Free Cyber AB CMMC-CCP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

Understanding RA.L2-3.11.2: Vulnerability Scanning

TheRA.L2-3.11.2practice requires organizations to:

✔Regularly scan for vulnerabilitiesin systems and applications.

✔Perform scans when new vulnerabilities are identified.

✔Use vulnerability scanning tools or servicesto proactively detect security weaknesses.

Why Is an Incident Monitoring Report Irrelevant?

Anincident monitoring reporttrackssecurity incidents, notvulnerability scanning activities.

Vulnerability scanning reportsshould include:

✔A list of vulnerabilities detected.

✔Remediation actions taken.

✔Scan frequency and schedule.

Theabsence of reported security incidentsdoesnotconfirm that vulnerability scans were performed.

Why is the Correct Answer "A. Inadequate because it is irrelevant to the practice"?

A. Inadequate because it is irrelevant to the practice → Correct

Alack of reported security incidents does not confirm that vulnerability scanning was performed.

B. Adequate because it fits well for expected artifacts → Incorrect

Incident monitoring reportsare not expected artifactsfor this control.Vulnerability scan reportsare required instead.

C. Adequate because no security incidents were reported → Incorrect

The absence of incidents does not mean the OSC is performing vulnerability scanning. This isnot valid evidence.

D. Inadequate because the OSC's service provider should be interviewed → Incorrect

While interviewing the provider may be useful, themain issue is that the provided evidence is irrelevant. Thecorrect evidence (vulnerability scan reports) is missing.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

NIST SP 800-171 (Requirement 3.11.2 – Vulnerability Scanning)

Defines the requirement toscan for vulnerabilities periodically and when new threats emerge.

CMMC Assessment Guide for Level 2

Specifies that evidence for RA.L2-3.11.2 should includevulnerability scan reports, not incident monitoring reports.

CMMC 2.0 Model Overview

Confirms that organizationsmust proactively identify vulnerabilities through scanning, not just rely on incident detection.

The term that describes"the prevention of damage to, protection of, and restoration of computers and electronic communication systems/services, including information contained therein, to ensure its availability, integrity, authentication, confidentiality, and non-repudiation"isCybersecurity.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

✅1. Cybersecurity Defined

Cybersecurityfocuses onprotecting networks, systems, and datafrom cyber threats.

It includes measures to ensure:

Availability(data is accessible when needed).

Integrity(data is accurate and unaltered).

Authentication(verifying users' identities).

Confidentiality(ensuring only authorized access).

Non-repudiation(preventing denial of actions).

The definition in the questionaligns directly with cybersecurity principles, making it the best answer.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(B) Data Security❌

Data securityfocusesspecificallyon protectingstored information(e.g., encryption, access controls), but cybersecurity is broader—it includesnetworks, systems, and communication services.

(C) Network Security❌

Network securityis asubset of cybersecuritythat focuses on protectingnetwork infrastructure(e.g., firewalls, intrusion detection systems).

The definition in the question includesmore than just networks, so cybersecurity is the better choice.

(D) Information Security❌

Information security (InfoSec)is related but broader than cybersecurity.

InfoSeccoversphysical and organizational security(e.g., policies, procedures) in addition todigital protections.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 define cybersecurityas the protection ofsystems, networks, and data from cyber threats.

DoD Cybersecurity Definitions(aligned with NIST) confirm that cybersecurity is the term thatbest fits the definition in the question.

TheLimited Practice Deficiency Correction Evaluationprocess occurs when anOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC)has undergone aCMMC Level 2 Assessmentby aCertified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO)and hasunresolved deficienciesin some security practices.

According toCMMC 2.0 policy and DFARS 252.204-7021, OSCs can still achieveInterim Certificationif they meet theminimum thresholdof security practices while addressing deficiencies through aPlan of Action & Milestones (POA & M).

Minimum Number of Practices Required

TheCMMC 2.0 Interim Rulestates that an OSCmust meet at least 100 out of 110 practicesto qualify for aPOA & M-based remediation.

