Create a Project Report filtered to the holiday promotion: This report will enable leadership and stakeholders to track the progress of all assets related to the promotion and ensure on-time delivery.

Option A involves creating a Program for each platform, which adds unnecessary complexity. Option B is similar but lacks the specific tracking of custom fields at the project level.

Refer toWorkfront’s documentation on managing Programs and custom formsfor details on setting up and reporting on large campaigns.

To ensure proper functioning of the Enhanced Connector between AEM and Workfront, it is critical that the firewall allows traffic forEvent SubscriptionsandWebhooks:

Event Subscriptions: These are necessary for synchronizing events between Workfront and AEM, such as when assets are modified or when metadata is updated.

Webhooks: Webhooks enable real-time data exchange and notifications between the two systems, allowing instant updates to flow between Workfront and AEM.

Option A (Experience Manager Workflows) is relevant within AEM but not directly tied to firewall configuration for the connector. Option B (Single Sign-On) is a security feature but not specifically tied to the Enhanced Connector’s data synchronization processes.

Refer to theWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor details on the processes that rely on Event Subscriptions and Webhooks.

When handling high-volume content ingestion in AEM,transient workflowsare a key factor for optimizing performance. Transient workflows do not persist workflow data in the JCR repository, which greatly reduces the load on the repository and improves overall performance. Since content ingestion typically involves processing a large number of assets, using transient workflows prevents unnecessary data accumulation in the repository.

Transient workflowsare ideal for operations where you don’t need to keep historical data about each workflow instance, such as ingestion processes, thereby making the system faster and more efficient.

Option A (using schedulers) is not related to workflow performance, and Option B (allocating more RAM) is a generic solution but not directly tied to optimizing workflow efficiency.

For further guidance, refer to AEM's documentation onworkflow optimizationandtransient workflows.

To motivate Marketing to endorse a single Workfront instance across the enterprise, the best first step is to initiateExecutive/Stakeholder Engagement. By getting senior leadership or key stakeholders from both the legal and marketing departments involved, it helps align the goals of the organization and illustrates the value of a unified system.

Executive engagementcan help overcome resistance from individual departments (such as Marketing) by emphasizing the strategic importance of having a centralized system and showcasing the benefits for the entire organization.

Options A (training on group admin functions) and B (demo tailored for multiple groups) are useful but would not be as impactful as engaging executives to drive the initiative from the top down.

Refer toWorkfront’s adoption and implementation strategiesfor more information on how to engage stakeholders effectively.

When configuring allowed HTTP request methods for /bin/workfront-tools on the AEM dispatcher, the safest and most appropriate methods to allow areGET, POST, and PUT. These methods cover the basic operations for retrieving data (GET), submitting data (POST), and updating data (PUT), which are typically required for the Enhanced Connector functionality.

GET: Used to retrieve data from the server.

POST: Used to send data to the server.

PUT: Used to update resources on the server.

Options A (DELETE) and B (HEAD, DELETE) are riskier and less commonly needed for this use case, and DELETE should be restricted unless absolutely necessary to prevent unintended deletions.

Refer toAdobe documentation on Dispatcher securityfor best practices regarding allowed HTTP methods.

To ensure that changes in metadata in Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) are synced back to Workfront for the fieldsContent TypeandEffort, the correct property assignment should map the Workfront custom form fields to the corresponding paths in the AEM JCR repository.

InOption A:

CUSTOM FORMS

is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/content-type

CUSTOM FORMS

is mapped to /jcr:content/metadata/effort

This configuration ensures that changes made in AEM’scontent-typeandeffortmetadata properties will be reflected in the respective custom fields in Workfront.

Options B and C use incorrect prefixes (e.g., "DE:") and would not map the properties correctly for synchronization between Workfront and AEM.

Refer to theWorkfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor detailed instructions on configuring metadata synchronization between AEM and Workfront.

The best practice for managing metadata in this case is to:

Create a document custom form: This form will capture the essential metadata details for the asset, such as title, description, and other key attributes, ensuring that the metadata is structured and managed correctly from the start.

Map the custom form fields along with project details: By mapping this information from Workfront to AEM, the metadata is automatically synchronized, reducing manual work and ensuring consistency across both systems.

Option B, which involves not creating custom forms, would likely lead to the same lack of metadata management as before. Option C suggests creating a project custom form, which is less relevant for capturing specific asset metadata.

Refer toAdobe Workfront Enhanced Connector documentationfor more on best practices around metadata management and custom forms.

In this case, since the user is reviewing a legal document where all changes are related to written copy, the most efficient way to highlight and provide comments is by using theText Select tool. This tool allows the user to select specific text in the document and attach comments directly related to the text, making it easier for others to understand the context of the feedback.

TheText Select toolis specifically designed for making text-based comments, which is ideal for written copy changes.

Options A (Freehand tool) and B (Box tool) are better suited for graphical annotations or drawing attention to areas of images, not text-specific feedback.

For more details, refer toWorkfront Proofing documentationon proofing tools and their use cases.

In this scenario, the best approach is to create separategroupsfor Marketing and IT within the same Workfront instance. Each group will have its owngroup administrator, and each department’s resources (e.g., custom statuses, templates, reports) can be isolated and managed independently by the group admins.

This solution ensures that:

Theexisting IT setupis not disrupted.

The Marketing department can have its own customized Workfront environment without overlapping with IT's configurations.

This approach avoids creating unnecessary complexity (as in Option A with companies) or restricting functionality (as in Option B with teams).

Refer toWorkfront documentation on group managementto learn how to implement group-specific configurations in a single instance.

When a new metadata profile is applied to a folder in AEM, itonly affects new assetsadded to that folderafterthe profile is applied. Existing assets that were already in the folder or subfolders prior to the profile being assigned will retain the metadata profile that was previously applied.

To update the metadata of existing assets with the new profile, you would need to either manually update the assets or run a script to reapply the metadata profile to those assets.

Option B is incorrect because the profile applies to all assets in the folder, not just direct children. Option C is incorrect because if there were invalid field values, you would likely see an error or warning, rather than a silent failure.

For more details, refer to AEM’sdocumentation on managing and applying metadata profiles.