Free Cyber AB CMMC-CCP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Understanding CUI Protection ResponsibilitiesControlled Unclassified Information (CUI)is sensitive butnot classifiedinformation that requires protection underDoD Instruction 5200.48andDFARS 252.204-7012.

Theprimary responsibilityfor handling CUIis safeguardingit against unauthorized access, disclosure, or modification.

TheCUI Program (as per NARA and DoD)mandatessafeguarding measuresto protectCUI in both digital and physical forms.

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 (Advanced) practices align with NIST SP 800-171, which focuses on safeguarding CUIthrough access controls, encryption, and monitoring.

DFARS 252.204-7012requires DoD contractors to implementcybersecurity safeguardsto protect CUI.

A. Shielding (Incorrect)–Shieldingis not a cybersecurity term associated with CUI protection.

B. Governing (Incorrect)–Governing refers to policy-making, not direct protection.

C. Correcting (Incorrect)–Correcting implies remediation, but the primary responsibility is tosafeguardCUI proactively.

The correct answer isD. Safeguarding, asCUI protection focuses on implementing cybersecurity safeguards.

Understanding the False Claims Act (FCA) and Whistleblower ProtectionsTheFalse Claims Act (FCA)(31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733) is aU.S. federal lawthat allowswhistleblowers (also known as "relators")to sue on behalf of the federal government if they believe a company issubmitting fraudulent claimsfor government funds.

The FCA includes a"qui tam" provision, which:

✅Allows private individuals to file lawsuits on behalf of the U.S. government.

✅Provides financial rewards to whistleblowersif the lawsuit results in recovered funds.

✅Protects whistleblowers from employer retaliation.

In the context ofCMMC and cybersecurity compliance, theFCA has been used to hold companies accountableformisrepresenting their cybersecurity compliancewhen working with federal contracts.

For example:

If a companyfalsely claimscompliance withCMMC, NIST SP 800-171, or DFARS 252.204-7012butfails to meet security requirements, it could beliable under the FCA.

TheDepartment of Justice (DOJ)has pursued cases under theCyber-Fraud Initiative, using theFCA against defense contractorsfor cybersecurity noncompliance.

Thus, the correct answer isC. False Claims Actbecause it specifically allows whistleblowers tosue on behalf of the federal government.

A. NIST SP 800-53❌Incorrect.NIST SP 800-53provides security controls for federal agencies butdoes notcontain whistleblower provisions.

B. NIST SP 800-171❌Incorrect.NIST SP 800-171outlines security requirements for protectingCUI, but itdoes not have legal mechanismsfor whistleblower lawsuits.

D. Code of Professional Conduct❌Incorrect. TheCMMC Code of Professional Conductapplies toC3PAOs and assessorsbut doesnot provide a legal basis for whistleblower lawsuits.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§ 3729–3733)– Establishes whistleblower protections and qui tam lawsuits.

DOJ Cyber-Fraud Initiative– Uses the FCA to enforce cybersecurity compliance in government contracts.

DFARS 252.204-7012 & CMMC– Require accurate reporting of cybersecurity compliance, which can lead to FCA violations if misrepresented.

CMMC Official ReferencesThus,option C (False Claims Act) is the correct answeras per official legal guidance.

Step 1: Understand the Assessor’s Role and Chain of ResponsibilityDuring a CMMC assessment, the assessor ispart of the team organized by a C3PAO (Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization). If the assessor determines thatevidence is insufficient or inadequate, they arenot authorizedto act independently in terms of halting or postponing the assessment.

Source Reference: CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0 – Section 3.5.4 & 3.5.6

"If the Assessment Team identifies gaps in the sufficiency or adequacy of evidence, they must work with the Lead Assessor and C3PAO to determine the appropriate course of action."

The C3PAO is responsible for overseeing the assessment lifecycle.

If evidence isnot adequate, the assessor mustescalate within their organization(i.e., to the Lead Assessor or C3PAO point of contact) to:

Request clarifications from the OSC,

Determine if additional evidence can be requested,

Decide on continuing, pausing, or modifying the assessment schedule.

