Free PCI SSC Assessor_New_V4 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, a user password and a PIN-activated smart card is an example of multi-factor authentication. This is one of the requirements for preventing unauthorized access to cardholder data using digital certificates.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, pre-production environments that are located within the cardholder data environment can be used for testing, as long as they are not accessible from untrusted networks and are monitored for any changes or vulnerabilities. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that testing environments are isolated from production environments.

an entity can use both the Customized Approach and the Defined Approach to meet the same requirement, as long as it uses compensating controls to address any weaknesses or gaps inthe customized control. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that an entity can use both approaches when appropriate.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, any in-scope system except for those identified as not at risk from malware must have anti-malware solutions installed and configured according to best practices. This is one of the requirements for preventing malware infections that could compromise cardholder data.

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, private or secret keys must be encrypted, stored within an SCD or stored as key components. This is one of the requirements for ensuring secure encryption and authentication.

The customized approach is a new option in PCI DSS v4.0 that allows entities to use alternate security controls or new technologies that meet the PCI DSS Customized Approach Objective for a requirement1. The customized approach requires the entity to complete and document a Controls Matrix and a Targeted Risk Analysis (TRA) for each customized control, and to provide this documentation to the assessor2. The assessor’s role is to review the documentation, assess the customized control, and verify that the customized approach was correctly followed3. The assessor must also document the assessment of the customized control in the Report on Compliance (ROC), using the ROC Template provided by PCI SSC4. Therefore, the correct answer is option B.

The other options are not true regarding the role of the assessor in the customized approach. Option A is not true because the assessor does not need another assessor to verify the TRA, as the assessor is responsible for reviewing and validating the TRA as part of the assessment process3. Option C is not true because the assessor can and must assess the control and the documentation, as well as document the work on the customized control in the ROC34. Option D is not true because the assessor is allowed to assist the entity with the completion of the Controls Matrix or the TRA, as long as the assessor does not design, develop, or implement the customized control for the entity5. References:

• PCI DSS v4.0: Is the Customized Approach Right For Your Organization?
• PCI DSS v4.0: Roles and Responsibilities for the Customized Approach
• PCI DSS v4.0 Report on Compliance Template
• PCI DSS v4.0
• PCI DSS v4.0: Customized Approach Explained

According to the PCI DSS v3.2.1 Quick Reference Guide1, the intent of assigning a risk ranking to vulnerabilities is to prioritize the highest risk items so they can be addressed more quickly, rather than ensuring all vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days or replacing the need to quarterly ASV scans or ensuring that critical security patches are installed at least quarterly. This is one of the requirements for ensuring that vulnerabilities are identified and mitigated as soon as possible.

The PCI DSS requires that the assessor validates that the sample of business facilities is representative of the entire population of facilities that are in scope for the assessment. According to the PCI DSS Requirement 12.8.5, “Maintain information about which PCI DSS requirements are managed by each service provider, and which are managed by the entity.” Furthermore, according to the PCI DSS Requirement 12.9.1, “For service providers, provide the written agreement/acknowledgment to their customers as specified at Requirement 12.8.2.” Therefore, the scenario that meets the PCI DSS requirements for validating the sample of business facilities is theone where all types and locations of facilities are represented, to ensure that the assessment covers the diversity and complexity of the card production environment. The other scenarios either do not account for the variability of the facilities, or do not follow the sampling methodology defined by the PCI DSS. References: PCI DSS v3.2.1, Card Production Security Assessor - Physical - Credly