Free Cyber AB CMMC-CCP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Last Step in Developing an Assessment Plan for an OSC

Developing anassessment planinvolves:

Defining the assessment scope(e.g., systems, networks, locations).

Planning test activities(e.g., interviews, evidence review, technical testing).

Verifying the OSC’s readiness(e.g., ensuring required documents are available).

Updating the assessment plan and schedule as needed.

Final Step: Obtaining and recording the OSC’s commitment to the assessment plan.

Why is obtaining commitment the last step?

✔Theassessment cannot proceed unless the OSC agrees to the finalized plan.

✔This ensuresOSC leadership understands the scope, timeline, and responsibilities.

✔TheC3PAO must document this commitmentto formalize the agreement.

Why is the Correct Answer "D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan"?

A. Verify the readiness to conduct the assessment → Incorrect

Readiness verification happens earlierin the planning process, not as the last step.

B. Perform certification assessment readiness review → Incorrect

Areadiness review is conducted before finalizing the plan, not at the very end.

C. Update the assessment plan and schedule as needed → Incorrect

Updating the plan happens before commitment is obtained; it is not the final step.

D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan → Correct

This is the final step before conducting the assessment. The OSC must formally agree to the plan.

CMMC 2.0 References Supporting This Answer:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) Document

States that theOSC must confirm agreement to the assessment plan before execution.

CMMC-AB Guidelines for C3PAOs

Specifies thatfinalizing the assessment plan requires documented commitment from the OSC.

CMMC Assessment Guide

Outlines thatassessments cannot begin without formal approval of the plan.

Final Answer:

✔D. Obtain and record commitment to the assessment plan.

Understanding CMMC 2.0 Incident Response Practices

TheIncident Response (IR) domaininCMMC 2.0 Level 2aligns withNIST SP 800-171, Section 3.6, which defines requirements forestablishing and maintaining an incident response capability.

Why "A. IR.L2-3.6.1: Incident Handling" is Correct?

The documentation provideddescribes an incident response capability that includes preparation, detection, analysis, containment, recovery, and user response activities.

IR.L2-3.6.1specifically requires organizations toestablish an incident handling processcovering:

Preparation

Detection & Analysis

Containment

Eradication & Recovery

Post-Incident Response

Why Other Answers Are Incorrect?

B. IR.L2-3.6.2: Incident Reporting (Incorrect)

Incident reporting focuses on reporting incidents to external parties (e.g., DoD, DIBNet),which isnot what the provided documentation describes.

C. IR.L2-3.6.3: Incident Response Testing (Incorrect)

Incident response testing ensures that the response process is regularly tested and evaluated,which isnot the primary focus of the documentation provided.

D. IR.L2-3.6.4: Incident Spillage (Incorrect)

Incident spillage specifically refers to CUI exposure or handling unauthorized CUI incidents,which isnot the scenario described.

Conclusion

The correct answer isA. IR.L2-3.6.1: Incident Handling, as the documentationattests to the establishment of an incident response capability.

How Many Practices Are Included in CMMC Level 2?

CMMC Level 2is designed to alignfullywithNIST SP 800-171, which consists of110 security controls (practices).

This meansall 110 practicesfrom NIST SP 800-171 are required for aCMMC Level 2 certification.

Breakdown of Practices in CMMC 2.0

CMMC Level

Number of Practices

Level 1

17 practices(Basic Cyber Hygiene)

Level 2

110 practices(Aligned with NIST SP 800-171)

Level 3

Not yet finalized but expected to exceed 110

Since CMMC Level 2 mandatesall 110 NIST SP 800-171 practices, the correct answer isC. 110 practices.

Why the Other Answers Are Incorrect

A. 17 practices

❌Incorrect.17 practicesapply only toCMMC Level 1, not Level 2.

B. 72 practices

❌Incorrect. There is no CMMC level with72 practices.

D. 180 practices

❌Incorrect. CMMC Level 2only requires 110 practices, not 180.

CMMC Official References

CMMC 2.0 Model– Confirms thatLevel 2 includes 110 practicesaligned withNIST SP 800-171.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev. 2– Outlines the110 security controlsrequired for handlingControlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

Thus,option C (110 practices) is the correct answer, as per official CMMC guidance.