✅Step 2: Why Contacting the C3PAO Is the Correct Action

A. Notify the CMMC-AB✘ Incorrect. The Cyber AB (formerly CMMC-AB) isnot involved in operational aspectsof assessments. They do not manage day-to-day assessment decisions.

B. Cancel the assessment✘ Incorrect. An assessorcannot unilaterally cancelan assessment. Only theC3PAO, in consultation with all parties, may take such action.

C. Postpone the assessment✘ Incorrect. Postponements are logistical decisions that must be managed through theC3PAO, not an individual assessor.

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

When an assessor determines that the evidence submitted by an OSC is inadequate or insufficient to meet a CMMC practice, thecorrect and required course of action is to consult with the C3PAO. The C3PAO will provide guidance or coordinate appropriate next steps.

CMMC Level 1 includes 17 practices derived fromFAR 52.204-21. Among them, theMedia Protection (MP) practicerequires organizations to ensure thatmedia containing FCI is sanitized or destroyed before disposal or release for reuseto prevent unauthorized access.

This requirement ensures that any storage devices, hard drives, USBs, or physical documents containingFederal Contract Information (FCI)areproperly disposed of or sanitizedto prevent data leakage.

The evidence collected for this practice should demonstrate that an organization has established and followed propermedia sanitization or destruction procedures.

Why the Correct Answer is "B. Adequate"?TheCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guideoutlines that for an assessment to be considered complete, all submitted evidence must meet the standard ofadequacybefore it is accepted by the Lead Assessor.

Definition of "Adequate" Evidence in CMMC:

Evidence isadequatewhen itfully demonstrates that a practice has been performed as requiredby CMMC guidelines.

TheLead Assessorevaluates whether the submitted documentation meets the CMMC 2.0 Level 1 requirements.

If the evidenceaccurately and completely demonstrates the sanitization or destruction of media containing FCI, then it meets the standard ofadequacy.

Why Not the Other Options?

A. Official– While the evidence may come from an official source, the CMMCdoes not require evidence to be "official", only that it beadequateto confirm compliance.

C. Compliant– Compliance is the final result of an assessment, but before compliance is determined, the evidence must first beadequatefor evaluation.

D. Subjective– CMMC evidence isobjective, meaning it should be based on verifiable documents, policies, logs, and procedures—not opinions or interpretations.

CMMC 2.0 Scoping Guide (Nov 2021)– Specifies that Media Protection (MP) at Level 1 applies only to assets that process, store, or transmit FCI.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide– Definesadequate evidenceas documentation that completely and clearly supports the implementation of a required security practice.

FAR 52.204-21– The source of the Level 1 requirements, which includessanitization and destruction of media containing FCI.

Relevant CMMC 2.0 References:Final Justification:The CCP’s statement that the evidence"fully reflects the performance of the practice"aligns with the definition ofadequate evidenceunder CMMC. Since adequacy is the key standard used before final compliance decisions are made, the correct answer isB. Adequate.

The CAP specifies that the C3PAO is responsible for assigning the Lead Assessor to an OSC’s assessment. While the OSC contracts with the C3PAO, the authority to appoint the Lead Assessor resides solely with the C3PAO.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

CAP v2.0, Assessment Team Composition (§2.10): “The C3PAO shall designate a qualified Lead Assessor to lead the assessment.”

Why Option B is Correct:

Only the C3PAO has the authority to select and assign the Lead Assessor.

The OSC may influence scheduling and planning but cannot appoint assessors.

Options A, C, and D are inconsistent with CAP requirements.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content):

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0, Assessment Team Roles and Responsibilities (§2.10).

In the context of the Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) 2.0, particularly at Level 2, organizations are required to implement stringent controls to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). This includes adhering to specific practices related to media protection and physical security.

Media Protection (MP):

MP.L2-3.8.1 – Media Protection:Organizations must protect (i.e., physically control and securely store) system media containing CUI, both paper and digital. This ensures that sensitive information is not accessible to unauthorized individuals.

Defense Innovation Unit

MP.L2-3.8.3 – Media Disposal:It is imperative to sanitize or destroy information system media containing CUI before disposal or release for reuse. This practice prevents potential data breaches from discarded or repurposed media.

