Free iSQI TMMi-P_Syll2.1 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

The Acting phase of a test improvement cycle focuses on executing the planned improvements. Key activities during this phase include creating solutions to address identified problems, planning actions to implement those solutions, and piloting solutions before full-scale deployment. These steps ensure that the improvements are well-defined, tested in a controlled environment, and refined before being fully implemented across the organisation.

The TMMi model is designed to be versatile and applicable across all test levels (including static and dynamic testing) and all types of development methodologies, such as waterfall, Agile, and DevOps. It provides comprehensive coverage of the testing process, ensuring that all critical aspects of testing—such as lifecycle processes, techniques, infrastructure, and organization—are addressed.

TMMi is not limited to specific development methods or organizational sizes; it is lifecycle-independent and can be used effectively with various development approaches, making it widely applicable in both small and large organizations.

TMMi References:

TMMi covers all test levels, including both static testing (such as reviews) and dynamic testing at multiple stages, and is applicable across different software development lifecycles​​.

Test Design and Execution is a key process area at TMMi Level 2, not Level 3. However, other process areas at TMMi Level 3 include Non-functional Testing, Peer Reviews, and Test Lifecycle and Integration. Test Design and Execution plays a foundational role in laying down the practices for creating and executing test cases, especially at earlier maturity levels. By TMMi Level 3, processes become more sophisticated with a broader range of testing techniques and integration into the overall lifecycle.

A typical business reason for starting a test improvement program is to achieve higher productivity. Test process improvements can lead to better efficiency in test execution, reduction of defects, and optimised resource usage, all of which contribute to the overall productivity of the organisation. By improving testing processes, organisations can reduce time-to-market and minimise costs associated with fixing defects post-production, which in turn boosts productivity.

This statement is FALSE because TMMi does not focus only on higher test levels like system and acceptance testing. In fact, TMMi covers all test levels, including lower levels like unit and integration testing, as well as static testing (e.g., reviews and inspections).

TMMi is designed to address testing at all levels of the software lifecycle and goes beyond dynamic testing (e.g., system and acceptance) to include static testing techniques as well. The model is comprehensive and is intended to support testing in both systems and software engineering. Furthermore, TMMi addresses the four cornerstones of structured testing: lifecycle, techniques, infrastructure, and organization. These are essential to ensure a thorough and structured approach to improving test processes and aligning them with business goals.

TMMi References:

TMMi documentation clearly indicates that it covers all test levels including static testing (such as peer reviews) and dynamic testing across different stages of development​​.

It is lifecycle-independent and can support different models, such as Agile, DevOps, and traditional V-models​.

CMMI and TMMi complement each other in many ways. While CMMI focuses on improving broader software development processes, TMMi specifically addresses testing. Implementing CMMI provides value to test organizations by enabling a structured and continuous improvement approach that can incorporate TMMi as part of the overall process.

CMMI’s continuous representation allows organizations to implement specific process areas related to testing (like verification and validation) and integrate TMMi practices for continuous improvement in their testing processes. Organizations following TMMi may also refer to CMMI practices for complementary process improvements in areas such as configuration management, planning, and performance measurement.

TMMi References:

TMMi outlines how CMMI’s process areas, such as Verification and Validation, provide critical value for testing organizations​​.

CMMI’s structure supports continuous process improvement that aligns well with TMMi’s structured approach to test process maturity​.

The assessment described, where only interviews are used to collect evidence, aligns with an informal TMMi assessment. Informal assessments are more flexible and do not require documentary evidence to corroborate interview data. They provide an indicative view of the organisation’s maturity but do not result in a formal maturity rating or certification​​.

The description provided, "Testing is a thoroughly defined, well-founded, and measurable process. Testing is perceived as evaluation; it consists of all lifecycle activities concerned with checking products and related work products," corresponds to TMMi Level 4, which is labelled "Measured." At this level, testing processes are quantitatively measured, and there is a strong focus on evaluating product and process quality using quantitative metrics. Testing is integrated throughout the lifecycle and becomes a predictable, measurable process that supports organisational goals.

In the Acting phase of the IDEAL model, the focus is on the implementation of the proposed solutions. Activities such as refining the solution and implementing the solution are key components of this phase. These actions are based on the plan developed in the earlier phases, and they are designed to apply the solutions to achieve the desired improvements. Specifically:

Refine solutions (i) refers to improving or adjusting the solution based on feedback from pilots or initial tests.

Implement Solution (iii) refers to the full implementation of the refined solution across the test process or organisation​​.

In the TMMi framework, a Specific Goal is unique to a particular process area and represents the essential outcomes that must be achieved for that process area. In contrast, a Generic Goal applies across multiple process areas and ensures that the processes are institutionalised, managed, and aligned with broader organisational objectives. Generic Goals help maintain consistency and effectiveness of processes across the organisation, while Specific Goals focus on the particular needs of an individual process area.