For CMMC Level 1 scoping , the DoD’s CMMC Scoping Guide – Level 1 (v2.13) instructs an organization performing a Level 1 self-assessment to consider what is in scope for protecting Federal Contract Information (FCI) . Specifically, it states that to appropriately scope a Level 1 self-assessment, the OSA should consider the people, technology, facilities, and external service providers (ESPs) within its environment that process, store, or transmit FCI .

In this scenario, the director is evaluating company offices and data centers where FCI is stored. These are physical locations and physical environments—exactly what the scoping guidance categorizes under Facilities . Facilities in a Level 1 context include physical sites and spaces that may house systems or media containing FCI (e.g., offices, server rooms, data centers), because those locations affect physical access controls, environmental protections, and overall safeguarding of where FCI is handled and stored.

This is distinct from Technology (devices/systems), People (personnel who handle FCI), and ESPs (external providers delivering IT/cyber services). Since the question is explicitly about which offices and data centers store FCI —a physical boundary and location question—the correct asset type is Facilities .

Federal Contract Information (FCI) is defined in FAR 52.204-21 as information provided by or generated for the government under contract but not intended for public release. Under CMMC 2.0, organizations handling FCI must implement FAR 52.204-21 Basic Safeguarding Requirements, ensuring proper protection in processing, storing, and transmitting FCI.

Analyzing the Given Options

The question involves an email system that is used to send FCI to a subcontractor. Let’s break down the possible answers:

A. Manage FCI → Incorrect

Managing FCI involves activities like organizing, storing, and maintaining access to FCI. Sending an email does not fall under management; it is an act of transmission.

B. Process FCI → Incorrect

Processing refers to actively using FCI for operational or analytical purposes, such as analyzing, modifying, or computing data. Simply sending an email does not constitute processing.

C. Transmit FCI → Correct

Transmission refers to the act of sending FCI from one entity to another. Since the contractor is sending FCI via email, this falls under transmitting the data.

Under the official CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0 , the OSC contracts directly with a C3PAO to arrange a Level 2 certification assessment, including the practical scope-of-work elements (timing, logistics, and the terms of performance). CAP v2.0 explicitly states that “The C3PAO shall execute a written contractual agreement for the CMMC Level 2 certification assessment with the OSC” and further clarifies that neither the Cyber AB nor DoD are parties to that contract.

Because the C3PAO is the assessment organization that conducts the certification assessment, it is also the entity the OSC coordinates with during the pre-assessment activities that shape the engagement and scope. CAP v2.0 places key Phase 1 responsibilities on the C3PAO/Lead CCA, including validating the OSC’s assessment scope against applicable scoping requirements and coordinating access to evidence and personnel needed for Phase 2.

By contrast, OUSD provides DoD-level oversight/policy, RPOs and the Cyber AB support the ecosystem, but they do not form the contractual relationship for a specific Level 2 certification assessment. CAP v2.0 is unambiguous that the contract (and any mutually agreed scope-of-work terms) is between the OSC and the C3PAO .

===========

What Does the Practice of Professionalism Require in the CMMC Code of Professional Conduct?

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)sets ethical and professional standards forCertified CMMC Assessors (CCAs) and Certified CMMC Professionals (CCPs).Professionalismrequireshonesty and integrity in all CMMC-related activities.

Step-by-Step Breakdown:

✅1. Professionalism Requires Ethical Behavior

TheCoPC states that professionalismincludes:

Acting with integrityin all assessment-related activities.

Providing truthful and objective assessmentsof cybersecurity practices.

Avoiding deceptive or misleading claimsabout assessments or compliance.

✅2. Why the Other Answer Choices Are Incorrect:

(A) Do not copy materials without permission to do so❌

This falls underIntellectual Property (IP) protection, notProfessionalism.

(B) Do not make assertions about assessment outcomes❌

Assessorsmustprovide findings based on evidence. The rule is aboutnot making false or misleading claims, not about avoiding assertions altogether.

(D) Ensure the security of all information discovered or received❌

This falls underConfidentiality, notProfessionalism.

Final Validation from CMMC Documentation:

TheCMMC Code of Professional Conduct (CoPC)definesProfessionalism as requiring honesty and integrityin allCMMC-related activities.

