Free Scrum SAFe-SASM Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Two specific anti-patterns likely present within the team's retrospectives are:

The team identifies improvements but is not allowed to address them (B): This anti-pattern occurs when the team discusses potential improvements but lacks the authority or support to implement them. This leads to frustration and a sense of futility, as the team feels their efforts in retrospectives do not result in meaningful change.

The team does not identify and commit to improvement items for how they do their work (C): Effective retrospectives should result in actionable items that the team commits to addressing in the next iteration. If the team fails to identify and commit to these improvements, the retrospective becomes an empty ritual without real impact on the team's performance or processes.

SAFe Scrum Master References

SAFe Principles: continuous improvement and the importance of retrospectives

SAFe 5.0 framework: best practices for effective retrospectives

Refactoring code involves making small, incremental changes to the internal structure of the code without altering its external behavior. The goal of refactoring is to improve code readability, maintainability, and performance while ensuring that the functionality remains unchanged. This practice helps in reducing technical debt, enhancing the quality of the codebase, and making future changes easier and less error-prone.

SAFe Scrum Master References

SAFe Agile Principles: continuous improvement and refactoring

SAFe 5.0 framework: best practices for maintaining high-quality code through refactoring

The Scrum Master should coach Lee to discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals. By framing his updates around how his work contributes to the broader objectives of the iteration, Lee can provide the team with better visibility into his progress and the impact of his work. This approach encourages team members to think beyond individual tasks and understand how their efforts align with the team's goals, fostering greater collaboration and accountability.

SAFe Scrum Master References

SAFe Principles: focusing on outcomes and aligning individual efforts with team goals

SAFe 5.0 framework: effective daily stand-up practices

The fishbone diagram, also known as an Ishikawa diagram or cause-and-effect diagram, is a tool used to systematically identify potential root causes of a problem. It helps teams brainstorm and categorize the possible causes of problems to identify root issues.

Problem Statement:Clearly defines the problem at the head of the fishbone diagram.

Categories:Major categories (e.g., methods, materials, equipment, people, environment, etc.) are identified and drawn as "bones" branching off from the main "spine."

Brainstorming:Each category is explored to list possible causes, which are added as smaller bones off the main categories.

Analysis:The team analyzes the diagram to identify which causes are most likely contributing to the problem.

This method helps teams to visually map out and drill down into all possible causes of a problem, leading to more thorough and effective problem-solving.

SAFe Scrum Master References:

SAFe Advanced Scrum Master Training Material, Chapter on Problem-Solving Techniques​​.

Collaboration with System Architects and the Systems Team is likely to have the greatest impact on Solution development during PI Planning. This is the time when teams plan their work for the upcoming Program Increment, and involving System Architects and the Systems Team can ensure that architectural considerations, dependencies, and technical requirements are properly addressed. Their input helps align the technical direction with business goals, identify potential risks, and plan for the necessary enablers and infrastructure needed to support the development efforts.

SAFe Scrum Master References

SAFe PI Planning guidelines

SAFe 5.0 framework: roles of System Architects and Systems Teams in PI Planning

Anti-Pattern Explanation:Iteration Planning should not be the first time the team hears about the business intent of the work they are about to start. This should have been communicated earlier through backlog refinement sessions and ongoing interactions with the Product Owner (PO).

Business Intent Communication:The PO should regularly update the team on the business context and intent behind backlog items to ensure alignment and readiness for Iteration Planning.

Impact:Introducing business intent for the first time during Iteration Planning can lead to confusion, inadequate preparation, and a rushed planning session, which undermines the effectiveness of the iteration.

SAFe Scrum Master References:

SAFe emphasizes the importance of continuous backlog refinement and clear communication of business intent to ensure that teams are well-prepared for Iteration Planning.

One of the primary outputs from the problem-solving workshop in SAFe is identifying the top improvement items for the next Program Increment (PI). These workshops focus on analyzing issues, determining root causes, and formulating actionable improvements. By prioritizing and committing to these improvement items, teams can systematically address problems and enhance their performance and productivity in subsequent PIs.

Phase-gate milestones are traditional project management mechanisms that mark the end of one phase and the beginning of another. One major problem with phase-gate milestones is that they assume a point solution exists and can be built correctly the first time. This assumption does not account for the iterative nature of Agile methodologies, where solutions are developed incrementally and iteratively, with feedback loops and continuous improvement. Assuming a point solution can be finalized early often leads to rigidity, lack of adaptability, and higher risks of delivering a product that does not meet the actual needs or expectations.