Summer Special 60% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: bestdeal

Free CIMA P3 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Questions 11

Y plc, a pharmaceutical company, has dealt with a number of risks in the manner indicated below.

Use the TARA framework to classify each of Y plc's responses.

P3 Question 11

Options:
CIMA P3 Premium Access
Questions 12

Under the COSO Enterprise Risk Management Framework, who is responsible for risk management?

Options:
A.

Every member of the entity.

B.

The board of directors only.

C.

Managers and directors only.

D.

The shareholders.

Questions 13

Company H operates a fleet of lorries. The Internal Auditor recently conducted an investigation into the transport needs of the company. Their report recommended that the lorries be disposed of, the drivers made redundant, and the distribution of the company's products be outsourced.

The type of investigation carried out by the Internal Auditor is best described as a:

Options:
A.

Compliance Audit

B.

Economy Audit

C.

Efficiency Audit

D.

Effectiveness Audit

Questions 14

Move the category of risk to the box beside the risk description it best matches.

P3 Question 14

Options:
Questions 15

GHY is a listed company. Tom is GHY's CEO and Peter is its non-executive Chair of the Board. Tom and Peter both have substantial relevant business and industrial experience and both are believed to have considerable integrity. Tom and Peter quickly developed a good working relationship after Peter's appointment. They have become close friends.

Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business. Tom and Peter jointly agree the agenda for every board meeting and both agree on the manner in which matters will be presented to the board.

Taking account of the principles of good corporate governance, which of the following statements is correct?

Options:
A.

It is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company.

B.

Non-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.

C.

The relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Board is not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.

D.

Since the non-executive chair clearly has a significant role within this company there is little danger that any individual will become excessively dominant.

Questions 16

Q is a company which generates electricity from alternative energy sources. It has just begun constructing a wind farm near a well-known beauty spot. The project has been controversial as campaigners say it will be noisy and unsightly.

The campaigners took legal action but lost the case. Some of them have started a campaign of direct action against Q and are physically blocking roads leading to the site and attempting to intimidate Q's staff.

Q has hired a security company to help it to protect its staff.

In relation to the ethics of this scenario, which of the following statements are valid?

Options:
A.

Q is within its rights to hire the security firm because it has duty of care to its employees.

B.

Q no longer has any duty of care to the protestors since their actions are illegal because they lost their court case.

C.

The security firm must take care not to use more force against the protestors than is absolutely necessary.

D.

Since the protestors have already lost their court case they would no longer be ethically justified in engaging in political lobbying to try to get the government to change the law in this area.

E.

The generation of electricity from clean, renewable and sustainable sources is too important for the protestors' concerns to be considered.

Questions 17

Which categories on a risk map best describe the loss of sales floor staff in a fast fashion chain?

Options:
A.

Low likelihood; low consequence

B.

High likelihood; high consequence

C.

Low likelihood; high consequence

D.

High likelihood, low consequence

Questions 18

An electricity company owns and operates a nuclear power station located ten miles from a large city. A recent and very extensive engineering examination of the power station concludes with the estimate that the probability of a major nuclear disaster within the next 20 years is 0.2%.

Which of the following best explains the relevance of quantifying the risk in that way?

Options:
A.

There is no acceptable level of risk for a major nuclear accident and so the probability has little information value in itself.

B.

The probability is so low as to be ignored.

C.

The directors will be able to argue that they were not negligent in the event of a major disaster within the 20 year period.

D.

The calculation of a precise probability demonstrates that the engineers who conducted the inspection are experts in their field.

Questions 19

The management of U is reviewing internal controls throughout the company. It has noted the following:-

1. In the trade receivables section, journal adjustments are made by the clerks, without any reference to their supervisor. Journal adjustments may relate to sales returns, discounts allowed, or transfers between accounts.

2. In the purchasing department, the purchasing manager selects and approves all suppliers, as they are the only person with sufficient experience to do so. They use a very limited number of suppliers because they can rely on these suppliers to provide goods of the quality required at a competitive price. They do not keep any documents in relation to negotiations with other potential suppliers or other quotes obtained.

In relation to the above, which of the following statements are valid?

Options:
A.

The fact that the purchasing manager uses a very small number of suppliers is, in itself, a sign of poor internal controls.

B.

It is acceptable for clerks in the trade receivables section to make journal adjustments without authorisation provided the amounts involved are not material to U's financial statements.

C.

It is acceptable for clerks in the trade receivable section to make journal adjustments without authorisation, provided they have no access to cash receipts.

D.

The fact that the purchasing manager does not keep documentation relating to negotiations with suppliers, or potential suppliers, is evidence that they are involved in fraudulent activity.

E.

Clerks making journal adjustments without reference to their supervisor is evidence of inadequate separation of duties.

F.

The way the role of purchasing manager is carried out in U increases the chance that the company will fall victim to fraudulent activity.

Questions 20

A government department is conducting a value for money audit on a school.

The school's pupils sit leaving exams. Classify each of the audit tests as either economy and efficiency or effectiveness.

P3 Question 20

Options: