Free The Open Group OGEA-101 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Strategy Portfolio Project Solution Delivery are the four purposes that typically frame the planning horizon, depth and breadth of an Architecture Project, and the contents of the EA Repository. They correspond to different levels of abstraction and granularity in the architecture development process. Reference: The TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2 - The Open Group, Section 2.4 Architecture Repository.

The Architecture Requirements Specification is one of the TOGAF deliverables that provides a set of quantitative statements that outline what an implementation project must do in order to comply with the architecture12. It is a companion to the Architecture Definition Document, which provides a qualitative view of the solution and aims to communicate the intent of the architect. The Architecture Requirements Specification provides a quantitative view of the solution, stating measurable criteria that must be met during the implementation of the architecture3. It typically forms a major component of an implementation contract or contract for more detailed Architecture Definition4. References:

•Deliverable: Architecture Requirements Specification - The Open Group

•Architecture Requirements Specification - Visual Paradigm Community Circle

•The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Definitions - The Open Group

•The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Architecture Requirements Specification - The Open Group

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation

When defining the scope of an architecture, TOGAF identifies four dimensions that need to be considered:

Breadth – This dimension addresses the extent of the enterprise that will be impacted by the architecture. It answers the question: How much of the enterprise is covered? For example, does the scope include the entire enterprise, a business unit, a division, or just a single organizational function?

Depth – This refers to the level of detail to be covered. For instance, will the architecture describe high-level capabilities, or will it go into detailed system design?

Time Period – This defines the planning horizon of the architecture. It could be short-term (tactical), medium-term, or long-term (strategic).

Architecture Domains – This refers to which domains are covered: Business, Data, Application, and Technology. The scope may include all or just a subset of these domains.

Project Scope (sometimes discussed separately) – Focuses on which specific programs, portfolios, or projects will be impacted.

Among these, the dimension that specifically relates to the extent of the enterprise is Breadth.

Why the other options are incorrect

A. Architecture Domains: Refers to the domains covered (Business, Data, Application, Technology), not the extent of the enterprise.

B. Depth: Refers to the level of detail, not the enterprise extent.

C. Project: Refers to the program or initiative focus, not enterprise coverage.

References

The Open Group, TOGAF® Standard, Version 9.2, Part II: ADM — Preliminary Phase (scope considerations).

The Open Group, TOGAF® 9 Certified Study Guide — discussion of the dimensions of architecture scope (Breadth, Depth, Time Period, Architecture Domains).

According to the TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, a transformation readiness assessment is a technique that evaluates the preparedness of the organization to undergo a change, and identifies the actions needed to increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. A transformation readiness assessment can be conducted in Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions, and the actions resulting from it can be dealt with in Phase F: Migration Planning 1. In Phase E, the transformation readiness assessment can help to identify the major implementation challenges and risks, and to define the critical success factors and key performance indicators for the architecture project. In Phase F, the actions resulting from the transformation readiness assessment can help to develop a detailed and realistic migration plan, and to address the gaps, issues, and dependencies that may affect the transition to the target architecture 1. References: 1: TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition, Part III: ADM Guidelines and Techniques, Chapter 29: Business Transformation Readiness Assessment.

The TOGAF Content Framework defines a detailed model of architectural work products (artifacts, deliverables, building blocks) and the relationships between them.

It is not a lifecycle management capability (A), that is related to the ADM itself.

It is not organized strictly by ADM phases (B).

It is not fixed; it is designed to be tailored (C).

The illustration shows an architecture development cycle based on the TOGAF ADM (Architecture Development Method), which is a method for developing and managing an enterprise architecture1.

The ADM consists of nine phases, each with a specific purpose and output. The phases are1:

Preliminary Phase: To prepare and initiate the architecture development cycle, including defining the architecture framework, principles, and governance.

Phase A: Architecture Vision: To define the scope, vision, and stakeholders of the architecture initiative, and to obtain approval to proceed.

