Free VMware 3V0-24.25 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

VCF 9.0 documentation explicitly indicates thatvCenter upgrades and the Supervisor/cluster (Workload Management) upgrade are distinct, noting that “if you have only upgraded vCenter and not the cluster” then DevOps engineers have reduced permissions until the cluster is upgraded. This supports the stated standard that VKS/Workload Management lifecycle can be treated separately from vCenter. For the private registry requirement, VCF 9.0 provides an operational mechanism to authenticate and pull artifacts from private registries: “Registry secrets allow package and repository consumers to authenticate to and pull images from private registries,” implemented via a standard Kubernetes Secret of type kubernetes.io/dockerconfigjson.

Taken together, the standard implies (1)asynchronoushandling (separate lifecycle from vCenter) and (2)privatesourcing (images pulled from an internal registry with registry secrets). Therefore, selectingAsynchronous Privatebest matches both requirements in a single configuration choice, aligning with the documented separation of upgrades and the documented need to use authenticated access to private registries.

VCF 9.0 states that you can provision Kubernetes clusters using both GUI and CLI approaches, and it explicitly calls out the CLI clients: “the VCF CLI and kubectl provide command-line interfaces for provisioning Kubernetes clusters.” That directly maps tokubectl (A)andVCF CLI (E)as supported clients for provisioning and lifecycle operations. Separately, VCF 9.0 explains that vSphere administrators can “manage and monitor vSphere Pods, VMs, and VKS clusters by using the vSphere Client,” which corresponds tovSphere UI (C)in the question. In addition, the vSphere Client is used to access Supervisor-facing self-service interfaces (for example, the Local Consumption Interface through the vSphere Client), reinforcing vSphere UI as an operational entry point for managing Supervisor-backed services and workloads.

By contrast,Cluster APIis a controller framework (not an operator “client” for admins in this context), andesxtop/esxcliare ESXi host tools that do not represent the documented, supported interfaces for provisioning and managing VKS clusters at the Kubernetes service layer.

Harbor reduces the risk of running vulnerable or tampered images primarily throughvulnerability scanningandimage signing.Vulnerability scanning (E)detects known CVEs in image layers (OS packages and application dependencies, depending on the scanner configuration). This allows teams to identify—and gate the use of—images that contain high/critical vulnerabilities before those images are deployed to Kubernetes clusters. Enforcing scanning as part of the image promotion process helps prevent outdated images with known CVEs from being pulled into production.Image signing (A)provides integrity and provenance controls by enabling consumers to verify that an image was produced and approved by a trusted publisher and has not been altered. When combined with admission controls/policies (for example, only allowing signed images from specific projects), signing helps block unauthorized or unapproved images from being deployed, which is critical when the incident involves exposed internal APIs and supply-chain risk.

The other choices do not directly prevent recurrence:automatic image update (B)is not a core Harbor registry control,deploy both container and VM images (C)is a content capability rather than a security control, andautomatic image validation (D)is not a standard Harbor registry capability distinct from signing/scanning.

VCF 9.0 documents that you obtain access to the Supervisor (and the contexts you’re entitled to, which commonly correspond to namespaces and workload clusters) by authenticating withkubectl vsphere login. The procedure “Get and Use the Supervisor Context” explains that after you log in, a Kubernetes configuration context is generated and you can view it in$HOME/.kube/config, which is “commonly called the kubeconfig file.”

The documentation is explicit that running kubectl vsphere login --server= --vsphere-username “creates a configuration file with the JSON Web Token (JWT) to authenticate to the Kubernetes API,” and then lists how to view and switch contexts using kubectl config get-contexts and kubectl config use-context.

This matches optionDprecisely: you don’t “download” kubeconfig from VCF Operations or a Supervisor Services page; instead, you generate/update your kubeconfig locally by logging in withkubectl’s vSphere plugin, which writes the required cluster/user/context details into .kube/config.

VCF 9.0 explicitly documents thatVKS supports two CNI options: Antrea and Calico, and that thesystem-defined default CNI is Antrea. This directly eliminates Flannel and Cilium as default supported options for VKS clusters on Supervisor in this context. VCF 9.0 also describes how a vSphere administrator can view or change this setting in the vSphere Client underSupervisor Management → Configure → Kubernetes Service → Default CNI, further reinforcing that Antrea is the baseline/default choice.

From a policy perspective in the question, the requirement is Kubernetes-layer observability and control of pod communications “without additional licensing or overlay complexity.” Antrea is presented in VCF 9.0 as the default CNI and is implemented usingOpen vSwitch, with networking and network policy capabilities provided at the Kubernetes layer for pods and services. Because it is the documented default (and supported) option for new VKS clusters, selectingAntreabest aligns with the “default supported option” requirement.

A Global Namespace in a service-mesh-driven, multi-cluster design is fundamentally anorganizational and policy boundarythat lets platform teams treat multiple Kubernetes namespaces—across multiple clusters/regions—as one logical application domain. That is whyBis correct: it defines an application boundary spanning clusters, which is exactly what “GovApp” needs when its tiers are distributed across regions but must still behave as one application. It also explains whyAis correct: the value of a Global Namespace is that you can applyconsistent identity, security, and traffic policiesacross all member namespaces and clusters, rather than configuring them separately per cluster. This supports uniform mTLS/authorization posture, consistent service-to-service access rules, and standardized routing behaviors regardless of where a service instance runs.

The other options describe outcomes that may be enabled by additional service-mesh features, but they are not the corerequirementsthat define a Global Namespace: distributed ingress/egress is not guaranteed simply by the namespace construct, automatic workload placement is typically handled by schedulers/placement engines rather than the namespace boundary, and centralized logging is an observability capability outside the namespace requirement itself.

In VCF 9.0 VKS clusters, network policy is a core Kubernetes networking control implemented by the cluster’s CNI (Antrea or Calico). The VCF documentation’s “VKS Cluster Networking” table describesNetwork policyas the feature that “controls what traffic is allowed to and from selected pods and network endpoints,” and identifies Antrea or Calico as the providers for this capability. That definition precisely matches optionB: it governs pod-to-pod and pod-to-external endpoint communication rules. This is different from ingress routing (which the same table describes separately as “Cluster ingress … routing for inbound pod traffic”), so option C is not correct for “network policy.” It is also different from NodePort behavior (external access via a port on each worker node through the Kubernetes network proxy), which is explicitly listed as “Service type: NodePort.” Finally, creating/operating clusters natively in Supervisor is a broader lifecycle function (Cluster API/VKS API), not the definition of network policy. Therefore,NetworkPolicyis the Kubernetes-layer mechanism to define and enforce allowed traffic flows.

VCF 9.0 describes VKS as providing self-service, declarative lifecycle management for Kubernetes clusters and explicitly identifiesCluster APIas the mechanism that enables Kubernetes-style lifecycle automation. The documentation states that “The Cluster API provides declarative, Kubernetes-style APIs for cluster creation, configuration, and management,” and that its inputs include resources describing “the virtual machines that make up the cluster” plus “cluster add-ons.” This directly maps to automated lifecycle management: a desired-state YAML is reconciled by controllers that create, update, and maintain the control plane and worker node resources without manual, imperative procedures.

The same VCF 9.0 content also notes VKS exposes “three layers of controllers” for lifecycle management and lists Cluster API as one of those layers, reinforcing that Cluster API is foundational for ongoing cluster operations (create, scale, upgrade, reconcile). Contour is an ingress controller (traffic routing), kubeadm is a Kubernetes bootstrap tool (not the VKS lifecycle controller framework), and Grafana is observability/visualization (not cluster lifecycle).