Free VMware 2V0-17.25 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

According to the VCF Automation 9.0 Guide, project creation requires administrative login at the tenant level: “To create a new project, log in as a Project Administrator of that tenant.” . After creation, projects must be mapped to Cloud Zones to determine compute placement. The document also emphasizes: “For scalable user management, assign groups from Active Directory to roles within projects rather than individual users.” This reduces management overhead as new members join.

Namespaces are not mandatory unless Kubernetes Supervisor is being integrated, which is not required in this scenario. Likewise, logging in as an Organization Administrator (F) is not needed for tenant-level project creation. Therefore, the correct steps are: Log in as Project Admin (A), Create a Project (D), Assign a Cloud Zone (B), and Use Active Directory Groups for membership (G). This ensures minimal ongoing administrative effort.

In VMware Cloud Foundation, lifecycle management boundaries are defined at the workload domain level. If independent lifecycle and scaling control is required, the cluster must be deployed as a separate workload domain.

VCF 9.0 supports workload domains that either:

Use a dedicated NSX instance, or

Share an existing NSX Manager instance.

Because the requirement only states independent lifecycle and scaling (not network isolation), the correct and efficient approach is to:

Deploy the new cluster as a new workload domain with shared NSX.

Deploying within an existing workload domain (A or B) would tie lifecycle operations together.

Deploying with a new NSX instance (C) is unnecessary unless full NSX isolation is required.

Thus, the correct action is D.

In VMware vSphere with Supervisor (used within VCF), a vSphere Namespace allows administrators to define resource quotas for Kubernetes workloads.

The vSphere documentation specifies that administrators can configure limits on:

CPU resources

Memory resources

Storage capacity

These quotas control the maximum resources that workloads deployed within the namespace can consume.

Incorrect options:

The number of containers (A) is managed at the Kubernetes level, not directly as a namespace resource quota in vSphere.

The number of services (D) is a Kubernetes object count limit, not a vSphere namespace resource limit.

Thus, the three configurable resource limitations are CPU, Memory, and Storage.

The VCF 9.0 Operations Access Control Guide describes how dashboard sharing and user access is managed:

Identity Broker Authentication (D):All external users must authenticate via the VCF Identity Broker, which integrates with Active Directory, LDAP, or other identity providers. Documentation states: “Identity Broker provides single sign-on and federation, ensuring users are authenticated consistently across VCF Operations and Automation services.”

Grant Access to Dashboard (E):After authentication, the administrator must explicitly grant access to the dashboard for the specified group. This ensures that only the intended users can view or interact with the dashboard.

Set Time-Bound Access (C):VCF Operations supports time-bound access policies. The documentation specifies: “Access can be granted with an expiration period, ensuring access is automatically revoked after the configured interval (for example, 90 days).” This aligns with the 3-month requirement.

Other options are not suitable:

Reports (A) only send static data, not interactive dashboard access.

Embedded code (B, F) bypasses access control and does not provide authentication or time-limited sharing, which violates the security requirement.

Thus, the correct three steps are: Use Identity Broker (D), Grant access to dashboard (E), and Configure 3-month access expiration (C).

In VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, the integration of operations management is centralized within VCF Operations (formerly known as vRealize Operations/VMware Aria Operations). Specifically, the Diagnostics feature is designed to proactively maintain the health of the VCF stack.

According to the VCF 9.0 administration guidelines, Diagnostics in VCF Operations (often powered by integrated tools like VMware Skyline or dedicated diagnostic probes) allows administrators to trigger a scan of the environment against a database of known issues, Knowledge Base (KB) articles, and security vulnerabilities.

VCF Operations Diagnostics: This tool automates the discovery of risks by analyzing logs and configuration data. It specifically maps the current environment's build versions against the VMware Security Advisory (VMSA) database and known bug reports to highlight relevant vulnerabilities directly within the VCF management interface.

Why others are incorrect: While the VMware Security Advisory website (A) contains the information, it is an external resource and not a tool within the VCF environment used to automatically identify issues relevant to that specific deployment. Fleet Management (B) and VCF Health (D) focus on lifecycle management (LCM) and general service availability (UP/DOWN status), whereas "Diagnostics" is the specific functional area for vulnerability and known-problem matching.

The Container Storage Interface (CSI) is a Kubernetes-standard interface that allows container orchestration platforms to provision and manage storage systems.

The VMware documentation explains:

“The CSI driver enables Kubernetes clusters to dynamically provision and manage persistent volumes backed by vSphere storage.”

CSI is necessary because:

Containers are ephemeral by nature, but applications often require persistent storage for stateful workloads.

CSI enables dynamic provisioning, attach/detach, resizing, and snapshot operations for persistent volumes.

Incorrect options:

CSI does not replace all third-party interfaces (A).

CSI does not merely detect storage (B).

Ephemeral storage (C) is handled natively by container runtimes and does not require CSI.

Therefore, CSI is necessary because it provides persistent storage functionality to containers.

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management documentation, included within VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, specifies that Resource Pools are the mechanism to delegate compute resources within a cluster. A resource pool acts as a container of compute resources (CPU and memory) that can be subdivided and assigned to VMs or groups of VMs.

The documentation states:

“Resource pools provide resource isolation, control, and delegation. You can configure reservations, limits, and shares to ensure that mission-critical workloads (such as production VMs) receive guaranteed resources, while development or test workloads consume only available resources.”

This aligns directly with the requirements:

Power on only if resources are available → Achieved via reservations and limits.

Production VMs require guaranteed levels of resources → Enforced using reservations.

Three-tier apps with varying demand → Controlled using shares and limits across multiple resource pools.

Other options are incorrect:

vSphere Availability (A) provides failover, not resource governance.

VCF Operations (B) monitors resource usage but does not allocate or enforce it.

Dynamic Resource Scheduling (D) balances workloads but does not provide delegated, guaranteed allocations per department or application tier.

Thus, the correct feature is vSphere Resource Pools.

VCF Operations Continuous Availability (CA) requires a multi-node deployment including a witness node. The standard deployment path involves:

Deploying VCF with High Availability (HA) mode initially (E).

Deploying required nodes including the Witness node (D).

Completing deployment of a Continuous Availability cluster (A).

Connecting to an existing instance (B) does not meet the requirement.

Conversion (C) alone is insufficient without proper CA cluster deployment.

Deploying without VCF Operations (F) violates design requirements.

The VCF Automation documentation defines its primary use cases as:

Self-Service Catalog – “VCF Automation Service Broker provides a catalog for developers and operators to request services and blueprints.”

Application Dependency Mapping – achieved through integration with VCF Operations for Networks. The guide highlights: “Developers can discover application relationships and map dependencies through automated workflows in VCF Automation.”Alerting (A) is handled by VCF Operations, not Automation. VPC implementation (B) and Private AI (D) are supported solutions but not direct Automation use cases. Therefore, the correct answers are C (Self-Service Catalog) and E (Application Dependency Mapping).

In VCF 9.x, air-gapped bring-up requires staging the required binaries in the VCF Installer. The documented list explicitly includes NSX and VCF Operations among the components to upload. The product guide states: “VMware Cloud Foundation required binaries include… NSX … VMware Cloud Foundation Operations … vCenter … SDDC Manager…” (exact list excerpt). This list does not call for ESX images or the legacy “Lifecycle Manager.”

Therefore, from the given options the two binaries that must be uploaded are NSX and VCF Operations. ESX is pre-imaged on hosts per preparation guidance and is not a required VCF Installer binary; “Lifecycle Manager” is not used in VCF 9.0 bring-up.

===========