Free Fortinet FCSS_LED_AR-7.6 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

The DHCP configuration shows:

set vci-match enable

set vci-string "FortiSwitch" "FortiExtender"

What this means

VCI = Vendor Class Identifier (DHCP option 60)

When vci-match is enabled, the DHCP server will only respond to DHCP requests from clients whose VCI string matches the configured vendor identifiers.

FortiSwitch and FortiExtender both send DHCP option 60 with:

"FortiSwitch"

"FortiExtender"

This is used in FortiLink deployments so only these devices receive IP addresses on the FortiLink network.

Therefore:

C. To connect, devices must match the VCI string; otherwise, they will not receive an IP address.

✔Correct.

This perfectly matches FortiGate FortiLink DHCP behavior.

Summary of incorrect options

A — Ignore FortiSwitch/FortiExtender

❌Opposite behavior.

B — Restrict based on hostname

❌VCI does NOT check hostname.

D — Reserve IPs

❌No reservation occurs; it's filtering, not reserving.

The FortiOS documentation explicitly states that a CSR used for certificate signing must contain accurate and valid fields, especially:

Common Name (CN)

Organization (O)

Country (C)

Public key parameters

According to the FortiGate certificate section:

Incorrect CSR field information can cause the CA to reject the request.

Reasons include:

The CA validates identity and organizational information.

Missing or malformed data invalidates PKI requirements.

The CSR is not corrected automatically by the CA.

Therefore:

✔A is correct.

Options B–D contradict PKI principles:

B is false: CAs do not issue certificates with mismatched identity fields for public trust.

C is false: CSR fields are not only for internal use; they define certificate identity.

D is false: CAs do not auto-correct CSR fields.

The SSL-VPN configuration hasRequire Client Certificateenabled. When this is enabled, FortiOS performs two checks:

Normal user authentication(username/password or PKI user)

Additional client certificate check– the client certificatemust be signed by a CA that FortiGate trusts

FortiOS documentation for “SSL VPN with certificate authentication” states:

“The client certificate only needs to be signed by a known CA in order to pass authentication.”

“The CA certificate is the certificate that signed both the server certificate and the user certificate… The CA certificate is available to be imported on the FortiGate.”

The debug output shows key lines:

__quick_check_peer-CA does not match.

Issuer of cert depth 0 is not detected in CMDB.

This tells us:

FortiGatedoes see the user’s certificate,

Butcannot find the issuing CAin its local CA certificate store (“CMDB” = configuration database).

This means theCA that signed the user certificate has not been importedinto FortiGate.

Now evaluate the options:

A. Enable Redirect HTTP to SSL-VPN– affects only redirection from HTTP to HTTPS; it has nothing to do with certificate validation.

B. Import the CA that signed the SSL VPN Server Certificate– the server certificate is already working (the portal comes up) and its CA is not what the debug complains about; the error is about thepeer (user) certificate. Often the same CA signs both, but the failing check specifically says the issuer of the client cert is not in CMDB.

C. Set the user certificate as the Server Certificate– incorrect; server and client certificates serve different roles.

D. Import the CA that signed the user certificate to FortiGate– this directly addresses the debug error and aligns with the documented requirement that the CA which issued the user certificate must be known to FortiGate.

When FortiAuthenticator is used as anFSSO agentbased onsyslog, it must:

Parse incoming syslog messagesfrom devices (firewalls, WLAN controllers, VPN concentrators, etc.).

Extract identity fieldssuch as:

Username

IP address

Login/logout event indicators

Syslogmatching ruleson FortiAuthenticator define:

Which syslog messages are relevant (by facility, message pattern, or regex).

How to capture specific fields (username, IP, group, event type).

FortiAuthenticator then uses this parsed data toinject logon sessions into FSSO, so FortiGate can apply identity-based policies.

Thus, the role of syslog matching rules is exactly as described inC.

A: Group mapping is handled separately via directory groups / FSSO config, not directly by matching rules.

