Free Saviynt SAVIGA-C01 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

The Job that should be created and scheduled to evaluate Rules on a need basis in Saviynt is A. Run Detective Rules and Take Action. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Jobs: Saviynt uses Jobs to perform various tasks, including data imports, rule evaluations, and provisioning operations.

"Run Detective Rules and Take Action": This specific job is designed to:

Evaluate Rules: It evaluates rules that are configured for detective (monitoring) purposes. These rules typically check for specific conditions or changes in user attributes, access rights, or other data.

Take Action (Optional): Based on the rule evaluation results, the job can be configured to automatically take actions, such as:

Generating alerts or notifications.

Creating tasks for administrators to review.

Triggering workflows.

Automatically remediating issues (e.g., revoking access if a rule detects a violation).

Scheduling: This job can be scheduled to run periodically (e.g., daily, hourly) to continuously monitor for changes and enforce defined rules.

On-Demand Execution: You can also run this job on-demand to evaluate rules immediately.

Other Options:

B. Provisioning Job: This job is primarily used for provisioning access to target systems, not for evaluating general-purpose rules.

C. User Import via Connection: This job is for importing user data from external sources.

D. Trigger Chain Job: This allows for running a series or "chain" of jobs, but it doesn't directly evaluate rules itself.

If the data displayed in the Campaign Preview mode does not meet the requirement in Saviynt, the appropriate action is A. Re-configure Campaign. Here's why:

Saviynt's Campaign Preview Mode: This mode allows administrators to review the data that will be included in a campaign before activating it. It's a crucial step for ensuring that the campaign scope, data, and configuration are correct.

Purpose of Preview Mode: The primary purpose of the preview is to identify any issues or discrepancies in the campaign setup before it goes live.

Re-configure Campaign: If the preview reveals problems (e.g., incorrect users or entitlements are included, the wrong Certifiers are assigned, filters are not working as expected), the administrator needs to go back and re-configure the campaign settings. This might involve:

Adjusting the campaign scope.

Modifying filters or selection criteria.

Changing Certifier assignments.

Updating the campaign schedule or notifications.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B. Check Summary: The summary provides a high-level overview of the campaign, but it doesn't allow for detailed data review like the preview mode.

C. Export Campaign: Exporting the campaign data won't fix the underlying configuration issues.

D. Activate Campaign: Activating a campaign with incorrect data would lead to inaccurate certification decisions and potential security risks.

=================

In this scenario, where John is a new full-time employee required to work from the Sydney office, the most specific and appropriate Enterprise Role assigned from the Birthright Rule would likely be A. Birthright - Sydney. Here's the reasoning:

Saviynt's Birthright Roles and Rules: Birthright roles are designed to automatically provision access based on specific criteria like location, job role, or employment type. Birthright rules define the conditions for assigning these roles.

Specificity of Role Assignment: The goal is to assign the most relevant and granular role based on the available information. In this case, John's location (Sydney) is the most specific criterion mentioned.

Why Other Options Are Less Likely:

B. Birthright - Permanent - Full-time: While John is a full-time employee, this role might be too broad if there are other location-specific roles.

C. Birthright - All: This role is likely too generic and would grant excessive access. It's generally not good practice to have an "all-encompassing" birthright role.

D. Birthright - Employee: Similar to the "Full-time" role, this might be too broad if location-specific roles are available.

Best Practices: It's a best practice in identity governance to use the most specific criteria possible when assigning birthright access. This helps enforce the principle of least privilege.

In summary: The "Birthright - Sydney" role is the most appropriate choice because it aligns with John's specific work location, ensuring he receives the necessary access for his role while adhering to the principle of least privilege.

The correct sequence of workflow events for an application where the Manager's approval should be followed by the Application Owner's approval is D. Start > Manager's Approval > Resource Owner's Approval > Approve/Reject > End. Here's a breakdown:

Saviynt's Workflow Structure: Saviynt workflows follow a sequential structure, starting with a "Start" event and ending with an "End" event.

