Free Adobe AD0-E902 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Understanding the Issue:

TheWatch Eventsmodule is generating a high number of bundles because it monitors a broad range of project updates in Workfront, resulting in an overwhelming amount of data passing through the scenario.

The goal is to reduce the number of bundles by narrowing the scope of monitored events.

Why Option C is Correct:

Switching to Watch Record:

TheWatch Recordmodule allows users to monitor specific records (e.g., projects, tasks) with additional filtering options in thecriteriaorfilter box.

By applying filters, the module can focus only on relevant updates, significantly reducing the number of bundles being processed.

Example: Filtering for specific project statuses, update types, or assigned users ensures that only relevant changes are captured.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ("Reducing the maximum number of returned events on the trigger"):

This limits the number of bundles processed per cycle but does not address the root cause, which is the broad monitoring scope of theWatch Eventsmodule.

Option B ("Reducing the maximum number of cycles in scenario settings"):

The number of cycles determines how many iterations the scenario performs in one run but does not reduce the number of bundles entering the scenario.

Steps to Use the Watch Record Module:

Replace theWatch Eventsmodule withWatch Record.

Specify the record type to monitor (e.g., Project).

Use the optional filter box to apply criteria, such as specific project fields, statuses, or other conditions.

Activate the scenario to test the refined data flow.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion: Watch Record Module

Workfront Community: Managing High Bundle Volumes in Fusion

Object ID in CRUD Operations:REST APIs commonly use CRUD operations to interact with resources. TheObject IDserves as a unique identifier for the resource and is generally required for the following actions:

A. Update:

To update a specific resource, the API must know which resource to modify. The Object ID is used to identify the exact resource that should be updated.

Example: A PUT or PATCH request typically requires the Object ID in the URL or body of the request.

URL Example:

PUT /tasks/{id}

B. Delete:

Similarly, when deleting a specific resource, the Object ID is needed to ensure the correct resource is removed.

Example: A DELETE request requires the Object ID in the URL to target the specific resource.

URL Example:

DELETE /tasks/{id}

Why Not Other Options?

C. Respond: This is not a standard CRUD operation in REST APIs and does not involve an Object ID.

D. Create: The Create operation (typically POST) does not require an Object ID because the resource does not yet exist. Instead, the API usually generates the Object ID after creation.

References:

REST API Documentation Best Practices: CRUD Operations

Experience League: Understanding CRUD in Workfront APIs

Understanding the Requirement:

The user wants to test the first half of the scenario for consistency without executing the remaining modules.

This requires halting further execution after a specific point in the scenario.

Why Option D ("Break") is Correct:

TheBreakmodule is a flow control module in Adobe Workfront Fusion that stops the execution of all subsequent modules in the scenario.

It is specifically designed for scenarios where you want to terminate execution after testing or processing a portion of the flow.

Example Use Case: After ensuring the first set of modules processes data correctly, the Break module prevents the execution of later modules to avoid unintended actions or changes.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option A ("Router"):

The Router splits the execution flow into multiple branches but does not stop the execution of subsequent modules.

Option B ("Sleep"):

The Sleep module pauses execution for a specified time but does not disable subsequent modules permanently.

Option C ("Ignore"):

There is no "Ignore" module in Workfront Fusion.

Steps to Use the Break Module:

Insert theBreakmodule at the point where you want to stop execution.

Save and run the scenario to test the flow up to the Break module.

Once satisfied with the results, remove or bypass the Break module to continue testing or finalizing the full scenario.

How This Solves the Problem:

The Break module allows targeted testing of specific sections of the scenario while preventing unwanted execution of subsequent actions, making it a safe and efficient way to debug workflows.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Flow Control Modules Documentation

Workfront Community: Using the Break Module in Scenario Development

Understanding the Scenario:

The issue involves end users inputting inconsistent date and currency formats that result in errors in a Workfront Fusion scenario.

The default behavior of Fusion stops the scenario after three retries due to input mismatches or invalid formats.

Why Option A is Correct:

Storing Incomplete Executions: In Adobe Workfront Fusion, enabling "Store incomplete executions" in the scenario settings allows administrators to capture incomplete runs without fully stopping the entire process. This feature stores all relevant data, even from incomplete runs, allowing administrators to identify and correct input issues manually.

Error Troubleshooting: By reviewing incomplete executions, admins can pinpoint where the scenario failed, resolve the issue, and potentially reprocess those incomplete records, preventing complete scenario stoppage.

Why Option B is Incorrect:

The "switch module" can handle specific input variations, but it is not a comprehensive solution for handling unexpected or inconsistent formats entered by end users. While it might mitigate some errors, it does not address the root cause and can miss unanticipated input patterns.

Why Option C is Incorrect:

Setting up an error handling path to notify users and request corrections adds an additional manual step for users but does not resolve the problem efficiently within Fusion. Moreover, this solution does not prevent the scenario from halting after retries.

Steps to Enable Storing Incomplete Executions:

Navigate to the scenario in Adobe Workfront Fusion.

Open theScenario Settingsby clicking the gear icon.

Enable the optionStore Incomplete Executionsunder Execution settings.