Phase B: Business Architecture: To describe the baseline and target business architecture, and to identify the gaps between them.

Phase C: Information Systems Architectures: To describe the baseline and target data and application architectures, and to identify the gaps between them.

Phase D: Technology Architecture: To describe the baseline and target technology architecture, and to identify the gaps between them.

Phase E: Opportunities and Solutions: To identify and evaluate the opportunities and solutions for implementing the target architecture, and to define the work packages and transition architectures.

Phase F: Migration Planning: To finalize the implementation and migration plan, and to ensure alignment with the enterprise portfolio and project management.

Phase G: Implementation Governance: To provide architecture oversight and guidance for the implementation projects, and to manage any architecture change requests.

Phase H: Architecture Change Management: To monitor the changes in the business and technology environment, and to assess the impact and performance of the architecture.

In addition to these phases, there is a central process called Requirements Management, which is labeled as item 1 in the illustration. This process operates throughout the ADM cycle, and its purpose is to manage the architecture requirements throughout the architecture development, ensuring that they are aligned with the business requirements and the stakeholder concerns2.

Therefore, the description that matches the phase of the ADM labeled as item 1 is C. Operates the process of managing architecture requirements.

1: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 5: Architecture Development Method (ADM)

2: The TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2, Chapter 17: Requirements Management

(Authoritative Open Group guidance distinguishes conceptual, logical, and physical concerns; at the logical level, component types are identified independently of implementation.) For example, the Open Group’s metamodel guidance emphasizes technology-agnostic structure to ensure consistency within an architecture description, which is precisely what the logical level captures before physical realization.

“The Content Metamodel defines a formal structure… to ensure consistency within the architecture description and also to provide guidance for organizations that wish to implement their architecture within an architecture tool.” Open Group Publications

The TOGAF Content Framework exists to give a detailed model of architectural work products—including deliverables, the artifacts within them, and the architectural building blocks those artifacts represent. The fundamental intent of embedding a Content Framework in TOGAF is to drive greater consistency in the outputs produced when following the Architecture Development Method (ADM). That means regardless of who is doing the architecture work, or in which phase of ADM, the types of outputs, their structure, classification (deliverable → artifact → building block), naming, and relationships remain consistent across the organisation. This structured model ensures that architecture work is systematic, standardised, and comparable across different projects or cycles. It is not primarily a mechanism for storage (that’s the role of the repository), nor is it only about addressing IT concerns or preventing gaps — its primary purpose is standardising architecture outputs to support clear communication, reuse, and governance across the enterprise

An Architecture Board is an executive-level group responsible for the review and maintenance of the strategic architecture and all of its sub-architectures1. It is a key element in a successful Architecture Governance strategy2.

An Architecture Board is typically made responsible, and accountable, for achieving some or all of the following goals2:

Providing the basis for all decision-making with regard to the architectures

Consistency between sub-architectures

Establishing targets for re-use of components

Flexibility of the Enterprise Architecture: To meet changing business needs To leverage new technologies

Enforcement of Architecture Compliance

Improving the maturity level of architecture discipline within the organization

Ensuring that the discipline of architecture-based development is adopted

Supporting a visible escalation capability for out-of-bounds decisions

Therefore, the correct answer is option D, which captures one of the goals of an Architecture Board as stated in the TOGAF Standard, Version 9.22.

Option A is incorrect, because conducting assessments of the maturity level of architecture discipline within the organization is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Capability Framework3.

Option B is incorrect, because allocating resources for architecture projects is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Governance Framework4.

Option C is incorrect, because creating the Statement of Architecture Work is not a direct responsibility of an Architecture Board, but rather a part of the Architecture Development Method5. References:

1: Architecture Board - The Open Group3

2: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Board

3: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Capability Framework

4: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part VI: Architecture Governance Framework - Architecture Governance Framework

5: TOGAF Standard, Version 9.2 - Part II: Architecture Development Method - Phase A: Architecture Vision