Thus, the correct answer is:

✅C. Refrain from dishonesty in all dealings regarding CMMC.

Step 1: Review CMMC 2.0 Reforms (Level 1 – Foundational)

As part ofCMMC 2.0, the DoD announced changes toreduce burden and costsfor companies that only handleFederal Contract Information (FCI):

DoD Statement (CMMC 2.0 Overview):

“Level 1 (Foundational) will only require an annual self-assessment, affirming implementation of the 17 FAR 52.204-21 controls.”

✅Step 2: Intent of “Reduced Assessment Costs”

The move to allowself-assessments at Level 1was explicitly designed toeliminate the costof hiring third-party assessors for organizations that only handle FCI.

Level 1 self-assessments are:

Conductedinternally by the OSC,

Affirmed annuallyby a senior company official,

Submitted via SPRS(Supplier Performance Risk System).

❌Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

B. Opt out of CMMC Assessments

✘Incorrect. Organizations must still perform aself-assessmentannually — they cannot opt out entirely.

C. Have assessment costs reimbursed by the DoD

✘No such reimbursement mechanism exists.

D. Pay no more than $500.00…

✘No such fixed cost is set or guaranteed in CMMC documentation.

UnderCMMC 2.0, all companies atLevel 1 (Foundational)are permitted toconduct self-assessmentsannually to demonstrate compliance, supporting the DoD’s goal ofreducing assessment costsfor low-risk contractors.

The correct document is a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) , because its specific purpose is to restrict a receiving party from disclosing sensitive or confidential information to unauthorized parties. In the official CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v2.0 , NDAs are called out directly as a required element of the contracting relationship for a Level 2 certification assessment.

CAP v2.0 states that the C3PAO and the OSC must execute a written contractual agreement for the assessment and then specifies that “A mutual non-disclosure agreement (NDA) between the parties shall be incorporated into the contractual agreement or negotiated and executed in a separate document (e.g., stand-alone NDA, master services agreement, etc.).”

This is important because CMMC assessments can involve access to highly sensitive organizational information, including details about system architectures, security implementations, and potentially CUI handling processes. The CAP’s NDA requirement supports controlling dissemination of that information and reinforces the broader confidentiality expectations placed on assessment participants.

While an “assessment agreement” or generic “legal agreement” might contain confidentiality clauses, CAP v2.0 explicitly identifies the NDA instrument (either embedded or standalone) as the mechanism to protect information exchanged during the assessment engagement. Therefore, the best answer—consistent with CMMC v2.0 official process documentation—is D (Non-disclosure agreement) .

According to the CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) and the C3PAO Authorization Requirements, every assessment conducted by a Certified Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) must undergo a formal Quality Management System (QMS) review before the results are finalized and uploaded to the eMASS (Enterprise Mission Assurance Support Service) or the SPRS (Supplier Performance Risk System).

The Quality Review Requirement: The CAP explicitly states that the C3PAO is responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the assessment findings. Before the Assessment Team Lead can formally submit the package, a person or team within the C3PAO (who was ideally not part of the active assessment team to ensure objectivity) must conduct an internal review. This review ensures that the evidence collected supports the "Met" or "Not Met" determinations and that all CMMC methodology requirements were followed.

Why other options are incorrect:

Option A: While there may be administrative costs associated with maintaining C3PAO status, paying a specific "per-submission fee" is not a mandatory procedural stepwithin the assessment lifecyclethat governs the validity of the results.

Option C: The Cyber AB (CMMC-AB) provides the platform and oversight, but a "forthcoming notification" is not a formal requirement in the CAP; the act of submission itself serves as the notification.

Option D: While a final briefing is a "best practice" and usually occurs during the "Post-Assessment" phase, the internal quality review (Option B) is the regulatory mandate that must be completed to ensure the C3PAO's certification of the results is valid and defensible.

Reference Documents:

CMMC Assessment Process (CAP) v1.0: Section on "Phase 4: Reporting Results," specifically the sub-section on C3PAO Quality Assurance Review.

C3PAO Quality Management System (QMS) Requirements: Outlines the necessity for internal validation of assessment packages to maintain accreditation.