Free SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

CDS View Entities are the successor of classic DDIC-based CDS views and do not use the CDS-managed DDIC view; therefore @AbapCatalog.sqlViewName (used for classic DDIC-based views) is not required for view entities. This eliminates option B.

RAP and CDS modeling rely on key fields identified by the keyword key in the underlying CDS view to uniquely identify instances; this key is fundamental for BOs and their sources. A view entity without any key elements therefore lacks a primary key and will not pass activation. This supports option A.

Authorization annotations are component annotations; their absence does not by itself block first-time activation of a CDS entity. This rules out option D as the primary cause.

Study-Guide anchors: CDS View Entities (successor of DDIC-based views; no SQL view name), requirement for key elements to define primary keys, and activation behavior for component annotations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

Sorted tables can be declared with unique keys (ensuring no duplicates) or with non-unique keys (allowing duplicates).

Hashed tables only allow unique keys.

Standard tables allow non-unique keys only.

Thus, sorted internal tables are the only type that can be configured with both unique and non-unique keys.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Dictionary and ABAP Cloud Programming Guide – Internal Table Types.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ABAP, when calculating the difference between two date fields (type DATS), the result is directly a type i (integer) representing the difference in days.

Statement B is correct:

data(gv_diff_days) = gs_booking-flight_date - gs_booking-order_date.

This directly subtracts two DATS fields, resulting in an integer value for the number of days difference. No conversion is necessary.

Statements A and D are incorrect because the conv d( ... ) attempts to convert the result back to a DATS type, which is invalid since the result is an integer (number of days), not a date.

Statement C is syntactically correct but would produce the negative of the desired value (flight date - order date). It is semantically incorrect for the use case.

This approach is consistent with ABAP for Cloud Development, which requires explicit typing, and ABAP language version strict mode, where automatic type inference is restricted.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

In RAP, changes to business object data are performed using Entity Manipulation Language (EML).

It provides ABAP statements such as READ ENTITIES, MODIFY ENTITIES, CREATE, and DELETE for RAP BOs.

EML is the cloud-compliant equivalent of SQL DML (insert/update/delete) but tailored to RAP’s transactional consistency.

Verified Study Guide Reference: RAP Programming Model – Entity Manipulation Language (EML).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Tier 1 (cloud-ready) extensions “follow ABAP Cloud rules and hence by default can only access the public SAP interfaces (objects released for cloud development).” This directly supports using released APIs (C) and cloud-enabled/released technologies (D).

The three-tier extensibility model separates safe cloud extensions (Tier 1) from classic code; Tier 2 wrappers exist only to mitigate missing public APIs, but they are not the recommended pattern for S/4HANA Cloud public-edition extensions (therefore B is not a rule).

In S/4HANA Cloud, object changes are not allowed; instead, customers must use predefined extension points (E)—for example, whitelisted extension includes, released BAdIs, or CDS extension points exposed for cloud usage—consistent with the ABAP Cloud principle of public, released artifacts only. (This is the prescribed approach in the ABAP Cloud extensibility guidance that accompanies the three-tier model.)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

Associations → ✅ Supported in CDS to define relationships between entities without materializing joins.

SQL (Structured Query Language) → ✅ CDS is built on SQL semantics and supports declarative data modeling with SQL-based syntax.

Annotations → ✅ Used to enrich CDS artifacts with metadata for UI, OData exposure, and behavior.

Delegation → ❌ Not a CDS feature; belongs to OO or API design patterns.

Inheritance → ❌ Not supported in CDS entities; CDS focuses on associations and compositions.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP CDS User Guide – CDS View Features and Annotations.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

Tier 1 extensibility in ABAP Cloud corresponds to the safe and upgrade-stable extension layer.

Adding custom fields to released DB tables or CDS views via released extension includes is fully supported.

Using classic user exits (A), manual note corrections (C), or wrappers for unreleased APIs (D) belong to Tier 2 or Tier 3, and are not part of Tier 1 safe extensibility.

This guarantees that custom code in Tier 1 is cloud-ready, upgrade-stable, and based only on released extension points and APIs.

Verified Study Guide Reference: ABAP Cloud Extensibility Model – Three-Tier Extensibility Rules.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In ABAP Cloud/RAP examples, test classes are created inside the development object (e.g., inside the behavior implementation) and are marked FOR TESTING—these are local classes (they live in the program/class include, not as separate global repository classes). The guides show creating test classes under the Test Classes tab and referencing the Local Types section of the implementation (friends etc.), i.e., local to the program/object.

This contrasts with global classes that exist as standalone repository objects; the RAP test patterns explicitly model the former (local) for unit tests within the object’s context.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation from Exact Extract:

avg(expr) → ✅ Allows numeric expressions (e.g., (f1 + f2) / 2).

sum(expr) → ✅ Accepts numeric expressions.

max() → ❌ Requires a single column, not expressions.

count(*) → ❌ Counts rows only, doesn’t accept expressions.

Study Guide Reference: ABAP SQL Documentation – Aggregate Functions.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Use ABAP Development Tools (ADT) in Eclipse: For ABAP Cloud development, ADT must be used, and modern object types such as CDS View Entities and Behavior Definitions can only be edited in ADT. This confirms option B.

Use SAP-released/predefined extension points: RAP extensibility is opt-in; every possible extension point must be defined explicitly in the original BO artifacts. Extensions are performed only at these predefined points to ensure lifecycle stability—this is exactly the “use SAP-released extension points” rule. This confirms option A.

In contrast, directly modifying SAP objects is not part of the clean-core, upgrade-stable model for public cloud; extensions must adhere to released APIs and predefined points (therefore C is not correct). The classic Web Dynpro UI technology is not the target for ABAP Cloud development in S/4HANA Cloud public edition (therefore D is not correct). (Context anchored by the extensibility/clean-core guidance above.)

Study-Guide anchors: ABAP Cloud development with ADT only; RAP opt-in extensibility and predefined extension points for cloud-ready, upgrade-safe extensions.