Free Amazon Web Services AIF-C01 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

The scenario where a student copies content from generative AI to write essays represents the challenge of plagiarism in responsible AI use.

Plagiarism:

Occurs when someone uses content generated by AI (or any source) without proper attribution, claiming it as their own.

This is a key challenge with generative AI models, which can produce human-like text that might be misused for academic or other purposes.

Why Option C is Correct:

Represents Unauthorized Use: Copying content directly from AI without attribution is a clear case of plagiarism.

Ethical Concern: Highlights the ethical considerations around using AI-generated content responsibly.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A. Toxicity: Refers to harmful or offensive content generation, not content copying.

B. Hallucinations: When AI generates incorrect or nonsensical information, not plagiarism.

D. Privacy: Involves the misuse or exposure of personal information, not copying content.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (AWS AI documents):

AWS Responsible AI and generative AI evaluation guidance emphasizes that assessing the quality and behavior of a foundation model requires representative and diverse evaluation datasets. These datasets should reflect real-world usage patterns, edge cases, and multiple business scenarios to properly evaluate how the model behaves in production.

Using diverse datasets that cover various use cases and usage scenarios allows organizations to:

Evaluate robustness and generalization of the FM

Identify failure modes, bias, and unsafe behavior across different inputs

Validate that the model performs consistently across business workflows

Why the other options are incorrect:

A may remove meaningful real-world patterns and does not reflect realistic usage.

B risks reinforcing model biases and does not provide independent evaluation.

D does not reflect real or meaningful business scenarios and can distort evaluation results.

AWS AI Study Guide References:

AWS Responsible AI evaluation practices

AWS guidance on foundation model testing and validation

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact AWS AI documents:

Amazon Q Developer is a fully managed generative AI assistant designed specifically to help developers write, test, and debug code.

Amazon Q Developer:

Generates code and test cases

Explains existing code

Integrates directly into developer workflows and IDEs

Requires minimal setup and operational overhead

Why the other options are incorrect:

Amazon Q Business (A) is focused on business knowledge and enterprise data.

Bedrock Agents (B) orchestrate workflows and API calls, not developer productivity tools.

SageMaker Clarify (D) focuses on explainability and bias detection.

AWS AI document references:

Amazon Q Developer Overview

Developer Productivity with Generative AI on AWS

Generative AI Tools for Software Development

The company is developing an ML model to predict customer churn, a binary classification task (churn or no churn). The F1 score is an evaluation metric that balances precision and recall, making it suitable for assessing the performance of binary classification models, especially when dealing with imbalanced datasets, which is common in churn prediction.

Exact Extract from AWS AI Documents:

From the Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide:

"The F1 score is a metric for evaluating binary classification models, combining precision and recall into a single value. It is particularly useful for tasks like churn prediction, where class imbalance may exist, ensuring the model performs well on both positive and negative classes."

(Source: Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide, Model Evaluation Metrics)

Detailed Explanation:

Option A: F1 scoreThis is the correct answer. The F1 score is ideal for binary classification tasks like churn prediction, as it measures the model’s ability to correctly identify both churners and non-churners.

Option B: Mean squared error (MSE)MSE is used for regression tasks to measure the average squared difference between predicted and actual values, not for binary classification.

Option C: R-squaredR-squared is a metric for regression models, indicating how well the model explains the variability of the target variable. It is not applicable to classification tasks.

Option D: Time used to train the modelTraining time is not an evaluation metric for model performance; it measures the duration of training, not the model’s accuracy or effectiveness.

Decision trees are an interpretable machine learning algorithm that clearly documents the decision-making process by showing how each input feature affects the output. This transparency is particularly useful when explaining how the model arrives at a certain decision, making it suitable for classifying genes into categories.

Option A (Correct): "Decision trees": This is the correct answer because decision trees provide a clear and interpretable representation of how input features influence the model's output, making it ideal for understanding the inner mechanisms affecting predictions.

Option B: "Linear regression" is incorrect because it is used for regression tasks, not classification.

Option C: "Logistic regression" is incorrect as it does not provide the same level of interpretability in documenting decision-making processes.

Option D: "Neural networks" is incorrect because they are often considered "black boxes" and do not easily explain how they arrive at their outputs.

AWS AI Practitioner References:

Interpretable Machine Learning Models on AWS: AWS supports using interpretable models, such as decision trees, for tasks that require clear documentation of how input data affects output decisions.

