Free CIPS L5M1 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Group Conformity (10 marks):

Group conformity refers to the tendency of individuals to align their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviours with the norms of the group to which they belong. People conform because they want acceptance, fear rejection, or assume the group’s judgement is correct. Conformity ensures cohesion and cooperation but may limit creativity. For example, in procurement, a junior buyer may adopt the team’s approach to negotiations, even if they personally believe another method could achieve better results.

Groupthink and its Effects (15 marks):

‘Groupthink’, a term developed by Irving Janis, occurs when the desire for consensus overrides realistic appraisal of alternatives. Members suppress doubts, ignore risks, and fail to voice disagreements to maintain harmony. This can seriously affect group behaviour in several ways:

Illusion of invulnerability– Groups may become overconfident and underestimate risks. For example, a procurement team might agree to single-source a supplier without considering supply chain risks.

Suppression of dissent– Members may withhold concerns to avoid conflict. This stifles creativity and prevents better solutions from being considered.

Pressure for uniformity– Individuals may feel obliged to agree even when they disagree. A buyer may stay silent when senior managers push for a supplier contract, even if they know the supplier has performance issues.

Biased decision-making– Groups may ignore warning signs or alternative perspectives, leading to flawed decisions. In procurement, this could mean overlooking ethical issues in a supplier relationship to maintain harmony with stakeholders.

Reduced accountability– Responsibility is shared across the group, so individuals may feel less accountable for poor decisions.

Groupthink can therefore lead to poor decision-making, increased risk, and lost opportunities. It is particularly dangerous in high-stakes environments like procurement, where mistakes in supplier selection or contract negotiation can damage cost, quality, and reputation.

Conclusion:

Group conformity means individuals adapt to group norms to gain acceptance, while groupthink is a negative consequence where consensus is prioritised over critical evaluation. For managers, recognising the risk of groupthink is vital. By encouraging open discussion, appointing a “devil’s advocate,” and welcoming diverse views, leaders can ensure group decisions are both inclusive and effective.

Thehuman relations approach to managementdeveloped in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also bysocial needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.

The foundation of this school came from theHawthorne Studies(Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.

Key principles of the human relations approach include:

Focus on people rather than just processes– recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.

Motivation through recognition and belonging– linking to theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s motivators.

Leadership style matters– supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.

Team dynamics are critical– informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.

Job satisfaction drives performance– happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal.

Advantagesof the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.

Disadvantagesinclude the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through “false concern.” It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.

In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.

In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.

When preparing a business case for additional resource, Zarah should follow a structured process to ensure that the proposal is clear, evidence-based, and aligned with the hospital’s strategic objectives.

The first step is toidentify the need. Zarah must gather evidence to show that the current department is understaffed and unable to manage the workload effectively. This may include statistics on increased purchase orders, supplier contracts, delays, or risks caused by the lack of staff.

Secondly, she shoulddefine the objectives of the business case. In this case, the objective is to secure funding and approval for an additional Procurement Assistant to ensure efficiency, compliance, and risk management in hospital procurement.

Thirdly, Zarah mustanalyse options. The business case should not only present recruitment as the only choice but also consider alternatives such as outsourcing, redistributing workload, or temporary staff. Each option should be reviewed in terms of cost, feasibility, and benefits.

Fourthly, she shouldpresent the costs and benefits. The costs will include salary, training, and any associated overheads. The benefits may include faster order processing, reduced errors, improved supplier management, compliance with healthcare regulations, and freeing up senior staff for strategic tasks. Non-financial benefits, such as improved staff morale and better patient outcomes through timely supply of materials, should also be highlighted.

The fifth step is toassess risks. For example, not hiring an additional assistant may risk delays in ordering medical supplies, poor compliance with procurement standards, and reputational damage to the hospital. Conversely, recruiting without sufficient workload planning could lead to under-utilisation of resources.

Sixthly, Zarah shouldrecommend the preferred option. Based on evidence, she would recommend hiring one additional Procurement Assistant as the best way to meet the workload demands while delivering value.

Finally, she shouldprepare the formal document and presentationfor hospital executives or the finance committee. The business case should be structured with an introduction, background, options, costs/benefits, risks, and recommendations.

Conclusion:

To create a strong business case, Zarah must identify the need, set clear objectives, analyse options, present costs and benefits, assess risks, and make a clear recommendation. A well-prepared business case will increase the likelihood of approval and ensure the procurement team has the resources needed to deliver efficient, compliant, and high-quality outcomes for the hospital.

