Master the Salesforce Certified Data Architect (WI24) Data-Architect Exam with Confidence!

Exploring external data sources in Salesforce to build 360 view of customer is the best strategy to satisfy the requirement, as it allows real-time access to data from other systems without storing it in Salesforce3. Using a customer data mart may not provide real-time information or may require additional integration efforts. Migrating customer activities from all 4 systems into Salesforce may exceed the storage limits or cause data quality issues. Periodically uploading summary information in Salesforce may not provide current or detailed information.

Implementing a workflow rule that sends Opportunity data through Outbound Messaging is the optimal real-time approach that achieves the solution of copying Opportunity records to the ERP once they reach a Closed/Won Stage. A workflow rule can trigger an Outbound Message when an Opportunity record meets certain criteria, such as having a Closed/Won Stage. An Outbound Message can send data from Salesforce to an external system via SOAP API, without requiring any code. The external system can then process the data and create a read-only record in the ERP system. The other options are not optimal or real-time, as they would either require additional systems or tools, not provide real-time data synchronization, or not meet the frequency requirement

Changing Opportunity Amount field access to Read Only for sales users field-level security (option C) is the best way to address the overwriting issue, as it prevents sales users from updating the field that is controlled by PPS, and ensures data consistency and accuracy. Creating a custom field for Opportunity amount that PSS updates separating the field sales user updates (option A) or creating a custom field for Opportunity amount that sales users update separating the field that PPS updates (option D) are not good solutions, as they may create confusion and inconsistency with the Opportunity Forecast feature. Changing PSS integration to update only Opportunity Amount field when the value is null (option B) is also not a good solution, as it may cause data loss or conflicts with the sales users’ inputs.

A data quality problem that could cause customers to be called by multiple Sales Reps is having duplicate Contact records in the system. Duplicate records can result from data entry errors, data imports, or integrations with other systems. Duplicate records can lead to confusion, inefficiency, and customer dissatisfaction

Scheduling a weekly dashboard displaying records that are missing information to be sent to managers for review and using Workflow, Validation Rules, and Force.com code (Apex) to enforce critical business processes are two approaches that an architect should recommend to enforce the new Data Quality Plan for UC’s Salesforce data. Scheduling a weekly dashboard can provide a regular and visual way of monitoring the data quality and identifying any gaps or issues that need to be addressed by the managers or users. Using Workflow, Validation Rules, and Apex can provide various ways of enforcing data quality standards and business logic by automating actions, displaying error messages, or executing custom code when users create or edit records. The other options are not suitable or helpful for enforcing the Data Quality Plan, as they would either not provide real-time feedback, not prevent data quality issues, or not leverage the capabilities of Salesforce

Both A and B are automated approaches to purge detailed transactional records from Salesforce and aggregate them at a summary level1. You can use a third-party integration tool (ETL) or schedulable batch Apex to perform these tasks. Option C is not correct because a third-party business intelligence system does not purge data from Salesforce, but only analyzes it. Option D is not correct because Apex triggers are not automated, but execute when a record is inserted, updated, deleted, or undeleted.

 Implementing a custom big object to store the data is the best recommendation to reduce the performance degradation of the platform, as it allows storing large volumes of data that do not need real-time access or reporting. Custom big objects can be defined using metadata API or developer console, and support up to 1 billion records per object. Creating a custom object or using the standard order object would consume a lot of storage space and impact the performance of queries and reports. Using a standard big object defined by salesforce would not be applicable for order records, as standard big objects are predefined for specific use cases such as audit trails or field history.

Using Bulk API to export 1 million records from Salesforce is the best option. Bulk API is a RESTful API that allows you to perform asynchronous operations on large sets of data. You can use Bulk API to create, update, delete, or query millions of records in batches. Bulk API is optimized for performance and scalability, and it can handle complex data loading scenarios.

The recommended solution for Universal Containers (UC) to implement its new Internet of Things technology is to create a new Container Reading custom object with a master-detail relationship to Container which is created when a new measure is received for a specific container. Implement an archiving process that runs every hour. This solution would allow UC to store and access current and historical temperature and humidity data for each container on Salesforce, and use reports and dashboards to analyze it. However, since UC expects a large volume of data over time, they should implement an archiving process that moves data off-platform after a certain period of time to avoid hitting the Org data storage limit and maintain optimal performance. The other options are not recommended, as they would either not store the historical data on Salesforce, or create too many custom fields on the Container object that could impact performance and usability.

 Clearing the role field in the generic user record and creating a role at the top of the role hierarchy and assigning it to the generic user are two measures that can help avoid performance issues while working with large number of order records. These measures can prevent data skew and lock contention that may occur when a single user owns or shares a large number of records