Free Microsoft AI-102 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

 The subscription will be charged 86 tokens for the execution of the session. No

 The text completion was truncated because the Max response tokens value was exceeded. No

 The prompt_tokens value will be included in the calculation of the Max response tokens value. No

From the response payload:

usage.prompt_tokens = 37

usage.completion_tokens = 86

usage.total_tokens = 123

finish_reason = " stop "

Billing is for total tokens (input + output), not just completion tokens.

Azure OpenAI bills on both prompt (input) and completion (output) tokens. Here, the total is 123 tokens, so it is not just 86. Hence No.

Not truncated by max response tokens.

If a response hits the maximum allowed output tokens, finish_reason would be " length " . Here it is " stop " and the model produced only 86 completion tokens while Max response tokens was set to 100, so the limit was not reached. Hence No.

max response tokens applies only to the generated output, not the prompt.

max_tokens (Max response tokens) limits the number of tokens the model may generate in the completion; it does not include prompt_tokens . Hence No.

Microsoft References

Azure OpenAI Service – Chat Completions API (parameters, max_tokens , response usage , finish_reason ).

https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/ai-services/openai/reference#chat-completions

Azure OpenAI pricing and token usage model (charges for input and output tokens).

https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/ai-services/openai/overview#pricing

Token counting and limits (context vs. max output tokens).

https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/ai-services/openai/concepts/tokenizers#token-limits

Can search content in different formats, including video

Audio and video insights (multi-channels). When indexing by one channel, partial result for those models will be available.

Keywords extraction: Extracts keywords from speech and visual text.

Named entities extraction: Extracts brands, locations, and people from speech and visual text via natural language processing (NLP).

Topic inference: Makes inference of main topics from transcripts. The 2nd-level IPTC taxonomy is included.

Artifacts: Extracts rich set of " next level of details " artifacts for each of the models.

Sentiment analysis: Identifies positive, negative, and neutral sentiments from speech and visual text.

C: Analyze Receipt - Get Analyze Receipt Result.

Query the status and retrieve the result of an Analyze Receipt operation.

Request URL: https://{endpoint}/formrecognizer/v2.0-preview/prebuilt/receipt/analyzeResults/{resultId}

E: POST {Endpoint}/vision/v3.2/read/analyze

Use this interface to get the result of a Read operation, employing the state-of-the-art Optical Character Recognition (OCR) algorithms optimized for text-heavy documents.

Scenario: Contoso plans to develop a document processing workflow to extract information automatically from PDFs and images of financial documents

The document processing solution must be able to process standardized financial documents that have the following characteristics:

- Contain fewer than 20 pages.

- Be formatted as PDF or JPEG files.

- Have a distinct standard for each office.

*The document processing solution must be able to extract tables and text from the financial documents.

The document processing solution must be able to extract information from receipt images.

Box 1: " categories " : [ " Locations " , " Persons " , " Organizations " ],

Locations, Persons, Organizations are in the outputs.

Scenario: Contoso plans to develop a searchable knowledgebase of all the intellectual property

Note: The categories parameter is an array of categories that should be extracted. Possible category types: " Person " , " Location " , " Organization " , " Quantity " , " Datetime " , " URL " , " Email " . If no category is provided, all types are returned.

Box 2: { " name " : " entities " }

The include wikis, so should include entities in the outputs.

Note: entities is an array of complex types that contains rich information about the entities extracted from text, with the following fields

name (the actual entity name. This represents a " normalized " form)

wikipediaId

wikipediaLanguage

wikipediaUrl (a link to Wikipedia page for the entity)

etc.

Scenario: All planned projects must support English, French, and Portuguese.

If a bot uses multiple LUIS models and QnA Maker knowledge bases (knowledge bases), you can use the Dispatch tool to determine which LUIS model or QnA Maker knowledge base best matches the user input. The dispatch tool does this by creating a single LUIS app to route user input to the correct model.

Within a search service, synonym maps are a global resource that associate equivalent terms, expanding the scope of a query without the user having to actually provide the term. For example, assuming " dog " , " canine " , and " puppy " are mapped synonyms, a query on " canine " will match on a document containing " dog " .

Create synonyms: A synonym map is an asset that can be created once and used by many indexes.

The requirements state:

All AI solution responses must have a confidence score ≥ 70%.

If the response confidence score is < 70%, the response must be improved by human input.

Members of the Consultant-Bookkeeper group must be able to process financial documents, which includes performing manual review when the AI confidence is below threshold.

Looking at the provided JSON:

" fields " : {

" ReceiptType " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Itemized " ,

" confidence " : 0.672

},

" MerchantName " : {

" type " : " string " ,

" valueString " : " Tailwind " ,

" confidence " : 0.913

}

}

ReceiptType.confidence = 0.672 → this is below 0.7.

MerchantName.confidence = 0.913 → this is above 0.7.

Therefore, the correct condition for triggering manual review is:

documentResults.fields. < field > .confidence < 0.7

Now, evaluating the options:

A. documentResults.docType == " prebuilt:receipt "

Always true for receipts, does not check confidence. Not correct.

B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

This is the correct general expression: trigger manual review whenever any field confidence is below 0.7.

C. documentResults.fields.ReceiptType.confidence > 0.7

This would bypass manual review when ReceiptType has high confidence. The requirement is to trigger review when confidence < 0.7, so this is the opposite.

D. documentResults.fields.MerchantName.confidence < 0.7

This only checks one field (MerchantName). In the JSON, MerchantName has confidence 0.913 ( > 0.7), so this condition would not trigger, but ReceiptType clearly needs review. Too narrow.

Correct Answer: B. documentResults.fields.*.confidence < 0.7

Microsoft References

Azure AI Document Intelligence – Confidence scores

Human-in-the-loop for Document Intelligence

The wiki contains text in English, French and Portuguese.

Scenario: All planned projects must support English, French, and Portuguese.

The Document Extraction skill extracts content from a file within the enrichment pipeline. This allows you to take advantage of the document extraction step that normally happens before the skillset execution with files that may be generated by other skills.

Note: The Translator Text API will be used to determine the from language. The Language detection skill is not required.

Step 1: Create a new project and load sample documents

Create a new project. Projects store your configurations and settings.

Step 2: Label the sample documents

When you create or open a project, the main tag editor window opens.

Step 3: Train a custom model.

Finally, train a custom model.