Part A – Knowledge Transfer (10 points):

Knowledge transfer refers to the process of sharing skills, experience, insights and information from one person or group to another within an organisation. It ensures that valuable expertise is not lost and that best practice can be replicated. This can happen formally, such as through training, mentoring, or documented procedures, or informally, through conversations, collaboration, and shared experiences. In procurement, knowledge transfer might involve senior buyers passing negotiation tactics to junior colleagues or documenting supplier performance insights in a shared database.

Part B – Ensuring Strong Knowledge Management (15 points):

Managers play a key role in creating systems and cultures that support knowledge sharing. Some ways include:

Creating knowledge repositories– using databases, intranets, or category management playbooks where information is stored and accessible to all team members.

Encouraging mentoring and coaching– pairing experienced staff with new employees helps transfer tacit knowledge that may not be written down.

Promoting collaboration and teamwork– cross-functional project teams and regular knowledge-sharing meetings spread expertise across functions.

Using technology– collaboration platforms (e.g., SharePoint, Teams) allow procurement staff to record supplier insights, lessons learned, and contract data in real time.

Rewarding knowledge sharing– recognising and incentivising individuals who share expertise encourages a culture of openness rather than knowledge hoarding.

Embedding learning in processes– after-action reviews, lessons-learned sessions after supplier negotiations or tenders ensure experiences are captured systematically.

Leadership behaviours– managers must role-model transparency and collaboration, showing staff that sharing knowledge is valued.

Conclusion:

Knowledge transfer is about ensuring that critical experience and expertise are shared across the organisation. Managers can ensure strong knowledge management by combining systems, processes, and culture – from IT tools and databases to mentoring and recognition. In procurement, effective knowledge management helps avoid repeated mistakes, builds stronger supplier relationships, and improves decision-making across the team.

Understanding individuals is crucial for effective leadership. People bring unique qualities to the workplace, which influence how they behave, perform, and interact. Four important factors that make up the individual are as follows.

Firstly,personalityplays a major role. Traits such as extroversion, conscientiousness, or openness (from models like the Big Five) influence how individuals communicate, make decisions, and fit into teams. For example, an extrovert may thrive in negotiation roles, while an introvert may excel in analytical procurement tasks.

Secondly,attitudes and valuesshape how individuals respond to work situations. Values around ethics, sustainability, or fairness can influence motivation and alignment with organisational culture. In procurement, a professional with strong ethical values may be more resistant to corruption risks.

Thirdly,perception and motivationaffect behaviour. Individuals interpret situations differently, and motivation theories such as Maslow, Herzberg or McGregor’s Theory X/Y show how personal drivers impact performance. Some may be motivated by pay, others by recognition or career development.

Finally,abilities and skillsdefine what individuals can contribute. These include technical competencies, problem-solving skills, and interpersonal abilities. A skilled negotiator, for example, adds significant value to a procurement team.

Managers must also choose effective ways to lead teams. Three common approaches are:

Autocratic leadership– where the manager makes decisions without consulting the team. This can be effective in crises or routine, highly regulated tasks (e.g., compliance procurement), but risks low morale if overused.

Democratic or participative leadership– where managers involve team members in decision-making. This improves engagement, creativity, and buy-in. For example, involving procurement staff in category strategy development can generate stronger results.

Laissez-faire leadership– where the manager provides minimal direction, allowing the team high autonomy. This works well when teams are highly skilled and self-motivated, but may cause confusion if individuals lack experience.

In conclusion, individuals are shaped by their personality, values, perceptions/motivations, and skills, all of which affect their workplace performance. Managers can choose between autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire leadership depending on the situation. Successful leaders adapt their style to the individuals and teams they manage, ensuring both high performance and motivation.

Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (10 points):

Motivation refers to the internal drive that influences people’s behaviour and performance.

Intrinsic motivationcomes from within the individual and is linked to personal satisfaction, enjoyment, achievement, or a sense of purpose. For example, a procurement professional may feel motivated by solving complex supplier challenges or contributing to sustainability goals.

Extrinsic motivationcomes from external rewards such as pay, bonuses, promotions, or recognition. For instance, a buyer might be motivated by achieving cost savings to receive a financial bonus.

Both types of motivation are important in the workplace. Intrinsic motivation sustains long-term commitment, while extrinsic rewards provide short-term incentives. Effective managers balance both to maximise performance.

