An Organization has previously provisioned its own AWS VPC hosting various servers. The organization now needs to use Cloudhub to host a Mule application that will implement a REST API once deployed to Cloudhub, this Mule application must be able to communicate securely with the customer-provisioned AWS VPC resources within the same region, without being interceptable on the public internet.
What Anypoint Platform features should be used to meet these network communication requirements between Cloudhub and the existing customer-provisioned AWS VPC?
An architect is designing a Mule application to meet the following two requirements:
1. The application must process files asynchronously and reliably from an FTPS server to a back-end database using VM intermediary queues for
load-balancing Mule events.
2. The application must process a medium rate of records from a source to a target system using a Batch Job scope.
To make the Mule application more reliable, the Mule application will be deployed to two CloudHub 1.0 workers.
Following MuleSoft-recommended best practices, how should the Mule application deployment typically be configured in Runtime Manger to best
support the performance and reliability goals of both the Batch Job scope and the file processing VM queues?
Refer to the exhibit.
A business process involves two APIs that interact with each other asynchronously over HTTP. Each API is implemented as a Mule application. API 1 receives the initial HTTP request and invokes API 2 (in a fire and forget fashion) while API 2, upon completion of the processing, calls back into API l to notify about completion of the asynchronous process.
Each API Is deployed to multiple redundant Mule runtimes and a separate load balancer, and is deployed to a separate network zone.
In the network architecture, how must the firewall rules be configured to enable the above Interaction between API 1 and API 2?
According to the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), which supporting protocol does File Transfer Protocol (FTP) use for reliable communication?
An integration Mute application consumes and processes a list of rows from a CSV file. Each row must be read from the CSV file, validated, and the row data sent to a JMS queue, in the exact order as in the CSV file.
If any processing step for a row falls, then a log entry must be written for that row, but processing of other rows must not be affected.
What combination of Mute components is most idiomatic (used according to their intended purpose) when Implementing the above requirements?
A project team uses RAML specifications to document API functional requirements and deliver API definitions. As per the current legal requirement, all designed API definitions to be augmented with an additional non-functional requirement to protect the services from a high rate of requests according to define service level agreements.
Assuming that the project is following Mulesoft API governance and policies, how should the project team convey the necessary non-functional requirement to stakeholders?
As a part of project requirement, client will send a stream of data to mule application. Payload size can vary between 10mb to 5GB. Mule application is required to transform the data and send across multiple sftp servers. Due to the cost cuttings in the organization, mule application can only be allocated one worker with size of 0.2 vCore.
As an integration architect , which streaming strategy you would suggest to handle this scenario?
A mule application is deployed to a Single Cloudhub worker and the public URL appears in Runtime Manager as the APP URL.
Requests are sent by external web clients over the public internet to the mule application App url. Each of these requests routed to the HTTPS Listener event source of the running Mule application.
Later, the DevOps team edits some properties of this running Mule application in Runtime Manager.
Immediately after the new property values are applied in runtime manager, how is the current Mule application deployment affected and how will future web client requests to the Mule application be handled?
A gaming company has implemented an API as a Mule application and deployed the API implementation to a CloudHub 2.0 private space. The API implementation must connect to a mainframe application running in the customer’s on-premises corporate data center and also to a Kafka cluster running in an Amazon AWS VPC.
What is the most efficient way to enable the API to securely connect from its private space to the mainframe application and Kafka cluster?
A platform architect includes both an API gateway and a service mesh in the architect of a distributed application for communication management.
Which type of communication management does a service mesh typically perform in this architecture?
|
PDF + Testing Engine
|
|---|
|
$49.5 |
|
Testing Engine
|
|---|
|
$37.5 |
|
PDF (Q&A)
|
|---|
|
$31.5 |
Salesforce Free Exams |
|---|
|