Free Salesforce Data-Architect Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 8

According to the Salesforce documentation2, extracting large amounts of data from Salesforce can be challenging and time-consuming, as it can encounter performance issues, API limits, timeouts, etc. To extract 100 million records from Salesforce for migration to an enterprise data warehouse (EDW), a data extraction strategy that can provide maximum performance is:

Utilize PK Chunking with the Bulk API (option C). This means using a feature that allows splitting a large query into smaller batches based on the record IDs (primary keys) of the queried object. This can improve performance and avoid timeouts by processing each batch asynchronously and in parallel using the Bulk API3.

Installing a third-party AppExchange tool (option A) is not a good solution, as it can incur additional costs and dependencies. It may also not be able to handle such a large volume of data efficiently. Calling the REST API in successive queries (option B) is also not a good solution, as it can encounter API limits and performance issues when querying such a large volume of data. Using the Bulk API in parallel mode (option D) is also not a good solution, as it can still cause timeouts and errors when querying such a large volume of data without chunking.

Integrating Salesforce with ERP and making ERP the system of truth (option B) and implementing a de-dupe solution and establishing account ownership in Salesforce (option D) are the two solutions that a data architect should recommend to resolve the complaints. Option B ensures that account data is consistent and accurate across both systems, while option D prevents duplicate records and clarifies who owns each account in Salesforce. Building a nightly batch job to de-dupe data and merge account records (option A) is not a good solution, as it does not address the root cause of the duplication and may result in data loss or conflicts. Building a nightly sync job from ERP to Salesforce (option C) is also not sufficient, as it does not prevent duplication or establish ownership in Salesforce.

Ordering batches by Auto-number field will ensure that the records are processed in a sequential order and avoid any locking issues that might occur when loading related records in parallel mode. Creating indexes, grouping batches by AccountId, or sorting batches by Name field values are not necessary or beneficial for loading Opportunity records using the Bulk API.

Making use of a third-party tool to help merge duplicate Contacts across Accounts and using Data.com to standardize Contact address information to help identify duplicates are two solutions that UC should implement to cleanse their data and have a single Contact across departments. A third-party tool, such as an app from the AppExchange, can provide advanced features and capabilities for finding and merging duplicate Contacts across different Accounts, based on various criteria and rules. Data.com can provide address verification and standardization services that can enhance the quality and consistency of Contact address information and make it easier to identify duplicates. The other options are not feasible or effective for cleansing the data, as they would either not work across different Accounts, not address the root cause of duplication, or not provide sufficient functionality for merging duplicates

Enabling field history tracking on the Case object is the first step to implement a reporting solution to measure the support reps case closure rates. Field history tracking allows you to track changes to certain fields on the Case object, such as Status, Owner, or Priority. You can then create reports based on the field history data to analyze how long it took to close a case, how many times the case owner changed, or how many cases were escalated.

Exploring external data sources in Salesforce to build 360 view of customer is the best strategy to satisfy the requirement, as it allows real-time access to data from other systems without storing it in Salesforce3. Using a customer data mart may not provide real-time information or may require additional integration efforts. Migrating customer activities from all 4 systems into Salesforce may exceed the storage limits or cause data quality issues. Periodically uploading summary information in Salesforce may not provide current or detailed information.

Using the Consent Management Feature to validate consent provided under the person Account and Contact that is provided by the customer (option C) is the best option to implement these requirements, as it allows UC to store and manage consent preferences for Person Accounts and Contacts using native Salesforce features and tools. Configuring custom fields in Person Account and Contact to store consent provided by customers and validate consent against the fields (option A) or building Custom object to store consent information in Person Account and Contact and validate against this object before contacting customers (option B) are not good options, as they may require more customization and maintenance effort, and they do not leverage the existing Data Protection and Privacy feature. Deleting contact information from customers who have declined consent to be contacted (option D) is also not a good option, as it may cause data loss or compliance issues, and it does not allow UC to track or update consent preferences.