Save the settings and activate the scenario.

How This Solves the Problem:

Enabling this setting ensures that no data is lost when the scenario fails due to inconsistent inputs. Admins can access the incomplete executions through the scenario execution history, apply necessary corrections, and retry specific records or steps as needed.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Official Documentation: Scenario Settings

Workfront Community: Handling Incomplete Executions

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Error:

The error message [403] The caller does not have permission is aGoogle API permission error.

It typically indicates that the user or application does not have the required access rights to perform the requested action on the Google Slide presentation.

Option Analysis:

A. Reauthorize their Google connection:

This step might be necessary if the user's credentials or token have expired, but this is not the primary issue here since the error specifically states apermission problem.

B. Update Google sharing permissions for the document:

Correct. The error suggests that the Google Slide document has not been shared with the user or service account being used in Fusion. Updating the sharing settings to grant proper permissions (e.g., "Editor" or "Viewer" access) will resolve the issue.

C. Contact Workfront Support to troubleshoot the root cause:

While Workfront Support can help with Fusion-related issues, this error originates from Google and is unrelated to Workfront's systems.

D. Search the Google status site to determine the cause:

The Google status site is useful for identifying system-wide outages, but this is a user-specific permission issue, not a Google platform-wide problem.

Steps to Resolve:

Open the Google Slide presentation.

Update the sharing permissions:

Grant access to the Google account or service account being used in Fusion.

Ensure the account has at leastEditoror appropriate access rights.

Save the changes and rerun the Fusion scenario.

Why Updating Permissions is Best:

This action directly addresses the root cause of the error, which is inadequate access rights.

Once permissions are updated, Fusion will be able to connect to and manipulate the Google Slide document as intended.

References:The [403] The caller does not have permission error is documented in Google API troubleshooting guides, which recommend verifying and updating document sharing settings for resolving access issues.

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Understanding the Scenario:

The diagram shows two routes, each leading to an aggregator module (Aggregator 1 and Aggregator 2).

The bundle inspector indicates different output counts for the two aggregators: Aggregator 1 displays 1, and Aggregator 2 displays 10.

Option Analysis:

A. Aggregator 1’s route is set to process the 1st bundle only, and Aggregator 2's route is set to process all bundles:

Incorrect. Aggregators process data from their input modules based on their configuration. While filters or limits might be applied earlier in the flow, the scenario does not suggest that the aggregator's configuration explicitly limits bundles in this way.

B. The source module for the aggregators are different:

Correct. The two aggregators receive input from different modules. For example, Aggregator 1 might aggregate bundles from "Projects," which outputs a single bundle, while Aggregator 2 aggregates bundles from "Issues," which outputs 10 bundles. This explains the differing numbers in the bundle inspector.

C. Aggregator 2 displays a 10 in the bundle inspector because it is set to repeat 10 times:

Incorrect. Aggregators do not "repeat" a specific number of times. Instead, they process the input bundles passed to them and output a result based on the aggregation logic.

D. The scenario's router is set to only allow projects through the route to Aggregator 1 and only allows tasks through the route to Aggregator 2:

Incorrect. While the router might direct specific bundles (e.g., "Projects" to Aggregator 1 and "Issues" to Aggregator 2), the difference in bundle counts is determined by the source modules, not by the router's configuration alone.

Why Source Modules Determine Bundle Counts:

Each aggregator processes data from a source module. If the source module outputs different numbers of bundles, the aggregators will show different bundle counts.

In this example, "Projects" might output only 1 bundle (e.g., 1 project), while "Issues" outputs 10 bundles (e.g., 10 issues).

How to Verify:

Inspect the source modules feeding into each aggregator. Check the number of bundles they produce during the scenario run.

Confirm that the aggregators are aggregating based on their respective inputs.

References:This explanation aligns with Workfront Fusion's handling of bundles and aggregation logic. Differences in bundle counts at the aggregator level are typically due to differences in the source module outputs, as shown in the scenario.

Understanding the Requirement:

The field data from a third-party system needs to be transformed into one of three possible choices.

This transformation implies conditional logic, where the output depends on the value of the input field.

Why Option A ("Switch") is Correct:

TheSwitchfunction evaluates a given input against multiple cases and outputs a corresponding value based on the matched condition.

For example:

switch(field, "value1", "choice1", "value2", "choice2", "defaultChoice")

If field equals "value1", the output is "choice1".

If field equals "value2", the output is "choice2".

If no conditions match, the output is "defaultChoice".

This functionality perfectly fits the requirement to transform the input into one of three possible choices.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B ("Slice"):

The slice function is used for extracting a portion of a string or array but does not support conditional transformations.

Option C ("Split"):

The split function divides a string into an array based on a specified delimiter. It is not designed for conditional logic or value mapping.

How This Solves the Problem:

The Switch function allows flexible and dynamic transformations, ensuring the field data is mapped to the correct choice based on its value.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation

Workfront Community: Using the Switch Function for Conditional Logic

When encountering the error429: Too many requests, which indicates the web service is being overwhelmed by requests, the following actions can help:

A. Add a Sleep Module:

Adding aSleepmodule introduces a delay between iterations, reducing the frequency of API calls.