One theory of motivation (15 points):

A widely used theory isHerzberg’s Two-Factor Theory. Herzberg identified two sets of factors that influence motivation:

Hygiene factors– these do not motivate if present, but if absent, they cause dissatisfaction. Examples include salary, working conditions, policies, supervision, and job security. For example, if procurement staff lack proper tools or fair pay, they may feel dissatisfied, but simply improving pay will not necessarily make them highly motivated.

Motivators– these are intrinsic to the job and lead to satisfaction and motivation. They include achievement, recognition, responsibility, personal growth, and meaningful work. For instance, giving a buyer responsibility to lead a supplier negotiation or recognising their success increases intrinsic motivation.

Herzberg’s theory highlights that managers cannot rely on pay and policies alone. They must remove dissatisfaction by ensuring fair hygiene factors and then boost engagement by providing motivators. In procurement, this could mean ensuring fair contracts, proper systems, and clear processes (hygiene factors), while also giving staff opportunities for training, career progression, and recognition (motivators).

Conclusion:

Intrinsic motivation is about internal satisfaction, while extrinsic motivation relies on external rewards. Herzberg’s theory shows that managers should address hygiene factors to avoid dissatisfaction but must focus on motivators to truly drive performance. For procurement and supply leaders, combining both ensures staff remain engaged, loyal, and productive.

The lifecycle of a group is often described usingTuckman’s Five Stages of Group Development. This model explains how groups evolve over time, moving from initial formation to effective performance. The five stages are as follows:

1. Forming:

At this stage, the group is coming together for the first time. Members are polite, cautious, and uncertain of their roles. There is little conflict, but people look to the leader for guidance. For example, a new procurement project team might be established to source a new supplier. At this point, roles are unclear, and members rely on the manager to set objectives.

2. Storming:

As individuals begin to assert themselves, conflict often emerges. Differences in working styles, personalities, or priorities can lead to tension. In procurement, this might involve disagreements between finance and operations about whether to prioritise cost savings or quality. The leader’s role here is to manage conflict and keep the team focused on objectives.

3. Norming:

Once conflicts are resolved, the group begins to establish shared norms, values, and ways of working. Roles and responsibilities become clearer, and collaboration improves. In a procurement context, the team may agree on supplier evaluation criteria and work more cohesively to achieve sourcing outcomes.

4. Performing:

The group is now fully functional and works effectively towards its goals. Members trust each other, communication flows well, and productivity is high. For example, the procurement team may now run tendering processes efficiently, negotiate with suppliers, and deliver strong results with minimal supervision.

5. Adjourning (or Mourning):

When the task is complete, the group disbands. This can cause feelings of loss for members who valued the team, but it also creates an opportunity to reflect on lessons learned. In procurement, this could involve completing a sourcing project, closing supplier contracts, and disbanding the cross-functional team after a lessons-learned review.

Conclusion:

The five stages of group development – forming, storming, norming, performing, and adjourning – describe how teams evolve over time. Understanding this lifecycle helps managers support their teams at each stage, managing conflict in storming, reinforcing collaboration in norming, and maximising results during performing. In procurement, applying Tuckman’s model ensures that cross-functional teams move quickly from formation to high performance, delivering greater value to the organisation.

Procurement plays a central role in engaging with different stakeholders. Effective collaboration ensures efficiency, compliance, and value creation. The way procurement collaborates can vary depending on the stakeholder group. Two examples aresuppliersandother departments within the organisation.

Collaboration with Suppliers:

Procurement must develop strong relationships with suppliers to ensure continuity of supply, cost efficiency, and quality. This involves activities such as contract negotiation, performance monitoring, and supplier relationship management (SRM). Collaboration often focuses on building trust, sharing forecasts, and working on joint initiatives like innovation or sustainability. For example, in a manufacturing firm, procurement may collaborate with a fabric supplier to develop new eco-friendly materials. The relationship can be transactional for routine items or strategic for high-value, critical suppliers.

Collaboration with Other Departments:

Internally, procurement must work closely with functions such as Finance, Operations, and Marketing. Collaboration ensures that procurement strategies align with organisational needs. For example, Finance may require procurement to manage budgets and compliance, while Operations depends on procurement for timely materials. Collaboration may involve cross-functional teams, joint decision-making, and regular communication. For instance, procurement and product development may work together to source innovative materials that match design requirements.

Comparison:

Both collaborations require trust, open communication, and alignment of goals.

With suppliers, collaboration often focuses externally on securing value and innovation. With internal departments, it focuses on aligning procurement activity with business objectives.