B: Enforcement of authentication policies is done on FortiGate, not directly by the matching rules.

D: While irrelevant logs can be ignored via rules, the primary purpose isparsing and extraction, not generic filtering.

When a FortiGate is deployed usingZero Touch Provisioning (ZTP)or auto-discovery:

FortiGate retrieves theFortiManager IP address(from DHCP Option 240, FortiCloud/ZTNA provisioning, or manual set).

The next step isnot UI authorizationor DHCP changes—it immediately attempts to form aFGFM (FortiGate–FortiManager) tunnel.

The FGFM protocol usesTCP port 541to establish a secure management channel.

FortiManager will still require manual authorization of the deviceinside FortiManager, but this occursafterthe tunnel is established.

Therefore, the first automatic action after retrieving the FMG address iscreating the secure FGFM tunnel on TCP/541.

FortiLink device detection relies on FortiGate'sDevice IdentificationandIoT Detectioncapabilities to classify devices connected to FortiSwitch ports.

To enabledevice identificationandvulnerability detectionfor IoT/endpoint devices in LAN Edge deployments, FortiGate must subscribe to the correct FortiGuard services.

1. Required FortiGuard License for Device Identification (IoT Detection)

The FortiOS documentation clearly states:

“IoT detection service… requires anAttack Surface Security Rating service licenseto download the IoT signature package.”

Additionally:

“The following settings are required for IoT device detection:

A validAttack Surface Security Rating service licenseto download the IoT signature package.”

This service provides:

IoT signature package

IoT device classification

Device behavior profiling

This makesAttack Surface Securitymandatory for FortiLink device detection.

2. Required FortiGuard License for Device Vulnerability Detection

FortiOS further clarifies that IoT vulnerabilities require theIoT Detection license, which is included under the same Attack Surface service entitlement:

“To detect IoT vulnerabilities the FortiGate must have a validIoT Definitions license…”

The IoT Definitions license comeswith the Attack Surface Security Rating serviceand is used for:

Scanning connected devices

Identifying IoT/endpoint vulnerabilities

Reporting vulnerability severity

Enabling NAC-based remediation (VLAN steering, port isolation)

In LAN Edge Architect, this license combination is emphasized as a foundational requirement for:

FortiSwitch NAC

FortiLink device profiling

Automated quarantine actions

IoT device classification

Vulnerability-based segmentation

3. Why the Correct Answer Is Option D

OptionDlists:

✔FortiGuard Attack Surface Security

✔FortiGuard IoT Detection

These are exactly the services required per FortiOS 7.4.1:

Attack Surface Security Rating→ provides IoT signature package + vulnerability data

IoT Detection (Definitions)→ enables actual device-type and vulnerability identification

Together they powerFortiLink Device DetectionandIoT Vulnerability Detection, which are essential LAN Edge security functions.

4. Why Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Vulnerability Management + Endpoint Protection

Not used for FortiLink device detection; Endpoint detection relies on IoT service, not FortiClient.

B. Threat Intelligence + IoT Detection

Threat Intelligence (ThreatIntel DB) is used for FAZ IOC, not LAN Edge device detection.

C. Threat Intelligence + Endpoint Protection

Same issue—does not provide IoT device classification or vulnerability scanning.

LAN Edge 7.6 Architect Context Summary

In LAN Edge designs:

FortiGate acts as the controller for FortiSwitch via FortiLink.

Device detection is done at the FortiGate level using NAC/IoT signature capabilities.

Vulnerability detection enables dynamic segmentation decisions (e.g., move device to quarantine VLAN).

To support this, two licenses aremandatory:

Attack Surface Security(includes Security Rating + IoT Detection DB)

IoT Detection(part of the same entitlement, but explicitly required for vulnerability detection)

Thus the verified answer aligns perfectly with LAN Edge operational requirements and Fortinet documentation.