By slowing down the rate of requests, you avoid hitting the rate limits of the web service, thus reducing the chances of receiving a 429 error.

This approach is useful for managing high-volume iterations without overloading the external service.

C. Add a Module to Test the Service for Errors:

Adding a module to test the service's response before making a call can help prevent the 429 error by checking if the service is ready to handle requests.

This preemptive check allows the scenario to conditionally execute, ensuring that it doesn't overwhelm the service and respects the API rate limits.

Why Not Other Options?

B. Use an Ignore Directive: Ignoring errors can be risky because it would cause the scenario to ignore 429 errors, possibly leading to failed API calls that are not addressed. Ignoring an error doesn’t solve the issue of too many requests being sent to the service.

D. Use a Break Directive: TheBreakdirective would stop the execution, which is counterproductive when trying to resolve the issue by reducing the rate of requests. It would not address the root cause of too many requests.

References:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Documentation: Handling API Rate Limiting with Sleep and Error Handling

Experience League Community: Managing Web Service Errors in High-Volume Iterations

Understanding the Scenario:

The image represents a Workfront Fusion scenario with a Workfront module, HTTP modules, and routers splitting the execution path.

The goal is to reuse multiple fields from the Workfront module (e.g., data extracted or processed earlier in the flow) as mapped expressions in HTTP PUT requests located in the bottom paths.

Why Option A is Correct:

Set Multiple Variables Module: This module allows you to define and store multiple variables at a single point in the scenario (e.g., after the Workfront module). These variables can then be reused throughout subsequent steps in the scenario.

Get Multiple Variables Module: By placing this module between the Text Parser and the bottom Router, you can retrieve all previously stored variables, ensuring consistent access across all branches of the flow. This avoids redundancy and ensures the data is easily accessible for each HTTP request in the bottom paths.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B ("Set Multiple Variables after Workfront, Get Variables before each HTTP module"): This is partially correct but less efficient. Adding multiple Get Variable modules before each HTTP request results in repetitive configuration and increases maintenance complexity.

Option C ("Set Variable and Get Variable for each HTTP module"): Using individual Set and Get Variable modules increases duplication. This approach requires separate variables for each data point, which is inefficient compared to using the Set/Get Multiple Variables module for multiple fields at once.

Steps to Configure the Solution:

After the Workfront module:

Add aSet Multiple Variablesmodule.

Define all the fields required for the HTTP PUT requests as variables, mapping them from the Workfront module outputs.

Between the Text Parser and the bottom Router:

Add aGet Multiple Variablesmodule.

Retrieve the previously stored variables, ensuring they are accessible for all paths.

In the HTTP modules on each bottom path:

Use the retrieved variables for mapping in the PUT requests.

How This Solves the Problem:

This approach centralizes variable management, making it easier to access and modify data as needed.

It avoids redundancy, as variables are defined once and reused across all paths, reducing the risk of errors and ensuring consistency.

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion: Variables Module Overview

Workfront Community: Efficient Use of Variables in Fusion

Understanding the Requirement:

The project name in Workfront must include:

Purchase Order Number (PO#).

Name of the product.

PO Fulfillment Date (formatted as YY/MM/DD).

If a discount is provided, append the discount percentage and the approver's last name in the format: 15% Discount - UserLast.

Example Output:

sql

Copy

2837 - Compendium-Premium Running Shoes - 21/02/16 - 15% Discount - UserLast

Why Option A is Correct:

The expression in Option A achieves the desired result step-by-step:

3.PO#: Includes the PO number.

3.Name: Appends the name of the product.

formatDate(3.PO Fulfillment Date, YY/MM/DD): Formats the PO Fulfillment Date in the desired YY/MM/DD format.

if(3.Discount Provided? = "Yes"; "- " + 3.Discount % + " Discount - " + 3.Approver Last Name):

Uses the if function to check if a discount was provided.

If "Yes," it appends the discount percentage (3.Discount %) and approver's last name (3.Approver Last Name) with the required format.

Why the Other Options are Incorrect:

Option B:

The expression is incorrect because it places if(3.Discount Provided?...) directly after PO Fulfillment Date without using formatDate for date formatting. This results in an unformatted date.

Option C:

Uses parseDate instead of formatDate, which is incorrect in this context. parseDate is used to interpret strings as dates, not to format dates for output.

Option D:

The expression does not include any conditional logic for checking if a discount is provided. It simply appends Discount - Approver Last Name regardless of whether a discount was given.

Steps to Use the Expression in Workfront Fusion:

Place the expression in the module that defines the project title in Workfront.

Map the fields (PO#, Name, PO Fulfillment Date, etc.) to the respective columns from the CSV data.

Test the scenario to ensure the output matches the desired format.

Final Expression (Option A):

3.PO# + " - " + 3.Name + " - " + formatDate(3.PO Fulfillment Date; YY/MM/DD) + if(3.Discount Provided? = "Yes"; " - " + 3.Discount % + " Discount - " + 3.Approver Last Name)

References and Supporting Documentation:

Adobe Workfront Fusion Functions Documentation

Workfront Community: Handling Conditional Logic and Date Formatting