A maximum of 10 practices can be listed in the POA & Mfor later correction.

Failure to meet at least 100 practices results in failing the assessment outright, requiring a full reassessment after remediation.

Why "C. 100 Practices" is Correct?

The Lead Assessor can recommend POA & M placementonly if the OSC meets at least 100 practices.

Less than 100 practices scored as MET means the OSC does not qualify for a POA & Mand mustretest completely.

DFARS 252.204-7021 and CMMC 2.0 policiesconfirm the100-practice thresholdfor conditional certification.

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect?

A. 80 practices (Incorrect)– Falls well below the 100-practice requirement.

B. 88 practices (Incorrect)– Still below the POA & M eligibility threshold.

D. 110 practices (Incorrect)– While meeting 110 practices would be ideal,CMMC allows a POA & M option at 100 practices.

Conclusion

The correct answer isC. 100 practices, as this meets theminimum threshold for POA & M-based Interim Certification.

Understanding the Role of NIST SP 800-171 in CMMC

NIST Special Publication (SP)800-171is the definitive standard for protectingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)innonfederal systems and organizations. It provides security requirements that organizations handling CUImust implementto protect sensitive government information.

This document isthe foundationofCMMC 2.0 Level 2compliance, which aligns directly withNIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2requirements.

Breakdown of Answer Choices

NIST SP

Title

Relevance to CMMC

NIST SP 800-37

Risk Management Framework (RMF)

Focuses on risk assessment for federal agencies, not directly applicable to CUI in nonfederal systems.

NIST SP 800-53

Security and Privacy Controls for Federal Systems

Provides security controls forfederalinformation systems, not specifically tailored tononfederalorganizations handling CUI.

NIST SP 800-88

Guidelines for Media Sanitization

Covers secure data destruction and disposal, not overall CUI protection.

NIST SP 800-171

Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Systems and Organizations

✅Correct Answer – Directly addresses CUI protection in contractor systems.

Key Requirements from NIST SP 800-171

The document outlines110 security controlsgrouped into14 families, including:

Access Control (AC)– Restrict access to authorized users.

Audit and Accountability (AU)– Maintain system logs and monitor activity.

Incident Response (IR)– Establish an incident response plan.

System and Communications Protection (SC)– Encrypt CUI in transit and at rest.

These controls serve as thebaseline requirementsfor organizations seekingCMMC Level 2 certificationto work withCUI.

Official Reference from CMMC 2.0 Documentation

CMMC 2.0 Level 2alignsdirectlywith NIST SP800-171 Rev. 2.

DoD contractors that handle CUImustcomply withall 110 controlsfrom NIST SP800-171.

Final Verification and Conclusion

The correct answer isD. NIST SP 800-171, as this documentexplicitly definesthe cybersecurity requirements for protectingCUI in nonfederal systems and organizations.

Step 1: Understand the Definitions of Evidence Evaluation Criteria

TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP)introduces two key criteria for evaluating evidence:

Adequacy– Does the evidencealign with the practice?

Sufficiency– Is the evidencecomprehensive enoughin terms ofcoverage across systems, users, and scope?

CAP v1.0 – Section 3.5.4:

“Evidence must be evaluated for bothadequacy(is it the right evidence?) andsufficiency(is there enough of it across all in-scope assets and areas?) to score a practice as MET.”

✅Step 2: Applying to the Scenario

In the question, the Lead Assessor is asking the team toverify that evidence is sufficient across:

Domains

Practices

Host Units

Supporting Organizations

Enclaves

➡️This is adirect reference to sufficiency, which evaluates whether thebreadth and depthof evidence is enough to make an informed judgment that the control is truly implemented across theentire assessed environment.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Adequacy

✘Adequacy refers to therelevanceof the evidence to the specific practice — not itscoverageacross scope.

B. Capability

✘Not a term used in evidence validation within CMMC CAP documentation.

D. Objectivity

✘While objectivity is important, it refers to theunbiased nature of assessment activities, not to theextent of evidence coverage.

