Free Saviynt SAVIGA-C01 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

An AD Connection in Saviynt is required to establish communication and data exchange with an Active Directory (AD) domain. This connection enables Saviynt to automatically reconcile accounts from AD, ensuring that the identity information in Saviynt stays synchronized with the AD.

Why other options are incorrect:

AD Control, AD Rule, AD Role: These terms are not standard components within Saviynt's framework for integrating with Active Directory.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The section on integrating with Active Directory clearly outlines the need for an AD Connection and provides step-by-step instructions for configuring it.

Saviynt Connectors: Saviynt offers pre-built connectors for Active Directory that simplify the process of establishing the connection.

In Saviynt's SSO setup, the "Max Authentication Session" parameter determines the maximum duration of an SSO session within Saviynt, overriding any longer durations set by the Identity Provider (IdP).

Session Duration Logic: Saviynt's internal session timeout setting takes precedence over the IdP's session timeout. This ensures that Saviynt can enforce its own security policies regarding session lifetimes.

Why other options are incorrect:

B. 10,000 seconds: This is the IdP's session logout value, but Saviynt's "Max Authentication Session" setting overrides it.

C. 3600 seconds: This is the default value, but the question specifies a configured value of 5000 seconds.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The documentation for configuring SSO settings within Saviynt explains the "Max Authentication Session" parameter and its impact on session duration.

Saviynt Best Practices: Saviynt's best practices for SSO often recommend aligning session timeouts between the IdP and Saviynt to avoid confusion and potential security gaps.

The UIADMIN ROLE in Saviynt grants users the privilege to edit UI (User Interface) labels. This role is crucial for customizing the Saviynt interface to align with an organization's terminology and branding.

UI Customization: Saviynt allows administrators to modify various UI elements, including labels, to improve user experience and comprehension. The UIADMIN ROLE provides the necessary permissions for these modifications.

Why other options are incorrect:

The other options are not standard Saviynt roles and do not have any associated privileges for UI label editing.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: The documentation on Saviynt's administration and configuration settings includes information about UI customization and the associated UIADMIN ROLE.

Saviynt Support: Saviynt's support resources may contain articles or knowledge base entries related to UI customization and the permissions required.

To set up an Entitlement Owner Campaign for Entitlements belonging to an Oracle ERP Endpoint that launches at the beginning of every month, and includes only Accounts and Entitlements that meet the prerequisites, the 2-key configurations you should recommend are A. Use Campaign Template and the Schedule Later option. Here's a breakdown:

Campaign Template:

Purpose: Templates allow you to save a set of campaign configurations as a reusable template. This is ideal for recurring campaigns with consistent settings.

Benefits: Using a template saves time and ensures consistency across multiple campaign instances. You can define the scope (Oracle ERP Endpoint), Certifier type (Entitlement Owners), and other settings within the template.

Prerequisites: You can include logic within the template to filter for Accounts and Entitlements that meet the defined prerequisites.

Schedule Later option:

Purpose: This option allows you to schedule the campaign to launch at a specific date and time in the future.

Recurring Scheduling: You can configure the campaign to run on a recurring schedule, such as the beginning of every month.

Automation: This automates the campaign launch process, eliminating the need for manual intervention each month.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

B. Use Advanced Configurations and Preview mode and create the Campaign at the beginning of each month: This approach is manual and prone to errors. It doesn't leverage the automation benefits of templates and scheduling.

C. Use Advanced Configurations and set the Campaign expiry to 31 days: While setting an expiry is important, it doesn't address the need for recurring monthly launches or using a template for consistent configuration.

D. Cannot be achieved: This is incorrect; the scenario can be easily achieved using Campaign Templates and the Schedule Later option.

=================

The bulk operation that is not typically a supported feature in the same way as the others is C. Bulk Approval - Single-click approval for multiple entitlements in a single request. Here's why:

Saviynt's Bulk Operations: Saviynt supports various bulk operations to streamline administration and user experience, especially when dealing with multiple users or requests.

Supported Bulk Operations:

A. Bulk Request Access: Saviynt allows users to request access for multiple users in a single request. This is a common and supported feature.

B. Disabling multiple users and their access: Administrators can disable multiple user accounts and revoke their access in bulk.

D. Deleting multiple users: Saviynt supports the bulk deletion of user accounts.

Bulk Approval - Granularity: While Saviynt supports bulk approvals (approving multiple requests at once), it typically operates at the request level, not at the individual entitlement level within a single request. Approving multiple separate requests in one go is a standard bulk approval action.