Workflow Activities: Each step in the workflow is represented by an activity, such as an approval task.

Manager's Approval: In this scenario, the first required approval is from the Manager. This would be represented by a "TASK Access Approve" activity (or similar, depending on the specific configuration) assigned to the user's manager.

Application Owner's Approval: After the Manager's approval, the workflow needs to proceed to the Application Owner for their approval. This would be another "TASK Access Approve" activity assigned to the Application Owner. In Saviynt terms, Application Owner is a type of Resource Owner.

Approve/Reject: This activity represents the decision point where the final approver (in this case, the Application Owner) either approves or rejects the request.

End: The workflow concludes with the "End" event, signifying the completion of the process.

Other Options:

A. Start > Resource Owner's Approval > Manager's Approval > Approve/Reject > End: Incorrect order; the manager's approval should come before the application owner's.

B. Start > Manager's Approval > Custom Assignment > Approve/Reject > End: "Custom Assignment" is not the most appropriate activity for a standard approval step. "TASK Access Approve" would be more suitable.

C. Start > Manager's Approval > Access Approval > Approve/Reject > End: "Access Approval" is a bit redundant; "TASK Access Approve" assigned to the appropriate role is clearer.

In essence: The correct workflow sequence accurately reflects the required approval hierarchy: first the Manager, then the Application Owner, followed by the final decision (Approve/Reject) and the end of the workflow.

It is True that multiple indices can be selected while creating Analytics using the Elasticsearch Query in Saviynt. Here's why:

Saviynt's Analytics and Elasticsearch: Saviynt's analytics capabilities are often built on top of Elasticsearch, a powerful search and analytics engine.

Indices in Elasticsearch: In Elasticsearch, an index is like a database table. It's a collection of documents with similar characteristics. Saviynt uses indices to store various types of data, such as user data, account data, entitlement data, and event logs.

Multi-Index Queries: Elasticsearch allows you to query across multiple indices simultaneously. This is a fundamental feature of the search engine.

Saviynt's Interface: When creating analytics in Saviynt using Elasticsearch queries, the interface typically allows you to select multiple indices as the data source for your analysis.

Use Cases: This capability is essential for creating comprehensive analytics that span different data domains. For example, you might want to analyze user access patterns (from one index) in conjunction with application usage data (from another index).

In conclusion: The ability to select multiple indices is a core feature of Elasticsearch and is supported within Saviynt's analytics interface,

=================

Saviynt primarily leverages SAML 2.0 as its core authentication mechanism. SAML (Security Assertion Markup Language) is an open standard for exchanging authentication and authorization data between parties, in this case, between users and Saviynt. It allows for secure, single sign-on experiences.

While Saviynt can interact with databases, REST APIs, and LDAP directories for various purposes like identity data aggregation or provisioning, these are not its primary authentication methods.

Databases: Saviynt can connect to databases to pull identity information, but the platform itself doesn't authenticate users directly against a database.

REST: REST APIs are used for programmatic interaction with Saviynt, not typically for initial user authentication.

LDAP: While LDAP can be a source of identity data, Saviynt's core authentication relies on SAML for its standardized and secure approach.

Key Saviynt IGA references supporting this:

Saviynt Documentation: The official Saviynt documentation consistently refers to SAML as the primary authentication mechanism.

Saviynt Connectors: Saviynt provides pre-built connectors for various identity providers (IdPs) that support SAML, further emphasizing its reliance on this standard.

Saviynt Training Materials: Saviynt's training courses and certifications highlight SAML's role in the platform's authentication framework.

To get the details of a successfully executed Rule in Saviynt, an Admin should look in the C. Current Rule Trail. Here's why:

Saviynt's Rule Engine and Logging: Saviynt's rule engine executes various types of rules (e.g., birthright rules, user update rules, technical rules). It maintains logs to track rule execution and outcomes.

Current Rule Trail: This log specifically captures the details of recently executed rules, including:

Rule Name: The name of the rule that was executed.

