Free CSI IFC Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 5

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

A lower standard deviation indicates lower volatility and thus lower risk. Fund B, with a standard deviation of 2%, is less risky than Fund A, with a standard deviation of 5%. The feedback from the document states:

"We can find the probable range of returns as follows: Average Return + Standard deviation = Positive outcome. Average Return - Standard deviation = Negative outcome. In any given year Fund A, which has the higher standard deviation, could fluctuate much more widely, making it less attractive as an investment, even over the long-term. Volatility is the most common measure of risk."

Dividends from a large public Canadian corporation are eligible for the dividend tax credit, which reduces the amount of tax payable on this type of income. The dividend tax credit is a non-refundable tax credit that recognizes that dividends are paid out of income that has already been taxed at the corporate level, and therefore should not be taxed again at the personal level. The dividend tax credit applies to both federal and provincial taxes, and the rates vary depending on the province or territory of residence12

References = Canadian Investment Funds Course (CIFC) - Module 4: Taxation - Section 4.1: Taxation of Investment Income3 and web search results from search_web(query="tax treatment of different types of investment income in Canada")12

3: https://www.ifse.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/CIFC-Module-4.pdf

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Liquid alternative funds (liquid alts) are designed to offer more flexibility in using short sales, leverage, and derivatives compared to traditional mutual funds, but with less freedom than hedge funds. The feedback from the document states:

"Liquid alts, also known as alternative mutual funds, were recently introduced into Canada, and are allowed greater use of short sales, leverage, and derivatives compared to regular mutual funds, but not to the same extent as hedge funds."

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The financial planning pyramid illustrates the risk-return spectrum of investments. For a very aggressive investor, high-risk securities like OTC securities are suitable. The feedback from the document states:

"As a visual aid, the planning pyramid helps you show clients how mutual funds fit into the investment universe. A very aggressive investor could consider investments such as OTC Securities."

The bond fund should be contributed to Natasha’s RRSP from a tax efficiency perspective, because interest income from bonds is fully taxable at her marginal tax rate outside of an RRSP. By contributing the bond fund to her RRSP, Natasha can defer paying tax on the interest income until she withdraws it from her RRSP in retirement, when she may be in a lower tax bracket. The equity fund should be kept outside of her RRSP, because dividends and capital gains from equities receive preferential tax treatment compared to interest income. Dividends qualify for the dividend tax credit and capital gains are only 50% taxable. Furthermore, equities tend to have higher returns than bonds over the long term, which means that Natasha would have more after-tax income by keeping them outside of her RRSP. References: Registered Retirement Savings Plan (RRSP), Does it pay to invest in an RRSP? Here’s the math

Tony is employing a top-down investment approach, which is a method of selecting securities based on macroeconomic factors, such as the state of the economy, the industry trends, and the market conditions. A top-down investor starts by analyzing the big picture and then drills down to the specific sectors, regions, and companies that are expected to perform well in that environment. Tony has done an economic analysis of the various provinces and sectors of the Canadian economy and has determined that Nova Scotia and Alberta present the best prospects. He has also identified potential in the oil and gas sector. He then narrows down his selection to an oil supply firm in Medicine Hat and a drilling company in Halifax. This shows that he is using a top-down approach to choose his investments.

A is correct because Francis will receive $37,888 in Canadian dollars when he redeems the Funds. This is calculated by dividing the current proceeds from the redemption in US dollars by the current CAD/USD exchange rate and rounding to the nearest dollar. That is,

While comparing Fund Facts of the different mutual funds, Simone points out that not only are the fund management expenses different but so are the investor profiles for each fund. This behaviour from Simone is ethical because it shows that she is providing accurate and complete information to Pierre and helping him make an informed decision based on his personal circumstances and objectives4. Fund Facts is a document that summarizes key information about a mutual fund, such as its investment objectives, risks, fees, performance history, and investor rights5. By comparing Fund Facts of different mutual funds, Simone can help Pierre understand how each fund differs in terms of its suitability, costs, and potential returns. The other behaviours from Simone are unethical because they do not serve Pierre’s best interests or comply with professional standards. Simone’s ability to keep her knowledge current on competitors’ investment offerings does not necessarily show that she is putting her client’s interest first. She may have other motives for researching other funds, such as trying to persuade Pierre to stay with her dealer’s funds or finding new opportunities for herself4. Knowing Pierre does not like that her dealer’s funds have trailer fees, she chooses not to discuss the relationship between trailer fees and MER while making comparisons. This behaviour is unethical because it is misleading and omits relevant information that Pierre should know before investing4. Trailer fees are fees paid by the fund manager to the dealer for the ongoing services provided by the dealer and its advisors to unitholders5. Trailer fees are part of the management expense ratio (MER), which is the total cost of running and distributing a fund expressed as a percentage of its assets5. Trailer fees and MERs affect the net returns of a fund and may create conflicts of interest between the advisor and the client5. When comparing her dealer’s own mutual funds to the one Pierre discovered, Simone emphasizes the importance of similar net rates of return and minimizes the significance of management expense ratios (MERs). This behaviour is unethical because it is biased and does not present a balanced view of the pros and cons of each fund4. Net rates of return are not the only factor to consider when evaluating a fund’s performance. MERs are also important because they reduce the fund’s gross returns and may indicate how efficiently the fund is managed5. A fund with a lower MER may have an advantage over a fund with a higher MER, all else being equal5. References: Unit 2: Know Your Client, What’s a good MER fee plus 3 strategies to avoid high fees - Bellvest

A treasury bill is a short-term debt instrument issued by the government at a discount from its face value and redeemed at par value at maturity. The difference between the purchase price and the face value is the interest income earned by the investor. Therefore, Megan treats the $1,800 difference as interest income for tax purposes. Interest income is fully taxable at the investor’s marginal tax rate in the year it is received. Megan does not report any capital gain, dividend, or return of capital from the treasury bill.