Free APA AICP Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 4

Ian McHarg’s overlay planning technique, introduced in his 1969 bookDesign with Nature, uses map overlays to identify areas suitable for development by assessing environmental constraints (e.g., floodplains, slopes). The goal is to guide development to areas where it will be least environmentally damaging (option A). The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Fundamental Planning Knowledge,” states, “McHarg’s overlay planning technique identifies areas for development that minimize environmental damage by analyzing natural constraints.” Option B (least economically viable) contradicts the purpose of guidingfeasible development. Options C (most physically feasible) and D (most spatially efficient) are secondary considerations, as McHarg prioritized environmental impact. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “McHarg’s method uses overlays to locate development where it is least environmentally damaging,” supporting option A.

Sustainable development integrates social, economic, and environmental goals to create resilientcommunities. All four outcomes align with this framework: I (expanding choice and opportunity) supports social sustainability; II (local economies meeting resident needs) reflects economic sustainability; III (harmony between nature and social climate) addresses environmental sustainability; and IV (responsiveness to disadvantaged populations) ensures equity, a core sustainability principle. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” defines sustainable development outcomes as including “expanded opportunities, economic vitality, environmental harmony, and equity for disadvantaged groups.” The APA’sPolicy Guide on Sustainability(2015) states, “Sustainable development strategies should enhance choice, support local economies, balance nature and society, and prioritize the disadvantaged,” encompassing all four outcomes. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Successful sustainable development includes all these outcomes to achieve holistic community benefits,” supporting option D.

Meaningful engagement that avoids marginalization requires a tailored approach to ensure diverse communities are actively included and their voices are heard. Option C (developing a specific plan for engaging diverse communities and adjusting methods as needed) ensures inclusivity by proactively addressing barriers to participation (e.g., language, accessibility) and adapting strategies to maximize involvement. TheAICP Code of Ethics(2022), Section A, Principle 1(f), states, “We shall seek social justice by working to expand choice and opportunity for all persons,” emphasizing the need for inclusive engagement. The APA’sPlanning for Equity Policy Guide(2019) recommends “creating targeted engagement plans for diverse communities and adapting methods to ensure participation,” aligning with option C. Option A (participation rewards) may help but does not guarantee meaningful engagement. Option B (relying solely on community partners) risks over-dependence and may not reach all groups. Option D (survey with extended duration) is a single method and may not address broader engagement needs. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) supports option C, noting, “Effective engagement involves specific plans to include diverse communities and flexibility to adjust methods.”

Zoning ordinances can improve equity by increasing housing options, particularly for underserved groups. Option C (authorize accessory dwelling units by right) allows homeowners to build secondary units (e.g., granny flats) without discretionary approval, increasing affordable housing supply and supporting diverse populations like seniors or low-income families. The APA’s AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” identifies “permitting accessory dwelling units (ADUs) by right as a key strategy to improve housing equity by increasing affordable options.” The APA’s Policy Guide on Housing (2019) states, “ADUs by right enhance equity by providing affordable housing and supporting multigenerational living.” Option A (planned unit development) may increase flexibility but doesn’t directly address equity. Option B (restricting home-based businesses) limits economic opportunities. Option D (increased parking) prioritizes cars, not housing equity. The CPC Study Manual (2024) confirms, “Authorizing ADUs by right is a best practice for zoning to improve housing equity,” supporting option C.

Creative placemaking involves collaboration between public, private, and non-profit sectors to leverage a community’s arts and cultural assets for physical improvements, enhancing community identity and vitality. Option A (creative placemaking) matches this description. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” defines creative placemaking as “a process that partners with multiple sectors to use arts and culture for community development and physical improvements.” Option B (public realm activation) focuses on activating public spaces but not specifically through arts. Option C (design charrette) is a participatory design process, not necessarily arts-focused. Option D (scenario planning) is a strategic tool, not a development process. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “Creative placemaking uses arts and culture through multi-sector partnerships to create physical improvements,” supporting option A.

