Free ISTQB CTAL-TM Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 6

Context Analysis:The question involves integrating an existing test automation framework into a CI/CD pipeline. The integration requires modifications to the framework and results reporting. This aligns with ISTQB Advanced Test Management concepts focusing on evaluating and adapting test tools for specific project needs (Syllabus reference: TM-1.6.1 and TM-1.6.4).

Evaluation of Options:

A. Investigation that the tool will be fit for purpose:

Correct. Before integrating the framework, a thorough investigation is necessary to confirm whether the tool can support the required modificationsand functionality. This aligns with the emphasis on ensuring tools meet both current and future needs as per the ISTQB syllabus section TM-1.6.1​​​.

B. Training regarding how to make the framework modifications so the integration is possible:

Incorrect. While training might be useful later, it is not the first step or the primary requirement to ensure the integration is feasible.

C. A review to determine if this is the best tool to use for the integration with the CI/CD pipeline:

Incorrect. This step might be relevant in an earlier phase of tool selection, but the question assumes the tool has already been chosen.

D. Investigation of the licensing models of the tool and an understanding of any potential costs:

Incorrect. Licensing investigation is part of tool selection and budgeting, not directly related to technical integration feasibility.

Syllabus Alignment:The ISTQB Advanced Level Test Management syllabus emphasizes the importance of ensuring the selected tools and technologies align with organizational requirements and technical feasibility. This is outlined in the "Test Tools" section of the syllabus (TM-1.6.1, TM-1.6.4).

Conclusion:The correct answer isA. Investigation that the tool will be fit for purpose, as this step ensures the technical requirements for integration are met before proceeding with modifications or training.

Context Analysis:

The project described has teams using different methodologies (traditional vs. Agile) tailored to their needs.

The "fit for purpose" hybrid approach is explicitly designed to combine methodologies based on team and project requirements.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Sequential:

Incorrect. A sequential approach suggests a traditional waterfall-like model, not a hybrid.

B. Hybrid as a transition to Agile:

Incorrect. This term implies the entire project is transitioning to Agile, which is not the case here.

C. Agile:

Incorrect. Only the development team is Agile; the business team uses a traditional approach.

D. Hybrid as fit for purpose:

Correct. Combines the most effective aspects of both traditional and Agile methodologies to suit the project context.

Syllabus Alignment:

ISTQB defines hybrid models as combinations of methodologies tailored to specific project needs (TM-1.2.4).

Purpose of Retrospectives:

Retrospectives are team meetings aimed at reflecting on the work process to identify what went well (strengths) and areas that can be improved (opportunities).

This aligns with continuous process improvement practices.

Evaluation of Options:

A(Everyone shakes hands) is trivial and not a core activity.

B(Reviewing data collection methods) may be part of broader discussions but is not the primary focus.

Cis correct because it directly reflects retrospective goals.

D(Brainstorming solutions) typically occurs in follow-up sessions, not during the retrospective itself.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

Retrospective practices are emphasized in "Improving the Test Process" (TM-1.5.4) in the syllabus​​.

Estimation Technique Selection:

Extrapolation uses historical data from similar projects to estimate effort for a new one.

Since the current upgrade is 10% larger than the previous one, extrapolation is the most straightforward method.

Evaluation of Options:

A(Function points) focuses on size estimation and is not specific to historical data.

C(Planning poker) andD(Three-point estimation) involve collaborative or probabilistic techniques, not a direct extrapolation.

Bis correct as it directly applies historical project data to estimate effort.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

Effort estimation techniques are covered under "Test Estimation" (TM-2.2.1) in the syllabus​​.

Context Analysis:

The manager perceives conservative estimates as overly negative. The goal is to balance optimism with realism to satisfy both the team and the manager.

Three-point estimation provides a range of estimates: optimistic, pessimistic, and most likely, addressing the need for a positive yet realistic projection.

Evaluation of Options:

A. Wideband Delphi:

Involves group-based estimation using consensus techniques. While reliable, it does not explicitly offer optimistic vs. realistic estimates.

B. Planning Poker:

Often used in Agile projects, this technique involves relative estimation but does not inherently provide optimistic and pessimistic figures.

C. Three-point estimation:

Correct. Combines optimistic, pessimistic, and realistic estimates to calculate a weighted average. This allows presentation of both realistic and “positive” numbers to the manager.

D. Extrapolation:

Based on past data trends but does not offer a range of estimates or a way to address manager concerns directly.

Syllabus Alignment:The ISTQB syllabus mentions estimation methods like three-point estimation as effective techniques for providing balanced and transparent project timelines (TM-2.2.1).

