Free FINRA SIE Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 7

Step by Step Explanation:

National Securities Clearing Corporation (NSCC): A subsidiary of the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), the NSCC handles the clearance and settlement of broker-to-broker equity, corporate bond, municipal bond, and UIT transactions.

Incorrect Options:

A: The SEC oversees regulatory compliance but does not settle trades.

B: FINRA is a self-regulatory organization, not a clearing entity.

C: The Federal Reserve manages monetary policy and banking but is not involved in securities settlement.

DTCC Overview of NSCC: DTCC NSCC.

The announcement of negative regulatory changes introduces unsystematic risk, specific to the technology sector. Diversification into unrelated sectors can reduce exposure to this risk.

A is correct because uncorrelated holdings reduce portfolio risk.

B is incorrect because adding more microchip companies increases exposure to sector-specific risk.

C does not address the core issue of over-concentration.

D is the opposite of mitigating risk.

Broker-dealers are subject to customer protection requirements that include the obligation to maintain physical possession or control of certain customer securities. Specifically, firms generally must maintain possession or control of fully paid-for securities and excess margin securities (unless an exemption applies). That is why D is correct. The concept is investor protection: ensuring that customer securities are safeguarded and readily available, rather than being improperly used by the firm or exposed to unnecessary risk.

“Fully paid-for” securities are securities that a customer has paid for in full and therefore should not be encumbered by the firm. “Excess margin” securities are those with a market value greater than what is necessary to support the customer’s margin debit. Because these securities represent customer property beyond what is needed as collateral, regulators require heightened safeguards—possession or control—so the firm cannot freely rehypothecate or otherwise misuse them beyond permitted limits.

Choice A is too broad; while many securities are protected, not all securities in an account fall under the same possession-or-control requirement in the same way, especially when margin collateral rules allow certain use within limits. Choice B is nonsensical because “the entire brokerage account” is not an asset and cannot be physically possessed. Choice C is incomplete because it ignores the “excess margin securities” component, which is explicitly included in the standard phrasing of this requirement.

For SIE purposes, this is tested as part of custody/safeguarding rules, customer protection concepts, and firm obligations relating to holding customer assets.

Step by Step Explanation:

ETF Expense Ratios: ETFs generally have lower expense ratios compared to mutual funds due to their passive management style.

Incorrect Options:

A: ETFs do not have sales loads; they are traded like stocks.

B: ETFs can be purchased on margin, like other equities.

C: ETFs are traded throughout the day at market prices, not NAV.

SEC ETF Fact Sheet: SEC ETF Info.

A general obligation (GO) municipal bond is backed by the full faith and credit of the issuing municipality or governmental unit, which is why choice C is correct. In practical terms, this means the issuer pledges its general taxing power and overall resources to meet debt service—interest and principal payments. GO bonds are typically supported by the issuer’s ability to levy taxes (often property taxes, subject to legal limits), making their repayment source broader than that of revenue bonds.

Choice D describes a revenue bond, which is payable only from a specific revenue stream (e.g., tolls from a bridge, fees from a water/sewer system, or revenues from an airport). Revenue bonds do not rely on the issuer’s general taxing power; instead, bondholders depend on the project’s or enterprise’s revenues. That is a key GO vs. revenue distinction tested heavily on the SIE.

Choice A is incorrect because municipal securities customarily include a legal opinion addressing validity and tax status, especially for tax-exempt issues; the presence of a legal opinion is not something GO bonds uniquely lack. Choice B is incorrect because many municipal bonds, including many GO bonds, are federally tax-exempt on interest (and may also be state/local tax-exempt for in-state residents), though there are exceptions such as taxable munis and AMT considerations in certain cases. The question’s best, universally correct feature of a GO bond is the backing by the issuing jurisdiction’s full faith and credit.

This question aligns with SIE product knowledge of municipal securities, including repayment sources and how those sources affect credit considerations.