Defense Innovation Unit

Physical Protection (PE):

PE.L2-3.10.2 – Monitor Facility:Organizations are required to protect and monitor the physical facility and support infrastructure for organizational systems. This includes ensuring that areas where CUI is processed or stored are secure and access is controlled.

Defense Innovation Unit

Application to the Scenario:

Given that the Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) operates within a shared, multi-tenant building and utilizes a common conference room for assessments, the following considerations are crucial:

Reviewing the Evidence File:The evidence file, which contains CUI, should be reviewed on a secure, authorized device to prevent unauthorized access or potential data leakage.

Printing the Evidence File:If printing is necessary, ensure that the printer is located in a secure area, and the printed documents are retrieved immediately to prevent unauthorized viewing.

Making Notes:Any notes derived from the evidence file should be treated with the same level of security as the original document, especially if they contain CUI.

Disposal of Printed Materials:After the assessment, all printed materials and notes containing CUI must be destroyed using a cross-cut shredder. Cross-cut shredding ensures that the information cannot be reconstructed, thereby maintaining confidentiality.

totem.tech

Options A and D are inadequate as they involve leaving sensitive information in unsecured locations, which violates CMMC physical security requirements. Option B, while secure in terms of digital handling, does not address the proper disposal of any physical copies that may have been made. Therefore, Option C is the best practice, aligning with CMMC 2.0 guidelines by ensuring that all physical media containing CUI are properly reviewed, securely stored during use, and thoroughly destroyed when no longer needed.

Understanding Assessment Methods in CMMC 2.0According to theCMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, assessors usethree primary assessment methodsto determine compliance with security practices:

Examine– Reviewing documents, policies, configurations, and system records.

Interview– Speaking with personnel to gather insights into security processes.

Test– Performing technical validation of system functions and security controls.

TheAssessment Team Memberis inspectingAssessment Objects(e.g., system configurations, user access control settings, policies) to determine if the OSC's evidence is sufficient forAC.L1-3.1.1 (Access Control – Authorized Users).

This activity aligns directly with theExaminemethod, which involves reviewing artifacts such as:

Access control lists (ACLs)

System user authentication logs

Account management policies

Role-based access control settings

"Observe" (Option B)is incorrect because "observing" is not an official assessment method in CMMC.

"Test" (Option A)is incorrect because the assessment is not actively executing a function but ratherreviewingevidence.

"Interview" (Option D)is incorrect because no personnel are being questioned—only documentation is being reviewed.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Guide, Section 3.5 – Assessment Methods

CMMC Level 2 Assessment Guide – Access Control Practices (AC.L1-3.1.1)

Why Option C (Examine) is CorrectOfficial CMMC Documentation ReferencesFinal VerificationSince the activity involves reviewing documents and records to verify access control measures, it falls under theExaminemethod, makingOption C the correct answer.

The term Adversarial Assessment is formally defined in DoD cyber terminology. It describes testing that evaluates a unit or system’s ability to perform its mission while facing simulated cyber threat activity representative of a real-world adversary.

Supporting Extracts from Official Content:

DoD Cybersecurity Test and Evaluation Guidebook: “Adversarial Assessment: Test conducted to evaluate a unit’s ability to support its mission while withstanding cyber threat activity representative of an actual adversary.”

Why Option D is Correct:

A penetration test is narrower and focuses on identifying vulnerabilities.

Black hat testing is not an official DoD or CMMC term.

Red cell assessment refers more broadly to force-on-force exercises and is not the term used in CMMC/governing DoD definitions.

References (Official CMMC v2.0 Content and Source Documents):

DoD Cybersecurity Test and Evaluation Guidebook.

CMMC v2.0 Governance – Source Documents (incorporating DoD definitions).

Understanding Federal Contract Information (FCI)Federal Contract Information (FCI) is defined by48 CFR 52.204-21(Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems). FCI refers to information that:

Is NOT intended for public release.

Is provided by or generated for the government under a contract.

Is necessary to develop or deliver a product or service to the government.

Excludes publicly available government information(such as information on public websites).

Excludes simple transactional information(e.g., necessary to process payments).

In the context ofCMMC 2.0, organizations thatprocess, store, or transmit FCImust meetCMMC Level 1 (Foundational), which requires implementing17 basic safeguarding practicesoutlined inFAR 52.204-21.