In an SD-Branch deployment (FortiGate + FortiSwitch + FortiAP),FortiAIOps:

Collects telemetry and logs from Fabric devices

Usesmachine-learning / AI analyticsto:

Spot anomalies (latency, packet loss, RF issues, misconfigurations)

Highlight root causes

Proposeoptimization recommendations(e.g., channel changes, power tuning, config fixes)

It doesnot:

Automatically disable devices (Afalse)

Replace SD-WAN config or all routing (Cfalse)

Fixallissues with zero human input (Dis marketing fantasy, not reality)

A FortiGate interface can operate with different types of captive portal modes.

The available portal types that require user interaction or login include:

✔A. Terms Acknowledgment Without Authentication

Forces users to accept terms before accessing the network

No credentials required

Still considered a captive portalCommon in guest Wi-Fi.

✔E. Authentication

Requires username/password

Supports local users, RADIUS, LDAP, OAuth, etc.

Why the other options are incorrect

❌B. Email Notification Only

Not a valid captive portal mode on FortiGate.

❌C. Disclaimer + Authentication

This is not a selectable mode; disclaimers are part of the captive portal customization but not a standalone option.

❌D. Guest Pass Access

Guest pass authentication exists onFortiAuthenticator, not as a direct portal type on FortiGate.

From the exhibit, LDAP on FortiGate is correctly configured and tested:

diagnose test authserver ldap FAC-LDAP wifi101 password

authenticate 'wifi101' against 'FAC-LDAP' succeeded!

Group membership(s) - CN=Domain Users,...

So:

LDAP connectivity works

Bind DN, DN, CNID, and credentials are correct(so optionCis eliminated).

Firewall policies do not affect the802.1X / Wi-Fi authentication stepitself, soAis not the root cause.

Nothing in the scenario indicates that AD is enforcing LDAPS-only; the LDAP test already succeeds using the configured parameters, soBis also excluded.

The Wi-Fi supplicant is configured forPEAP with inner authentication = MSCHAPv2.

MSCHAPv2 is achallenge–response mechanism designed for RADIUS, not for LDAP simple bind. FortiGate’s LDAP implementation uses asimple bind (username/password) over LDAP or LDAPS, and it doesnotimplement MSCHAPv2 against LDAP backends.

In Fortinet’s design, if you needPEAP-MSCHAPv2 with Active Directory, you must use:

ARADIUS server(such as Windows NPS or FortiAuthenticator), and

Have FortiGate use RADIUS,notLDAP, as the authentication backend for 802.1X / Wi-Fi users.

Because FortiGate cannot process MSCHAPv2 exchanges directly against an LDAP server, authentication fails when the inner method is MSCHAPv2, even though LDAP works when tested with a simple bind from the CLI.

In this scenario:

FortiGate + FortiAnalyzer are part of theSecurity Fabric

AnAutomation Stitchis configured:

Trigger:Compromised Host – High(IOC from FortiAnalyzer)

Action:Quarantine on FortiSwitch + FortiAP

A test device10.0.2.1visits a malicious website.

FortiAnalyzer logs show the event, butFortiGate does NOT quarantine the device.

This means theautomation did not receive an IOC trigger, OR theFabric did not classify it as a compromise.

Let's evaluate each answer option.

✅C. The malicious website is not recognized as an indicator of compromise (IOC) by FortiAnalyzer.

✔Correct.

For FortiGate to quarantine a device:

FortiAnalyzer must classify the event as aCompromised Host → High / Medium / Critical

FortiAnalyzer must generate anIOC event

FortiGate must receive that IOC through the Fabric

Even though the FAZ log shows:

Action = blocked

Category = Malicious Websites

→ That doesNOTautomatically mean an IOC was generated.

A blocked website event isnot always an IOCunless:

It is included in theIOC database

FAZ’sAnalytics / UTM / IOCengine marks it as a compromise

Thus, if FAZ only logs a “Malicious Website” event butdoes not classify it as an IOC,