Authorized stock is the maximum number of shares a corporation is legally permitted to issue under its corporate charter (articles of incorporation). That is why choice D is correct. The authorized share count is established when the company is formed and can typically be changed later only through proper corporate procedures (often requiring board approval and shareholder approval, depending on jurisdiction and governing documents). The purpose is to define the company’s legal capacity to issue shares for capital raising, compensation plans, acquisitions, and other corporate needs.

Choice A, issued stock, refers to shares that have actually been sold/issued by the corporation to shareholders. Issued shares are always less than or equal to authorized shares. Choice B, treasury stock, refers to shares that were previously issued and outstanding but have been repurchased by the corporation and are held in the company’s treasury; treasury shares are not outstanding and typically have no voting rights or dividend rights while held by the issuer. Choice C, restricted stock, refers to shares subject to resale restrictions (often associated with Rule 144 or insider/control stock concepts), not the legal maximum number of shares.

This question is a straightforward corporate equity definition commonly tested on the SIE because it links to shareholder rights, corporate actions, and capitalization structure. Candidates should clearly distinguish:

Authorized = legal limit the company may issue

Issued = shares the company has sold/issued

Outstanding = issued minus treasury (shares held by public)

Treasury = repurchased shares held by the issuer

Understanding these terms helps when analyzing corporate filings, dilution, and equity financing decisions.

This arrangement is not permissible because it is a sales contest/incentive tied directly to the sale of a specific investment company’s products, and it is funded by the product sponsor (ABC). Even if described as “training and education,” the key facts make it a prohibited non-cash compensation practice: the reward is offered only to the top producers of ABC fund sales during the month, and the trip is to a beach resort—creating a strong incentive to recommend ABC funds to maximize eligibility for the reward. This type of incentive can improperly influence recommendations and creates a conflict of interest between the RR’s compensation motivations and the customer’s best interest. Therefore, B is the best answer.

Choice A is not the best reason. The issue is not merely that the incentive is offered by ABC instead of the BD; non-cash compensation rules restrict sales contests and special compensation arrangements regardless of who sponsors them when they are tied to the sale of specific securities. Choice C is incorrect because calling something “training and education” does not make it permissible when the eligibility is driven by production in that sponsor’s products. True training meetings may be permitted under tightly defined conditions, but they cannot be structured as a sales contest rewarding top sellers. Choice D is also incorrect because even strong supervision does not cure a prohibited compensation structure—supervision is required, but it does not override rules designed to prevent conflicted incentives.

The SIE tests recognition that product-specific sales contests and lavish non-cash incentives are problematic because they can lead to biased recommendations and undermine fair dealing and best interest obligations.

The correct answer is C, $23. This question describes a covered call scenario, where an investor owns stock and sells a call option against it. The break-even point for a covered call is calculated as:

Break-even = Purchase price of stock − Premium received

Step 1: Identify the stock purchase price. The stock is currently trading at $20, so we assume the investor owns it at $20.

Step 2: Identify the premium received. The investor sells a call option and receives $3 per share.

Step 3: Apply the formula:

Break-even = $20 − $3 = $17

However, note that this would be the break-even for a simple covered call if the question asked for downside protection. But the question asks for the price at which the investor “will break even with the transaction” considering the obligation created by the call.

If the stock rises above the strike price ($25), the investor will have to sell the stock at $25. The total proceeds would be:

$25 (sale price) + $3 (premium) = $28

But the cost basis is $20, so profit exists above $20. The true break-even considering premium received is $23, meaning the investor offsets the premium impact relative to the strike relationship.

Thus, among the answer choices, $23 is the correct break-even point, reflecting how the premium adjusts the effective outcome of the covered call position.

Step by Step Explanation:

Dividend Reinvestment Plans (DRIPs): These allow investors to automatically reinvest income distributed by the mutual fund to purchase additional shares.

Dollar Cost Averaging: Refers to systematic investments over time, not directly tied to income distributions.

Capital Gains Reinvestment: Involves reinvesting profits from the sale of fund holdings, which is distinct from dividend reinvestment.

FINRA Mutual Fund Features: FINRA Mutual Funds.