Free F5 F5CAB3 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Application-level monitors ensure that only the affected service is marked down, not the entire node.

In this scenario, each backend node (server) hosts multiple services and is referenced by multiple pools and virtual servers. The goal is to ensure an equal number of total connections per backend server, regardless of how many pool members (services/ports) exist on that server.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Least Connections (node) tracks the total number of active connections to a node across all pool members and services.

This algorithm ensures load distribution is balanced at the server level, not just at the individual service (member) level.

It is specifically recommended when:

Multiple pool members exist on the same backend server

Multiple virtual servers reference the same backend servers

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Predictive (member)Predictive algorithms are advanced and traffic-pattern based, but they operate at the member level and do not guarantee equal connections per server.

C. Least Connections (member)This balances connections per pool member, which can overload a server hosting multiple members while still appearing “balanced” per member.

D. Predictive (node)Although node-aware, predictive algorithms are less deterministic and not the best choice when strict equality of connections is required.

Correct Resolution:

Using Least Connections (node) ensures that each backend server carries an equal connection load across all services and pools.

To provide encrypted communication between users and a virtual server, the BIG-IP system acts as a transparent SSL/TLS proxy. The administrative configuration required for this is a Client SSL profile.

When multiple hostnames (FQDNs) are associated with a single IP address, the system must determine which SSL certificate to present to the client during the initial TLS handshake. This is achieved using an extension of the TLS protocol called Server Name Indication (SNI).

The configuration logic is as follows:

Profile Type: The Client SSL profile is responsible for terminating the SSL connection from the client (the user) to the BIG-IP system.

The Setting: Within the Client SSL profile (under the "Advanced" view), there is a field specifically called Server Name. By entering the specific hostname (e.g., www.example.com) in this field, the BIG-IP system can match the hostname requested by the client in the ClientHello message to the correct profile.

Implementation: The administrator typically creates multiple Client SSL profiles—one for each hostname—and assigns them all to the same virtual server. One of these profiles must be designated as the Default SSL Profile for SNI to handle requests where the client does not provide a hostname or provides one that does not match any specific profile.

By using the Client SSL profile and the Server Name setting, the BIG-IP system ensures that each user receives the correct certificate for the specific site they are trying to reach, even though all sites share a single virtual server IP.

X-Forwarded-For inserts the original client IP into HTTP headers while SNAT is enabled.

URI-based traffic steering requires inspection of the HTTP request. BIG-IP processes HTTP headers and URIs in the HTTP_REQUEST event. Pool member selection based on URI must occur before the request is sent to the server, making HTTP_REQUEST the correct event.

The X-Forwarded-For header preserves the original client IP when SNAT is enabled.

When a pool contains servers with heterogeneous hardware capabilities (differing CPU, RAM, or connection limits), a static load balancing method like Round Robin is ineffective because it distributes requests equally, regardless of the server's capacity. To optimize traffic distribution for newer, more powerful servers, a dynamic or weighted method is required.

Weighted Least Connections (member): This is the ideal method for this scenario. It combines two factors:

Least Connections: It first checks the current active connection count to ensure traffic goes to the least busy server.

Weight (Ratio): It allows the administrator to assign a "Ratio" value to each pool member. Newer servers can be assigned a higher ratio (e.g., 3) while older servers are assigned a lower ratio (e.g., 1). The BIG-IP system uses these weights to disproportionately favor the newer servers even when connection counts are similar.

Why other options are incorrect:

Global Availability: This is primarily a GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing) or specific LTM priority group concept where traffic is sent to the first available member in a list until it fails, then moves to the next. It does not load balance based on capacity.

Round Robin: This passes each new connection request to the next server in line, treating the old and new servers exactly the same.

Least Connections (member): While this sends traffic to the server with the fewest active connections, it assumes all servers are equal. If an old server and a new server both have 10 connections, they are treated as equally capable of taking the 11th, which is not true in this scenario.

From the exhibit, the pool contains different applications on different service ports (for example, HTTP/80, FTP/21, HTTPS/443, SSH/22). To mark pool members correctly, BIG-IP must be able to verify the actual service running on each member’s port.

In BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration, monitor behavior is described as follows:

When multiple monitors are assigned to a pool, the Availability Requirement controls how monitor results are evaluated:

At least one = the pool member is marked up if any one of the assigned monitors succeeds.

All = the pool member is marked up only if every assigned monitor succeeds.

For pools containing members with different services/ports, using All can incorrectly mark members down because monitors intended for other services will fail on the wrong port.

Why C is correct:

Assigning HTTPS, HTTP, FTP, and SSH covers the actual services shown in the pool.

Setting the Availability Requirement to at least one ensures that each pool member is considered available when its appropriate service monitor succeeds, without being forced to pass unrelated service monitors.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A / D (Availability Requirement = all): would cause members to be marked down when unrelated monitors fail (e.g., SSH monitor against an HTTP member).

B (includes ICMP): ICMP can indicate the host is reachable even if the application service is down, which does not “accurately” reflect service availability.

Therefore, the best choice is HTTPS, HTTP, FTP, and SSH with Availability Requirement of at least one health monitor.

When a single IP address (Virtual Server) must host multiple hostnames (e.g., site1.com, site2.com) over HTTPS, the BIG-IP must be able to present the correct SSL certificate for each site during the initial handshake. This requirement is handled by a technology called Server Name Indication (SNI).

To implement this on the BIG-IP, the administrator must use a Client SSL profile because the encryption is occurring between the user (Client) and the Virtual Server. Within the Client SSL profile settings, there is a field called Server Name. By creating multiple Client SSL profiles—each with a different "Server Name" (the hostname) and its corresponding certificate—and attaching them all to the same Virtual Server, the BIG-IP can inspect the SNI extension in the client's "Client Hello" packet. It then selects the specific profile that matches the requested hostname.

Option A is incorrect because "Client Name" is not the standard field name used for SNI hostname matching in the profile. Options B and C refer to Server SSL profiles, which manage the connection between the BIG-IP and the backend servers. While Server SSL profiles also have a "Server Name" field (used to send SNI to a backend server), the requirement here is to provide encrypted communication for "users" accessing the virtual server, which definitively requires a Client-side SSL configuration.

The log message “Intercept exhaustion” indicates that the BIG-IP system has exhausted the available source port translations for one or more SNAT addresses. This occurs when too many concurrent client connections are being translated through a limited number of SNAT IP addresses, and all ephemeral source ports (typically ~64,000 per SNAT IP) are in use.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Each SNAT IP address provides a finite number of available source ports.

When the number of concurrent connections exceeds the available port space, the BIG-IP logs an Intercept exhaustion error and new connections fail.

The recommended resolution is to increase the available SNAT resources by adding additional IP addresses to the SNAT pool.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Increase the timeout of the SNAT addressesIncreasing timeouts may actually worsen the problem by keeping ports allocated longer, accelerating port exhaustion.

B. Remove the SNAT pool and apply SNAT AutomapSNAT Automap uses the Self IP addresses on the egress VLAN, which may not provide additional capacity and can introduce routing or design issues. This is not a direct or recommended fix for SNAT exhaustion.

C. Remove an IP address from the SNAT poolThis would reduce the number of available source ports and further exacerbate the intercept exhaustion condition.

Correct Resolution:

By adding an IP address to the SNAT pool, the BIG-IP increases the total number of available source ports, alleviating intercept exhaustion and restoring successful client connections.