When an assessor evaluates whether the evidence is broad enough across all necessary systems, units, and enclaves to score a practice as MET, they are evaluatingsufficiency— one of the two core criteria for evidence validity in a CMMC assessment.

According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and the CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide, an assessment finding is built upon evidence collected through three primary methods: Examine, Interview, and Test. The term "affirmation" in this context refers to the verbal or written statements provided by the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) personnel to confirm that a practice is implemented as described.

Broad Definition of Evidence: The CAP allows for a wide variety of artifacts to be used as evidence. "Affirmations" are typically captured during the Interview process or found within Examine objects.

Validity of Formats:

Interviews: Direct verbal affirmations from subject matter experts (SMEs).

Emails and Messaging (Chat/Slack/Teams): These are considered valid "Examine" objects (records/artifacts) that serve as written affirmations or evidence of an activity (e.g., an email chain approving a firewall change or a message confirming a system update).

Presentations and Demonstrations: These fall under "Examine" (the presentation slides) and "Test/Examine" (the demonstration of a mechanism).

Why Option C is correct: The CMMC framework does not disqualify digital communications like emails or messaging as evidence. In fact, these are often the primary artifacts used to prove that a process (like an approval workflow or notification) is occurring in practice. As long as the assessor can verify the authenticity and integrity of these communications, they are appropriate for collecting affirmations.

Why Option D is less accurate: While screenshots are indeed used as evidence, the core question asks if thespecificlist (interviews, demonstrations, emails, messaging, presentations) is appropriate. Option C directly validates the list provided in the prompt without introducing extraneous elements like screenshots, which—while valid—are not the focus of the "appropriate" determination for the items listed.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section 3.4 (Collect and Verify Evidence), which discusses the types of artifacts and "human evidence" (interviews) that support findings.

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide: "Assessment Methods" section, clarifying that evidence can include any records (electronic or physical) that demonstrate the implementation of a practice.

NIST SP 800-171A: The underlying standard for assessment procedures, which encourages the use of various evidence types to satisfy assessment objectives.

1. Understanding Basic Safeguarding Requirements for FCI in CMMC Level 1

Federal Contract Information (FCI) is defined as information provided by or generated for the government under a contract that isnot intended for public release.

CMMCLevel 1is designed to ensurebasic safeguardingof FCI, aligning with15 security requirementsfound inFAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems).

Contractors handlingonly FCImust meetCMMC Level 1, which alignsdirectlywith the safeguarding requirements set inFAR 52.204-21.

2. FAR 52.204-21 and Its Role in CMMC Level 1 Compliance

FAR 52.204-21establishes the baseline cybersecurity controls that contractors must implement to protectFCI.

The15 basic safeguarding requirementsinclude:

Limiting information accessto authorized users.

Identifying and authenticating usersbefore allowing system access.

Protecting transmitted FCIfrom unauthorized disclosure.

Monitoring and controlling connectionsto external systems.

Applying boundary protectionand cybersecurity measures.

Sanitizing mediabefore disposal.

Updating security configurationsto reduce vulnerabilities.

Providing physical securityprotections.

Controlling physical accessto systems that process FCI.

Enforcing multi-factor authentication (MFA) where applicable.

Patching vulnerabilitiesin software and hardware.

Limiting the use of removable media.

Creating and retaining system audit logs.

Performing risk-based security assessments.

Developing an incident response plan.

These 15 practices form thefoundationof CMMCLevel 1 Self-Assessment, ensuring contractorsmeet minimum cybersecurity expectationsfor handling FCI.

3. Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

B. 22 CFR 120-130:

This refers toInternational Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), which controls the export of defense-related articles and services,notFCI safeguarding requirements.

C. DFARS 252.204-7011:

This clause refers toalternative line item structuresand does not pertain to cybersecurity or safeguarding FCI.

D. DFARS 252.204-7021:

This clause enforcesCMMC requirementsbut doesnot definebasic safeguarding controls. It requires compliance with CMMC but does not specify the foundational requirements (which come fromFAR 52.204-21for Level 1).