A. CDI (Controlled Defense Information)→ Incorrect

This term was used inDFARS 252.204-7012but has been replaced byCUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)in CMMC discussions.

B. CTI (Cyber Threat Intelligence)→ Incorrect

This refers to intelligence on cyber threats, tactics, and indicators, not contractual data.

C. CUI (Controlled Unclassified Information)→ Incorrect

CUI is sensitive information requiring additional safeguarding but is a separate category from FCI.

D. FCI (Federal Contract Information)→Correct

The definition of FCI explicitly matches the description given in the question.

Why is the Correct Answer FCI (D)?

FAR 52.204-21 (Basic Safeguarding of Covered Contractor Information Systems)

Defines FCI and the required safeguards.

Establishes17 cybersecurity practicesfor FCI protection.

CMMC 2.0 Framework

Level 1 (Foundational)is required for contractors handlingFCI.

Ensures compliance withbasic safeguarding requirementsoutlined inFAR 52.204-21.

NIST SP 800-171 and DFARS 252.204-7012

FCI doesnotrequire compliance withNIST SP 800-171, butCUI does.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting this Answer:

1. Understanding the Validation of Findings in CMMC AssessmentsValidation of findings is an essential part of theCMMC assessment process, ensuring that observations and preliminary conclusions drawn by the assessment team are accurate, fair, and based on complete evidence. This process occurs iteratively during theDaily Checkpointsand is fundamental in determining the overall compliance status of theOrganization Seeking Certification (OSC).

2. The Role of Preliminary Findings in the Assessment ProcessPreliminary findings arenot finalbut rather a mechanism for ensuring transparency, accuracy, and fairness. These findings serve several key purposes:

Allows for OSC Input & Clarification: The OSC has an opportunity to review andprovide additional evidencethat may address deficiencies identified by the assessment team.

Prevents Misinterpretations: By allowing the OSC to comment, the assessment team can refine or correct their understanding of the OSC's implementation of CMMC practices.

Supports Fair and Informed Ratings: Before finalizing MET or NOT MET determinations, the assessment team ensures they have considered all relevant evidence.

Encourages a Collaborative Assessment Process: This validation activity fosters open communication between assessors and the OSC, reducing disputes and misunderstandings.

The primary purpose of preliminary findings is to allow theOSC to comment and provide additional evidencebefore final determinations are made.

This aligns withCMMC Assessment Process guidance, which emphasizes iterative validation of findings throughDaily Checkpoints and Final Outbriefdiscussions.

The validation of findings ensures thatOSC responses and supplementary evidence are considered, making the assessment process more accurate and fair.

3. Why Answer Choice "A" is Correct4. Why Other Answer Choices Are IncorrectOption

Reason for Elimination

B. It determines whether the OSC will be rated MET or NOT MET on their assessment.

Incorrect: Preliminary findings do not directly determine the final rating. The assessment team reviews all collected evidence before making a final decision.

C. It confirms that the Assessment Team's findings are right and cannot be changed.

Incorrect: Findings arenot finalat the preliminary stage. The OSC has the opportunity to challenge findings by providing new or clarifying evidence.

D. It corroborates the Assessment Team's understanding of the CMMC practices and controls.

Partially Correct but Not the Best Answer: While validation helps refine understanding, itsprimary function is to allow OSC input, making optionA the most accurate choice.

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document:

Section 5.3 – Validation of Findings: "The OSC is given the opportunity to provide additional evidence and comments to clarify or supplement preliminary assessment results."

Section 5.4 – Daily Checkpoints: "The assessment team discusses preliminary findings with the OSC, allowing the organization to address concerns in real time."

CMMC 2.0 Level 2 Scoping & Assessment Guide:

Confirms that the assessment process includes continuous dialogue with the OSC before final determinations are made.

5. Official CMMC References Supporting This Answer6. ConclusionPreliminary findings are acrucial validation stepin CMMC assessments, ensuring that organizations have the opportunity toprovide additional evidence and clarify potential misunderstandings. This iterative process improves accuracy and fairness in determining compliance with CMMC requirements. Therefore, the correct answer is:

A. It allows the OSC to comment and provide additional evidence.