Each request (even if it's a bulk request for multiple users or contains multiple entitlements) is usually treated as a single unit for approval.

Approvers typically approve or reject the entire request, not individual entitlements within it.

Security and Control: This approach maintains better control and auditability. Approving each entitlement within a single request individually would require a more complex interface and potentially increase the risk of accidental approvals.

Possible Workarounds:

Separate Requests: To achieve a similar outcome, users could submit separate requests for each entitlement, allowing the approver to approve them individually (and potentially in bulk if they are separate requests).

Custom Workflows: In theory, it might be possible to create highly customized workflows to handle this scenario, but it's not a standard out-of-the-box feature.

In summary: While Saviynt excels at bulk operations for users and requests, single-click approval of individual entitlements within a single request is not a typical supported feature due to the need for granular control and a clear audit trail. Bulk approvals usually apply to entire requests, not to individual entitlements within them.

=================

When Single Sign-On (SSO) is enabled in Saviynt EIC using an external Identity Provider (IdP) like Azure AD, it generally becomes the exclusive authentication method. This means users cannot use Saviynt's native authentication (i.e., logging in with a username/password stored directly within Saviynt).

Reasons for this:

Security and Centralized Control: SSO with an IdP enhances security by centralizing authentication and enforcing stronger password policies. Allowing native logins would create a potential bypass of these security measures.

User Experience: SSO provides a seamless login experience, eliminating the need for users to remember multiple credentials. Offering both SSO and native logins could lead to confusion and a less streamlined process.

Administrative Efficiency: SSO simplifies user management by delegating authentication to the IdP. Administrators don't need to manage separate user accounts and passwords within Saviynt.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's documentation on SSO configurations emphasizes that enabling SSO typically disables native authentication methods.

Saviynt Best Practices: Saviynt's best practices for SSO recommend enforcing SSO as the sole authentication method for improved security and user experience.

Saviynt Implementation Guides: Implementation guides for setting up SSO with various IdPs, including Azure AD, often highlight the exclusive nature of SSO authentication.

The option that cannot be regarded as a Smart Filter in Saviynt's User Manager and Service Account Campaigns is A. User's Assigned Role counts. Here's why:

Saviynt's Smart Filters: Smart Filters are pre-defined filters in Saviynt that help Certifiers quickly focus on specific access patterns or risk indicators during a certification campaign. They are designed to highlight potentially problematic or high-risk access.

Examples of Smart Filters:

B. Access with SoD Violations: This is a Smart Filter because it highlights access that violates Segregation of Duties policies, a significant risk indicator.

C. Out-of-Band Access for Entitlements: This is a Smart Filter as it identifies access that was granted outside of the normal Saviynt processes, potentially indicating a security risk.

D. Risk Level for Accounts: This is a Smart Filter because it allows Certifiers to focus on accounts with high-risk levels, which might require more scrutiny.

Why "User's Assigned Role counts" Is Not a Smart Filter:

Not a Risk Indicator: Simply knowing the number of roles assigned to a user doesn't inherently indicate a risk or a specific access pattern that requires attention. A user might have many roles legitimately, or they might have few roles but with high-risk access.

Not Actionable: This information alone doesn't provide enough context for a Certifier to make an informed decision about whether to approve or revoke access.

Alternative: While not a "Smart Filter", the number of roles assigned could be a data point displayed within the campaign, but it wouldn't be considered a pre-defined filter for highlighting risks.

=================

Closed: SoD Violations which are closed with or without remediation

Open: SoD Violations which require immediate attention

Risk Accepted: SoD Violations which have Mitigation Controls applied

In Process: SoD Violations which are assigned

Closed: This status implies that the SoD violation has been addressed. It could have been resolved through remediation (e.g., removing conflicting access) or through acceptance after a review process (without direct remediation, perhaps mitigated in another way).

Open: This status indicates that the SoD violation is active and needs immediate attention to mitigate the associated risk.

Risk Accepted: This status suggests that the SoD violation has been acknowledged, but instead of being fully remediated, mitigation controls have been put in place to reduce the risk to an acceptable level. This usually follows a formal risk acceptance process.

In Process: This status means that the SoD violation is currently being worked on. It has likely been assigned to someone for investigation, remediation, or further action.

Therefore, the matches you've made in the image are accurate and reflect standard SoD management practices.