Free Amazon Web Services Data-Engineer-Associate Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 5

AWS Database Migration Service (AWS DMS) is purpose-built to migrate and continuously replicate data from both AWS-hosted and on-premises databases. It supports full-load (existing data) and change data capture (CDC) for ongoing changes, making it the most cost-effective and operationally simple solution in this scenario.

“DMS supports both full-load and continuous replication via CDC. This enables replicating existing and future data from various sources to a data lake in Amazon S3.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

AWS Glue is not suitable for real-time CDC replication across hybrid environments.

In AWS Glue’s SQL implementation (Spark SQL-compatible), the MERGE INTO statement supports conditional actions.

The clause WHEN MATCHED THEN DELETE deletes matching records from the target table (accounts) where the join condition is true.

“A MERGE INTO statement can perform updates, inserts, or deletes based on the match condition between source and target tables.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

The Amazon Redshift Data API enables you to interact with your Amazon Redshift data warehouse in an easy and secure way. You can use the Data API to run SQL commands, such as loading data into tables, without requiring a persistent connection to the cluster. The Data API also integrates with Amazon EventBridge, which allows you to monitor the execution status of your SQL commands and trigger actions based on events. By using the Data API to publish an event to EventBridge, the data engineer can invoke the Lambda function that writes the load statuses to the DynamoDB table. This solution is scalable, reliable, and cost-effective. The other options are either not possible or not optimal. You cannot use a second Lambda function to invoke the first Lambda function based on CloudWatch or CloudTrail events, as these services do not capture the load status of Redshift tables. You can use the Data API to publish a message to an SQS queue, but this would require additional configuration and polling logic to invoke the Lambda function from the queue. This would also introduce additional latency and cost. References:

Using the Amazon Redshift Data API

Using Amazon EventBridge with Amazon Redshift

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Store Management, Section 2.2: Amazon Redshift

For query workloads on S3 data that depend on date-based filters, partitioning by order date optimizes performance and cost because Athena reads only the relevant partitions.

Athena scales automatically and doesn’t degrade with increasing data size when partitions are managed efficiently.

“Partitioning data in Amazon S3 based on query predicates such as order date improves Athena query performance and reduces scanned data volume.”

– Ace the AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate Certification - version 2 - apple.pdf

This is the most cost-effective and scalable option for date-based queries.

Problem Analysis:

The company requires a centralized data warehouse for consolidating data from various sources.

They use Amazon QuickSight in direct query mode, necessitating fast response times for analytical queries.

Users query the data intermittently, with unpredictable spikes during the day.

Operational overhead should be minimal.

Key Considerations:

The solution must support fast, SQL-based analytics.

It must handle unpredictable spikes efficiently.

Must integrate seamlessly with QuickSight for direct querying.

Minimize operational complexity and scaling concerns.

Solution Analysis:

Option A: Amazon Redshift Serverless

Redshift Serverless eliminates the need for provisioning and managing clusters.

Automatically scales compute capacity up or down based on query demand.

Reduces operational overhead by handling performance optimization.

Fully integrates with Amazon QuickSight, ensuring low-latency analytics.

Reduces costs as it charges only for usage, making it ideal for workloads with intermittent spikes.

Option B: Amazon Athena with S3 (Apache Parquet)

Athena supports querying data directly from S3 in Parquet format.

While it’s cost-effective, performance depends on the size and complexity of the data.

It is not optimized for high-speed analytics needed by QuickSight in direct query mode.

Option C: Amazon Redshift Provisioned Clusters

Requires manual cluster provisioning, scaling, and maintenance.

Higher operational overhead compared to Redshift Serverless.

Option D: Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL

Aurora is optimized for transactional databases, not data warehousing or analytics.

Does not meet the requirement for fast analytics queries.

Final Recommendation:

Amazon Redshift Serverless is the best choice for this use case because it provides fast analytics, integrates natively with QuickSight, and minimizes operational complexity while efficiently handling unpredictable spikes.

Amazon Redshift Serverless Overview

Amazon QuickSight and Redshift Integration

Athena vs. Redshift

Options B and D are correct. AWS Prescriptive Guidance states that shuffle is a major cause of Spark performance issues and can exhaust local disk space on executors, leading to “No space left on device” failures. AWS specifically recommends assessing shuffle performance in CloudWatch metrics and in the Spark UI, and for data skew, it says to examine metrics in the Spark UI, including task duration and spill behavior across executors. That makes B the correct low-cost way to identify the source of the problem.

For remediation, AWS Glue documentation states that Spark can throw “No space left on device” when there is insufficient local disk on the executor, and that you can use Amazon S3 to store Spark shuffle data by enabling the AWS Glue Spark shuffle plugin. The S3 shuffle approach is specifically presented as a way to run shuffle-intensive jobs more reliably when they are bound by local disk capacity. In skew scenarios, using a skew-mitigation technique such as salting is also a standard way to distribute hot keys more evenly. That makes D the most cost-effective corrective step.