TheAICP Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct(2022) outlines specific conditions under which membership must be revoked. Section E, Rule of Conduct 25 states, “A planner’s certification shall be revoked if the planner is convicted of a serious crime, as defined in the AICP Ethics Code.” A serious crime includes felonies or crimes involving moral turpitude (e.g., fraud, bribery), which directly impact professional integrity. Option A aligns with this rule. Option B (accused of violating an aspirational principle) does not mandate revocation—violations of aspirational principles are not enforceable, unlike rules of conduct, and accusations alone do not trigger revocation. Option C (not completing certification maintenance credits) may result in suspension, but revocation requires a formal process and is not automatic. Option D (revoked state license) does not automatically revoke AICP membership, as AICP certification is independent of state licensure. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “AICP membership must be revoked upon conviction of a serious crime, as it undermines the profession’s integrity,” supporting option A.

The National Register of Historic Places is administered by the National Park Service (NPS), which operates under the U.S. Department of the Interior. Listings must be approved by the Keeper of the National Register, a position within the NPS, making the Department of the Interior the correct authority. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Areas of Practice,” states, “The Department of the Interior, through the National Park Service, approves listings to the National Register of Historic Places.” Option A (National Trust for Historic Preservation) is a private organization that advocates for preservation but does not approve listings. Options C (HUD) and D (Bureau of Land Management) have unrelated roles—HUD focuses on housing, and the BLM manages public lands. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “The Department of the Interior oversees the National Register via the NPS,” supporting option B.

A CDC in a low-income community raising funds for workshops should seek stable, neutral funding. Option D (funding from a community or regional foundation) is best, as foundations often support community engagement and are less likely to have conflicts of interest. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan Implementation,” states, “CDCs can effectively raise funds for public engagement by seeking grants from community or regional foundations, which prioritize community development.” Option A (community donations) may be limited in a low-income area. Option B (developer’s grant) poses a conflict, as the developer is involved in the controversial project. Option C (mayor’s office) may introduce political bias.TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, “Foundations are a reliable funding source for CDCs to support neutral community engagement,” supporting option D.

Office-housing linkage programs require developers to provide or fund affordable housing as a condition of office development, aiming to balance jobs and housing. To be legally upheld, the rationale must demonstrate a legitimate public purpose and a nexus between the program and the stated goals, as established in cases likeNollan v. California Coastal Commission(1987) andDolan v. City of Tigard(1994). Option I (counteracting market forces for affordable housing) and option IV (balancing jobs and housing while easing traffic) directly address public welfare by linking office development to housing needs and reducing commute-related congestion, which courts have upheld as valid public purposes. Option II (controlling random office growth) is less directly tied to housing and may not justify the linkage requirement. Option III (new revenue source) is not a sufficient public purpose for imposing exactions, as it lacks a direct nexus to the housing issue. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Plan and Policy Development,” notes that linkage programs must “demonstrate a public purpose, such as addressing housing shortages for workers and reducing traffic impacts,” supporting options I and IV. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms that “linkage programs are upheld when they address housing-jobs imbalances and related issues like traffic,” aligning with option A.

When a city council disapproves a plan, the next steps should focus on understanding the reasons for disapproval and building support. Option I (mayor meeting with council members) facilitates dialogue to address concerns and gain support. Option III (committee of business and communityleaders) brings in stakeholders to review and potentially strengthen the plan, increasing its legitimacy. The APA’sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under “Administration and Management,” recommends “engaging stakeholders and decision-makers to address plan disapproval, such as through meetings with council and forming review committees.” Option II (mayor implementing the plan) is inappropriate, as it bypasses the council’s authority. Option IV (returning to the planning department) may be a later step but doesn’t address immediate council concerns. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, “After disapproval, planners should recommend engaging decision-makers and stakeholders, such as through council meetings and review committees,” supporting option C (I and III).