Free SAP C_SEC_2405 Practice Exam with Questions & Answers | Set: 2

To transport changes to the authorization object S_TABU_DIS with ACTVT field value 02 for transaction SM30 from the development system to the quality assurance system, the correct approach is to save the changes to a Workbench transport request and transport them using the Transport Management System (TMS). These changes, maintained in transaction SU24, affect authorization defaults stored in tables like USOBT_C and USOBX_C, which are classified as Workbench objects because they involve system-wide configuration rather than client-specific settings. A Workbench transport request is used for cross-client objects, ensuring that the authorization defaults are consistently applied in the target system. SU25’s transport interface (option A) is for initial setup or upgrades, not specific authorization changes. A Customizing transport request (option C) is for client-specific settings, not applicable here. Saving tables directly (option D) is unnecessary, as SU24 handles the transport. This method ensures secure and efficient propagation of authorization changes across SAP systems.

Restricted users in SAP HANA Cloud face specific limitations to enhance security and control access. They can only connect to the database using HTTP/HTTPS protocols, typically via web-based interfaces, ensuring that connections are secure and aligned with cloud security standards. They are prohibited from connecting via ODBC or JDBC, which prevents direct database access through external applications, reducing the risk of unauthorized data extraction. Additionally, restricted users cannot create objects in the database, such as tables or views, limiting their ability to modify the database structure and maintaining data integrity. Contrary to option A, restricted users do not have full SQL access via the SQL console; their SQL capabilities are limited. Option E is incorrect, as restricted users cannot create objects at all, even in their own schema. These restrictions ensure that restricted users, often used for read-only or limited-access scenarios, operate within a tightly controlled environment, supporting SAP HANA Cloud’s security model.

In the administration console of SAP Cloud Identity Services, both read and write transformations can be defined for Proxy systems. Proxy systems act as intermediaries between source and target systems, facilitating user provisioning and synchronization by transforming user attributes during data exchange. Read transformations modify data retrieved from the source system, while write transformations adjust data sent to the target system, ensuring compatibility and compliance with system requirements. This dual transformation capability is unique to proxy systems, as they handle bidirectional data flows. Source systems, which provide user data, typically support only read transformations to format outgoing data, while target systems, which receive data, support only write transformations to process incoming data. By enabling both transformation types, proxy systems offer flexibility in managing complex identity management scenarios, ensuring seamless integration across SAP and non-SAP systems while maintaining data integrity and security in cloud-based identity management.

To ensure that required authorizations for a new custom transaction in SAP S/4HANA on-premise are automatically created when the transaction is added to a PFCG role, you must maintain each authorization object in transaction SU24 and set the Default Status to "Yes". SU24 is used to define authorization defaults for transactions, specifying which authorization objects and values should be proposed when the transaction is included in a role. Setting the Default Status to "Yes" ensures that these objects are automatically included in the role’s authorization data during PFCG maintenance, streamlining role creation and ensuring consistency. Transaction SU22 is for SAP-delivered defaults, not custom transactions, making options A and B incorrect. Option C is incorrect because SU24 maintains authorization objects, not individual authorizations. This configuration in SU24 supports efficient and secure role management, reducing manual effort and ensuring that the custom transaction’s authorization requirements are consistently applied across roles, aligning with SAP’s best practices for custom development.

In the SAP S/4HANA Business User Concept, the entities that share data with Business Partners are User and Employee. The User entity represents the technical user account in the system, defined in user master records, and is linked to Business Partners to associate system access with business roles and authorizations. The Employee entity represents the human resource data of an individual, such as their organizational assignment or job role, and is synchronized with Business Partners to ensure that user access aligns with their employment details. This integration ensures that Business Partners, which serve as a central entity for managing business relationships, have consistent data for access control and business processes. The Employer entity is not directly linked to Business Partners, as it represents the organization, not an individual. Similarly, Administrator is a role or user type, not an entity sharing data with Business Partners. This data-sharing mechanism supports seamless identity and access management, enhancing security and operational alignment in SAP S/4HANA systems.

In SAP systems, table authorization groups are controlled using views V_DDAT_54 and V_BRG_54. V_DDAT_54 is a maintenance view that allows administrators to assign tables to authorization groups, defining which groups protect specific tables and ensuring that access is restricted to authorized users. V_BRG_54 is another view used to manage table authorization groups, particularly for assigning and maintaining group definitions that link to authorization objects like S_TABU_DIS. These views enable granular control over table access, supporting data security and compliance. PRGN_CUST is a customizing table for role and authorization settings, not specifically for table authorization groups, and SSM_CUST is related to system settings, not table access control. By using V_DDAT_54 and V_BRG_54, SAP provides a structured approach to managing table authorizations, ensuring that sensitive data in tables is protected against unauthorized access while allowing efficient administration of access controls.

In SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition, the authorization concept revolves around business roles and catalogs. Business roles, which group authorizations for specific business processes, can be directly assigned to business users to grant access to relevant applications and data. Similarly, business catalogs, which contain collections of SAP Fiori apps and other functionalities, can be directly assigned to business roles to define the scope of access. However, business catalogs cannot be assigned directly to users; they must be linked through business roles. Additionally, individual SAP Fiori apps, dashboards, or displays are not directly assigned to business roles; they are included within business catalogs. This structured approach ensures a scalable and manageable authorization framework tailored to business needs.

In the SAP Business Technology Platform (BTP) Cockpit, Trust Configuration is available at both the Global Account and Subaccount levels. At the Global Account level, trust configurations define the identity provider (IdP) settings that apply across all subaccounts within the account, enabling centralized management of authentication for the entire BTP environment. This allows administrators to establish a default IdP or configure custom IdPs for consistent user authentication. At the Subaccount level, trust configurations provide flexibility to override or customize the IdP settings specific to individual subaccounts, accommodating unique requirements for different applications or services. This dual-level approach ensures that organizations can balance global standardization with localized control. The Directory and Organization levels are not used for trust configurations in SAP BTP, as these are not part of the platform’s security configuration hierarchy, making options C and D incorrect.

The Display Authorization Trace in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition is a powerful tool for analyzing authorization issues. It allows administrators to analyze authorization check results for missing authorizations, identifying gaps where users lack necessary permissions to perform tasks, which is critical for troubleshooting access issues. Additionally, it can display business roles granting specific access, providing visibility into which roles provide permissions for particular applications or data, aiding in role management and compliance checks. The tool also supports analyzing authorization check results for already assigned authorizations, helping administrators verify whether existing permissions are functioning as intended. However, adjusting role restrictions, either to address missing authorizations or for forensic analysis, is not a function of the Display Authorization Trace, as it is a diagnostic tool, not a maintenance interface. These capabilities make the Display Authorization Trace essential for ensuring secure and efficient access control, supporting both operational and audit requirements in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Public Edition.

In SAP S/4HANA, when performing a comparison from an imparting (parent) role to a derived role, organizational level field values are handled with specific rules to maintain consistency and flexibility. Data for organizational levels that have already been maintained in the derived role is not overwritten, preserving any custom configurations made specifically for the derived role. This ensures that existing organizational assignments, such as company codes or plants, remain intact unless explicitly changed. Additionally, data for organizational levels is transferred from the imparting role to the derived role only when the authorization data for the derived role is first modified. This conditional transfer prevents unnecessary updates to organizational values until changes are initiated, allowing administrators to control when inherited values are applied. These mechanisms support efficient role maintenance while protecting customized settings in derived roles, ensuring alignment with business requirements and security policies.