Data augmentation for imbalanced classes is the correct technique to address bias in input data affecting image generation.

Data Augmentation for Imbalanced Classes:

Involves generating new data samples by modifying existing ones, such as flipping, rotating, or cropping images, to balance the representation of different classes.

Helps mitigate bias by ensuring that the training data is more representative of diverse characteristics and scenarios.

Why Option A is Correct:

Balances Data Distribution: Addresses class imbalance by augmenting underrepresented classes, which reduces bias in the model.

Improves Model Fairness: Ensures that the model is exposed to a more diverse set of training examples, promoting fairness in image generation.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B. Model monitoring for class distribution: Helps identify bias but does not actively correct it.

C. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG): Involves combining retrieval and generation but is unrelated to mitigating bias in image generation.

D. Watermark detection for images: Detects watermarks in images, not a technique for addressing bias.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation (AWS AI documents):

Overfitting occurs when an ML model learns patterns too closely from training data, including noise, and fails to generalize to unseen data. According to AWS ML fundamentals, a key indicator of overfitting is high training accuracy combined with reduced accuracy on new or test data.

Option A directly reflects this behavior: the model performs well during training but loses accuracy when evaluated on new data, which is a textbook symptom of overfitting.

Why the other options are not overfitting:

B describes an under-featured model (underfitting risk).

C indicates poor data representativeness, not overfitting.

D reflects limited feature selection, which may lead to underfitting or bias, not overfitting.

AWS AI Study Guide References:

AWS Machine Learning concepts: bias vs. variance

AWS training and evaluation best practices

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact AWS AI documents:

When a foundation model is customized directly in Amazon Bedrock, the correct way to use the customized model for inference is to purchase Provisioned Throughput.

Provisioned Throughput:

Enables consistent performance and predictable latency

Allows production use of customized Bedrock models

Is the required deployment mechanism for custom FMs in Bedrock

Why the other options are incorrect:

SageMaker endpoints (B) are not used for Bedrock-native custom models.

Model Registry (C) applies to SageMaker models.

Approval status (D) does not deploy or enable usage.

AWS AI document references:

Amazon Bedrock Custom Model Deployment

Provisioned Throughput for Foundation Models

Using Customized Models in Amazon Bedrock

Few-shot learning involves providing a model with a few examples (shots) to learn from. For improving intent detection accuracy in a chatbot using a large language model (LLM), the data should consist of pairs of user messages and their corresponding correct intents.

Few-shot Learning for Intent Detection:

Few-shot learning aims to enable the model to learn from a small number of examples. For intent detection, the model needs to understand the relationship between user messages and the intended action or meaning.

Providing examples of user messages and the correct user intents allows the model to learn patterns in the phrasing or language that corresponds to each intent.

Why Option C is Correct:

User Messages and Intents: These examples directly teach the model how to map a user’s input to the appropriate intent, which is the goal of intent detection in chatbots.

Improves Accuracy: By using few-shot learning with these examples, the model can generalize better from limited data, improving intent detection.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A. Pairs of chatbot responses and correct user intents: Incorrect because it does not focus on user input but rather on outputs.

B. Pairs of user messages and correct chatbot responses: This would be useful for response generation, not intent detection.

D. Pairs of user intents and correct chatbot responses: Again, this is not aligned with detecting intents but with generating responses.

The correct answer is C – Test the AI solution to ensure that it does not discriminate against any protected groups. According to AWS Responsible AI principles, fairness and bias mitigation are essential when AI is used for high-impact decisions such as hiring. AWS documentation emphasizes evaluating datasets, model outputs, and demographic performance to ensure that AI systems do not reinforce or reproduce discriminatory patterns. Services such as Amazon SageMaker Clarify support automated bias detection and explainability, helping teams identify and mitigate unwanted correlations in training data or model predictions. Option A violates AWS guidance, as human-in-the-loop review is required for sensitive decisions. Option B risks amplifying historical bias because training on only “successful” hires can create feedback loops. Option D contradicts transparency principles, which AWS states are crucial for accountability in regulated or ethical decision-making domains. Therefore, rigorous fairness testing aligns with AWS’s recommended practices for responsible AI in hiring workflows.

Referenced AWS Documentation:

AWS Responsible AI Whitepaper – Fairness and Bias Mitigation

Amazon SageMaker Clarify Documentation