Free VMware 2V0-13.25 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

As per the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide (Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Model Framework), a conceptual model defines what the solution will deliver at a high level — focusing on major components and interactions without specifying implementation details or configurations.

The statement “Users will connect to the application servers via the NSX Advanced Load Balancer” fits this definition because it identifies a functional relationship between solution components (users and applications) and introduces the NSX ALB as a key service enabler — without going into configuration or performance specifics.

In contrast:

Option A (MTTR 6 hours) defines a service level target, part of non-functional design.

Option B (stretched L2 networks) and C (vSphere HA parameter tuning) belong to the logical and physical design stages respectively, as they involve implementation specifics.

Therefore, D represents a conceptual model statement, describing service delivery intent and architectural interaction.

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — “Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Design Layers Explained.”

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Design Standards — “Conceptual Model: High-Level Service Definition and Interaction.”

Deploying a single VCF Operations instance (central management point) while placing Cloud Proxies or Collector nodes at remote sites enables local data ingestion. This ensures remote-site resilience (REQ‑002), centralized visibility for IT users (REQ‑001), and data sovereignty compliance because data can remain within local jurisdictions (REQ‑003). This model aligns with VMware’s recommended best practice for multi-site monitoring with minimal duplication of management infrastructure.

The requirement specifying "yearly workload growth of up to 10%" relates directly to the system's ability to handle increased demand over time, which falls under the design quality of Performance. Performance in VMware Cloud Foundation design includes considerations for scalability and the ability to sustain projected growth. This requirement addresses the system’s capacity to manage future workload expansion without degradation in service levels.

According to the VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Design Library and NSX Segment Profiles Design Section, “If you do not associate a custom segment profile when you create a segment, the NSX Manager automatically associates a corresponding default system-defined segment profile.” These default segment profiles provide baseline Layer 2 networking configurations — including SpoofGuard, Segment Security, MAC Discovery, and QoS controls — that ensure security and operational compliance for most workload use cases.

The guide explains that these defaults “cannot be deleted or modified” but “can be inherited by custom segment profiles,” offering a reliable starting point for secure and consistent lifecycle management. The rationale for using them in a design is to maintain operational simplicity, consistent enforcement of baseline security policies, and reduced administrative overhead when deploying or scaling segments across workload domains.

This approach aligns with the VCF design principles of standardization, automation, and maintainability, ensuring that the network fabric adheres to validated security baselines without requiring complex customization unless dictated by specific use cases (such as industrial or multi-tenant environments).

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 — NSX Segment Profiles and Default Behavior (pp. 1700–1703).

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 — NSX Networking Design Guide: Segment Profiles and Default Settings Overview.

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0 Design Recommendations — VCF-NSX-DES-RCMD-SEG-PROFILE-001.

The VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Architecture Guide defines three levels of design abstraction — Conceptual, Logical, and Physical. The Physical Design translates logical components into tangible configuration and implementation details. VMware describes it as:

“The physical design includes the specific details for hardware models, network topologies, storage layouts, port configurations, VLAN IDs, and zoning of Fibre Channel fabrics.”

In contrast:

The Conceptual Design defines what the solution must deliver (high-level goals and relationships).

The Logical Design outlines component relationships and service flows without vendor-specific or configuration details.

Therefore, the Physical Design is where the architect defines server model types, port mappings, uplink configurations, vSAN disk group layouts, and Fibre Channel zones, all aligned to the validated VCF Bill of Materials (BOM).

References (VMware Cloud Foundation documents):

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.1 Design Guide — Conceptual, Logical, and Physical Design Definitions (pp. 79–81).

VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0.2 Architecture Overview — Physical Design Implementation Detailing Hardware and Network Configuration.

Advanced Memory Tiering with NVMe optimizes memory performance, essential for workloads that are latency-sensitive.

NSX Enhanced Data Path (EDP) is specifically designed for high-performance, low-latency packet processing, critical in real-time applications.Options like Global Deduplication or Deep Snapshots can negatively impact latency due to additional processing overhead.

VMware Cloud Foundation architecture uses the RACR framework (Requirements, Assumptions, Constraints, Risks) to classify inputs:

Business requirements describe high-level outcomes the business wants to achieve, often focusing on cost, efficiency, or customer satisfaction.

Technical requirements define how infrastructure should behave to meet performance, resiliency, or security needs.

Among the given options:

A (growth by 30%) and C (no SPOF) are technical requirements.

B (security and resiliency) is also a technical requirement.

D (reduce operational costs) directly aligns with business goals, making it the correct business requirement.

In a multi-tenant environment, isolation, predictable performance, and scalability are critical. vSAN with tiered storage policies enables the architect to define performance tiers (e.g., RAID-1 for critical workloads, RAID-5/6 for capacity-efficient workloads). This aligns with the need for low latency and high IOPS for tenant workloads, without oversubscribing or compromising performance.

Options A and D disregard tenant performance and isolation, potentially leading to noisy neighbor issues. Option B reduces availability and scalability and is contrary to best practices.

Since the constraint is existing stretched cluster model, the design assumes a single cluster across two sites.

To meet the minimize downtime requirement, the Single Management Zone Supervisor with HA control plane ensures control plane resiliency within that stretched cluster.

Options with “Simple Availability” do not meet the high availability requirement. Options with three zones are not applicable because the constraint specifies a stretched cluster model.

Logical design decisions specify how features are configured to meet conceptual requirements. In VMware Cloud Foundation logical design, tuning VMware Distributed Resource Scheduler (DRS) parameters such as latency sensitivity for workload clusters is explicitly part of logical design because it directly impacts workload performance and cluster behavior. Options A and B are conceptual or operational, and option D is a standard best practice at the physical design layer. VMware documents emphasize that logical design choices define how features (like DRS, HA, and vSAN policies) are implemented .