Supplier collaboration may involve formal tools like contracts, KPIs, and SRM frameworks, whereas internal collaboration relies more on teamwork, communication, and shared processes.

Contrast:

Suppliers are external stakeholders, so procurement must manage risks, legal compliance, and negotiation dynamics. Internal departments are internal stakeholders, requiring influence, persuasion, and partnership.

Supplier collaboration aims at building long-term external relationships; internal collaboration ensures smooth workflows and organisational efficiency.

Conclusion:

Procurement collaborates with both suppliers and internal departments, but the focus differs. Supplier collaboration is about external value creation and innovation, while internal collaboration is about aligning processes and achieving organisational goals. Successful procurement professionals adapt their approach to meet the needs of each group while ensuring overall business success.

When entering negotiations with a new supplier, a procurement professional must use a variety of interpersonal and cognitive skills to achieve the best outcome. Three important qualities arecuriosity, creative thinking, and reflective analysis.

Curiosity (8–9 marks):

Curiosity means asking questions, exploring options, and seeking to understand the supplier’s position. In a negotiation, curiosity allows the buyer to uncover the supplier’s motivations, constraints, and priorities. For example, asking why a supplier has higher costs may reveal underlying logistics challenges, which could be solved collaboratively. Curiosity builds rapport, demonstrates interest, and helps procurement move beyond price to explore value-added benefits such as quality improvements or sustainability initiatives.

Creative Thinking (8–9 marks):

Creative thinking is about generating new solutions and finding alternatives to traditional approaches. In negotiation, this may involve looking for win-win outcomes rather than focusing only on cost. For example, instead of demanding lower prices, procurement could propose longer contracts, volume commitments, or joint innovation projects that benefit both parties. Creative thinking expands the scope of negotiation and helps develop more sustainable supplier relationships.

Reflective Analysis (8–9 marks):

Reflective analysis involves reviewing past experiences and learning from them to improve decision-making. Before negotiating, procurement professionals can reflect on what has worked or failed in previous negotiations. During the negotiation, reflective analysis helps assess whether strategies are effective and adapt accordingly. After the negotiation, reflection allows continuous improvement in approach. For example, a buyer may reflect on why a past supplier negotiation failed due to being too aggressive, and adjust by using more collaborative tactics with the new supplier.

Conclusion:

Curiosity helps procurement gather insights, creative thinking enables innovative solutions, and reflective analysis ensures continuous improvement. Together, these skills allow procurement professionals to build trust, secure better value, and establish strong long-term relationships with new suppliers.

Blake and Mouton’sLeadership Gridhighlights five leadership styles based on two dimensions:concern for peopleandconcern for task. Kevin can use different styles depending on the skills of his team and the importance of each project.

Impoverished Management (Low task/Low people)This style shows little concern for people or performance. Kevin would provide minimal guidance or support, essentially leaving the team to their own devices. While not usually effective, it may be applied temporarily where staff are highly capable and self-motivated, or in less critical projects where close oversight is not needed.

Country Club Management (High people/Low task)Here, Kevin shows strong concern for people but little focus on results. He prioritises team harmony, morale, and relationships. This could be used with a new or inexperienced team to build confidence and trust, but it risks low performance if project deadlines or targets are missed.

Task Management (High task/Low people)This style focuses heavily on performance, structure, and efficiency, with little attention to employee needs. Kevin might use this in high-pressure procurement projects, such as negotiating urgent supply contracts, where results are critical. However, overuse can demotivate staff and create high turnover.

Middle-of-the-Road Management (Medium task/Medium people)This is a balanced approach where Kevin gives some attention to both people and results but does not excel in either. It produces average performance and morale. Kevin might use this style for steady projects with moderate importance, though it risks mediocrity if not adapted when situations demand more.

Team Management (High task/High people)This is considered the most effective style, where Kevin drives high performance while also motivating and supporting his team. He involves employees in decision-making, sets challenging goals, and encourages collaboration. For example, in strategic procurement projects, Kevin could adopt this style to achieve strong results while also developing his team’s skills.

By switching between these styles, Kevin can match leadership behaviours to the skills of his team and the importance of the task. For example, urgent, high-value contracts may need task management, while long-term development projects may benefit from team management.

Conclusion:

Blake and Mouton’s grid provides five leadership styles – impoverished, country club, task-focused, middle-of-the-road, and team management. Each has strengths and weaknesses, and Kevin’s role as Head of Procurement is to adapt his approach depending on the project demands and the skills of his team members. By applying situational leadership, he can ensure both high performance and team engagement.