Free Symantec 250-586 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

TheBase Architecturesection of theInfrastructure Designwithin SES Complete provides a visual layout of thesolution topology and component placement. This section is essential for understanding how various components of the solution are distributed across the environment, detailing where each component resides and how they interconnect. This overview helps ensure that each part of the architecture is aligned with the overall security requirements and deployment model.

References in Symantec Endpoint Security Documentationexplain that having a clear illustration of component placement and solution topology is crucial for effective deployment, maintenance, and scalability of the endpoint security infrastructure.

Thefirst phaseof theSES Complete Implementation Frameworkis theAssessphase. This phase involves gathering information about the customer’s environment, identifying business and technical requirements, and understanding the customer’s security objectives.

Purpose of the Assess Phase: The goal is to fully understand the customer’s needs, which guides the entire implementation process.

Foundation for Solution Design: This phase provides essential insights that shape the subsequent design and implementation stages, ensuring that the solution aligns with the customer’s requirements.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (Design)follows the Assess phase, where the gathered information is used to develop the solution.

Option C (Operate)andOption D (Transform)are later phases focusing on managing and evolving the solution post-deployment.

Thus, theAssessphase is the correct starting point in theSES Complete Implementation Framework.

Beyond performance improvements,Symantec Insightprovides two additional benefits:reputation scoring for documentsandfalse positive mitigation. Insight leverages a vast database of file reputation data to score documents based on their likelihood of being malicious, which aids in accurate threat detection. Additionally, Insight reduces false positives by utilizing reputation information to distinguish between legitimate files and potentially harmful ones, thereby improving the accuracy of threat assessments.

Symantec Endpoint Security Documentationhighlights Insight’s role in enhancing both detection accuracy and reliability by mitigating false positives and providing reputation-based assessments that support proactive threat identification.

In the context ofIntegrated Cyber Defense Manager (ICDm), atenantis the overarching container that can includemultiple domainswithin it. Each tenant represents a unique customer or organization within ICDm, while domains allow for further subdivision within that tenant. This structure enables large organizations to segregate data, policies, and management within a single tenant based on different operational or geographical needs, while still keeping everything organized under one tenant entity.

Symantec Endpoint Security Documentationdescribes tenants as the primary unit of organizational hierarchy in ICDm, with domains serving as subdivisions within each tenant for flexible management.

Asingle site designin aSEP on-premise architectureis often chosen whencentralized reporting without delayis a primary requirement. This design allows for real-time access to data and reports, as all data processing occurs within a single, centralized server environment.

Centralized Data Access: A single site design ensures that data is readily available without the delays that might occur with multi-site replication or distributed environments.

Efficient Reporting: With all logs, alerts, and reports centralized, administrators can quickly access real-time information, which is crucial for rapid response and monitoring.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (geographic coverage)would typically favor a multi-site setup.

Option B (legal constraints on log retention)does not specifically benefit from a single site design.

Option D (control over WAN usage)is more relevant to distributed environments where WAN traffic management is necessary.

Therefore,centralized reporting with no delayis a key reason for opting for asingle site design.

TheSolution Configuration Designin theImplement phaseserves toguide the implementation of features and functionswithin the deployment. It provides specific details on how to configure the solution to meet the organization's security requirements.

Purpose in Implementation: This document provides detailed instructions for configuring each feature and function that the solution requires. It helps ensure that all components are set up according to the design specifications.

Guidance for Administrators: The Solution Configuration Design outlines precise configurations, enabling administrators to implement necessary controls, settings, and policies.

Consistency in Deployment: By following this document, the implementation team can maintain a consistent approach across the environment, ensuring that all features operate as intended and that security measures align with the intended use case.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (brief functional overview)is typically part of the initial design phase.

Option B (hardware requirements)would be part of the Infrastructure Design.

Option D (storage and hardware configuration)is more relevant to system sizing rather than feature configuration.

Thus, theSolution Configuration Designis key to guiding theimplementation of features and functions.

TheExecutive Summarysection of theSES Complete Solution Designprovides asummary of the features and functions to be implemented. This summary is tailored for stakeholders and decision-makers, offering a high-level overview of the solution’s capabilities, key features, and intended outcomes without going into technical specifics. It helps to convey the value and strategic benefits of the SES Complete solution to the organization.

SES Complete Implementation Documentationhighlights the Executive Summary as a crucial section for communicating the solution’s scope and anticipated impact to executives and non-technical stakeholders.

TheSymSubmit Pageis the designated platform forsubmitting evidence of malware not detected by Symantec products. This process allows Symantec to analyze the submission and potentially update its definitions or detection techniques.

Purpose of SymSubmit: This page is specifically set up to handle customer-submitted files that may represent new or undetected threats, enabling Symantec to improve its malware detection capabilities.

Process of Submission: Users can submit files, URLs, or detailed descriptions of the suspected malware, and Symantec’s security team will review these submissions for potential inclusion in future updates.

Improving Detection: By submitting undetected malware, organizations help Symantec maintain up-to-date threat intelligence, which enhances protection for all users.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (SymProtect Cases Page)is not intended for malware submissions.

Option B (Virus Definitions and Security Update Page)provides updates, not a submission platform.

Option D (Symantec Vulnerability Response page)is focused on reporting software vulnerabilities, not malware.

The correct location for submitting undetected malware is theSymSubmit Page.

For an organization withremote locations and minimal bandwidththat wants a content distribution solution without configuring an internal LiveUpdate server, using aGroup Update Provider (GUP)is the best choice.

Efficient Content Distribution: The GUP serves as a local distribution point within each remote location, reducing the need for each client to connect directly to the central management server for updates. This minimizes WAN bandwidth usage.

No Need for Internal LiveUpdate Server: The GUP can pull updates from the central SEP Manager and then distribute them to local clients, eliminating the need for a dedicated internal LiveUpdate server and optimizing bandwidth usage in remote locations.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option A (External LiveUpdate)would involve each client connecting to Symantec’s servers, which could strain bandwidth.

Option B (Management Server)directly distributing updates is less efficient for remote locations with limited bandwidth.

Option C (Intelligent Updater)is typically used for manual updates and is not practical for ongoing, automated content distribution.

Thus, theGroup Update Provideris the optimal solution forremote locations with limited bandwidththat do not want to set up an internal LiveUpdate server.

TheConfiguration Designsection in theSES Complete Solution Designprovides asummary of the features and functionsthat will be implemented in the deployment. This section outlines the specific elements that make up the security solution, detailing what will be configured to meet the customer’s requirements.

Summary of Features and Functions: This section acts as a blueprint, summarizing the specific features (e.g., malware protection, firewall settings, intrusion prevention) and configurations that need to be deployed.

Guidance for Implementation: By listing the features and functions, the Configuration Design serves as a reference for administrators, guiding the deployment and ensuring all necessary components are included.

Ensuring Solution Completeness: The summary helps verify that the solution covers all planned security aspects, reducing the risk of missing critical configurations during deployment.

Explanation of Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

Option B (testing scenarios)is part of the Test Plan, not the Configuration Design.

Option C (solution validation)is conducted after configuration and is typically part of testing.

Option D (base architecture and infrastructure requirements)would be found in the Infrastructure Design section.

Therefore, theConfiguration Design sectionprovidesa summary of the features and functions to be implemented.