Free APMG-International Better-Business-Cases-Practitioner Practice Exam with Questions & Answers

No, because inflation should be included as a cost in the Financial Appraisal.

No, because any increase in cost should be dealt with as an issue.

Yes, because any cost increase could threaten the affordability of a scheme.

Yes, because any risk that might affect the financial viability of a scheme should be closely managed.

Amend entry 1, because the SRO of the programme and project should be ultimately responsible for delivering the benefits.

Amend entry 1, because the SRO of the programme should delegate responsibility for delivering benefits to the Project Manager.

Amend entry 2, because the SRO of the programme should ensure that mechanisms are in place for realizing benefits.

No change to entry 2, because the delivery of benefits should be tracked at programme level.

No change to entry 2, because the Programme Director should report on the delivery of benefits to the other members of the Consortium.

No, because a sensitivity analysis is only conducted in the Economic Case.

No, because the forecast for demand was identified in the Strategic Case.

Yes, because the preferred option should be subject to a sensitivity analysis in the Financial and Economic Case.

Yes, because all short listed options should be subject to sensitivity analysis.

The Consortium has been formed to plan the transformation of education and learning for 14-19- year-olds throughout the Western Area.

Formal meetings have been held over the past nine months to establish the goals to be achieved.

Pittville is the commercial, retail and cultural centre of Topland, with a population of circa22,000.

There are problems accessing learning in some parts of the region.

There is a shortage of higher education establishments in the region.

No, because the Pittville project is part of a larger programme of change.

No, because whether the change is sufficiently large to warrant a project should have been determined before this stage.

Yes, because this stage should confirm the strategic context of the proposal.

Yes, because this stage should provide stakeholders with an early indication of the preferredoption.

Teaching staff will automatically become employees at the new campus with the same terms and conditions of employment.

The selected contractor will be responsible for taking measures to reduce any potential errors in the construction phase.

All construction work is to comply with standard building regulations.

The new campus building is to be listed as an asset on the Local Education Authority balance sheet.

The Local Education Authority is best placed to respond to possible opposition from staff and parents.

Business fit and synergy with other parts of the organization.

The spending option that optimizes Value For Money.

A profile of the organization.

Critical success factors essential to the successful delivery of the project.

As wide a range of options as possible that meet the spending objectives.

Strategic fit and business needs.

Potential Value For Money.

Supply side capacity and capability.

Potential affordability.

Potential achievability.

The Pittville project is part of a larger programme of change.

Having a sufficient number of students with one provider will potentially attract good quality teaching staff.

Pittville University can accommodate a further 80 full time learners within the existing facility before the new site is available.

The building of the new campus must achieve compliance with the regulations on the Disability Discrimination Act.

The Consortium has agreed that the priority for the Western Area Learning Improvements Programme is improving the learning provision for 16-18-year-olds in Pittville.