Free SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

class_setup( )

setup( )

teardown( )

class_teardown( )

ABAP Unit Test framework defines a fixed sequence for test fixture methods to ensure reliable test execution and cleanup:

class_setup( ):Called once before any tests in the test class are run. Used to prepare global test data or setup that applies to all tests.

setup( ):Called before each individual test method to prepare local test data or preconditions.

teardown( ):Called after each individual test method to clean up what was done in setup( ).

class_teardown( ):Called once after all tests have been executed to clean up class-level resources.

This sequence supports isolation and repeatability of test executions, ensuring that one test's result does not influence another’s.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

A watchpoint halts program execution when the content of a specified variable changes.

Exception breakpoints → Trigger when exceptions are raised.

Conditional breakpoints → Stop only if a Boolean condition is true at that line.

Thus, watchpoint is the correct tool for variable-change monitoring.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP Debugging Guide – Breakpoints and Watchpoints.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In the RAP model, a Business Object (BO) is composed of the following key parts:

A CDS view, which defines the data model layer (entity structure, projections, associations).

A Behavior Definition (BDEF), which defines the behavior layer – what operations can be performed (create, update, delete, validations, determinations).

Therefore:

Option B and C are correct.

Option A is incorrect because "Process definition" is not a RAP construct; process logic is handled via behavior implementation and determinations.

Option D is incorrect because "Authentication rules" are managed externally (e.g., via IAM, authorizations), not inside the BO.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ABAP, inheritance is declared in the class DEFINITION using the keyword INHERITING FROM. The RAP documentation shows this exact syntax in multiple class definitions, for example:

“CLASS lcl_local_event_consumption DEFINITION INHERITING FROM cl_abap_behavior_event_handler.” This proves the inheritance clause belongs to the DEFINITION section, not the IMPLEMENTATION, and uses the form INHERITING FROM .(Back-End Developer – ABAP Cloud study areas: RAP handler/event classes use standard ABAP OO rules; architecture shows inheritance declared in DEFINITION with INHERITING FROM.)

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

In the ABAP RESTful Application Programming Model (RAP), development follows a bottom-up approach. The sequence starts with the database table (persistence), followed by creating a data model view (interface view), and then a projection view.

The projection view is the next artifact after the database table because it exposes only the fields needed for the app, aligning with the encapsulation principle of RAP. This ensures that only the required subset of the underlying data model is made available.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP RAP Development Guide – Data Modeling and Projection Views.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

With @Environment.systemField: #SYSTEM_LANGUAGE, the system field sy-langu is automatically supplied as a default value for the parameter.

This works both in ABAP and in view-on-view scenarios (A).

Developers can still override this value when calling the view explicitly (B).

Options C and D are incorrect: system fields are not limited to ABAP only, and overriding is allowed.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP CDS Guide – System Fields in View Parameters.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

OData services are the standard way to expose RAP services; service bindings bind a service definition to a protocol such as OData.

Business events are a released RAP capability for integration; RAP BOs can define, raise, and consume business events, with remote consumption via SAP Event Mesh and event bindings.

CDS views define the semantic data models used for exposure and consumption; ADT defines CDS entities for the data model that can be used in applications. Together, CDS (data modeling) + OData (service exposure) + Events (event-driven integration) constitute the released, recommended integration building blocks in ABAP Cloud/RAP. (BAdIs are classic enhancement spots and not positioned as the primary integration frameworks for ABAP Cloud developer extensibility; SOAP is not the recommended channel in the RAP guidance above.)

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Multi-column internal tables are defined using a structured row type, meaning each row is defined by a structure (either defined inline or as a global structure type in the Dictionary).

Option B is correct because it describes how internal tables with multiple fields are built using structured rows.

Option A is incorrect because the row type must be complete and consistent.

Option C is incorrect because nested components are not a requirement.

Option D is misleading. Though “complete data type” may sound correct, it lacks specificity. The correct technical description is that the row type is a structure.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

In CDS UNION, field names and positions must match exactly across all SELECT statements.

In this case, the first SELECT uses id, while the second uses agencynum AS id, which is fine. However, the literal 'Customer' AS partner and 'Agency' AS partner create inconsistencies.

SAP CDS guidelines specify that for a UNION, field names must be identical and aligned in order; mismatches cause an activation error.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP CDS Development User Guide – Union Compatibility Rules.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

ABAP SQL (also known as Open SQL):

Is fully integrated in the ABAP language and supports embedded use with host variables, making Option B correct.

Is first processed by the ABAP Database Interface, which translates Open SQL into the database-specific native SQL. Hence, Option A is also correct.

Option C is incorrect because ABAP SQL is not directly executed on HANA or any database; it is interpreted and adapted by the ABAP layer.

Option D is incorrect because ABAP SQL is not restricted to HANA; it is database-agnostic and works across different supported DBs.