Experience-Based Testing:

This testing approach relies on the testers' knowledge, experience, and intuition about the system and its usage rather than formal requirements or models.

It is often used when documentation is incomplete or time constraints limit more structured approaches.

Evaluation of Options:

A(Detailed requirements) andB(Usage models) are associated with structured testing techniques.

Cis correct as experience-based testing depends on the testers' understanding of the system.

D(Full risk assessment) supports risk-based testing, not experience-based testing.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

Experience-based testing is detailed under "Test Techniques" (TM-1.4.1) in the ISTQB syllabus​​.

Test Process Improvement Models:

TMMi® (Test Maturity Model Integration)has five maturity levels: Initial, Managed, Defined, Measured, and Optimization.

Other models, likeTPI® NEXT, focus on key areas but do not use a maturity-level framework.

CMMi® (Capability Maturity Model Integration)applies broadly to process improvement but is not specific to testing.

GQM (Goal-Question-Metric)is a measurement approach, not a maturity model.

Evaluation of Options:

A (TMMi®)is correct as it directly incorporates a five-level maturity framework for test process improvement.

Other options are not aligned with the question context.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

TMMi is referenced in the ISTQB syllabus under "Improving the Test Process" (TM-1.5.1) as a standard for maturity models​​​.

Key Factors in Test Estimation:

Test estimation requires identifying measurable factors that influence the testing process, includingeffort(workload in person-hours),time(calendar duration),cost, and thespecific test activities(e.g., planning, design, execution).

These are critical to align resources and schedules, ensuring effective project management.

Evaluation of Options:

Ais incorrect: While "lines of code" may relate to testing scope in specific cases, it is not universally applicable in test estimation.

Bis incorrect: "Start and end dates" are outputs of planning, not estimation.

Cis partially correct but lacks a focus on "test activities," which is crucial for completeness.

Dis correct as it covers effort, time, cost, and test activities, reflecting a comprehensive test estimate.

References and Syllabus Alignment:

As per ISTQB Advanced Test Management syllabus, test estimation should consider effort, time, cost, and activities under "Test Planning" (TM-1.1.1)​​​.

Definition:

Test control involves monitoring and taking actions to align testing with objectives, addressing deviations in test progress or outcomes.

Evaluation of Options:

A. To monitor the testing:

Incorrect. Monitoring is part of the process but does not define the purpose of test control.

B. To return the test environment to its starting state and data:

Incorrect. This pertains to test environment setup or cleanup, not test control.

C. To project detect trends and outcomes:

Incorrect. Detecting trends is part of monitoring, not control.

D. To take corrective actions required to meet the test objectives:

Correct. Test control is proactive, focusing on corrective measures to ensure test objectives are met (Syllabus section TM-1.5.3).

Step by Step Comprehensive Detailed Explanation:

Definition of Cost of Quality (CoQ):CoQ is composed of four components:

Prevention Costs:Costs related to activities to prevent defects (e.g., training, quality planning).

Appraisal Costs:Costs associated with evaluating products to ensure defect-free delivery (e.g., testing).

Internal Failure Costs:Costs due to defects found before delivery to the customer (e.g., rework).

External Failure Costs:Costs from defects discovered after delivery (e.g., warranty claims, reputation damage).

Calculation Process:

Defect Prevention Cost:Given as $10,000 (fixed).

Appraisal Cost:$250 per defect for 200 defects = 250×200=50,000250 \times 200 = 50,000250×200=50,000.

Internal Failure Cost:$200 per defect for 200 defects = 200×200=40,000200 \times 200 = 40,000200×200=40,000.

External Failure Cost:$2,000 per defect for 100 defects = 2,000×100=200,0002,000 \times 100 = 200,0002,000×100=200,000.

Total CoQ:Adding all costs together:

Total CoQ=10,000+50,000+40,000+200,000=300,000.\text{Total CoQ} = 10,000 + 50,000 + 40,000 + 200,000 = 300,000.Total CoQ=10,000+50,000+40,000+200,000=300,000.

Correct Answer and Justification:The total cost is$300,000, making Option A the correct answer.

References and Documentation from Advanced Test Management:

ISTQB Advanced Test Management Syllabus v3.0, Section 2.2.2:This section emphasizes understanding and calculating the cost of quality by segregating it into the four components as seen above​​.

ATM Sample Exam Questions 2024 (Example Calculations):Highlights similar numerical examples to calculate CoQ​.

ISTQB Exam Structure Rules v1.9:Ensures alignment with K2-level understanding for cost analysis scenarios in test management​.