Free VMware 2V0-13.25 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Business requirementsdescribe the high-level goals of the organization, typically related touser experience, cost reduction, compliance, or agility.

A(best end-user experience) aligns directly with business objectives.

B, C, and Daretechnical requirements: they specify infrastructure design behaviors (migration, security, SLA).

Therefore, thebusiness requirementis ensuring the bestend-user experience.

This statement expresses a financial limit — “Remaining budget” — constraining future expenditures on hardware. This is clearly aconstraint, as it restricts the design options (e.g., can't procure new hardware). In the VMware Conceptual Model framework, constraints are factors that limit design choices without introducing risk or goal definitions.

Logical design decisions specify how features are configured to meet conceptual requirements. In VMware Cloud Foundation logical design, tuningVMware Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS)parameters such as latency sensitivity for workload clusters is explicitly part of logical design because it directly impacts workload performance and cluster behavior. Options A and B are conceptual or operational, and option D is a standard best practice at the physical design layer. VMware documents emphasize that logical design choices definehow features (like DRS, HA, and vSAN policies) are implemented.

AProvider-managed Content Libraryis curated and controlled centrally by the VCF administrator or provider. It enables vetting and version control over VM templates and OVFs, ensuring compliance with organizational policies, including security reviews. This directly supports the requirement that all images must be reviewed and approved before being used in deployments.

According to VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 documentation, when a stretched cluster is deployed across sites with sub-5ms latency and high-speed interconnects,vSANcan be configured for zero RPO (Recovery Point Objective), ensuring 100% data consistency and availability in the event of a site failure.vSANsupports co-locating management and application workloads and provides the shared storage functionality with automatic failover capabilities.

Additionally,vSphere Virtual Volumes (vVols)provide granular control of virtual machine storage, and when backed by a storage system that supports replication and failover across sites (with support for VASA 3.0 or later), vVols can meet the same requirements for data availability and disaster recovery.

Dedicated NSX instances per workload domainprovide the highest level oflogical isolationand allowindependent upgrade cycles, fulfilling the requirement oftenant-specific customization. Each workload domain with its own NSX instance can be managed separately, updated independently, and configured with its own security policies, BGP/VRF, segments, and gateways.

NSX Federationcould achieve some level of centralization but does not support independent upgrade cycles per domain. Ashared NSX instancebreaks isolation and would tightly couple upgrade cycles, violating two of the key stated requirements.

The requirement ensures data protection, secure access, encryption, auditing, and regulatory compliance—fundamental principles in cybersecurity. These attributes fall squarely within the design quality ofSecurity, which concerns protecting confidentiality, integrity, and compliance. PCI-DSS compliance is about implementing security policies, encryption, access controls, monitoring, and auditing—all aspects of the Security design quality in VMware frameworks.

VMware Cloud Foundation scales usingworkload domains (WLDs). Each WLD provides its own vCenter Server, NSX Manager, and lifecycle independence through SDDC Manager.

Byusing multiple WLDsfor each department, the architecture supportsindependent scaling, policy separation, and lifecycle management.

Option A or Crestricts flexibility as all tenants would share a single WLD, leading to lifecycle constraints and “noisy neighbor” issues.

Option Dcontradicts best practices: multiple departments should not share a single cluster inside a WLD when separation and lifecycle flexibility are required.

This design ensures seamless addition of new workload domains as departments and applications grow.