4. Official CMMC 2.0 Reference & Study Guide Alignment

TheCMMC 2.0 model documentationconfirms that Level 1 is focused on the15 practices from FAR 52.204-21.

TheDoD’s official CMMC Assessment Guidefor Level 1 explicitly states that meeting FAR 52.204-21 is therequirement for passing a Level 1 Self-Assessment.

TheCMMC 2.0 Scoping Guideclarifies that contractors handling onlyFCIand seekingLevel 1 certificationmust implementonly FAR 52.204-21security controls.

Final Confirmation:

The correct answer isA. FAR 52.204-21, as it directly governs the basic safeguarding ofFCIand is the foundational requirement for aLevel 1 Self-Assessmentin CMMC 2.0.

In this scenario, the primary concern is the protection of Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in an environment that lacks sufficient physical security controls (specifically, a lack of a locked cabinet or drawer). According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and NIST SP 800-171 (specifically the Physical Protection (PE) family), CUI must be protected from unauthorized access at all times.

Responsibility of the Assessor: CMMC Professionals (CCPs and CCAs) are bound by the CMMC Code of Professional Conduct and the C3PAO's internal security protocols to ensure that any CUI provided by the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) is handled securely.

Physical Protection (PE.L2-3.10.1 and PE.L2-3.10.2): These practices require that an organization limit physical access to systems and equipment to authorized users and protect the physical facility. If the provided "hoteling space" does not offer a locked container (like a cabinet) to secure the CUI overnight, leaving it in an unlocked drawer (Option C) or on the desk (Option B) would be a violation of CUI handling requirements and a security risk.

Why Option A is the best "Next" step: In the absence of on-site secure storage, the assessor must maintain positive control of the CUI. Taking the document to a secure location (such as the assessor's hotel room or person) where they can ensure it remains under their control is the only viable way to prevent unauthorized access by janitorial staff or other unauthorized personnel at the client site overnight.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option B and C: Both fail to protect the CUI from unauthorized access in a non-secure, shared environment.

Option D: Taking a picture of CUI on a personal phone is a major security violation (spillage), as personal devices are generally not authorized to store or process CUI.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section regarding "Assessor Responsibilities for CUI and Proprietary Information."

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2: Physical Protection (PE) family (3.10.1, 3.10.2).

DoD Instruction 5200.48: "Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)," which specifies that CUI must be protected by at least one physical barrier when not in the direct control of an authorized individual.

1. Understanding CMMC 2.0 Levels and CUI Handling Requirements

UnderCMMC 2.0, contractors handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)must meet aminimumcertification level to be eligible for contract awards involving CUI.

CMMC 2.0 Levels:

Level 1 (Foundational) – 17 Practices

Covers onlyFederal Contract Information (FCI)security.

Does NOT meet CUI handling requirements.

Level 2 (Advanced) – 110 Practices✅

REQUIRED for handling CUI.

Aligns withNIST SP 800-171, which establishes security controls for protecting CUI.

Contractorsmust achieve Level 2for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 3 (Expert) – 110+ Practices

Required for contracts involvinghigh-value CUIandcritical national security information.

Includesadditionalprotections fromNIST SP 800-172.

2. Official CMMC 2.0 References Confirming Level 2 for CUI

TheCMMC 2.0 Model Overviewclearly states that Level 2 is required for contractorshandling CUI.

DFARS 252.204-7012mandates that contractors protecting CUI must implementNIST SP 800-171, which is thefoundation of CMMC Level 2.

TheDoD’s CMMC Assessment Guidefor Level 2 specifies thatorganizations handling CUI must demonstrate full implementation of 110 practices from NIST SP 800-171to qualify for contract awards.

3. Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

A. Level 1❌

Only covers FCI, not CUI.

Does notmeet DoD requirements for protectingCUI.

C. Level 3❌

While Level 3 offersadditional protectionsfor high-risk CUI, it isnot the minimumrequirement.

Level 2 is the minimumneeded to handle CUI.

D. Any level❌

OnlyLevel 2 and higherare eligible for contracts requiring CUI protection.

Level 1 doesnotmeet CUI security standards.