Options A and C increase cost by adding capacity before diagnosing or directly fixing the shuffle bottleneck. Option E is less precise than the Spark UI and Glue metrics for identifying skew.

Option B is correct because Amazon Q in QuickSight is the AWS feature built specifically for natural language interaction with business data. AWS documentation explains that Amazon Q in QuickSight lets users ask questions in natural language, generate summaries and data stories, and create visuals from author prompts. AWS Prescriptive Guidance also notes that users can generate insights with natural language prompts and that they do not have to write SQL queries or learn complex BI tooling. That matches the requirement that some analysts lack SQL knowledge and need to create reports frequently with minimal effort.

Option A is not the best answer because zero-ETL access addresses data movement and integration, not natural-language dashboard creation. Option C introduces another analytics platform and therefore more operational effort. Option D provides access to data, but federated querying still does not address the key requirement for natural-language dashboard and report generation for nontechnical analysts. The AWS-native feature that directly solves this problem with the least additional management is Amazon Q in QuickSight.

Redshift data sharing is a feature that enables you to share live data across different Redshift clusters without the need to copy or move data. Data sharing provides secure and governed access to data, while preserving the performance and concurrency benefits of Redshift. By setting up the sales team BI cluster as a consumer of the ETL cluster, the company can share the ETL cluster data with the sales team without interrupting the critical analysis tasks. The solution also minimizes the usage of the computing resources of the ETL cluster, as the data sharing does not consume any storage space or compute resources from the producer cluster. The other options are either not feasible or not efficient. Creating materialized views or database views would require the sales team to have direct access to the ETL cluster, which could interfere with the critical analysis tasks. Unloading a copy of the data from the ETL cluster to an Amazon S3 bucket every week would introduce additional latency and cost, as well as create data inconsistency issues. References:

Sharing data across Amazon Redshift clusters

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 2: Data Store Management, Section 2.2: Amazon Redshift

 Amazon Redshift Spectrum is a feature that allows you to run SQL queries directly against data in Amazon S3, without loading or transforming the data. Redshift Spectrum can query various data formats, such as CSV, JSON, ORC, Avro, and Parquet. However, not all data formats are equally efficient for querying. Some data formats, such as CSV and JSON, are row-oriented, meaning that they store data as a sequence of records, each with the same fields. Row-oriented formats are suitable for loading and exporting data, but they are not optimal for analytical queries that often access only a subset of columns. Row-oriented formats also do not support compression or encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

On the other hand, some data formats, such as ORC and Parquet, are column-oriented, meaning that they store data as a collection of columns, each with a specific data type. Column-oriented formats are ideal for analytical queries that often filter, aggregate, or join data by columns. Column-oriented formats also support compression and encoding techniques that can reduce the data size and improve the query performance. For example, Parquet supports dictionary encoding, which replaces repeated values with numeric codes, and run-length encoding, which replaces consecutive identical values with a single value and a count. Parquet also supports various compression algorithms, such as Snappy, GZIP, and ZSTD, that can further reduce the data size and improve the query performance.

Therefore, using a columnar storage file format, such as Parquet, will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to scan only the relevant columns and skip the rest, reducing the amount of data read from S3. Additionally, partitioning the data based on the most common query predicates, such as date, time, region, etc., will provide faster queries, as it allows Redshift Spectrum to prune the partitions that do not match the query criteria, reducing the amount of data scanned from S3. Partitioning also improves the performance of joins and aggregations, as it reduces data skew and shuffling.

The other options are not as effective as using a columnar storage file format and partitioning the data. Using gzip compression to compress individual files to sizes that are between 1 GB and 5 GB will reduce the data size, but it will not improve the query performance significantly, as gzip is not a splittable compression algorithm and requires decompression before reading. Splitting the data into files that are less than 10 KB will increase the number of files and the metadata overhead, which will degrade the query performance. Using file formats that are not supported by Redshift Spectrum, such as XML, will not work, as Redshift Spectrum will not be able to read or parse the data. References:

Amazon Redshift Spectrum

Choosing the Right Data Format

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 4: Data Lakes and Data Warehouses, Section 4.3: Amazon Redshift Spectrum

AWS Lake Formation is a service that allows you to easily set up, secure, and manage data lakes. One of the features of Lake Formation is row-level security, which enables you to control access to specific rows or columns of data based on the identity or role of the user. This feature is useful for scenarios where you need to restrict access to sensitive or regulated data, such as customer data from different countries. By registering the S3 bucket as a data lake location in Lake Formation, you can use the Lake Formation console or APIs to define and apply row-level security policies to the data in the bucket. You can also use Lake Formation blueprints to automate the ingestion and transformation of data from various sources into the data lake. This solution requires the least operational effort compared to the other options, as it does not involve creating or moving data, or managing multiple tables, views, or roles. References:

AWS Lake Formation

Row-Level Security

AWS Certified Data Engineer - Associate DEA-C01 Complete Study Guide, Chapter 4: Data Lakes and Data Warehouses, Section 4.2: AWS Lake Formation