Execution Time: The timestamp of when the rule was executed.

Status: Whether the rule execution was successful or not.

Details: Specific information about the rule's execution, such as the conditions that were evaluated and the actions that were taken.

Troubleshooting and Auditing: The Current Rule Trail is invaluable for troubleshooting rule behavior and for auditing purposes, providing a clear record of what rules were executed and their results.

Other Options:

A. Archived Rule Trail: This log stores details of older rule executions that have been archived. It's useful for historical analysis but not for recent executions.

B. Archived Application Logs: These logs are related to application activity, not rule execution.

D. Action Trail: The Action Trail captures general user and administrative actions within Saviynt, but it might not provide the detailed information about rule execution that the Current Rule Trail does.

In Saviynt, "Entitlements" refers to any type of access granted to users within a managed system or application. This broad term encompasses various forms of access controls, including:

Groups: Collections of users with shared access permissions.

Roles: Sets of permissions that define a user's job function or responsibilities.

Permissions: Specific access rights to resources or functionalities.

Responsibilities: Duties or tasks associated with a particular role.

Why other options are incorrect:

Endpoints: Refer to network devices or systems, not access rights.

Workflows: Are automated processes for tasks like approvals, not access itself.

Accounts: Represent user identities, not the specific access they have.

Saviynt IGA References:

Saviynt Documentation: Saviynt's documentation consistently uses the term "Entitlements" to describe the various types of access it manages.

Saviynt User Interface: The Saviynt interface uses "Entitlements" throughout its menus and features related to access management.

To reduce certification fatigue for Anitha, a manager with a large number of remote users, the recommended approach is C. Launch a Self Certification Campaign and then User Manager Campaign on certified items. Here's the rationale:

Self Certification Campaign:

Purpose: Allows users to review and certify their own access.

Benefits for this scenario:

Reduces Manager Burden: Shifts the initial review responsibility from Anitha to the individual users, who are most familiar with their own access needs.

Scalability: Well-suited for large, distributed teams, as it doesn't rely solely on the manager's capacity.

Empowerment: Gives users more control over their access and promotes a culture of accountability.

User Manager Campaign on Certified Items:

Purpose: Allows managers to review and certify their subordinates' access.

Benefits when combined with Self Certification:

Focus on Exceptions: Anitha can focus her review on items that were not self-certified or that require further scrutiny after the initial self-certification.

Reduced Volume: The volume of items Anitha needs to review is significantly reduced, as users have already certified their own access.

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines the manager's review process, making it more manageable and less time-consuming.

Why Other Options Are Less Suitable:

A. Launch User Manager Campaign and then Self Certification Campaign on certified items: This sequence is less effective because it puts the burden on the manager first, potentially leading to fatigue.

B. Launch Application Owner Campaign and then Self Certification Campaign on certified items: Application Owner campaigns are not relevant to a manager's review of their subordinates' access.

D. Launch Service Account Campaign and then User Manager Campaign on certified items: Service Account campaigns are for reviewing service accounts, not user access.

The maximum file attachment limit for a request in Saviynt is typically 10. Here's an explanation:

Saviynt's Access Request System (ARS): The ARS allows users to attach files to access requests to provide supporting documentation or justification.

Attachment Limits: To prevent excessive storage usage and potential performance issues, Saviynt imposes limits on the number and size of attachments allowed per request.

Default Limit: The default maximum number of attachments allowed per request in Saviynt is generally 10.

Configuration: While 10 is the common default, it's worth noting that this limit might be configurable within the ARS settings in some Saviynt deployments. However, significantly increasing this limit could impact performance.

File Size Limit: In addition to the number of attachments, there's also usually a limit on the individual file size and the total size of all attachments combined. This is also generally configurable. These file size limits are important for maintain system stability and performance.

Error Handling: If a user attempts to exceed the attachment limit, Saviynt will typically display an error message, preventing them from submitting the request until the number of attachments is reduced.