Free Microsoft DP-750 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

The correct answers are B and E.

The goal is to reduce storage costs while preserving 30 days of time travel. Two actions are needed:

Set delta.deletedFileRetentionDuration to a value aligned with the 30-day requirement (Option B). Note: the answer option states ' 10 days ' which would be insufficient for 30-day time travel — in practice this property should be set to at least 30 days. This property defines the retention floor: VACUUM will not delete any file newer than this threshold.

Run VACUUM on Table1 (Option E). VACUUM physically removes unreferenced data files older than the retention duration from storage. Without running VACUUM, obsolete files accumulate indefinitely regardless of the retention property setting — the property tells VACUUM what to keep; VACUUM is what does the actual cleanup.

Option C (OPTIMIZE) compacts small files for better query performance but never deletes anything. Option D (logRetentionDuration) keeps the transaction log for time travel but doesn ' t free up the data file storage.

A time series profile repeatedly calculates data-quality metrics as a table changes and preserves those measurements over time. This makes it possible to observe whether the number of null values in each column is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable as new records are added. A snapshot profile evaluates the table at a particular point in time and is therefore insufficient when the requirement is to analyze metric progression across multiple updates. Inference is associated with deriving information such as a schema or statistical characteristics; it is not the profile type used to maintain a historical sequence of monitoring measurements. Because the question requires repeated evaluation and the ability to observe changes throughout the dataset’s progression, the time series profile satisfies both requirements.

First dropdown: Year

Second dropdown: (2019, 2020, 2021)

The UNPIVOT operator converts the separate 2019, 2020, and 2021 columns into rows. Value becomes the output column containing the values previously stored in those year columns. Year becomes the output name column that identifies the original column from which each value came. Therefore, the expression must use Value FOR Year IN (2019, 2020, 2021). The Salesperson and Item columns are not included in the IN list because they remain identifier columns and are repeated for every resulting year row. A single source row consequently produces three output rows—one for each listed year. Selecting (Year) would reference an output name rather than the source columns that must be rotated.

The correct answer is D. Breaking the pipeline into separate tasks for ingestion, cleansing, and curation is the foundation of well-designed Lakeflow Jobs pipelines. Each task should own one responsibility — when a task does too much, debugging a failure becomes a hunt through unrelated code, and retry logic becomes expensive because you re-execute work that already succeeded.

Contoso ' s planned changes explicitly call for ' a clear execution order and dependencies ' and ' orchestrate multi-step ingestion and transformation workflows. ' Separate tasks map directly to those goals: Lakeflow Jobs tracks each task ' s status independently, so if cleansing fails, ingestion doesn ' t re-run.

Option A bundles everything into one notebook, which means a curation bug forces a full re-ingestion. Option B copies logic three times — any future change must be applied in triplicate, which is a maintenance hazard. Option C forces everything through SQL MERGE, which is the wrong tool for raw-event ingestion and doesn ' t address cleansing or schema drift.

The right ingestion tool depends on the source characteristics:

File-based telemetry and maintenance data → Auto Loader (cloudFiles). It monitors ADLS Gen2 for new arrivals, handles schema inference and evolution for the frequent schema drift, and requires minimal operational effort.

Real-time telemetry from Event Hubs → Spark Structured Streaming with the azure-eventhubs-spark connector. This provides exactly-once semantics and checkpoint-based recovery, satisfying ' resume processing after failures without reprocessing. '

Structured maintenance data from PostgreSQL → JDBC connector. Databricks supports direct JDBC reads from relational databases with pushdown predicates.

Daily CSV ERP extracts (50–100 GB) → COPY INTO or Auto Loader. Both support idempotent incremental batch loading into Delta tables with minimal code.

The solution requires spark.readStream with format( ' cloudFiles ' ) for Auto Loader, paired with .writeStream using mergeSchema=true and a checkpointLocation.

Auto Loader ' s cloudFiles source incrementally processes new JSON files without rescanning the entire directory. The mergeSchema option handles schema drift — when sensors add new fields, the target Delta table schema expands automatically instead of throwing a parse error. This directly addresses Contoso ' s requirement to ' support schema drift. '

The checkpointLocation is what gives the pipeline its resilience. Databricks writes the stream ' s committed offset and schema state to that path. If the cluster restarts, the engine reads the checkpoint and picks up exactly where it left off — no events are reprocessed, satisfying ' exactly-once semantics ' and ' resume processing after failures without reprocessing the data. '

Without a checkpoint, the stream would restart from the beginning on every cluster bounce, which is precisely the problem Contoso is trying to eliminate.

Production ingestion: Job compute

BI: Serverless SQL warehouse

Job compute is designed for automated production workloads executed through Lakeflow Jobs. Its lifecycle can be tied to the job run, providing workload isolation and avoiding the cost of maintaining an interactive all-purpose cluster continuously. It is therefore appropriate for scheduled ingestion and transformation processing. A serverless SQL warehouse is designed for BI and Databricks SQL workloads. It provides rapid startup, automatic infrastructure management, scaling, and optimized SQL-query execution for dashboards and reporting tools. All-purpose compute is intended primarily for interactive notebook development and exploration, while shared compute does not provide the same job-specific isolation or SQL-serving experience. Consequently, job compute should support production ingestion, and a serverless SQL warehouse should serve the BI workload.

The correct mapping is SCD Type 1 for equipment metadata and SCD Type 2 for IoT sensor ownership history.

SCD Type 1 overwrites the existing record whenever an attribute changes — no history is kept. Contoso ' s requirement for equipment metadata (name, manufacturer, model, commissioning date) states ' historical values are NOT required, ' which is the textbook definition of Type 1. A MERGE INTO with WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE handles this cleanly in Delta Lake.

SCD Type 2 creates a new row for each change, preserving the full history through effective-date or version columns. Contoso requires that ' analysts must track the full history of ownership ' as sensors change hands over time — that full audit trail is only possible with Type 2. Type 3 (keeping just the previous value in an extra column) would lose earlier ownership records, so it doesn ' t satisfy the ' full history ' requirement.

The correct answer is A. Photon is Azure Databricks ' native vectorized query engine, written in C++, designed to accelerate data ingestion and SQL-heavy workloads significantly over the standard Spark JVM path. Enabling it on a job compute cluster directly addresses Contoso ' s requirement for ' fast and consistent performance for BI workloads ' and ' production ingestion workloads that can scale automatically during telemetry spikes. '

Photon integrates transparently — no code changes are needed — and pairs well with autoscaling job clusters to handle the bursty 40,000-sensor telemetry load.

Option B contradicts the isolation requirement: Contoso explicitly needs production and development separated, not merged onto shared compute. Option C with a fixed large node gives peak capacity at all times, driving up costs even during quiet periods. Option D disabling autoscaling is the opposite of what ' s needed — telemetry spikes require elastic scaling, not a locked node count.

Concurrency setting: Limit concurrent runs to one.

Execution behavior: Queue the new run.

Limiting concurrent runs to one ensures that only one instance of Job1 can execute at a time. This prevents two hourly runs from simultaneously modifying the same tables, files, checkpoints, or downstream systems, thereby reducing the risk of duplicate processing and data corruption. When a scheduled trigger occurs while an earlier execution is still active, queueing the new run preserves that execution and starts it after the active run finishes. Allowing concurrent runs would violate the non-overlap requirement. Restarting the job during an overlap could interrupt partially completed work. Canceling the new run or skipping it would avoid simultaneous execution, but the scheduled processing interval could be lost. Single-run concurrency combined with queueing therefore serializes the executions without discarding scheduled work.