Free Huawei H12-821_V1.0 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 8

Comprehensive and Detailed in-depth Step-by-Step Explanation:

In IS-IS, the interface cost is a metric used to determine the best path to a destination. Lower-cost paths are preferred over higher-cost paths. By default, IS-IS interface costs can range from 1 to 63 .

Default Cost Range:

IS-IS allows the configuration of interface costs within the range of 1–63 by default. This range is sufficient for most networks.

Maximum Configurable Cost:

The maximum value that can be configured by default is 63 . If there is a requirement for a higher cost range, the metric-style can be changed to wide , which allows the cost range to extend beyond 63.

Option A (67): Incorrect. 67 is not the maximum default value.

Option B (63): Correct. This is the maximum default cost value.

Option C (64): Incorrect. This is beyond the default range.

Option D (68): Incorrect. This is beyond the default range.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Interface ID in IPv6:

The interface ID is the last 64 bits of an IPv6 address, and it uniquely identifies an interface within a subnet.

It can be generated in three ways:

Manually Configured: Explicitly assigned by an administrator.

System-Generated: The operating system assigns a random or pseudo-random value.

EUI-64 Standard: Generated based on the MAC address of the interface.

Correct Statement:

IPv6 supports all three methods for generating interface IDs.

The preference of routing protocols determines the selection order of routes when a router receives multiple routes to the same destination from different routing protocols. For instance, OSPF has a higher preference over RIP, so OSPF routes will be selected first. Huawei routing preferences confirm this behavior ​.

Comprehensive and Detailed in-depth Step-by-Step Explanation:

To answer this question, it is essential to distinguish between the roles of ABRs and ASBRs in OSPF and the function of route summarization:

Route Summarization on ABRs:

Route summarization in OSPF can reduce the number of inter-area Type 3 LSAs that ABRs propagate between areas.

ABRs perform route summarization to reduce the amount of routing information exchanged between areas, thereby decreasing the size of the routing table and improving resource utilization.

Route Summarization on ASBRs:

ASBRs summarize external routes (from outside OSPF) into Type 5 LSAs or Type 7 LSAs (in NSSAs).

ASBR route summarization does not impact inter-area Type 3 LSAs because ASBRs are responsible for importing and summarizing external routes , not summarizing routes between OSPF areas.

Since the statement refers to configuring route summarization on ASBRs to reduce inter-area Type 3 LSAs , it is incorrect . Route summarization for inter-area Type 3 LSAs must be configured on ABRs, not ASBRs.

Correct Statement: Route summarization on ABRs reduces the number of inter-area Type 3 LSAs.

Configuration Analysis:

On R2 , the following configuration has been applied:

acl 200

rule deny source 10.1.0.0 0.0.3.0

rule permit

#

ospf 1

filter-policy 2000 import

This configuration uses ACL 200 to filter routes during import into the OSPF routing table on R2.

Rule deny source 10.1.0.0 0.0.3.0: Blocks routes in the range 10.1.0.0/24 to 10.1.3.0/24 (inclusive).

Rule permit: Allows all other routes to be imported.

Impact of ACL 200 on Route Import:

10.1.0.0/24 to 10.1.3.0/24: These subnets are explicitly denied by ACL 200 and will not appear in R2 ' s routing table.

10.1.4.0/24 and beyond: These subnets are permitted by the rule permit statement and will be imported into R2 ' s routing table.

Routing Table Entries on R2:

Option A (10.1.4.0/24): Exists in R2 ' s routing table because it is permitted.

Option B (10.1.3.0/24): Does not exist because it is denied by ACL 200.

Option C (10.1.2.0/24): Does not exist because it is denied by ACL 200.

Option D (10.1.1.0/24): Does not exist because it is denied by ACL 200.

A (10.1.4.0/24)

The forwarding plane of a switch consists of data forwarding hardware, such as line cards or forwarding engines, and is responsible for tasks like encapsulating/decapsulating packets, providing high-speed data channels, and collecting packet statistics. However, main control boards are part of the control plane, not the forwarding plane. This distinction ensures a separation of data forwarding and control functionalities ​.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

VRRP Virtual MAC Address Format:

The VRRP virtual MAC address is generated using the format: 0000-5e00-01XX , where XX represents the VRID in hexadecimal.

Calculation:

VRID = 1 → Hexadecimal = 01 .

Virtual MAC = 0000-5e00-0101.

Correct Option:

C (0000-5e00-0101).

A is false – The correct formula is: Skew_Time = (256 - Priority)/256 × Advertisement_Interval.

B is false – By default, the preemption delay is typically 0s , not 1s, meaning a higher-priority backup router can preempt immediately unless configured otherwise.

C is true – The default Advertisement interval in VRRP is 2 seconds .

D is true – The formula Master_Down_Interval = 3 × Advertisement_Interval + Skew_Time is correct.

Reference from Huawei HCIP-Datacom-Core Technology Study Guide:

“The VRRP Skew_Time is calculated as (256 - Priority)/256 × Adver_Interval. The Master_Down interval includes this Skew_Time to stagger failover.”

(Chapter: High Availability – Section: VRRP Timer Mechanism)